CVE-2025-9905
Arbitary Code execution in Keras load_model()
The Keras Model.load_model method can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True.
One can create a specially crafted .h5/.hdf5 model archive that, when loaded via Model.load_model, will trigger arbitrary code to be executed.
This is achieved by crafting a special .h5 archive file that uses the Lambda layer feature of keras which allows arbitrary Python code in the form of pickled code. The vulnerability comes from the fact that the safe_mode=True option is not honored when reading .h5 archives.
Note that the .h5/.hdf5 format is a legacy format supported by Keras 3 for backwards compatibility.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- Passive
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
7.3
Arbitary Code execution in Keras load_model()
The Keras Model.load_model method can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True.
One can create a specially crafted .h5/.hdf5 model archive that, when loaded via Model.load_model, will trigger arbitrary code to be executed.
This is achieved by crafting a special .h5 archive file that uses the Lambda layer feature of keras which allows arbitrary Python code in the form of pickled code. The vulnerability comes from the fact that the safe_mode=True option is not honored when reading .h5 archives.
Note that the .h5/.hdf5 format is a legacy format supported by Keras 3 for backwards compatibility.
- Record
CVE-2025-9905- CVSS 4.0
- 7.3 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H - Weakness
- CWE-913
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2025-30277
7.3
The Keras Model.load_model method can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True.
One can create a specially crafted .h5/.hdf5 model archive that, when loaded via Model.load_model, will trigger arbitrary code to be executed.
This is achieved by crafting a special .h5 archive file that uses the Lambda layer feature of keras which allows arbitrary Python code in the form of pickled code. The vulnerability comes from the fact that the safe_mode=True option is not honored when reading .h5 archives.
Note that the .h5/.hdf5 format is a legacy format supported by Keras 3 for backwards compatibility.
- Record
EUVD-2025-30277- CVSS 4.0
- 7.3 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-36rr-ww3j-vrjv
8.7
The Keras `Model.load_model` method **silently** ignores `safe_mode=True` and allows arbitrary code execution when a `.h5`/`.hdf5` file is loaded.
Note: This report has already been discussed with the Google OSS VRP team, who recommended that I reach out directly to the Keras team. I’ve chosen to do so privately rather than opening a public issue, due to the potential security implications. I also attempted to use the email address listed in your SECURITY.md, but received no response.
Summary
When a model in the .h5 (or .hdf5) format is loaded using the Keras Model.load_model method, the safe_mode=True setting is silently ignored without any warning or error. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim’s machine with the same privileges as the Keras application. This report is specific to the .h5/.hdf5 file format. The attack works regardless of the other parameters passed to load_model and does not require any sophisticated technique—.h5 and .hdf5 files are simply not checked for unsafe code execution.
From this point on, I will refer only to the .h5 file format, though everything equally applies to .hdf5.
Details
Intended behaviour
According to the official Keras documentation, safe_mode is defined as:
safe_mode: Boolean, whether to disallow unsafe lambda deserialization. When safe_mode=False, loading an object has the potential to trigger arbitrary code execution. This argument is only applicable to the Keras v3 model format. Defaults to True.
I understand that the behavior described in this report is somehow intentional, as safe_mode is only applicable to .keras models.
However, in practice, this behavior is misleading for users who are unaware of the internal Keras implementation. .h5 files can still be loaded seamlessly using load_model with safe_mode=True, and the absence of any warning or error creates a false sense of security. Whether intended or not, I believe silently ignoring a security-related parameter is not the best possible design decision. At a minimum, if safe_mode cannot be applied to a given file format, an explicit error should be raised to alert the user.
This issue is particularly critical given the widespread use of the .h5 format, despite the introduction of newer formats.
As a small anecdotal test, I asked several of my colleagues what they would expect when loading a .h5 file with safe_mode=True. None of them expected the setting to be silently ignored, even after reading the documentation. While this is a small sample, all of these colleagues are cybersecurity researchers—experts in binary or ML security—and regular participants in DEF CON finals. I was careful not to give any hints about the vulnerability in our discussion.
Technical Details
Examining the implementation of load_model in keras/src/saving/saving_api.py, we can see that the safe_mode parameter is completely ignored when loading .h5 files. Here's the relevant snippet:
def load_model(filepath, custom_objects=None, compile=True, safe_mode=True):
is_keras_zip = ...
is_keras_dir = ...
is_hf = ...
