Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-27626

OliveTin vulnerable to OS Command Injection via `password` argument type and webhook JSON extraction bypasses shell safety checks

10.0 CriticalPublic exploitFix available

OliveTin gives access to predefined shell commands from a web interface. In versions up to and including 3000.10.0, OliveTin's shell mode safety check (checkShellArgumentSafety) blocks several dangerous argument types but not password. A user supplying a password-typed argument can inject shell metacharacters that execute arbitrary OS commands. A second independent vector allows unauthenticated RCE via webhook-extracted JSON values that skip type safety checks entirely before reaching sh -c. When exploiting vector 1, any authenticated user (registration enabled by default, authType: none by default) can execute arbitrary OS commands on the OliveTin host with the permissions of the OliveTin process. When exploiting vector 2, an unauthenticated attacker can achieve the same if the instance receives webhooks from external sources, which is a primary OliveTin use case. When an attacker exploits both vectors, this results in unauthenticated RCE on any OliveTin instance using Shell mode with webhook-triggered actions. As of time of publication, a patched version is not available.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

0.64%Up 0.6 points since Feb 25, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 10.0

OliveTin vulnerable to OS Command Injection via `password` argument type and webhook JSON extraction bypasses shell safety checks

OliveTin gives access to predefined shell commands from a web interface. In versions up to and including 3000.10.0, OliveTin's shell mode safety check (checkShellArgumentSafety) blocks several dangerous argument types but not password. A user supplying a password-typed argument can inject shell metacharacters that execute arbitrary OS commands. A second independent vector allows unauthenticated RCE via webhook-extracted JSON values that skip type safety checks entirely before reaching sh -c. When exploiting vector 1, any authenticated user (registration enabled by default, authType: none by default) can execute arbitrary OS commands on the OliveTin host with the permissions of the OliveTin process. When exploiting vector 2, an unauthenticated attacker can achieve the same if the instance receives webhooks from external sources, which is a primary OliveTin use case. When an attacker exploits both vectors, this results in unauthenticated RCE on any OliveTin instance using Shell mode with webhook-triggered actions. As of time of publication, a patched version is not available.

Record
CVE-2026-27626
CVSS 3.1
10.0 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-78
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-8600 10.0

OliveTin gives access to predefined shell commands from a web interface. In versions up to and including 3000.10.0, OliveTin's shell mode safety check (checkShellArgumentSafety) blocks several dangerous argument types but not password. A user supplying a password-typed argument can inject shell metacharacters that execute arbitrary OS commands. A second independent vector allows unauthenticated RCE via webhook-extracted JSON values that skip type safety checks entirely before reaching sh -c. When exploiting vector 1, any authenticated user (registration enabled by default, authType: none by default) can execute arbitrary OS commands on the OliveTin host with the permissions of the OliveTin process. When exploiting vector 2, an unauthenticated attacker can achieve the same if the instance receives webhooks from external sources, which is a primary OliveTin use case. When an attacker exploits both vectors, this results in unauthenticated RCE on any OliveTin instance using Shell mode with webhook-triggered actions. As of time of publication, a patched version is not available.

Record
EUVD-2026-8600
CVSS 3.1
10.0 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-49gm-hh7w-wfvf 9.9

OliveTin: OS Command Injection via `password` argument type and webhook JSON extraction bypasses shell safety checks

Summary

OliveTin's shell mode safety check (checkShellArgumentSafety) blocks several dangerous argument types but not password. A user supplying a password-typed argument can inject shell metacharacters that execute arbitrary OS commands. A second independent vector allows unauthenticated RCE via webhook-extracted JSON values that skip type safety checks entirely before reaching sh -c.

Details

Vector 1 — password type bypasses shell safety check (PR:L)

service/internal/executor/arguments.go has two gaps:

// Line 198-199 — TypeSafetyCheck returns nil (no error) for password type
case "password":
    return nil  // accepts ANY string including ; | ` $()

// Line 313 — checkShellArgumentSafety blocks dangerous types but not password
unsafe := map[string]bool{
    "url":                      true,
    "email":                    true,
    "raw_string_multiline":     true,
    "very_dangerous_raw_string": true,
    // "password" is absent — not blocked
}

Shell execution at service/internal/executor/executor_unix.go:18:

exec.CommandContext(ctx, "sh", "-c", finalParsedCommand)

A user supplies a password argument value of '; id; echo ' → sh -c interprets the shell metacharacters → arbitrary command execution.

