CVE-2026-102275
PyJWT accepts inconsistent OKP x/d JWKs, causing public/private key identity confusion
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
6.5
PyJWT accepts inconsistent OKP x/d JWKs, causing public/private key identity confusion
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-102275- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-345, CWE-348
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-88547
6.5
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.
- Record
EUVD-2026-88547- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-x33g-cr3x-6449
6.5
PyJWT accepts inconsistent OKP x/d JWKs, causing public/private key identity confusion
Summary
PyJWT accepts internally inconsistent OKP private JWKs where the declared public key x does not correspond to the supplied private key d.
When d is present, OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk() constructs the Ed25519/Ed448 private key from d without verifying that the public key derived from d matches x. As a result, the original JWK can contain one public key identity while PyJWT performs cryptographic operations using a different key.
In affected DPoP integrations, this can allow a stolen sender-constrained access token to be used without possession of the legitimate holder's private key.
Details
The vulnerable logic is in jwt/algorithms.py:
if "x" not in obj:
raise InvalidKeyError('OKP should have "x" parameter')
x = base64url_decode(obj.get("x"))
if "d" not in obj:
if curve == "Ed25519":
return Ed25519PublicKey.from_public_bytes(x)
return Ed448PublicKey.from_public_bytes(x)
d = base64url_decode(obj.get("d"))
if curve == "Ed25519":
return Ed25519PrivateKey.from_private_bytes(d)
return Ed448PrivateKey.from_private_bytes(d)
When d is present, x is parsed but never compared with the public key derived from d.
For example, PyJWT accepts:
{
"kty": "OKP",
"crv": "Ed25519",
"x": "<legitimate-user-public-key>",
"d": "<attacker-private-key>"
}
even though x and d belong to different key pairs.
The behavior has existed since OKP private-JWK import was introduced:
- Ed25519: PyJWT 2.1.0+
- Ed448: PyJWT 2.2.0+
- Confirmed through PyJWT 2.14.0 and current master
A correct import should derive the public key from d and reject the JWK when it does not equal the supplied x.
PoC
The reproducer creates two Ed25519 keypairs:
- a legitimate holder keypair
- an attacker keypair
It then:
- Creates an access token whose
cnf.jktis bound to the legitimate public key. - Creates a DPoP proof JWK containing the legitimate user's
xtogether with the attacker'sd. - Computes the RFC 7638 thumbprint from
x, which still matches the access-token binding. - Passes the complete JWK to
PyJWK.from_dict(). - PyJWT imports the private key from the attacker-controlled
d. - A DPoP proof signed with the attacker's private key verifies successfully.
Observed result:
thumbprint_matches: true
actual_key_is_attacker_key: true
actual_key_matches_declared_x: false
stolen_sender_constrained_token_accepted: true
attacker_has_legitimate_private_key: false
Tested on PyJWT 2.13.0, PyJWT 2.14.0, and current master.
The complete reproducer is:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from __future__ import annotations
import base64
import hashlib
import json
import os
import platform
import time
from importlib.metadata import version
from typing import Any
import jwt
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ed25519 import Ed25519PrivateKey
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization import (
Encoding,
NoEncryption,
PrivateFormat,
PublicFormat,
)
ACCESS_TOKEN_SECRET = b"synthetic-authorization-server-key-32b"
HTTP_METHOD = "GET"
HTTP_URI = "https://resource.example/protected"
def b64url(raw: bytes) -> str:
return base64.urlsafe_b64encode(raw).rstrip(b"=").decode("ascii")
def public_x(private_key: Ed25519PrivateKey) -> str:
return b64url(private_key.public_key().public_bytes(Encoding.Raw, PublicFormat.Raw))
def private_d(private_key: Ed25519PrivateKey) -> str:
return b64url(
private_key.private_bytes(Encoding.Raw, PrivateFormat.Raw, NoEncryption())
)
def jwk_thumbprint(jwk: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
canonical = json.dumps(
{"crv": jwk["crv"], "kty": jwk["kty"], "x": jwk["x"]},
separators=(",", ":"),
sort_keys=True,
).encode("ascii")
return b64url(hashlib.sha256(canonical).digest())
def access_token_hash(access_token: str) -> str:
return b64url(hashlib.sha256(access_token.encode("ascii")).digest())
def verify_resource_request(
…
- Record
GHSA-x33g-cr3x-6449- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-345, CWE-348
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
6.5
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-102275- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-345, CWE-348
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBELL-CVE-2026-102275
8.2
- Record
BELL-CVE-2026-102275- CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-07
OSV
6.5
PyJWT accepts inconsistent OKP x/d JWKs, causing public/private key identity confusion
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-102275- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-345, CWE-348
- Updated
- 2026-11-03
Show 20 moreShow less
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-102275
8.2
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-102275- CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-x33g-cr3x-6449
6.5
PyJWT accepts inconsistent OKP x/d JWKs, causing public/private key identity confusion
Summary
PyJWT accepts internally inconsistent OKP private JWKs where the declared public key x does not correspond to the supplied private key d.
