CVE-2026-28388
NULL Pointer Dereference When Processing a Delta CRL
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
NVD Score used
7.5
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
CVE-2026-28388- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-476
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
CVE List
7.5
NULL Pointer Dereference When Processing a Delta CRL
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
CVE-2026-28388- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-476
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-19962
7.5
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
EUVD-2026-19962- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-rpg5-467j-c25q
7.5
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL...
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
GHSA-rpg5-467j-c25q- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-476
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2026-28388
7.5
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2026-28388- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBELL-CVE-2026-28388
7.5
- Record
BELL-CVE-2026-28388- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 48 moreShow less
OSV
7.5
NULL Pointer Dereference When Processing a Delta CRL
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
CVE-2026-28388- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-476
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-28388
7.5
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing. Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application. When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference. Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it. The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-28388- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVJLSEC-2026-273
7.5
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in
the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a
freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and
an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
JLSEC-2026-273- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2041
7.5
openssl security update
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyAgreeRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyAgreeRecipientInfo is processed, the optional parameters field of KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing.
Applications and services that call CMS_decrypt() on untrusted input (e.g., S/MIME processing or CMS-based protocols) are vulnerable.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28389)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyTransportRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyTransportRecipientInfo with RSA-OAEP encryption is processed, the optional parameters field of RSA-OAEP SourceFunc algorithm identifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing.
Applications and services that call…
- Record
OESA-2026-2041- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2042
7.5
openssl security update
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyAgreeRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyAgreeRecipientInfo is processed, the optional parameters field of KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing.
Applications and services that call CMS_decrypt() on untrusted input (e.g., S/MIME processing or CMS-based protocols) are vulnerable.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28389)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyTransportRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyTransportRecipientInfo with RSA-OAEP encryption is processed, the optional parameters field of RSA-OAEP SourceFunc algorithm identifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing.
Applications and services that call…
- Record
OESA-2026-2042- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2043
7.5
openssl security update
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyAgreeRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyAgreeRecipientInfo is processed, the optional parameters field of KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing.
Applications and services that call CMS_decrypt() on untrusted input (e.g., S/MIME processing or CMS-based protocols) are vulnerable.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28389)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyTransportRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyTransportRecipientInfo with RSA-OAEP encryption is processed, the optional parameters field of RSA-OAEP SourceFunc algorithm identifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing.
Applications and services that call…
- Record
OESA-2026-2043- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2044
7.5
openssl security update
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyAgreeRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyAgreeRecipientInfo is processed, the optional parameters field of KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing.
Applications and services that call CMS_decrypt() on untrusted input (e.g., S/MIME processing or CMS-based protocols) are vulnerable.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28389)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyTransportRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyTransportRecipientInfo with RSA-OAEP encryption is processed, the optional parameters field of RSA-OAEP SourceFunc algorithm identifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing.
Applications and services that call…
- Record
OESA-2026-2044- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2045
7.5
openssl security update
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyAgreeRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyAgreeRecipientInfo is processed, the optional parameters field of KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing.
Applications and services that call CMS_decrypt() on untrusted input (e.g., S/MIME processing or CMS-based protocols) are vulnerable.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28389)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyTransportRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyTransportRecipientInfo with RSA-OAEP encryption is processed, the optional parameters field of RSA-OAEP SourceFunc algorithm identifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing.
Applications and services that call…
- Record
OESA-2026-2045- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2078
7.5
shim security update
Initial UEFI bootloader that handles chaining to a trusted full \ bootloader under secure boot environments.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
- Record
OESA-2026-2078- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2079
7.5
shim security update
Initial UEFI bootloader that handles chaining to a trusted full \ bootloader under secure boot environments.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
- Record
OESA-2026-2079- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2080
7.5
shim security update
Initial UEFI bootloader that handles chaining to a trusted full \ bootloader under secure boot environments.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
- Record
OESA-2026-2080- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2081
7.5
shim security update
Initial UEFI bootloader that handles chaining to a trusted full \ bootloader under secure boot environments.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
- Record
OESA-2026-2081- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2082
7.5
shim security update
Initial UEFI bootloader that handles chaining to a trusted full \ bootloader under secure boot environments.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
- Record
OESA-2026-2082- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2189
7.5
compat-openssl11 security update
OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: An invalid or NULL pointer dereference can happen in an application processing a malformed PKCS#12 file.