This is not the "admin already has access" pattern: OliveTin explicitly enforces an admin/user boundary where admins define commands and users only supply argument values. The password type is the documented, intended mechanism for user-supplied sensitive values. The safety check exists precisely to prevent users from escaping this boundary — password is the one type it fails to block.

Vector 2 — Webhook JSON extraction skips TypeSafetyCheck entirely (PR:N)

service/internal/executor/handler.go:153-157 extracts arbitrary key-value pairs from webhook JSON payloads and injects them into ExecutionRequest.Arguments. These webhook-extracted arguments have no corresponding config-defined ActionArgument entry, so parseActionArguments() in arguments.go finds no type to check against and skips TypeSafetyCheck entirely. The values are templated directly into the shell command and passed to sh -c.

Example: an admin command template git pull && echo {{ git_message }} with Shell mode enabled. A webhook POST with {"git_message": "x; id"} injects id into the shell command. The webhook endpoint is unauthenticated by default (authType: none in default config).

PoC

# Vector 1 — authenticated user with password-type argument
curl -X POST http://localhost:1337/api/StartAction \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"actionId": "run-command", "arguments": [{"name": "pass", "value": "'; id; echo '"}]}'

# Vector 2 — unauthenticated webhook
curl -X POST http://localhost:1337/webhook/git-deploy \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"git_message": "x; id #", "git_author": "attacker"}'

Confirmed on jamesread/olivetin:latest (3000.10.0), 3/3 runs. Both vectors produced uid=1000(olivetin) output and arbitrary file write to /tmp/pwned.

Impact

  • Vector 1: Any authenticated user (registration enabled by default, authType: none by default) can execute arbitrary OS commands on the OliveTin host with the permissions of the OliveTin process.
  • Vector 2: Unauthenticated attacker can achieve the same if the instance receives webhooks from external sources, which is a primary OliveTin use case.

Combined: unauthenticated RCE on any OliveTin instance using Shell mode with webhook-triggered actions.

Record
GHSA-49gm-hh7w-wfvf
CVSS 3.1
9.9 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-78
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 9.9

OliveTin gives access to predefined shell commands from a web interface. In versions up to and including 3000.10.0, OliveTin's shell mode safety check (checkShellArgumentSafety) blocks several dangerous argument types but not password. A user supplying a password-typed argument can inject shell metacharacters that execute arbitrary OS commands. A second independent vector allows unauthenticated RCE via webhook-extracted JSON values that skip type safety checks entirely before reaching sh -c. When exploiting vector 1, any authenticated user (registration enabled by default, authType: none by default) can execute arbitrary OS commands on the OliveTin host with the permissions of the OliveTin process. When exploiting vector 2, an unauthenticated attacker can achieve the same if the instance receives webhooks from external sources, which is a primary OliveTin use case. When an attacker exploits both vectors, this results in unauthenticated RCE on any OliveTin instance using Shell mode with webhook-triggered actions. As of time of publication, a patched version is not available.

Record
CVE-2026-27626
CVSS 3.1
9.9 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-78
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 9.9

OliveTin vulnerable to OS Command Injection via `password` argument type and webhook JSON extraction bypasses shell safety checks

OliveTin gives access to predefined shell commands from a web interface. In versions up to and including 3000.10.0, OliveTin's shell mode safety check (checkShellArgumentSafety) blocks several dangerous argument types but not password. A user supplying a password-typed argument can inject shell metacharacters that execute arbitrary OS commands. A second independent vector allows unauthenticated RCE via webhook-extracted JSON values that skip type safety checks entirely before reaching sh -c. When exploiting vector 1, any authenticated user (registration enabled by default, authType: none by default) can execute arbitrary OS commands on the OliveTin host with the permissions of the OliveTin process. When exploiting vector 2, an unauthenticated attacker can achieve the same if the instance receives webhooks from external sources, which is a primary OliveTin use case. When an attacker exploits both vectors, this results in unauthenticated RCE on any OliveTin instance using Shell mode with webhook-triggered actions. As of time of publication, a patched version is not available.

