Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-23990

Flux Operator Web UI Impersonation Bypass via Empty OIDC Claims

5.3 MediumFix available

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., email, groups), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting username and groups values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.44%Up 0.4 points since Jan 22, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 5.3

Flux Operator Web UI Impersonation Bypass via Empty OIDC Claims

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., email, groups), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting username and groups values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Record
CVE-2026-23990
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-269, CWE-862
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-4140 5.3

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., email, groups), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting username and groups values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Record
EUVD-2026-4140
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-4xh5-jcj2-ch8q 5.3

Flux Operator Web UI Impersonation Bypass via Empty OIDC Claims

A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges.

After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting username and groups values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions.

Impact

  • Privilege Escalation: Any authenticated user can escalate to operator-level read permissions and perform suspend/resume/reconcile actions
  • Data Exposure: Unauthorized read access to Flux resources across all namespaces, bypassing RBAC restrictions
  • Information Disclosure: View sensitive GitOps pipeline configurations, source URLs, and deployment status across the entire cluster

Attack Scenario

Prerequisite: Cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., email, groups), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values.

  1. Cluster admin configures OIDC authentication with a provider that does not include email or groups claims in tokens
  2. User authenticates with a valid token from that provider
  3. The default CEL expressions evaluate to empty values:
    • Username: has(claims.email) ? claims.email : '' → ""
    • Groups: has(claims.groups) ? claims.groups : [] → []
  4. Authentication succeeds (token signature is valid)
  5. A userClient is created with empty impersonation config
  6. All subsequent API requests bypass impersonation and execute as the flux-operator service account
  7. User gains operator-level read access across all namespaces

Patches

This vulnerability was fixed in Flux Operator v0.40.0.

Workarounds

The workaround is to make the email and groups claims required in the web config impersonation section.

Example config:

apiVersion: web.fluxcd.controlplane.io/v1
kind: Config
spec:
  baseURL: https://flux.example.com
  authentication:
    type: OAuth2
    oauth2:
      provider: OIDC
      clientID: "<redacted>"
      clientSecret: "<redacted>"
      issuerURL: "https://login.microsoftonline.com/<redacted>/v2.0"
      scopes: [openid, profile, email, offline_access]
      impersonation:
        username: claims.email
        groups: claims.groups

References

See the Pull Request fixing this vulnerability https://github.com/controlplaneio-fluxcd/flux-operator/pull/610

Credits

This vulnerability was discovered by the Flux Operator maintainers during a debugging session with end-users.

Record
GHSA-4xh5-jcj2-ch8q
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-269, CWE-862
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 5.3

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., email, groups), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting username and groups values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Record
CVE-2026-23990
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-269, CWE-862
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 5.3

Flux Operator Web UI Impersonation Bypass via Empty OIDC Claims

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., email, groups), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting username and groups values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Record
CVE-2026-23990
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-269, CWE-862
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-4xh5-jcj2-ch8q 5.3

Flux Operator Web UI Impersonation Bypass via Empty OIDC Claims

A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges.

After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting username and groups values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions.

Impact

  • Privilege Escalation: Any authenticated user can escalate to operator-level read permissions and perform suspend/resume/reconcile actions
  • Data Exposure: Unauthorized read access to Flux resources across all namespaces, bypassing RBAC restrictions
  • Information Disclosure: View sensitive GitOps pipeline configurations, source URLs, and deployment status across the entire cluster

Attack Scenario

Prerequisite: Cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., email, groups), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values.

  1. Cluster admin configures OIDC authentication with a provider that does not include email or groups claims in tokens
  2. User authenticates with a valid token from that provider
  3. The default CEL expressions evaluate to empty values:
    • Username: has(claims.email) ? claims.email : '' → ""
    • Groups: has(claims.groups) ? claims.groups : [] → []
  4. Authentication succeeds (token signature is valid)
  5. A userClient is created with empty impersonation config
  6. All subsequent API requests bypass impersonation and execute as the flux-operator service account
  7. User gains operator-level read access across all namespaces

Patches

This vulnerability was fixed in Flux Operator v0.40.0.

Workarounds

The workaround is to make the email and groups claims required in the web config impersonation section.

Example config:

apiVersion: web.fluxcd.controlplane.io/v1
kind: Config
spec:
  baseURL: https://flux.example.com
  authentication:
    type: OAuth2
    oauth2:
      provider: OIDC
      clientID: "<redacted>"
      clientSecret: "<redacted>"
      issuerURL: "https://login.microsoftonline.com/<redacted>/v2.0"
      scopes: [openid, profile, email, offline_access]
      impersonation:
        username: claims.email
        groups: claims.groups

References

See the Pull Request fixing this vulnerability https://github.com/controlplaneio-fluxcd/flux-operator/pull/610

Credits

This vulnerability was discovered by the Flux Operator maintainers during a debugging session with end-users.