Impact summary: An application processing a malformed PKCS#12 file can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer on memory read, resulting in a Denial of Service.
A type confusion vulnerability exists in PKCS#12 parsing code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid pointer read.
The location is constrained to a 1-byte address space, meaning any attempted pointer manipulation can only target addresses between 0x00 and 0xFF. This range corresponds to the zero page, which is unmapped on most modern operating systems and will reliably result in a crash, leading only to a Denial of Service. Exploiting this issue also requires a user or application to process a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file. It is uncommon to accept untrusted PKCS#12 files in applications as they are usually used to store private keys which are trusted by definition. For these reasons, the issue was assessed as Low severity.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the PKCS12 implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.(CVE-2026-22795)
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module…
- Record
OESA-2026-2189- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2190
7.5
compat-openssl11 security update
OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: An invalid or NULL pointer dereference can happen in an application processing a malformed PKCS#12 file.
Impact summary: An application processing a malformed PKCS#12 file can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer on memory read, resulting in a Denial of Service.
A type confusion vulnerability exists in PKCS#12 parsing code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid pointer read.
The location is constrained to a 1-byte address space, meaning any attempted pointer manipulation can only target addresses between 0x00 and 0xFF. This range corresponds to the zero page, which is unmapped on most modern operating systems and will reliably result in a crash, leading only to a Denial of Service. Exploiting this issue also requires a user or application to process a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file. It is uncommon to accept untrusted PKCS#12 files in applications as they are usually used to store private keys which are trusted by definition. For these reasons, the issue was assessed as Low severity.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the PKCS12 implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.(CVE-2026-22795)
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module…
- Record
OESA-2026-2190- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2191
7.5
compat-openssl11 security update
OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: An invalid or NULL pointer dereference can happen in an application processing a malformed PKCS#12 file.
Impact summary: An application processing a malformed PKCS#12 file can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer on memory read, resulting in a Denial of Service.
A type confusion vulnerability exists in PKCS#12 parsing code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid pointer read.
The location is constrained to a 1-byte address space, meaning any attempted pointer manipulation can only target addresses between 0x00 and 0xFF. This range corresponds to the zero page, which is unmapped on most modern operating systems and will reliably result in a crash, leading only to a Denial of Service. Exploiting this issue also requires a user or application to process a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file. It is uncommon to accept untrusted PKCS#12 files in applications as they are usually used to store private keys which are trusted by definition. For these reasons, the issue was assessed as Low severity.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the PKCS12 implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.(CVE-2026-22795)
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module…
- Record
OESA-2026-2191- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2619
9.8
edk2 security update
EDK II is a modern, feature-rich, cross-platform firmware development environment for the UEFI and PI specifications.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyAgreeRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyAgreeRecipientInfo is processed, the optional parameters field of KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing.
Applications and services that call CMS_decrypt() on untrusted input (e.g., S/MIME processing or CMS-based protocols) are vulnerable.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28389)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyTransportRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyTransportRecipientInfo with RSA-OAEP encryption is processed, the optional parameters field of RSA-OAEP SourceFunc algorithm identifier is examined without checking for its…
- Record
OESA-2026-2619- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2620
8.1
edk2 security update
EDK II is a modern, feature-rich, cross-platform firmware development environment for the UEFI and PI specifications.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
- Record
OESA-2026-2620- CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2621
8.1
edk2 security update
EDK II is a modern, feature-rich, cross-platform firmware development environment for the UEFI and PI specifications.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
- Record
OESA-2026-2621- CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-2622
9.8
edk2 security update
EDK II is a modern, feature-rich, cross-platform firmware development environment for the UEFI and PI specifications.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate usage.
By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.
The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28388)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyAgreeRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyAgreeRecipientInfo is processed, the optional parameters field of KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing.
Applications and services that call CMS_decrypt() on untrusted input (e.g., S/MIME processing or CMS-based protocols) are vulnerable.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28389)
Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyTransportRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen.
Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service.
When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyTransportRecipientInfo with RSA-OAEP encryption is processed, the optional parameters field of RSA-OAEP SourceFunc algorithm identifier is examined without checking for its…
- Record
OESA-2026-2622- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:7261
9.8
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:7261- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVROOT-OS-ALPINE-315-CVE-2026-28388
7.5
CVE-2026-28388 in openssl - Patched by Root
Root has patched CVE-2026-28388 in the openssl package for Root:Alpine:3.15. Multiple fixed versions available.
