CVE-2026-111917

Vikunja 2.3.0 before 2.7.0 contains an improper session validation vulnerability that allows attackers to keep WebSocket access after revocation because handleAuth never checks the JWT sid claim against the sessions table. Attackers holding a stolen access token can open or maintain connections to /api/v2/ws after session deletion or TOTP enrollment, continuing to receive the victim's notification.created pushes, including comment, task and project content.

Vikunja 2.3.0 before 2.7.0 contains an improper session validation vulnerability that allows attackers to keep WebSocket access after revocation because handleAuth never checks the JWT sid claim against the sessions table. Attackers holding a stolen access token can open or maintain connections to /api/v2/ws after session deletion or TOTP enrollment, continuing to receive the victim's notification.created pushes, including comment, task and project content.

Vikunja 2.3.0 before 2.7.0 contains an improper session validation vulnerability that allows attackers to keep WebSocket access after revocation because handleAuth never checks the JWT sid claim against the sessions table. Attackers holding a stolen access token can open or maintain connections to /api/v2/ws after session deletion or TOTP enrollment, continuing to receive the victim's notification.created pushes, including comment, task and project content.

Summary

Vikunja v2.6.0 introduced server-side sessions with revocation semantics: DELETE /api/v2/user/sessions/{id} documents "Revokes a specific session by its UUID", and enabling TOTP calls DeleteAllUserSessions to invalidate all sessions. The WebSocket endpoint accepts any cryptographically valid user JWT without ever resolving its sid (session id) claim against the sessions table. A connection authenticated before revocation stays authenticated and continues to receive live pushes indefinitely, and even brand-new WebSocket connections are accepted with a token whose session was deleted. The revocation feature therefore does not cover the WebSocket boundary at all.

Details

User access JWTs carry a session reference: NewUserJWTAuthtoken (pkg/modules/auth/auth.go:188) sets claims["sid"] = sessionID, and the API login-session documentation describes the claim as tying the JWT to a server-side session. On the HTTP side nothing consumes the claim per request either (REST access tokens simply expire after their short TTL, a design the maintainers documented when fixing GHSA-96q5, and refresh tokens are correctly invalidated when the session row is deleted).

The WebSocket endpoint GET /api/v2/ws authenticates through the first client message. Connection.handleAuth (pkg/websocket/connection.go:168) validates the token exclusively with auth.GetUserIDFromToken (pkg/modules/auth/auth.go:292):

func GetUserIDFromToken(tokenString string) (int64, error) {
	token, err := jwt.Parse(tokenString, func(_ *jwt.Token) (any, error) {
		return []byte(config.ServiceSecret.GetString()), nil
	})
	...
	typ, ok := claims["type"].(float64)
	if !ok || int(typ) != AuthTypeUser {
		return 0, jwt.ErrTokenInvalidClaims
	}
	...
}

The function verifies signature and token type only. No session lookup occurs anywhere in the WebSocket path, and no re-validation happens after the initial auth. Consequently:

1. A connection authenticated before DELETE /api/v2/user/sessions/{id} (or before TOTP enable, which runs models.DeleteAllUserSessions, pkg/routes/api/v2/user_totp.go:208) remains registered in the hub and keeps receiving every subscribed event, such as notification.created with the full notification object including comment, task and project content.
2. A new connection opened after the deletion, using the same pre-revocation token, authenticates successfully.
3. Session deletion is observable only in the REST surface. The user's session list empties, the refresh token dies on next use, but the WebSocket channel never notices.

For REST the exposure is bounded by the 10-minute access-token TTL. For WebSocket it is not: a connection lives until the client closes it, so a session the user believes revoked retains a live, server-pushed data channel with no time bound.

PoC

vikunja-ws-auth-ignores-session-revocation-PoC.zip

The attached archive contains deployment/deploy.sh (local Vikunja v2.6.0 on loopback with SQLite) and poc/poc.sh running poc/poc.py:

1. Victim registers and logs in. Second user registers for later interaction.
2. Control: the victim's WebSocket authenticates and subscribes to notification.created. Negative control: a garbage token is rejected with invalid_token.
3. Every victim session is deleted via DELETE /api/v2/user/sessions/{id} (the list afterwards reports 0 remaining).
4. Exploit A: a brand-new WebSocket connection authenticates successfully with the deleted-session token.
5. Exploit B: the second user comments on a task mentioning the victim. The victim's pre-revocation WebSocket connection receives the notification.created push with the full notification payload.

Result: 10 checks passed on two consecutive runs, each from a wiped database.

