CVE-2026-101087

Nezha versions 2.0.10 through 2.3.2 use a restricted HTTP client to validate user-configurable notification and DDNS webhook URLs, but the denylist did not cover IPv6 transition ranges — specifically the 6to4 prefix 2002::/16 and the local-use IPv4/IPv6 translation prefix 64:ff9b:1::/48. Because such addresses satisfy Go's netip.Addr.IsGlobalUnicast check, the URL validator accepted them. An authenticated user able to configure a webhook may be able to cause the dashboard to issue requests to an otherwise restricted IPv6 endpoint, but only where the dashboard's network provides unusual or non-standards-compliant routing for these transition ranges; no direct path to an IPv4 metadata, loopback, or private-network HTTP request has been demonstrated. The issue is fixed in version 2.3.3 (commit d1fcde8e), which blocks both prefixes.

Nezha versions 2.0.10 through 2.3.2 use a restricted HTTP client to validate user-configurable notification and DDNS webhook URLs, but the denylist did not cover IPv6 transition ranges — specifically the 6to4 prefix 2002::/16 and the local-use IPv4/IPv6 translation prefix 64:ff9b:1::/48. Because such addresses satisfy Go's netip.Addr.IsGlobalUnicast check, the URL validator accepted them. An authenticated user able to configure a webhook may be able to cause the dashboard to issue requests to an otherwise restricted IPv6 endpoint, but only where the dashboard's network provides unusual or non-standards-compliant routing for these transition ranges; no direct path to an IPv4 metadata, loopback, or private-network HTTP request has been demonstrated. The issue is fixed in version 2.3.3 (commit d1fcde8e), which blocks both prefixes.

Nezha versions 2.0.10 through 2.3.2 use a restricted HTTP client to validate user-configurable notification and DDNS webhook URLs, but the denylist did not cover IPv6 transition ranges — specifically the 6to4 prefix 2002::/16 and the local-use IPv4/IPv6 translation prefix 64:ff9b:1::/48. Because such addresses satisfy Go's netip.Addr.IsGlobalUnicast check, the URL validator accepted them. An authenticated user able to configure a webhook may be able to cause the dashboard to issue requests to an otherwise restricted IPv6 endpoint, but only where the dashboard's network provides unusual or non-standards-compliant routing for these transition ranges; no direct path to an IPv4 metadata, loopback, or private-network HTTP request has been demonstrated. The issue is fixed in version 2.3.3 (commit d1fcde8e), which blocks both prefixes.

Nezha versions 2.0.10 through 2.3.2 use a restricted HTTP client to validate user-configurable notification and DDNS webhook URLs, but the denylist did not cover IPv6 transition ranges — specifically the 6to4 prefix 2002::/16 and the local-use IPv4/IPv6 translation prefix 64:ff9b:1::/48. Because such addresses satisfy Go's netip.Addr.IsGlobalUnicast check, the URL validator accepted them. An authenticated user able to configure a webhook may be able to cause the dashboard to issue requests to an otherwise restricted IPv6 endpoint, but only where the dashboard's network provides unusual or non-standards-compliant routing for these transition ranges; no direct path to an IPv4 metadata, loopback, or private-network HTTP request has been demonstrated. The issue is fixed in version 2.3.3 (commit d1fcde8e), which blocks both prefixes.

Nezha versions 2.0.10 through 2.3.2 use a restricted HTTP client to validate user-configurable notification and DDNS webhook URLs, but the denylist did not cover IPv6 transition ranges — specifically the 6to4 prefix 2002::/16 and the local-use IPv4/IPv6 translation prefix 64:ff9b:1::/48. Because such addresses satisfy Go's netip.Addr.IsGlobalUnicast check, the URL validator accepted them. An authenticated user able to configure a webhook may be able to cause the dashboard to issue requests to an otherwise restricted IPv6 endpoint, but only where the dashboard's network provides unusual or non-standards-compliant routing for these transition ranges; no direct path to an IPv4 metadata, loopback, or private-network HTTP request has been demonstrated. The issue is fixed in version 2.3.3 (commit d1fcde8e), which blocks both prefixes.