- Record
ROOT-OS-ALPINE-315-CVE-2026-28388- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVROOT-OS-ALPINE-317-CVE-2026-28388
7.5
CVE-2026-28388 in openssl - Patched by Root
Root has patched CVE-2026-28388 in the openssl package for Root:Alpine:3.17. Multiple fixed versions available.
- Record
ROOT-OS-ALPINE-317-CVE-2026-28388- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVROOT-OS-DEBIAN-11-CVE-2026-28388
7.5
CVE-2026-28388 in rootio-openssl - Patched by Root
Root has patched CVE-2026-28388 in the rootio-openssl package for Root:Debian:11. Multiple fixed versions available.
- Record
ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-11-CVE-2026-28388- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-28388
7.5
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing. Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application. When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference. Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it. The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application. When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference. Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it. The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-28388- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-81953 No score
CVE-2026-28388 affecting package openssl for versions less than 3.3.5-5
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
AZL-81953- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-82100 No score
CVE-2026-28388 affecting package openssl-fips-provider 3.1.2-2
Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL Number extension is missing.
Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to a Denial of Service for an application.
When CRL processing and delta CRL processing is enabled during X.509 certificate verification, the delta CRL processing does not check whether the CRL Number extension is NULL before dereferencing it. When a malformed delta CRL file is being processed, this parameter can be NULL, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Exploiting this issue requires the X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS flag to be enabled in the verification context, the certificate being verified to contain a freshestCRL extension or the base CRL to have the EXFLAG_FRESHEST flag set, and an attacker to provide a malformed CRL to an application that processes it.
The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.
The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
AZL-82100- Updated
- 2026-11-05
OSVCLSA-2026-1777297012 No score
openssl: Fix of 3 CVEs
- CVE-2026-28388: fix NULL dereference in check_delta_base() when a Delta CRL lacks the CRL Number extension
- CVE-2026-28389: fix NULL dereference in dh/ecdh_cms_set_shared_info() when KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier has no parameters field
- CVE-2026-28390: fix NULL dereference in rsa_cms_decrypt() when the pSourceFunc X509_ALGOR has no parameters field
- Record
CLSA-2026-1777297012- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1777396609 No score
openssl: Fix of 3 CVEs
- CVE-2026-28388: fix NULL dereference in check_delta_base() when a Delta CRL lacks the CRL Number extension
- CVE-2026-28389: fix NULL dereference in dh/ecdh_cms_set_shared_info() when KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier has no parameters field
- CVE-2026-28390: fix NULL dereference in rsa_cms_decrypt() when the pSourceFunc X509_ALGOR has no parameters field
- Record
CLSA-2026-1777396609- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1777999127 No score
Fix CVE(s): CVE-2026-28387, CVE-2026-28388, CVE-2026-28389, CVE-2026-28390
- SECURITY UPDATE: fix UAF/double-free in DANE client by using X509_free() for dane->mcert
- debian/patches/CVE-2026-28387.patch: fix UAF/double-free in DANE client by using X509_free() for dane->mcert
- CVE-2026-28387
- SECURITY UPDATE: NULL check delta->crl_number before ASN1_INTEGER_cmp() in check_delta_base()
- debian/patches/CVE-2026-28388.patch: NULL check delta->crl_number before ASN1_INTEGER_cmp() in check_delta_base()
- CVE-2026-28388
- SECURITY UPDATE: NULL check alg->parameter in [ec]dh_cms_set_shared_info() before deref
- debian/patches/CVE-2026-28389.patch: NULL check alg->parameter in [ec]dh_cms_set_shared_info() before deref
- CVE-2026-28389
- SECURITY UPDATE: NULL check plab->parameter in rsa_cms_decrypt() before deref
- debian/patches/CVE-2026-28390.patch: NULL check plab->parameter in rsa_cms_decrypt() before deref
- CVE-2026-28390
- Record
CLSA-2026-1777999127- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1778020035 No score
openssl: Fix of CVE-2026-28388
