Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-12490

Bypass of client certificate verification with transfer over TLS

8.2 HighFix available

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.22%Up 0.1 points since Jun 25, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.2

Bypass of client certificate verification with transfer over TLS

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.

Record
CVE-2026-12490
CVSS 4.0
8.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-306, CWE-284
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-39185 8.2

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.

Record
EUVD-2026-39185
CVSS 4.0
8.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-27xx-c7vg-hjjj 8.2

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should...

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.

Record
GHSA-27xx-c7vg-hjjj
CVSS 4.0
8.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-284
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.2

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.

Record
CVE-2026-12490
CVSS 4.0
8.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-284, CWE-306
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2026-12490 7.5

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.

Record
ALPINE-CVE-2026-12490
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 7.5

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.

Record
CVE-2026-12490
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 4 moreShow less
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-12490 7.5

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.

Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-12490
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-12490 8.2

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.

Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-12490
CVSS 4.0
8.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:11395-1 No score

nsd-4.14.3-1.1 on GA media

These are all security issues fixed in the nsd-4.14.3-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.

Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:11395-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21502-1 No score

Security update for nsd

This update for nsd fixes the following issues:

Changes in nsd:

Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21502-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
nsd
Alpine:v3.24
before 4.14.3-r0
4.14.3-r0
nsd
Debian:12
All versions, plus listed versions
4.10.1-14.10.1~rc2-14.10.1~rc2-24.11.0-14.11.1-1
Show 22 moreShow less
4.12.0-14.12.0-24.13.0-14.13.0-24.13.0-34.13.0-44.13.0-54.13.0-64.14.0-14.14.1-14.14.2-14.14.3-14.15.0-14.15.0~rc1-14.15.1-14.15.2-14.15.3-14.15.4-14.6.1-14.7.0-14.8.0-14.9.1-1
None known
nsd
Debian:13
All versions, plus listed versions
4.12.0-14.12.0-24.13.0-14.13.0-24.13.0-3
Show 13 moreShow less
4.13.0-44.13.0-54.13.0-64.14.0-14.14.1-14.14.2-14.14.3-14.15.0-14.15.0~rc1-14.15.1-14.15.2-14.15.3-14.15.4-1
None known
nsd
Debian:14
before 4.14.3-1, plus listed versions
4.12.0-14.12.0-24.13.0-14.13.0-24.13.0-3
Show 6 moreShow less
4.13.0-44.13.0-54.13.0-64.14.0-14.14.1-14.14.2-1
4.14.3-1
nsd
Ubuntu:26.10
All versions, plus listed versions
4.14.0-14.14.2-14.14.3-14.15.0-14.15.0-1build1
None known
nsd
Ubuntu:Pro:26.04:LTS
before 4.14.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1, plus listed versions
4.12.0-14.13.0-64.14.0-1
4.14.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1
nsd
openSUSE:Tumbleweed
From an advisory covering 4 CVEs
before 4.14.3-1.1
4.14.3-1.1
nsd
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 4 CVEs
before 4.14.3-bp160.1.1
4.14.3-bp160.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-12490 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.2) in Nlnet Labs Nsd, published June 25, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.22%, the 12th percentile. Fixed in nsd 4.14.3-r0.

References

Show 10 moreShow less
MoveEnter Open