When d is present, OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk() constructs the Ed25519/Ed448 private key from d without verifying that the public key derived from d matches x. As a result, the original JWK can contain one public key identity while PyJWT performs cryptographic operations using a different key.
In affected DPoP integrations, this can allow a stolen sender-constrained access token to be used without possession of the legitimate holder's private key.
Details
The vulnerable logic is in jwt/algorithms.py:
if "x" not in obj:
raise InvalidKeyError('OKP should have "x" parameter')
x = base64url_decode(obj.get("x"))
if "d" not in obj:
if curve == "Ed25519":
return Ed25519PublicKey.from_public_bytes(x)
return Ed448PublicKey.from_public_bytes(x)
d = base64url_decode(obj.get("d"))
if curve == "Ed25519":
return Ed25519PrivateKey.from_private_bytes(d)
return Ed448PrivateKey.from_private_bytes(d)
When d is present, x is parsed but never compared with the public key derived from d.
For example, PyJWT accepts:
{
"kty": "OKP",
"crv": "Ed25519",
"x": "<legitimate-user-public-key>",
"d": "<attacker-private-key>"
}
even though x and d belong to different key pairs.
The behavior has existed since OKP private-JWK import was introduced:
- Ed25519: PyJWT 2.1.0+
- Ed448: PyJWT 2.2.0+
- Confirmed through PyJWT 2.14.0 and current master
A correct import should derive the public key from d and reject the JWK when it does not equal the supplied x.
PoC
The reproducer creates two Ed25519 keypairs:
- a legitimate holder keypair
- an attacker keypair
It then:
- Creates an access token whose
cnf.jktis bound to the legitimate public key. - Creates a DPoP proof JWK containing the legitimate user's
xtogether with the attacker'sd. - Computes the RFC 7638 thumbprint from
x, which still matches the access-token binding. - Passes the complete JWK to
PyJWK.from_dict(). - PyJWT imports the private key from the attacker-controlled
d. - A DPoP proof signed with the attacker's private key verifies successfully.
Observed result:
thumbprint_matches: true
actual_key_is_attacker_key: true
actual_key_matches_declared_x: false
stolen_sender_constrained_token_accepted: true
attacker_has_legitimate_private_key: false
Tested on PyJWT 2.13.0, PyJWT 2.14.0, and current master.