- CVE-2026-28388: fix NULL pointer dereference in check_delta_base() when delta CRL lacks CRL Number extension
- Record
CLSA-2026-1778020035- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1778020314 No score
openssl: Fix of CVE-2026-28388
- CVE-2026-28388: fix NULL pointer dereference in check_delta_base() when delta CRL lacks CRL Number extension
- Record
CLSA-2026-1778020314- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1778061272 No score
openssl: Fix of CVE-2026-28388
- CVE-2026-28388: fix NULL pointer dereference in check_delta_base() when delta CRL lacks CRL Number extension
- Record
CLSA-2026-1778061272- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1778071148 No score
openssl: Fix of 5 CVEs
- CVE-2026-28387: fix use of OPENSSL_free instead of X509_free on dane->mcert in dane_match() (X509 reference-count bypass / UAF)
- CVE-2026-28388: fix NULL deref in check_delta_base when a delta CRL carries the Delta CRL Indicator extension but lacks a CRL Number
- CVE-2026-28389: fix NULL deref in dh_cms_set_shared_info / ecdh_cms_set_shared_info on absent CMS KARI parameters
- CVE-2026-31789: fix integer overflow in OPENSSL_buf2hexstr causing heap OOB write when converting > SIZE_MAX/3 bytes (32-bit builds)
- Record
CLSA-2026-1778071148- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1778583971 No score
Fix CVE(s): CVE-2026-28387, CVE-2026-28388
- SECURITY UPDATE: A use-after-free / heap corruption in dane_match() of
the X.509 verifier where the cached DANE-matched certificate was freed
via OPENSSL_free() instead of X509_free(), bypassing the X509 reference
counting and freeing certificate fields that may still be referenced by
other holders. An attacker able to influence the DANE TLSA records used
during certificate verification can trigger memory corruption.
- debian/patches/CVE-2026-28387.patch: replace OPENSSL_free(dane->mcert) with X509_free(dane->mcert) in dane_match() in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c.
- CVE-2026-28387
- SECURITY UPDATE: A NULL pointer dereference in check_delta_base() of
the X.509 CRL verifier when a delta CRL lacks the CRL Number extension.
A remote attacker controlling a delta CRL can trigger a crash, leading
to Denial of Service in applications using -crl_check with -use_deltas.
- debian/patches/CVE-2026-28388.patch: NULL-check delta->crl_number before passing it to ASN1_INTEGER_cmp() in check_delta_base() in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c, and ship the upstream test fixtures and verify recipe.
- CVE-2026-28388
- Record
CLSA-2026-1778583971- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1778787445 No score
Fix CVE(s): CVE-2026-28387, CVE-2026-28388, CVE-2026-28389
- SECURITY UPDATE: Use-after-free / heap corruption in dane_match() of
the X.509 verifier where the cached DANE-matched certificate was freed
via OPENSSL_free() instead of X509_free(), bypassing the X509 reference
counting and freeing certificate fields that may still be referenced by
other holders. An attacker able to influence the DANE TLSA records used
during certificate verification can trigger memory corruption.
- debian/patches/CVE-2026-28387.patch: replace OPENSSL_free(dane->mcert) with X509_free(dane->mcert) in dane_match() in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c.
- CVE-2026-28387
- SECURITY UPDATE: NULL pointer dereference in check_delta_base() of
the X.509 CRL verifier when a delta CRL lacks the CRL Number extension.
A remote attacker controlling a delta CRL can trigger a crash, leading
to denial of service in applications using -crl_check with -use_deltas.
- debian/patches/CVE-2026-28388.patch: NULL-check delta->crl_number before passing it to ASN1_INTEGER_cmp() in check_delta_base() in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c, and ship the upstream test fixtures and verify recipe.
- CVE-2026-28388
- SECURITY UPDATE: NULL pointer dereference in dh_cms_set_shared_info()
and ecdh_cms_set_shared_info() when a CMS KeyAgreeRecipientInfo has
no KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier parameters field, allowing a
remote attacker to trigger a denial of service via crafted CMS data.
- debian/patches/CVE-2026-28389.patch: NULL-check alg->parameter before accessing its type in crypto/dh/dh_ameth.c and crypto/ec/ec_ameth.c.
- CVE-2026-28389
- Record
CLSA-2026-1778787445- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1779094874 No score
Fix CVE(s): CVE-2026-28388, CVE-2026-28389
- SECURITY UPDATE: NULL pointer dereference in check_delta_base() when a
delta CRL is processed without the required CRL Number extension and
X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS is enabled, leading to a denial of service.