Record
CVE-2026-27626
CVSS 3.1
9.9 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-78
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-49gm-hh7w-wfvf 9.9

OliveTin: OS Command Injection via `password` argument type and webhook JSON extraction bypasses shell safety checks

Summary

OliveTin's shell mode safety check (checkShellArgumentSafety) blocks several dangerous argument types but not password. A user supplying a password-typed argument can inject shell metacharacters that execute arbitrary OS commands. A second independent vector allows unauthenticated RCE via webhook-extracted JSON values that skip type safety checks entirely before reaching sh -c.

Details

Vector 1 — password type bypasses shell safety check (PR:L)

service/internal/executor/arguments.go has two gaps:

// Line 198-199 — TypeSafetyCheck returns nil (no error) for password type
case "password":
    return nil  // accepts ANY string including ; | ` $()

// Line 313 — checkShellArgumentSafety blocks dangerous types but not password
unsafe := map[string]bool{
    "url":                      true,
    "email":                    true,
    "raw_string_multiline":     true,
    "very_dangerous_raw_string": true,
    // "password" is absent — not blocked
}

Shell execution at service/internal/executor/executor_unix.go:18:

exec.CommandContext(ctx, "sh", "-c", finalParsedCommand)

A user supplies a password argument value of '; id; echo ' → sh -c interprets the shell metacharacters → arbitrary command execution.

This is not the "admin already has access" pattern: OliveTin explicitly enforces an admin/user boundary where admins define commands and users only supply argument values. The password type is the documented, intended mechanism for user-supplied sensitive values. The safety check exists precisely to prevent users from escaping this boundary — password is the one type it fails to block.

Vector 2 — Webhook JSON extraction skips TypeSafetyCheck entirely (PR:N)

service/internal/executor/handler.go:153-157 extracts arbitrary key-value pairs from webhook JSON payloads and injects them into ExecutionRequest.Arguments. These webhook-extracted arguments have no corresponding config-defined ActionArgument entry, so parseActionArguments() in arguments.go finds no type to check against and skips TypeSafetyCheck entirely. The values are templated directly into the shell command and passed to sh -c.

Example: an admin command template git pull && echo {{ git_message }} with Shell mode enabled. A webhook POST with {"git_message": "x; id"} injects id into the shell command. The webhook endpoint is unauthenticated by default (authType: none in default config).

PoC

# Vector 1 — authenticated user with password-type argument
curl -X POST http://localhost:1337/api/StartAction \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"actionId": "run-command", "arguments": [{"name": "pass", "value": "'; id; echo '"}]}'

# Vector 2 — unauthenticated webhook
curl -X POST http://localhost:1337/webhook/git-deploy \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"git_message": "x; id #", "git_author": "attacker"}'

Confirmed on jamesread/olivetin:latest (3000.10.0), 3/3 runs. Both vectors produced uid=1000(olivetin) output and arbitrary file write to /tmp/pwned.

Impact

  • Vector 1: Any authenticated user (registration enabled by default, authType: none by default) can execute arbitrary OS commands on the OliveTin host with the permissions of the OliveTin process.
  • Vector 2: Unauthenticated attacker can achieve the same if the instance receives webhooks from external sources, which is a primary OliveTin use case.

Combined: unauthenticated RCE on any OliveTin instance using Shell mode with webhook-triggered actions.

Record
GHSA-49gm-hh7w-wfvf
CVSS 3.1
9.9 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-78
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-4547 No score

OliveTin: OS Command Injection via `password` argument type and webhook JSON extraction bypasses shell safety checks in github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin

OliveTin: OS Command Injection via password argument type and webhook JSON extraction bypasses shell safety checks in github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin

Record
GO-2026-4547
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
  • GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
  • GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
  • GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
  • GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
  • GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
  • GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
  • GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
  • GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
  • GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
  • GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
  • GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
  • GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
  • GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
  • GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
  • GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
  • GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
  • GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
  • GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
  • GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
  • GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
  • GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
  • GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
  • GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
  • GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
  • GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
  • GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
  • GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
  • GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
  • GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
  • GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
  • GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
  • GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
  • GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
  • GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
  • GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
  • GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
  • GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
  • GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
  • GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
  • GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
  • GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
  • GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
  • GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
  • GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
  • GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
  • GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
  • GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
  • GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
  • GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
  • GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
  • GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
  • GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
  • GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
  • GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
  • GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
  • GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
  • GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
  • GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
  • GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
  • GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
  • GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
  • GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
  • GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
  • GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
  • GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
  • GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
  • GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
  • GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
  • GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
  • GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
  • GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
  • GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
  • GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
  • GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
  • GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
  • GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:0757-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