The complete reproducer is:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from __future__ import annotations
import base64
import hashlib
import json
import os
import platform
import time
from importlib.metadata import version
from typing import Any
import jwt
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ed25519 import Ed25519PrivateKey
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.serialization import (
Encoding,
NoEncryption,
PrivateFormat,
PublicFormat,
)
ACCESS_TOKEN_SECRET = b"synthetic-authorization-server-key-32b"
HTTP_METHOD = "GET"
HTTP_URI = "https://resource.example/protected"
def b64url(raw: bytes) -> str:
return base64.urlsafe_b64encode(raw).rstrip(b"=").decode("ascii")
def public_x(private_key: Ed25519PrivateKey) -> str:
return b64url(private_key.public_key().public_bytes(Encoding.Raw, PublicFormat.Raw))
def private_d(private_key: Ed25519PrivateKey) -> str:
return b64url(
private_key.private_bytes(Encoding.Raw, PrivateFormat.Raw, NoEncryption())
)
def jwk_thumbprint(jwk: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
canonical = json.dumps(
{"crv": jwk["crv"], "kty": jwk["kty"], "x": jwk["x"]},
separators=(",", ":"),
sort_keys=True,
).encode("ascii")
return b64url(hashlib.sha256(canonical).digest())
def access_token_hash(access_token: str) -> str:
return b64url(hashlib.sha256(access_token.encode("ascii")).digest())
def verify_resource_request(
…
- Record
GHSA-x33g-cr3x-6449- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-345, CWE-348
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-4453
6.5
python-jwt security update
setup.py test %endif
Security Fix(es):
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT get_signing_key_from_jwt is affected because unknown kid misses force refreshes without a negative cache or minimum refresh interval. This occurs when unauthenticated tokens repeatedly use the same unknown kid or varying kid values absent from the cached JWKS. As a result, each cache miss causes PyJWKClient to refresh the JWKS. Consequently, attacker traffic can amplify outbound requests to the configured JWKS endpoint. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.(CVE-2026-101917)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.0.0a1 until 2.15.0, PyJWT PyJWKClient.get_signing_key_from_jwt is affected because payload parser catches ValueError but not RecursionError. This occurs when an attacker-controlled recursively nested payload reaches json.loads. As a result, documented PyJWT exception handling does not contain the failure. Consequently, an unauthenticated request can raise an exception that may produce an HTTP 500 response. The advisory-defined affected implementation also includes jwt/api_jwt.py, verify_signature=False. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.(CVE-2026-101918)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.13.0 until 2.14.0, PyJWS._load in jwt/api_jws.py is affected because parser catches ValueError but not RecursionError. This occurs when a deeply nested token header reaches json.loads. As a result, RecursionError escapes the documented PyJWT error hierarchy. Consequently, an unauthenticated malformed token can cause a request-level failure and HTTP 500. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.(CVE-2026-102265)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT signature segment is affected because signature segment decoding accepts characters outside the canonical Base64URL representation. This occurs when non-Base64URL characters are appended to a valid compact JWS signature segment. As a result, base64url_decode produces the same signature bytes for different serialized segments. Consequently, raw-token revocation checks can fail to recognize an equivalent modified token. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.(CVE-2026-102269)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.(CVE-2026-102275)
- Record
OESA-2026-4453- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-4454
6.5
python-jwt security update
setup.py test %endif
Security Fix(es):
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.0.0a1 until 2.15.0, PyJWT PyJWKClient.get_signing_key_from_jwt is affected because payload parser catches ValueError but not RecursionError. This occurs when an attacker-controlled recursively nested payload reaches json.loads. As a result, documented PyJWT exception handling does not contain the failure. Consequently, an unauthenticated request can raise an exception that may produce an HTTP 500 response. The advisory-defined affected implementation also includes jwt/api_jwt.py, verify_signature=False. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.(CVE-2026-101918)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.13.0 until 2.14.0, PyJWS._load in jwt/api_jws.py is affected because parser catches ValueError but not RecursionError. This occurs when a deeply nested token header reaches json.loads. As a result, RecursionError escapes the documented PyJWT error hierarchy. Consequently, an unauthenticated malformed token can cause a request-level failure and HTTP 500. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.(CVE-2026-102265)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT signature segment is affected because signature segment decoding accepts characters outside the canonical Base64URL representation. This occurs when non-Base64URL characters are appended to a valid compact JWS signature segment. As a result, base64url_decode produces the same signature bytes for different serialized segments. Consequently, raw-token revocation checks can fail to recognize an equivalent modified token. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.(CVE-2026-102269)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.(CVE-2026-102275)
- Record
