CVE-2026-114611
OCO-Server: MDM /profile endpoint accepts self-signed PKCS#7 signatures (PKCS7_NOVERIFY): device MDM identity (certificate + private key) disclosure and device-record hijack
OCO-Server is a self-hosted endpoint management application for computer inventory, software deployment, and mobile device management. Prior to 1.2.3,the Apple MDM enrollment endpoint frontend/api-mdm.php verifies the signed enrollment-request plist with openssl_pkcs7_verify(..., PKCS7_NOVERIFY, ...). PKCS7_NOVERIFY disables signer certificate chain and trust validation, so the signature only has to be self-consistent with whatever certificate is embedded in the PKCS#7 blob. A self-signed certificate from an unrelated attacker is accepted. Because the endpoint trusts the SERIAL field taken from the unverified payload, anyone who knows a registered device's serial number can sign a forged plist (SERIAL = victim device, attacker-chosen UDID) with an arbitrary self-signed certificate; POST it unauthenticated to /api-mdm.php/profile (Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature); and receive the victim device's freshly minted MDM identity: a certificate with CN=<serial> issued by the server's internal MDM device CA, bundled with its private key in a PKCS#12 payload inside the returned .mobileconfig enrollment profile. Additionally, the victim's mobile_device database row is silently overwritten with the attacker-supplied UDID (device-record hijack). With the stolen certificate and key, the attacker can impersonate the victim device on all subsequent MDM traffic (/checkin, /mdm, /parameters), which authenticate callers by the certificate CN (the serial number) via checkSignature() in the same file. This yields control over the victim device's MDM relationship: reading its management data, replacing its push token, and disrupting or redirecting its enrollment. Version 1.2.3 fixes the issue.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
9.1
OCO-Server: MDM /profile endpoint accepts self-signed PKCS#7 signatures (PKCS7_NOVERIFY): device MDM identity (certificate + private key) disclosure and device-record hijack
OCO-Server is a self-hosted endpoint management application for computer inventory, software deployment, and mobile device management. Prior to 1.2.3,the Apple MDM enrollment endpoint frontend/api-mdm.php verifies the signed enrollment-request plist with openssl_pkcs7_verify(..., PKCS7_NOVERIFY, ...). PKCS7_NOVERIFY disables signer certificate chain and trust validation, so the signature only has to be self-consistent with whatever certificate is embedded in the PKCS#7 blob. A self-signed certificate from an unrelated attacker is accepted. Because the endpoint trusts the SERIAL field taken from the unverified payload, anyone who knows a registered device's serial number can sign a forged plist (SERIAL = victim device, attacker-chosen UDID) with an arbitrary self-signed certificate; POST it unauthenticated to /api-mdm.php/profile (Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature); and receive the victim device's freshly minted MDM identity: a certificate with CN=<serial> issued by the server's internal MDM device CA, bundled with its private key in a PKCS#12 payload inside the returned .mobileconfig enrollment profile. Additionally, the victim's mobile_device database row is silently overwritten with the attacker-supplied UDID (device-record hijack). With the stolen certificate and key, the attacker can impersonate the victim device on all subsequent MDM traffic (/checkin, /mdm, /parameters), which authenticate callers by the certificate CN (the serial number) via checkSignature() in the same file. This yields control over the victim device's MDM relationship: reading its management data, replacing its push token, and disrupting or redirecting its enrollment. Version 1.2.3 fixes the issue.
- Record
CVE-2026-114611- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-295
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-108268
9.1
OCO-Server is a self-hosted endpoint management application for computer inventory, software deployment, and mobile device management. Prior to 1.2.3,the Apple MDM enrollment endpoint frontend/api-mdm.php verifies the signed enrollment-request plist with openssl_pkcs7_verify(..., PKCS7_NOVERIFY, ...). PKCS7_NOVERIFY disables signer certificate chain and trust validation, so the signature only has to be self-consistent with whatever certificate is embedded in the PKCS#7 blob. A self-signed certificate from an unrelated attacker is accepted. Because the endpoint trusts the SERIAL field taken from the unverified payload, anyone who knows a registered device's serial number can sign a forged plist (SERIAL = victim device, attacker-chosen UDID) with an arbitrary self-signed certificate; POST it unauthenticated to /api-mdm.php/profile (Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature); and receive the victim device's freshly minted MDM identity: a certificate with CN=<serial> issued by the server's internal MDM device CA, bundled with its private key in a PKCS#12 payload inside the returned .mobileconfig enrollment profile. Additionally, the victim's mobile_device database row is silently overwritten with the attacker-supplied UDID (device-record hijack). With the stolen certificate and key, the attacker can impersonate the victim device on all subsequent MDM traffic (/checkin, /mdm, /parameters), which authenticate callers by the certificate CN (the serial number) via checkSignature() in the same file. This yields control over the victim device's MDM relationship: reading its management data, replacing its push token, and disrupting or redirecting its enrollment. Version 1.2.3 fixes the issue.