# Support for remote zip files
if (
file_utils.is_remote_path(filepath)
and not file_utils.isdir(filepath)
and not is_keras_zip
and not is_hf
):
...
if is_keras_zip or is_keras_dir or is_hf:
...
if str(filepath).endswith((".h5", ".hdf5")):
return legacy_h5_format.load_model_from_hdf5(
filepath, custom_objects=custom_objects, compile=compile
)
As shown, when the file format is .h5 or .hdf5, the method delegates to legacy_h5_format.load_model_from_hdf5, which does not use or check the safe_mode parameter at all.
Solution
Since the release of the new .keras format, I believe the simplest and most effective way to address this misleading behavior—and to improve security in Keras—is to have the safe_mode parameter raise an explicit error when safe_mode=True is used with .h5/.hdf5 files. This error…
- Record
GHSA-36rr-ww3j-vrjv- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H - Weakness
- CWE-913
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
7.3
The Keras Model.load_model method can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True.
One can create a specially crafted .h5/.hdf5 model archive that, when loaded via Model.load_model, will trigger arbitrary code to be executed.
This is achieved by crafting a special .h5 archive file that uses the Lambda layer feature of keras which allows arbitrary Python code in the form of pickled code. The vulnerability comes from the fact that the safe_mode=True option is not honored when reading .h5 archives.
Note that the .h5/.hdf5 format is a legacy format supported by Keras 3 for backwards compatibility.
- Record
CVE-2025-9905- CVSS 4.0
- 7.3 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 7.3 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-913
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
7.3
Arbitary Code execution in Keras load_model()
The Keras Model.load_model method can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True.
One can create a specially crafted .h5/.hdf5 model archive that, when loaded via Model.load_model, will trigger arbitrary code to be executed.
This is achieved by crafting a special .h5 archive file that uses the Lambda layer feature of keras which allows arbitrary Python code in the form of pickled code. The vulnerability comes from the fact that the safe_mode=True option is not honored when reading .h5 archives.
Note that the .h5/.hdf5 format is a legacy format supported by Keras 3 for backwards compatibility.
- Record
CVE-2025-9905- CVSS 4.0
- 7.3 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H - Weakness
- CWE-913
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2025-9905
7.3
The Keras Model.load_model method can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True. One can create a specially crafted .h5/.hdf5 model archive that, when loaded via Model.load_model, will trigger arbitrary code to be executed. This is achieved by crafting a special .h5 archive file that uses the Lambda layer feature of keras which allows arbitrary Python code in the form of pickled code. The vulnerability comes from the fact that the safe_mode=True option is not honored when reading .h5 archives. Note that the .h5/.hdf5 format is a legacy format supported by Keras 3 for backwards compatibility.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2025-9905- CVSS 3.1
- 7.3 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 4 moreShow less
OSVGHSA-36rr-ww3j-vrjv
8.7
The Keras `Model.load_model` method **silently** ignores `safe_mode=True` and allows arbitrary code execution when a `.h5`/`.hdf5` file is loaded.
Note: This report has already been discussed with the Google OSS VRP team, who recommended that I reach out directly to the Keras team. I’ve chosen to do so privately rather than opening a public issue, due to the potential security implications. I also attempted to use the email address listed in your SECURITY.md, but received no response.
Summary
When a model in the .h5 (or .hdf5) format is loaded using the Keras Model.load_model method, the safe_mode=True setting is silently ignored without any warning or error. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim’s machine with the same privileges as the Keras application. This report is specific to the .h5/.hdf5 file format. The attack works regardless of the other parameters passed to load_model and does not require any sophisticated technique—.h5 and .hdf5 files are simply not checked for unsafe code execution.
From this point on, I will refer only to the .h5 file format, though everything equally applies to .hdf5.
Details
Intended behaviour
According to the official Keras documentation, safe_mode is defined as:
safe_mode: Boolean, whether to disallow unsafe lambda deserialization. When safe_mode=False, loading an object has the potential to trigger arbitrary code execution. This argument is only applicable to the Keras v3 model format. Defaults to True.
I understand that the behavior described in this report is somehow intentional, as safe_mode is only applicable to .keras models.
However, in practice, this behavior is misleading for users who are unaware of the internal Keras implementation. .h5 files can still be loaded seamlessly using load_model with safe_mode=True, and the absence of any warning or error creates a false sense of security. Whether intended or not, I believe silently ignoring a security-related parameter is not the best possible design decision. At a minimum, if safe_mode cannot be applied to a given file format, an explicit error should be raised to alert the user.
This issue is particularly critical given the widespread use of the .h5 format, despite the introduction of newer formats.
As a small anecdotal test, I asked several of my colleagues what they would expect when loading a .h5 file with safe_mode=True. None of them expected the setting to be silently ignored, even after reading the documentation. While this is a small sample, all of these colleagues are cybersecurity researchers—experts in binary or ML security—and regular participants in DEF CON finals. I was careful not to give any hints about the vulnerability in our discussion.