OESA-2026-4454- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-4455
6.5
python-jwt security update
setup.py test %endif
Security Fix(es):
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT get_signing_key_from_jwt is affected because unknown kid misses force refreshes without a negative cache or minimum refresh interval. This occurs when unauthenticated tokens repeatedly use the same unknown kid or varying kid values absent from the cached JWKS. As a result, each cache miss causes PyJWKClient to refresh the JWKS. Consequently, attacker traffic can amplify outbound requests to the configured JWKS endpoint. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.(CVE-2026-101917)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.0.0a1 until 2.15.0, PyJWT PyJWKClient.get_signing_key_from_jwt is affected because payload parser catches ValueError but not RecursionError. This occurs when an attacker-controlled recursively nested payload reaches json.loads. As a result, documented PyJWT exception handling does not contain the failure. Consequently, an unauthenticated request can raise an exception that may produce an HTTP 500 response. The advisory-defined affected implementation also includes jwt/api_jwt.py, verify_signature=False. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.(CVE-2026-101918)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.13.0 until 2.14.0, PyJWS._load in jwt/api_jws.py is affected because parser catches ValueError but not RecursionError. This occurs when a deeply nested token header reaches json.loads. As a result, RecursionError escapes the documented PyJWT error hierarchy. Consequently, an unauthenticated malformed token can cause a request-level failure and HTTP 500. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.(CVE-2026-102265)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT signature segment is affected because signature segment decoding accepts characters outside the canonical Base64URL representation. This occurs when non-Base64URL characters are appended to a valid compact JWS signature segment. As a result, base64url_decode produces the same signature bytes for different serialized segments. Consequently, raw-token revocation checks can fail to recognize an equivalent modified token. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.(CVE-2026-102269)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.(CVE-2026-102275)
- Record
OESA-2026-4455- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-4456
6.5
python-jwt security update
setup.py test %endif
Security Fix(es):
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT get_signing_key_from_jwt is affected because unknown kid misses force refreshes without a negative cache or minimum refresh interval. This occurs when unauthenticated tokens repeatedly use the same unknown kid or varying kid values absent from the cached JWKS. As a result, each cache miss causes PyJWKClient to refresh the JWKS. Consequently, attacker traffic can amplify outbound requests to the configured JWKS endpoint. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.(CVE-2026-101917)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.0.0a1 until 2.15.0, PyJWT PyJWKClient.get_signing_key_from_jwt is affected because payload parser catches ValueError but not RecursionError. This occurs when an attacker-controlled recursively nested payload reaches json.loads. As a result, documented PyJWT exception handling does not contain the failure. Consequently, an unauthenticated request can raise an exception that may produce an HTTP 500 response. The advisory-defined affected implementation also includes jwt/api_jwt.py, verify_signature=False. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.(CVE-2026-101918)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.13.0 until 2.14.0, PyJWS._load in jwt/api_jws.py is affected because parser catches ValueError but not RecursionError. This occurs when a deeply nested token header reaches json.loads. As a result, RecursionError escapes the documented PyJWT error hierarchy. Consequently, an unauthenticated malformed token can cause a request-level failure and HTTP 500. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.(CVE-2026-102265)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT signature segment is affected because signature segment decoding accepts characters outside the canonical Base64URL representation. This occurs when non-Base64URL characters are appended to a valid compact JWS signature segment. As a result, base64url_decode produces the same signature bytes for different serialized segments. Consequently, raw-token revocation checks can fail to recognize an equivalent modified token. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0.(CVE-2026-102269)
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.(CVE-2026-102275)
- Record
OESA-2026-4456- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-4183
8.2
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.
- Record
PYSEC-2026-4183- CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-102275
6.5
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-102275- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-105233 No score
CVE-2026-102275 affecting package python-jwt for versions less than 2.15.1-1
PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.1.0 until 2.15.0, PyJWT OKPAlgorithm.from_jwk in jwt/algorithms.py is affected because private-JWK import path does not compare the public key derived from d with x. This occurs when an OKP private JWK supplies non-corresponding x and d components. As a result, identity derived from x can differ from operations performed with d. Consequently, if an integration also accepts private key parameters from a proof header without rejecting them, an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.0.