Record
GHSA-4xh5-jcj2-ch8q
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-269, CWE-862
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-4351 No score

Flux Operator Web UI Impersonation Bypass via Empty OIDC Claims in github.com/controlplaneio-fluxcd/flux-operator

Flux Operator Web UI Impersonation Bypass via Empty OIDC Claims in github.com/controlplaneio-fluxcd/flux-operator

Record
GO-2026-4351
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
  • GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
  • GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
  • GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
  • GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
  • GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
  • GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
  • GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
  • GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
  • GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
  • GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
  • GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
  • GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
  • GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
  • GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
  • GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
  • GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
  • GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
  • GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
  • GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
  • GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
  • GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
  • GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
  • GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
  • GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
  • GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
  • GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
  • GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
  • GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
  • GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
  • GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
  • GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
  • GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
  • GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
  • GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
  • GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
  • GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
  • GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
  • GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
  • GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
  • GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
  • GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
  • GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
  • GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
  • GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
  • GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
  • GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
  • GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
  • GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
  • GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
  • GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
  • GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
  • GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
  • GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
  • GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
  • GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
  • GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
  • GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
  • GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
  • GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
  • GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
  • GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
  • GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
  • GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
  • GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
  • GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
  • GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
  • GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
  • GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
  • GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
  • GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
  • GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
  • GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
  • GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
  • GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
  • GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
  • GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:0403-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260205T172317 2026-02-05T17:23:17Z. Refs jsc#PED-11136 Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-4337 CVE-2025-68121
    • GO-2026-4357 CVE-2026-23954 GHSA-7f67-crqm-jgh7
    • GO-2026-4359 CVE-2026-23953 GHSA-x6jc-phwx-hp32
    • GO-2026-4395 CVE-2026-25499 GHSA-gwch-7m8v-7544
    • GO-2026-4396 CVE-2026-25059 GHSA-qmj2-8r24-xxcq
    • GO-2026-4397 CVE-2026-25060 GHSA-wf93-3ghh-h389
    • GO-2026-4398 GHSA-grh9-37g7-53mj
    • GO-2026-4403 CVE-2025-22873
    • GO-2026-4404 CVE-2025-70849 GHSA-mw8w-q3f7-2v85
    • GO-2026-4405 CVE-2026-25121 GHSA-5g94-c2wx-8pxw
    • GO-2026-4406 CVE-2026-25122 GHSA-6p9p-q6wh-9j89
    • GO-2026-4407 CVE-2026-24843 GHSA-qxx2-7h4c-83f4
    • GO-2026-4408 CVE-2026-24844 GHSA-vqqr-rmpc-hhg2
    • GO-2026-4409 CVE-2026-25145 GHSA-2w4f-9fgg-q2v9
    • GO-2026-4411 CVE-2026-25579 GHSA-hrr4-3wgr-68x3
    • GO-2026-4412 CVE-2026-25143 GHSA-rf4g-89h5-crcr
    • GO-2026-4413 CVE-2026-25578 GHSA-rh3r-8pxm-hg4w
    • GO-2026-4414 CVE-2026-25160 GHSA-8jmm-3xwx-w974
    • GO-2026-4415 CVE-2026-25161 GHSA-x4q4-7phh-42j9
    • GO-2026-4416 CVE-2026-25538 GHSA-8wpc-j9q9-j5m2
    • GO-2026-4417 CVE-2026-24514 GHSA-2pf9-vr92-6h3v
    • GO-2026-4418 CVE-2023-43631 GHSA-3mq9-xhgq-r7gj
    • GO-2026-4419 CVE-2026-24513 GHSA-4g2f-xcph-2335
    • GO-2026-4421 CVE-2026-24735 GHSA-5w5r-8xc6-2xhw
    • GO-2026-4422 CVE-2023-43632 GHSA-6jp5-grgh-jw42
    • GO-2026-4423 CVE-2026-1580 GHSA-9h3p-52vh-959w
    • GO-2026-4425 CVE-2025-62878 GHSA-jr3w-9vfr-c746
    • GO-2026-4426 CVE-2026-24512 GHSA-jx8c-56mg-h6vp
    • GO-2026-4428 CVE-2023-43633 GHSA-4c4v-42hc-72p6
    • GO-2026-4430 CVE-2023-43630 GHSA-phcg-h58r-gmcq
    • GO-2026-4432 CVE-2023-43634 GHSA-wc42-fcjp-v8vq
    • GO-2026-4433 CVE-2025-61732
    • GO-2026-4440 CVE-2025-47911
    • GO-2026-4441 CVE-2025-58190