Update to version 0.0.20260226T182644 2026-02-26T18:26:44Z (jsc#PED-11136) Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2025-4259 CVE-2025-13767 GHSA-fmqf-pmcm-8cx9
  • GO-2025-4260 CVE-2025-64641 GHSA-vww6-79rv-3j4x
  • GO-2026-4282 CVE-2017-18873 GHSA-x6mw-hf2j-vqpc
  • GO-2026-4305 CVE-2017-18903 GHSA-fcwg-45jh-5qhf
  • GO-2026-4325 CVE-2025-14822 GHSA-9r42-rhw3-2222
  • GO-2026-4326 CVE-2025-14435 GHSA-mx8m-v8qm-xwr8
  • GO-2026-4332 CVE-2026-23644 GHSA-2657-3c98-63jq
  • GO-2026-4348 CVE-2026-23991 GHSA-846p-jg2w-w324
  • GO-2026-4349 CVE-2026-23992 GHSA-fphv-w9fq-2525
  • GO-2026-4377 CVE-2026-24686 GHSA-jqc5-w2xx-5vq4
  • GO-2026-4410 CVE-2026-25140 GHSA-f4w5-5xv9-85f6
  • GO-2026-4502 CVE-2026-25766 GHSA-pgvm-wxw2-hrv9
  • GO-2026-4534 CVE-2026-25899 GHSA-2mr3-m5q5-wgp6
  • GO-2026-4535 CVE-2026-27585 GHSA-4xrr-hq4w-6vf4
  • GO-2026-4536 CVE-2026-27590 GHSA-5r3v-vc8m-m96g
  • GO-2026-4537 CVE-2026-27589 GHSA-879p-475x-rqh2
  • GO-2026-4538 CVE-2026-27587 GHSA-g7pc-pc7g-h8jh
  • GO-2026-4539 CVE-2026-27586 GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7
  • GO-2026-4540 CVE-2026-25891 GHSA-m3c2-496v-cw3v
  • GO-2026-4541 CVE-2026-27588 GHSA-x76f-jf84-rqj8
  • GO-2026-4543 CVE-2026-25882 GHSA-mrq8-rjmw-wpq3
  • GO-2026-4559 CVE-2026-27141

Update to version 0.0.20260225T230704 2026-02-25T23:07:04Z.

  • GO-2026-4358 CVE-2026-24137 GHSA-fcv2-xgw5-pqxf
  • GO-2026-4361 GHSA-c32p-wcqj-j677
  • GO-2026-4394 CVE-2026-24051 GHSA-9h8m-3fm2-qjrq
  • GO-2026-4399 CVE-2026-25518 GHSA-gx3x-vq4p-mhhv
  • GO-2026-4507 CVE-2026-26314 GHSA-2gjw-fg97-vg3r
  • GO-2026-4508 CVE-2026-26313 GHSA-689v-6xwf-5jf3
  • GO-2026-4509 CVE-2026-27017 GHSA-7m29-f4hw-g2vx
  • GO-2026-4511 CVE-2026-26315 GHSA-m6j8-rg6r-7mv8
  • GO-2026-4512 CVE-2026-26995 GHSA-rrxv-pmq9-x67r
  • GO-2026-4531 CVE-2026-25591 GHSA-w6x6-9fp7-fqm4
  • GO-2026-4532 CVE-2026-25802 GHSA-299v-8pq9-5gjq
  • GO-2026-4533 CVE-2026-27571 GHSA-qrvq-68c2-7grw
  • GO-2026-4542 CVE-2026-27598 GHSA-6v48-fcq6-ff23
  • GO-2026-4545 CVE-2025-50180 GHSA-3c9r-837r-qqm4
  • GO-2026-4546 CVE-2026-27611 GHSA-8vrh-3pm2-v4v6
  • GO-2026-4547 CVE-2026-27626 GHSA-49gm-hh7w-wfvf
  • GO-2026-4548 GHSA-2phg-qgmm-r638

Update to version 0.0.20260223T182315 2026-02-23T18:23:15Z.