- Record
AZL-105233- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1791271338 No score
TuxCare security update for pyjwt (7 CVEs)
TuxCare rebuilt pyjwt to address 7 CVEs. Fixed in 2.3.0.post4+tuxcare.
- Record
CLSA-2026-1791271338- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1791272473 No score
TuxCare security update for pyjwt (2 CVEs)
TuxCare rebuilt pyjwt to address 2 CVEs. Fixed in 2.10.1.post6+tuxcare.
- Record
CLSA-2026-1791272473- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1791272714 No score
TuxCare security update for pyjwt (2 CVEs)
TuxCare rebuilt pyjwt to address 2 CVEs. Fixed in 2.8.0.post5+tuxcare.
- Record
CLSA-2026-1791272714- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:11994-1 No score
python313-PyJWT-2.15.1-1.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the python313-PyJWT-2.15.1-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:11994-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:22074-1 No score
Security update for python-PyJWT
This update for python-PyJWT fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-101917: attacker traffic can amplify outbound requests to the configured JWKS endpoint (bsc#1283060).
- CVE-2026-101918: unauthenticated request can raise an exception that may produce an HTTP 500 response (bsc#1283061).
- CVE-2026-102267: forwarded credentials may be disclosed or verification keys may be substituted (bsc#1283064).
- CVE-2026-102268: an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens (bsc#1283065).
- CVE-2026-102269: raw-token revocation checks can fail to recognize an equivalent modified token (bsc#1283066).
- CVE-2026-102270: an attacker can cause intensive CPU consumption (bsc#1283067).
- CVE-2026-102271: an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens (bsc#1283068).
- CVE-2026-102274: Malformed RSA JWK aborts parsing of an entire JWK Set (bsc#1283071).
- CVE-2026-102275: an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key (bsc#1283072).
- CVE-2026-103001: reused mutable options mapping can cause verification checks bypass on subsequent decode calls (bsc#1283829).
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:22074-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:24126-1 No score
Security update for python-PyJWT
This update for python-PyJWT fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-101917: attacker traffic can amplify outbound requests to the configured JWKS endpoint (bsc#1283060).
- CVE-2026-101918: unauthenticated request can raise an exception that may produce an HTTP 500 response (bsc#1283061).
- CVE-2026-102267: forwarded credentials may be disclosed or verification keys may be substituted (bsc#1283064).
- CVE-2026-102268: an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens (bsc#1283065).
- CVE-2026-102269: raw-token revocation checks can fail to recognize an equivalent modified token (bsc#1283066).
- CVE-2026-102270: an attacker can cause intensive CPU consumption (bsc#1283067).
- CVE-2026-102271: an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens (bsc#1283068).
- CVE-2026-102274: Malformed RSA JWK aborts parsing of an entire JWK Set (bsc#1283071).
- CVE-2026-102275: an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key (bsc#1283072).
- CVE-2026-103001: reused mutable options mapping can cause verification checks bypass on subsequent decode calls (bsc#1283829).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:24126-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:24134-1 No score
Security update for python-PyJWT
This update for python-PyJWT fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-101917: attacker traffic can amplify outbound requests to the configured JWKS endpoint (bsc#1283060).
- CVE-2026-101918: unauthenticated request can raise an exception that may produce an HTTP 500 response (bsc#1283061).
- CVE-2026-102267: forwarded credentials may be disclosed or verification keys may be substituted (bsc#1283064).
- CVE-2026-102268: an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens (bsc#1283065).
- CVE-2026-102269: raw-token revocation checks can fail to recognize an equivalent modified token (bsc#1283066).
- CVE-2026-102270: an attacker can cause intensive CPU consumption (bsc#1283067).
- CVE-2026-102271: an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens (bsc#1283068).
- CVE-2026-102274: Malformed RSA JWK aborts parsing of an entire JWK Set (bsc#1283071).
- CVE-2026-102275: an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key (bsc#1283072).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:24134-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:24219-1 No score
Security update for python-PyJWT
This update for python-PyJWT fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-101917: attacker traffic can amplify outbound requests to the configured JWKS endpoint (bsc#1283060).