- Record
EUVD-2026-108268- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
9.1
OCO-Server is a self-hosted endpoint management application for computer inventory, software deployment, and mobile device management. Prior to 1.2.3,the Apple MDM enrollment endpoint frontend/api-mdm.php verifies the signed enrollment-request plist with openssl_pkcs7_verify(..., PKCS7_NOVERIFY, ...). PKCS7_NOVERIFY disables signer certificate chain and trust validation, so the signature only has to be self-consistent with whatever certificate is embedded in the PKCS#7 blob. A self-signed certificate from an unrelated attacker is accepted. Because the endpoint trusts the SERIAL field taken from the unverified payload, anyone who knows a registered device's serial number can sign a forged plist (SERIAL = victim device, attacker-chosen UDID) with an arbitrary self-signed certificate; POST it unauthenticated to /api-mdm.php/profile (Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature); and receive the victim device's freshly minted MDM identity: a certificate with CN=<serial> issued by the server's internal MDM device CA, bundled with its private key in a PKCS#12 payload inside the returned .mobileconfig enrollment profile. Additionally, the victim's mobile_device database row is silently overwritten with the attacker-supplied UDID (device-record hijack). With the stolen certificate and key, the attacker can impersonate the victim device on all subsequent MDM traffic (/checkin, /mdm, /parameters), which authenticate callers by the certificate CN (the serial number) via checkSignature() in the same file. This yields control over the victim device's MDM relationship: reading its management data, replacing its push token, and disrupting or redirecting its enrollment. Version 1.2.3 fixes the issue.
- Record
CVE-2026-114611- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-295
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
9.1
OCO-Server: MDM /profile endpoint accepts self-signed PKCS#7 signatures (PKCS7_NOVERIFY): device MDM identity (certificate + private key) disclosure and device-record hijack
OCO-Server is a self-hosted endpoint management application for computer inventory, software deployment, and mobile device management. Prior to 1.2.3,the Apple MDM enrollment endpoint frontend/api-mdm.php verifies the signed enrollment-request plist with openssl_pkcs7_verify(..., PKCS7_NOVERIFY, ...). PKCS7_NOVERIFY disables signer certificate chain and trust validation, so the signature only has to be self-consistent with whatever certificate is embedded in the PKCS#7 blob. A self-signed certificate from an unrelated attacker is accepted. Because the endpoint trusts the SERIAL field taken from the unverified payload, anyone who knows a registered device's serial number can sign a forged plist (SERIAL = victim device, attacker-chosen UDID) with an arbitrary self-signed certificate; POST it unauthenticated to /api-mdm.php/profile (Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature); and receive the victim device's freshly minted MDM identity: a certificate with CN=<serial> issued by the server's internal MDM device CA, bundled with its private key in a PKCS#12 payload inside the returned .mobileconfig enrollment profile. Additionally, the victim's mobile_device database row is silently overwritten with the attacker-supplied UDID (device-record hijack). With the stolen certificate and key, the attacker can impersonate the victim device on all subsequent MDM traffic (/checkin, /mdm, /parameters), which authenticate callers by the certificate CN (the serial number) via checkSignature() in the same file. This yields control over the victim device's MDM relationship: reading its management data, replacing its push token, and disrupting or redirecting its enrollment. Version 1.2.3 fixes the issue.
- Record
CVE-2026-114611- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-295
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-114611 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.1) in Schorschii Oco-server, published October 22, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.32%, the 25th percentile. No source names a fixed version.
References
github.com/schorschii/OCO-Server/security/advisories/GHSA-p549-5h7r-7639
github.com/schorschii/OCO-Server/commit/5cab5ad2461434816d706b7be9cc08bda15c1404
github.com/schorschii/OCO-Server/commit/f3a6591136f9bd92aff39ddfb26587e6dfdb64df
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/114xxx/CVE-2026-114611.json
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-114611