  • Update to version 0.0.20260204T190754 2026-02-04T19:07:54Z. Refs jsc#PED-11136 Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-4324 CVE-2026-23645 GHSA-pcjq-j3mq-jv5j
    • GO-2026-4327 CVE-2026-23742 GHSA-cc8m-98fm-rc9g
    • GO-2026-4329 CVE-2026-21696 GHSA-2497-gp99-2m74
    • GO-2026-4330 CVE-2026-22822 GHSA-77v3-r3jw-j2v2
    • GO-2026-4331 CVE-2025-69199 GHSA-8w7m-w749-rx98
    • GO-2026-4333 CVE-2026-23829 GHSA-54wq-72mp-cq7c
    • GO-2026-4334 CVE-2026-23517 GHSA-4r5r-ccr6-q6f6
    • GO-2026-4335 CVE-2026-23518 GHSA-63m5-974w-448v
    • GO-2026-4336 CVE-2026-22808 GHSA-gfpw-jgvr-cw4j
    • GO-2026-4343 CVE-2026-23847 GHSA-w836-5gpm-7r93
    • GO-2026-4344 CVE-2026-23849 GHSA-43mm-m3h2-3prc
    • GO-2026-4345 CVE-2026-23845 GHSA-6jxm-fv7w-rw5j
    • GO-2026-4346 CVE-2026-23851 GHSA-94c7-g2fj-7682
    • GO-2026-4347 CVE-2026-23850 GHSA-cv54-7wv7-qxcw
    • GO-2026-4348 CVE-2026-23991 GHSA-846p-jg2w-w324
    • GO-2026-4349 CVE-2026-23992 GHSA-fphv-w9fq-2525
    • GO-2026-4350 CVE-2026-23960 GHSA-cv78-6m8q-ph82
    • GO-2026-4351 CVE-2026-23990 GHSA-4xh5-jcj2-ch8q
    • GO-2026-4352 GHSA-r92c-9c7f-3pj8
    • GO-2026-4353 CVE-2026-24058 GHSA-pchf-49fh-w34r
    • GO-2026-4354 CVE-2026-23831 GHSA-273p-m2cw-6833
    • GO-2026-4355 CVE-2026-24117 GHSA-4c4x-jm2x-pf9j
    • GO-2026-4356 CVE-2026-24124 GHSA-j8hf-cp34-g4j7
    • GO-2026-4362 CVE-2026-20800 GHSA-2vgv-hgv4-22mh
    • GO-2026-4363 CVE-2026-20897 GHSA-393c-qgvj-3xph
    • GO-2026-4364 CVE-2026-20912 GHSA-4xx9-vc8v-87hv
    • GO-2026-4365 CVE-2026-0798 GHSA-8fwc-qjw5-rvgp
    • GO-2026-4366 CVE-2026-20888 GHSA-9cgq-wp42-4rpq
    • GO-2026-4367 CVE-2026-20736 GHSA-hgr3-x44x-33hx
    • GO-2026-4368 CVE-2026-20883 GHSA-j8xr-c56q-m8jj
    • GO-2026-4369 CVE-2026-20904 GHSA-qqgv-v353-cv8p
    • GO-2026-4370 CVE-2026-20750 GHSA-rw22-5hhq-pfpf
    • GO-2026-4377 CVE-2026-24686 GHSA-jqc5-w2xx-5vq4
    • GO-2026-4378 CVE-2026-24470 GHSA-mxxc-p822-2hx9
    • GO-2026-4379 CVE-2026-24738 GHSA-j49h-6577-5xwq
    • GO-2026-4380 CVE-2026-24740 GHSA-m855-r557-5rc5
    • GO-2026-4381 CVE-2026-22039 GHSA-8p9x-46gm-qfx2
    • GO-2026-4382 CVE-2026-23881 GHSA-r2rj-wwm5-x6mq
    • GO-2026-4384…
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:0403-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/controlplaneio-fluxcd/flux-operator
Go
 0.36.0 up to 0.40.0
0.40.0
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 15.6
From an advisory covering 76 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260205T172317-150000.1.146.1
0.0.20260205T172317-150000.1.146.1
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 1734 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1
0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-23990 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 5.3) in Control-plane Flux Operator, published January 21, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.44%, the 38th percentile. Fixed in github.com/controlplaneio-fluxcd/flux-operator 0.40.0.

References

Show 194 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 1,543 references and the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

Pages All vulnerabilities Browse Docs Sources Guide Get API key
MoveEnter Open