- CVE-2026-101918: unauthenticated request can raise an exception that may produce an HTTP 500 response (bsc#1283061).
- CVE-2026-102267: forwarded credentials may be disclosed or verification keys may be substituted (bsc#1283064).
- CVE-2026-102268: an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens (bsc#1283065).
- CVE-2026-102269: raw-token revocation checks can fail to recognize an equivalent modified token (bsc#1283066).
- CVE-2026-102270: an attacker can cause intensive CPU consumption (bsc#1283067).
- CVE-2026-102271: an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens (bsc#1283068).
- CVE-2026-102274: Malformed RSA JWK aborts parsing of an entire JWK Set (bsc#1283071).
- CVE-2026-102275: an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key (bsc#1283072).
- CVE-2026-103001: reused mutable options mapping can cause verification checks bypass on subsequent decode calls (bsc#1283829).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:24219-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:24377-1 No score
Security update for python-PyJWT
This update for python-PyJWT fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-101917: attacker traffic can amplify outbound requests to the configured JWKS endpoint (bsc#1283060).
- CVE-2026-101918: unauthenticated request can raise an exception that may produce an HTTP 500 response (bsc#1283061).
- CVE-2026-102267: forwarded credentials may be disclosed or verification keys may be substituted (bsc#1283064).
- CVE-2026-102268: an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens (bsc#1283065).
- CVE-2026-102269: raw-token revocation checks can fail to recognize an equivalent modified token (bsc#1283066).
- CVE-2026-102270: an attacker can cause intensive CPU consumption (bsc#1283067).
- CVE-2026-102271: an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens (bsc#1283068).
- CVE-2026-102274: Malformed RSA JWK aborts parsing of an entire JWK Set (bsc#1283071).
- CVE-2026-102275: an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key (bsc#1283072).
- CVE-2026-103001: reused mutable options mapping can cause verification checks bypass on subsequent decode calls (bsc#1283829).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:24377-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:5064-1 No score
Security update for python-PyJWT
This update for python-PyJWT fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-101917: attacker traffic can amplify outbound requests to the configured JWKS endpoint (bsc#1283060).
- CVE-2026-101918: unauthenticated request can raise an exception that may produce an HTTP 500 response (bsc#1283061).
- CVE-2026-102267: forwarded credentials may be disclosed or verification keys may be substituted (bsc#1283064).
- CVE-2026-102268: an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens (bsc#1283065).
- CVE-2026-102269: raw-token revocation checks can fail to recognize an equivalent modified token (bsc#1283066).
- CVE-2026-102270: an attacker can cause intensive CPU consumption (bsc#1283067).
- CVE-2026-102271: an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens (bsc#1283068).
- CVE-2026-102275: an attacker may use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key (bsc#1283072).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:5064-1- Updated
- 2026-11-03
OSVUSN-8934-1 No score
pyjwt vulnerabilities
Kingsley Olukanni discovered that PyJWT did not properly handle unknown key identifiers when retrieving signing keys. An attacker could possibly use this issue to amplify requests to the configured key endpoint, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, Ubuntu 26.04 LTS and Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-101917)
Ekalabya Ghosh discovered that PyJWT did not properly handle certain recursively nested JSON payloads. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause an application to fail, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2026-101918)
Pedram Hayati discovered that PyJWT did not properly handle malformed RSA keys in a JSON Web Key Set. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause authentication failures or a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, Ubuntu 26.04 LTS and Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-102274)
It was discovered that PyJWT did not properly validate certain OKP private key components. An attacker could possibly use this issue to confuse the identity of public and private keys, and use a stolen sender-constrained token without the legitimate private key. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, Ubuntu 26.04 LTS and Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-102275)