Impact

Session revocation, the mechanism a user relies on when a device is lost or a token is suspected…

Vikunja 2.3.0 before 2.7.0 contains an improper session validation vulnerability that allows attackers to keep WebSocket access after revocation because handleAuth never checks the JWT sid claim against the sessions table. Attackers holding a stolen access token can open or maintain connections to /api/v2/ws after session deletion or TOTP enrollment, continuing to receive the victim's notification.created pushes, including comment, task and project content.

Vikunja 2.3.0 before 2.7.0 contains an improper session validation vulnerability that allows attackers to keep WebSocket access after revocation because handleAuth never checks the JWT sid claim against the sessions table. Attackers holding a stolen access token can open or maintain connections to /api/v2/ws after session deletion or TOTP enrollment, continuing to receive the victim's notification.created pushes, including comment, task and project content.

Summary

Vikunja v2.6.0 introduced server-side sessions with revocation semantics: DELETE /api/v2/user/sessions/{id} documents "Revokes a specific session by its UUID", and enabling TOTP calls DeleteAllUserSessions to invalidate all sessions. The WebSocket endpoint accepts any cryptographically valid user JWT without ever resolving its sid (session id) claim against the sessions table. A connection authenticated before revocation stays authenticated and continues to receive live pushes indefinitely, and even brand-new WebSocket connections are accepted with a token whose session was deleted. The revocation feature therefore does not cover the WebSocket boundary at all.

Details

User access JWTs carry a session reference: NewUserJWTAuthtoken (pkg/modules/auth/auth.go:188) sets claims["sid"] = sessionID, and the API login-session documentation describes the claim as tying the JWT to a server-side session. On the HTTP side nothing consumes the claim per request either (REST access tokens simply expire after their short TTL, a design the maintainers documented when fixing GHSA-96q5, and refresh tokens are correctly invalidated when the session row is deleted).

The WebSocket endpoint GET /api/v2/ws authenticates through the first client message. Connection.handleAuth (pkg/websocket/connection.go:168) validates the token exclusively with auth.GetUserIDFromToken (pkg/modules/auth/auth.go:292):

func GetUserIDFromToken(tokenString string) (int64, error) {
	token, err := jwt.Parse(tokenString, func(_ *jwt.Token) (any, error) {
		return []byte(config.ServiceSecret.GetString()), nil
	})
	...
	typ, ok := claims["type"].(float64)
	if !ok || int(typ) != AuthTypeUser {
		return 0, jwt.ErrTokenInvalidClaims
	}
	...
}

The function verifies signature and token type only. No session lookup occurs anywhere in the WebSocket path, and no re-validation happens after the initial auth. Consequently:

1. A connection authenticated before DELETE /api/v2/user/sessions/{id} (or before TOTP enable, which runs models.DeleteAllUserSessions, pkg/routes/api/v2/user_totp.go:208) remains registered in the hub and keeps receiving every subscribed event, such as notification.created with the full notification object including comment, task and project content.
2. A new connection opened after the deletion, using the same pre-revocation token, authenticates successfully.
3. Session deletion is observable only in the REST surface. The user's session list empties, the refresh token dies on next use, but the WebSocket channel never notices.

For REST the exposure is bounded by the 10-minute access-token TTL. For WebSocket it is not: a connection lives until the client closes it, so a session the user believes revoked retains a live, server-pushed data channel with no time bound.

PoC

vikunja-ws-auth-ignores-session-revocation-PoC.zip

The attached archive contains deployment/deploy.sh (local Vikunja v2.6.0 on loopback with SQLite) and poc/poc.sh running poc/poc.py:

1. Victim registers and logs in. Second user registers for later interaction.
2. Control: the victim's WebSocket authenticates and subscribes to notification.created. Negative control: a garbage token is rejected with invalid_token.
3. Every victim session is deleted via DELETE /api/v2/user/sessions/{id} (the list afterwards reports 0 remaining).
4. Exploit A: a brand-new WebSocket connection authenticates successfully with the deleted-session token.
5. Exploit B: the second user comments on a task mentioning the victim. The victim's pre-revocation WebSocket connection receives the notification.created push with the full notification payload.

Result: 10 checks passed on two consecutive runs, each from a wiped database.

Impact

Session revocation, the mechanism a user relies on when a device is lost or a token is suspected…

Vikunja: WebSocket authentication ignores server-side session state, so revoked sessions keep receiving live pushes in code.vikunja.io/api.

NOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions.

(If this is causing false-positive reports from vulnerability scanners, please suggest an edit to the report.)

The additional affected modules and versions are: .