CVE-2025-71362
picklescan - Arbitrary Code Execution via Unsafe Deserialization in numpy.f2py.crackfortran
picklescan before 0.0.33 fails to detect unsafe deserialization when numpy.f2py.crackfortran functions call eval on arbitrary strings. Attackers can embed malicious code in pickle files that executes when loaded from untrusted sources.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- Passive
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
7.6
picklescan - Arbitrary Code Execution via Unsafe Deserialization in numpy.f2py.crackfortran
picklescan before 0.0.33 fails to detect unsafe deserialization when numpy.f2py.crackfortran functions call eval on arbitrary strings. Attackers can embed malicious code in pickle files that executes when loaded from untrusted sources.
- Record
CVE-2025-71362- CVSS 4.0
- 7.6 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-502
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2025-210418
7.6
picklescan before 0.0.33 fails to detect unsafe deserialization when numpy.f2py.crackfortran functions call eval on arbitrary strings. Attackers can embed malicious code in pickle files that executes when loaded from untrusted sources.
- Record
EUVD-2025-210418- CVSS 4.0
- 7.6 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-r8g5-cgf2-4m4m
8.9
Picklescan missing detection when calling numpy.f2py.crackfortran.getlincoef
Summary
An unsafe deserialization vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the host when loading a malicious pickle payload from an untrusted source.
Details
The numpy.f2py.crackfortran module exposes many functions that call eval on arbitrary strings of values. This is the case for getlincoef and _eval_length. This list is probably not exhaustive.
According to https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/security.html#advice-for-using-numpy-on-untrusted-data, the whole numpy.f2py should be considered unsafe when loading a pickle.
PoC
from numpy.f2py.crackfortran import getlincoef
class EvilClass:
def __reduce__(self):
payload = "__import__('os').system('echo \"successful attack\"')"
return getlincoef, (payload, [])
Impact
Who is impacted? Any organization or individual relying on picklescan to detect malicious pickle files from untrusted sources.
What is the impact? Attackers can embed malicious code in pickle file that remains undetected but executes when the pickle file is loaded.
Supply Chain Attack: Attackers can distribute infected pickle files across ML models, APIs, or saved Python objects.
Note
The problem was originally reported to the joblib project, but this was deemed unrelated to joblib itself. However, I checked that picklescan was indeed vulnerable.
- Record
GHSA-r8g5-cgf2-4m4m- CVSS 4.0
- 8.9 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P - Weakness
- CWE-502
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-r9x2-mw85-9c4x
7.6
picklescan before 0.0.33 fails to detect unsafe deserialization when numpy.f2py.crackfortran...
picklescan before 0.0.33 fails to detect unsafe deserialization when numpy.f2py.crackfortran functions call eval on arbitrary strings. Attackers can embed malicious code in pickle files that executes when loaded from untrusted sources.
- Record
GHSA-r9x2-mw85-9c4x- CVSS 4.0
- 7.6 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-502
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
7.6
picklescan before 0.0.33 fails to detect unsafe deserialization when numpy.f2py.crackfortran functions call eval on arbitrary strings. Attackers can embed malicious code in pickle files that executes when loaded from untrusted sources.
- Record
CVE-2025-71362- CVSS 4.0
- 7.6 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-502
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
7.6
picklescan - Arbitrary Code Execution via Unsafe Deserialization in numpy.f2py.crackfortran
picklescan before 0.0.33 fails to detect unsafe deserialization when numpy.f2py.crackfortran functions call eval on arbitrary strings. Attackers can embed malicious code in pickle files that executes when loaded from untrusted sources.
- Record
CVE-2025-71362- CVSS 4.0
- 7.6 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-502
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-r8g5-cgf2-4m4m
8.9
Picklescan missing detection when calling numpy.f2py.crackfortran.getlincoef
Summary
An unsafe deserialization vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the host when loading a malicious pickle payload from an untrusted source.
Details
The numpy.f2py.crackfortran module exposes many functions that call eval on arbitrary strings of values. This is the case for getlincoef and _eval_length. This list is probably not exhaustive.
According to https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/security.html#advice-for-using-numpy-on-untrusted-data, the whole numpy.f2py should be considered unsafe when loading a pickle.
PoC
from numpy.f2py.crackfortran import getlincoef
class EvilClass:
def __reduce__(self):
payload = "__import__('os').system('echo \"successful attack\"')"
return getlincoef, (payload, [])
Impact
Who is impacted? Any organization or individual relying on picklescan to detect malicious pickle files from untrusted sources.
What is the impact? Attackers can embed malicious code in pickle file that remains undetected but executes when the pickle file is loaded.
Supply Chain Attack: Attackers can distribute infected pickle files across ML models, APIs, or saved Python objects.
Note
The problem was originally reported to the joblib project, but this was deemed unrelated to joblib itself. However, I checked that picklescan was indeed vulnerable.
- Record
GHSA-r8g5-cgf2-4m4m- CVSS 4.0
- 8.9 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P - Weakness
- CWE-502
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
picklescanPyPI |
before 0.0.33 | 0.0.33 |
picklescanPyPI |
before 0.0.33, plus listed versions 0.0.10.0.100.0.110.0.120.0.13 Show 27 moreShow less0.0.140.0.150.0.160.0.170.0.180.0.190.0.20.0.200.0.210.0.220.0.230.0.240.0.250.0.260.0.270.0.280.0.290.0.30.0.300.0.310.0.320.0.40.0.50.0.60.0.70.0.80.0.9 |
0.0.33 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2025-71362 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.6) in Mmaitre314 Picklescan, published December 29, 2025. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.43%, the 37th percentile. Fixed in picklescan 0.0.33.
References
github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security/advisories/GHSA-r8g5-cgf2-4m4m
vulncheck.com/advisories/picklescan-arbitrary-code-execution-via-unsafe-deserialization-in-numpy-f2py-crackfortran
github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/pull/53
github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/commit/70c1c6c31beb6baaf52c8db1b6c3c0e84a6f9dab
github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/releases/tag/v0.0.33
github.com/advisories/GHSA-r8g5-cgf2-4m4m