- Record
USN-8934-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
pyjwtPyPI |
2.1.0 to 2.14.0 | 2.15.0 |
python-jwtAzure Linux:3 |
before 2.15.1-1 | 2.15.1-1 |
py3-jwtAlpaquita:25 |
2.10.1-r0 up to 2.15.1-r0 | 2.15.1-r0 |
py3-jwtAlpaquita:stream |
2.8.0-r1 up to 2.15.1-r0 | 2.15.1-r0 |
pyjwtTuxCare:PyPI From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
2.3.0 up to 2.3.0.post4+tuxcare, plus listed versions 2.3.0.post1+tuxcare2.3.0.post2+tuxcare2.3.0.post3+tuxcare |
2.3.0.post4+tuxcare |
pyjwtTuxCare:PyPI From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
2.10.1 up to 2.10.1.post6+tuxcare, plus listed versions 2.10.1.post1+tuxcare2.10.1.post2+tuxcare2.10.1.post3+tuxcare2.10.1.post4+tuxcare2.10.1.post5+tuxcare |
2.10.1.post6+tuxcare |
pyjwtTuxCare:PyPI From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
2.8.0 up to 2.8.0.post5+tuxcare, plus listed versions 2.8.0.post1+tuxcare2.8.0.post2+tuxcare2.8.0.post3+tuxcare2.8.0.post4+tuxcare |
2.8.0.post5+tuxcare |
pyjwtDebian:12 |
All versions, plus listed versions 2.10.1-12.10.1-22.10.1-32.10.1-42.11.0-2 Show 8 moreShow less2.12.1-12.13.0-12.14.0-12.15.0-12.15.1-12.6.0-12.6.0-1+deb12u12.7.0-1 |
None known |
pyjwtDebian:13 |
All versions, plus listed versions 2.10.1-22.10.1-2+deb13u12.10.1-32.10.1-42.11.0-2 Show 5 moreShow less2.12.1-12.13.0-12.14.0-12.15.0-12.15.1-1 |
None known |
pyjwtDebian:14 |
before 2.15.0-1, plus listed versions 2.10.1-22.10.1-32.10.1-42.11.0-22.12.1-12.13.0-12.14.0-1 |
2.15.0-1 |
Show 35 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
pyjwtPyPI |
2.1.0 up to 2.15.0, plus listed versions 2.10.02.10.12.11.02.12.02.12.1 Show 10 moreShow less2.13.02.14.02.2.02.3.02.4.02.5.02.6.02.7.02.8.02.9.0 |
2.15.0 |
python-jwtopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP4 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-11.oe2403sp4 | 2.8.0-11.oe2403sp4 |
python-jwtopenEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 2.3.0-12.oe2203sp4 | 2.3.0-12.oe2203sp4 |
python-jwtopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-11.oe2403sp1 | 2.8.0-11.oe2403sp1 |
python-jwtopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-11.oe2403sp3 | 2.8.0-11.oe2403sp3 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 2.12.1-160000.3.1 | 2.12.1-160000.3.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 2.9.0-159998.1.1 | 2.9.0-159998.1.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 2.12.1-160000.3.1 | 2.12.1-160000.3.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 2.12.1-160000.3.1 | 2.12.1-160000.3.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Micro 6.1 From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 2.12.1-slfo.1.1_3.1 | 2.12.1-slfo.1.1_3.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP4 From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 |
python-PyJWTSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 | 2.8.0-150400.8.20.1 |
pyjwtUbuntu:22.04:LTS |
before 2.3.0-1ubuntu0.6, plus listed versions 1.7.1-2ubuntu22.1.0-12.3.0-12.3.0-1ubuntu0.12.3.0-1ubuntu0.22.3.0-1ubuntu0.32.3.0-1ubuntu0.42.3.0-1ubuntu0.5 |
2.3.0-1ubuntu0.6 |
pyjwtUbuntu:24.04:LTS |
before 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.4, plus listed versions 2.7.0-12.7.0-1ubuntu0.12.7.0-1ubuntu0.22.7.0-1ubuntu0.3 |
2.7.0-1ubuntu0.4 |
pyjwtUbuntu:26.10 |
before 2.13.0-1ubuntu1.1, plus listed versions 2.10.1-4ubuntu12.12.1-12.13.0-12.13.0-1ubuntu1 |
2.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 |
pyjwtUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
before 2.10.1-4ubuntu1.3, plus listed versions 2.10.1-22.10.1-32.10.1-3build12.10.1-42.10.1-4ubuntu12.10.1-4ubuntu1.12.10.1-4ubuntu1.2 |
2.10.1-4ubuntu1.3 |
pyjwtUbuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.3.0-1ubuntu0.1+esm4, plus listed versions 1.0.0-0ubuntu11.3.0-11.3.0-1ubuntu0.11.3.0-1ubuntu0.1+esm11.3.0-1ubuntu0.1+esm21.3.0-1ubuntu0.1+esm3 |
1.3.0-1ubuntu0.1+esm4 |
pyjwtUbuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.1+esm4, plus listed versions 1.4.2-1.11.5.3+ds1-11.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.11.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.1+esm11.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.1+esm21.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.1+esm3 |
1.5.3+ds1-1ubuntu0.1+esm4 |
pyjwtUbuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.7.1-2ubuntu2.1+esm4, plus listed versions 1.7.0-21.7.1-11.7.1-2ubuntu11.7.1-2ubuntu21.7.1-2ubuntu2.11.7.1-2ubuntu2.1+esm11.7.1-2ubuntu2.1+esm21.7.1-2ubuntu2.1+esm3 |
1.7.1-2ubuntu2.1+esm4 |
pyjwtUbuntu:22.04:LTS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 2.3.0-1ubuntu0.6, plus listed versions 1.7.1-2ubuntu22.1.0-12.3.0-12.3.0-1ubuntu0.12.3.0-1ubuntu0.22.3.0-1ubuntu0.32.3.0-1ubuntu0.42.3.0-1ubuntu0.5 |
2.3.0-1ubuntu0.6 |
pyjwtUbuntu:24.04:LTS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.4, plus listed versions 2.7.0-12.7.0-1ubuntu0.12.7.0-1ubuntu0.22.7.0-1ubuntu0.3 |
2.7.0-1ubuntu0.4 |
pyjwtUbuntu:26.10 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 2.13.0-1ubuntu1.1, plus listed versions 2.10.1-4ubuntu12.12.1-12.13.0-12.13.0-1ubuntu1 |
2.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 |
pyjwtUbuntu:26.04:LTS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 2.10.1-4ubuntu1.3, plus listed versions 2.10.1-22.10.1-32.10.1-3build12.10.1-42.10.1-4ubuntu12.10.1-4ubuntu1.12.10.1-4ubuntu1.2 |
2.10.1-4ubuntu1.3 |
python-PyJWTopenSUSE:Tumbleweed From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 2.15.1-1.1 | 2.15.1-1.1 |
python-PyJWTopenSUSE:Leap 16.0 From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 2.12.1-160000.3.1 | 2.12.1-160000.3.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, aliases, references | OSV | |
| affected | OSV | |
| affected, aliases, facts, references | OSV | |
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-102275 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 6.5) in Jpadilla Pyjwt, published September 28, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.17%, the 5th percentile. Fixed in pyjwt 2.15.0.
References
github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/security/advisories/GHSA-x33g-cr3x-6449
github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/commit/3cd9ceec33ced359decbad75b413ad668ae6332c
github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/releases/tag/2.15.0
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-102275
github.com/advisories/GHSA-x33g-cr3x-6449
docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2026-102275
Show 44 moreShow less
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/102xxx/CVE-2026-102275.json
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-102275
github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-4453
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-101917
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-101918
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-102265
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-102269
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-4454
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-4455
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-4456
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202624126-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1283060
bugzilla.suse.com/1283061
bugzilla.suse.com/1283064
bugzilla.suse.com/1283065
bugzilla.suse.com/1283066
bugzilla.suse.com/1283067
bugzilla.suse.com/1283068
bugzilla.suse.com/1283071
bugzilla.suse.com/1283072
bugzilla.suse.com/1283829
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-101917
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-101918
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-102267
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-102268
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-102269
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-102270
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-102271
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-102274
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-102275
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-103001
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202624134-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202624219-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202624377-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20265064-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-102275
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-102275
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8934-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-101917
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-101918
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-102274
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-102266
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-102272
Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.