  • GO-2026-4392 CVE-2026-24845 GHSA-9m43-p3cx-w8j5
  • GO-2026-4434 CVE-2023-43635 GHSA-4jvr-vj2c-8q37
  • GO-2026-4435 CVE-2023-43636 GHSA-5h7v-g49c-h887
  • GO-2026-4436 CVE-2023-43637 GHSA-g7vp-j25f-h34p
  • GO-2026-4442 GHSA-x9p2-77v6-6vhf
  • GO-2026-4444 CVE-2026-23989 GHSA-9j2f-3rj3-wgpg
  • GO-2026-4445 CVE-2026-25760 GHSA-2286-hxv5-cmp2
  • GO-2026-4446 CVE-2026-24851 GHSA-jq9f-gm9w-rwm9
  • GO-2026-4447 GHSA-vf5j-r2hw-2hrw
  • GO-2026-4448 CVE-2025-64111 GHSA-gg64-xxr9-qhjp
  • GO-2026-4449 CVE-2025-64175 GHSA-p6x6-9mx6-26wj
  • GO-2026-4450 CVE-2026-23632 GHSA-5qhx-gwfj-6jqr
  • GO-2026-4451 CVE-2026-22592 GHSA-cr88-6mqm-4g57
  • GO-2026-4452 CVE-2026-24135 GHSA-jp7c-wj6q-3qf2
  • GO-2026-4453 CVE-2026-23633 GHSA-mrph-w4hh-gx3g
  • GO-2026-4454 GHSA-26gq-grmh-6xm6
  • GO-2026-4455 CVE-2025-70963 GHSA-9f8m-9547-2gqm
  • GO-2026-4456 CVE-2025-13523 GHSA-ffx7-34p2-vm3w
  • GO-2026-4457 CVE-2025-65852 GHSA-rjv5-9px2-fqw6
  • GO-2026-4458 CVE-2026-25793 GHSA-69x3-g4r3-p962
  • GO-2026-4459 CVE-2017-18907 GHSA-42x9-rr3c-gr59
  • GO-2026-4460 CVE-2017-18918 GHSA-5ghq-28r7-qwfj
  • GO-2026-4461 CVE-2026-25804 GHSA-86x4-wp9f-wrr9
  • GO-2026-4462 CVE-2017-18915 GHSA-hxxj-8phw-74vw
  • GO-2026-4463 CVE-2017-18917 GHSA-jxc4-w54c-qv5r
  • GO-2026-4464 CVE-2017-18911 GHSA-m462-mqw4-2c8m
  • GO-2026-4465 GHSA-vhvq-fv9f-wh4q
  • GO-2026-4466 CVE-2026-25791 GHSA-wxrw-gvg8-fqjp
  • GO-2026-4467 CVE-2017-18916 GHSA-x33g-375j-jhf7
  • GO-2026-4471 CVE-2025-66630 GHSA-68rr-p4fp-j59v
  • GO-2026-4473 CVE-2026-25934 GHSA-37cx-329c-33x3
  • GO-2026-4474 CVE-2026-25890 GHSA-4mh3-h929-w968
  • GO-2026-4475 CVE-2026-25889 GHSA-hxw8-4h9j-hq2r
  • GO-2026-4476 CVE-2017-18908…
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:0757-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin
Go
 before 0.0.0-20260222101908-4bbd2eab1532
0.0.0-20260222101908-4bbd2eab1532
github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin
Go
 All versions None known
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 15.6
From an advisory covering 104 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260226T182644-150000.1.149.1
0.0.20260226T182644-150000.1.149.1
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 1734 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1
0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1

Public exploits

Links only. Every CVE stores no exploit code.

Public exploits
SourceLinkDate
PoC in GitHub0xh7ml/CVE-2026-27626-PoC2026-06-30
PoC in GitHubCobrastrike62/CVE-2026-27626-POC2026-07-10
PoC in GitHubabdelhakimgaferNetworkSec/Enigm-Writeup2026-09-23
PoC in GitHubShisones/CVE-2026-276262026-10-11

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, exploits, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV, PoC in GitHub

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-27626 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 10.0) in Olivetin, published February 25, 2026. Public exploit code exists. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.64%, the 50th percentile. Fixed in github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin 0.0.0-20260222101908-4bbd2eab1532.

References

Show 194 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 1,542 references and the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

Pages All vulnerabilities Browse Docs Sources Guide Get API key
MoveEnter Open