Technical Details
Examining the implementation of load_model in keras/src/saving/saving_api.py, we can see that the safe_mode parameter is completely ignored when loading .h5 files. Here's the relevant snippet:
def load_model(filepath, custom_objects=None, compile=True, safe_mode=True):
is_keras_zip = ...
is_keras_dir = ...
is_hf = ...
# Support for remote zip files
if (
file_utils.is_remote_path(filepath)
and not file_utils.isdir(filepath)
and not is_keras_zip
and not is_hf
):
...
if is_keras_zip or is_keras_dir or is_hf:
...
if str(filepath).endswith((".h5", ".hdf5")):
return legacy_h5_format.load_model_from_hdf5(
filepath, custom_objects=custom_objects, compile=compile
)
As shown, when the file format is .h5 or .hdf5, the method delegates to legacy_h5_format.load_model_from_hdf5, which does not use or check the safe_mode parameter at all.
Solution
Since the release of the new .keras format, I believe the simplest and most effective way to address this misleading behavior—and to improve security in Keras—is to have the safe_mode parameter raise an explicit error when safe_mode=True is used with .h5/.hdf5 files. This error…
- Record
GHSA-36rr-ww3j-vrjv- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H - Weakness
- CWE-913
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2025-123
7.3
The Keras Model.load_model method can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True.
One can create a specially crafted .h5/.hdf5 model archive that, when loaded via Model.load_model, will trigger arbitrary code to be executed.
This is achieved by crafting a special .h5 archive file that uses the Lambda layer feature of keras which allows arbitrary Python code in the form of pickled code. The vulnerability comes from the fact that the safe_mode=True option is not honored when reading .h5 archives.
Note that the .h5/.hdf5 format is a legacy format supported by Keras 3 for backwards compatibility.
- Record
PYSEC-2025-123- CVSS 3.1
- 7.3 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2025-9905
7.3
The Keras Model.load_model method can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True. One can create a specially crafted .h5/.hdf5 model archive that, when loaded via Model.load_model, will trigger arbitrary code to be executed. This is achieved by crafting a special .h5 archive file that uses the Lambda layer feature of keras which allows arbitrary Python code in the form of pickled code. The vulnerability comes from the fact that the safe_mode=True option is not honored when reading .h5 archives. Note that the .h5/.hdf5 format is a legacy format supported by Keras 3 for backwards compatibility.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2025-9905- CVSS 4.0
- 7.3 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H - CVSS 3.1
- 7.3 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-67505 No score
CVE-2025-9905 affecting package keras for versions less than 3.3.3-4
The Keras Model.load_model method can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True.
One can create a specially crafted .h5/.hdf5 model archive that, when loaded via Model.load_model, will trigger arbitrary code to be executed.
This is achieved by crafting a special .h5 archive file that uses the Lambda layer feature of keras which allows arbitrary Python code in the form of pickled code. The vulnerability comes from the fact that the safe_mode=True option is not honored when reading .h5 archives.
Note that the .h5/.hdf5 format is a legacy format supported by Keras 3 for backwards compatibility.
- Record
AZL-67505- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
kerasPyPI |
3.0.0 up to 3.11.3 | 3.11.3 |
kerasAzure Linux:3 |
before 3.3.3-4 | 3.3.3-4 |
kerasDebian:11 |
All versions, plus listed versions 2.3.1+dfsg-32.3.1+dfsg2-1 |
None known |
kerasPyPI |
3.0.0 up to 3.11.3, plus listed versions 3.0.13.0.23.0.33.0.43.0.5 Show 21 moreShow less3.1.03.1.13.10.03.11.03.11.13.11.23.2.03.2.13.3.03.3.13.3.23.3.33.4.03.4.13.5.03.6.03.7.03.8.03.9.03.9.13.9.2 |
3.11.3 |
kerasUbuntu:18.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 1.0.7-22.1.1-1 |
None known |
kerasUbuntu:20.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2.2.4-1 |
None known |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| facts | OSV | |
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2025-9905 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.3) in Google Keras, published September 19, 2025. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.22%, the 12th percentile. Fixed in keras 3.11.3.
References
github.com/keras-team/keras/pull/21602
github.com/keras-team/keras/security/advisories/GHSA-36rr-ww3j-vrjv
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9905
github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/keras/PYSEC-2025-123.yaml
github.com/advisories/GHSA-36rr-ww3j-vrjv
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2025/9xxx/CVE-2025-9905.json
Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.