- debian/patches/CVE-2026-28388.patch: add NULL check for delta->crl_number before ASN1_INTEGER_cmp() in check_delta_base()
- CVE-2026-28388
- SECURITY UPDATE: NULL pointer dereference in dh_cms_set_shared_info()
and ecdh_cms_set_shared_info() when a CMS EnvelopedData message uses
KeyAgreeRecipientInfo with a KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier whose
optional parameter field is omitted, leading to a denial of service.
- debian/patches/CVE-2026-28389.patch: check alg->parameter for NULL before accessing its type field in dh_cms_set_shared_info() and ecdh_cms_set_shared_info()
- CVE-2026-28389
- Record
CLSA-2026-1779094874- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1780682107 No score
openssl11: Fix of 10 CVEs
- CVE-2021-3711: fix SM2 decryption buffer overflow; check the plaintext buffer is large enough when decrypting SM2; add extended tests for SM2
- CVE-2022-3996: fix X.509 policy constraints double-locking denial of service
- CVE-2023-0464: fix excessive resource use verifying X.509 policy constraints
- CVE-2023-0466: fix X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() does not enable policy check
- CVE-2023-2650: restrict the size of OBJECT IDENTIFIERs that OBJ_obj2txt translates
- CVE-2024-13176: fix timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computation
- CVE-2024-5535: validate provided client list in SSL_select_next_proto
- CVE-2025-9230: fix out-of-bounds read and write in RFC 3211 KEK unwrap
- CVE-2025-69419: fix one-byte write-before-buffer in PKCS#12 BMPString conversion
- CVE-2025-69421: fix NULL dereference in PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex()
- CVE-2026-28387: fix use-after-free / double-free in dane_match()
- CVE-2026-28388: fix NULL dereference in check_delta_base()
- CVE-2026-28389: fix NULL dereference in dh/ecdh_cms_set_shared_info()
- CVE-2026-28390: fix NULL dereference in rsa_cms_decrypt()
- Record
CLSA-2026-1780682107- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1780682108 No score
openssl11: Fix of 10 CVEs
- CVE-2021-3711: fix SM2 decryption buffer overflow; check the plaintext buffer is large enough when decrypting SM2; add extended tests for SM2
- CVE-2022-3996: fix X.509 policy constraints double-locking denial of service
- CVE-2023-0464: fix excessive resource use verifying X.509 policy constraints
- CVE-2023-0466: fix X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() does not enable policy check
- CVE-2023-2650: restrict the size of OBJECT IDENTIFIERs that OBJ_obj2txt translates
- CVE-2024-13176: fix timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computation
- CVE-2024-5535: validate provided client list in SSL_select_next_proto
- CVE-2025-9230: fix out-of-bounds read and write in RFC 3211 KEK unwrap
- CVE-2025-69419: fix one-byte write-before-buffer in PKCS#12 BMPString conversion
- CVE-2025-69421: fix NULL dereference in PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex()
- CVE-2026-28387: fix use-after-free / double-free in dane_match()
- CVE-2026-28388: fix NULL dereference in check_delta_base()
- CVE-2026-28389: fix NULL dereference in dh/ecdh_cms_set_shared_info()
- CVE-2026-28390: fix NULL dereference in rsa_cms_decrypt()
- Record
CLSA-2026-1780682108- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1780683040 No score
openssl11: Fix of 10 CVEs
- CVE-2021-3711: fix SM2 decryption buffer overflow; check the plaintext buffer is large enough when decrypting SM2; add extended tests for SM2
- CVE-2022-3996: fix X.509 policy constraints double-locking denial of service
- CVE-2023-0464: fix excessive resource use verifying X.509 policy constraints
- CVE-2023-0466: fix X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() does not enable policy check
- CVE-2023-2650: restrict the size of OBJECT IDENTIFIERs that OBJ_obj2txt translates
- CVE-2024-13176: fix timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computation
- CVE-2024-5535: validate provided client list in SSL_select_next_proto
- CVE-2025-9230: fix out-of-bounds read and write in RFC 3211 KEK unwrap
- CVE-2025-69419: fix one-byte write-before-buffer in PKCS#12 BMPString conversion
- CVE-2025-69421: fix NULL dereference in PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex()
- CVE-2026-28387: fix use-after-free / double-free in dane_match()
- CVE-2026-28388: fix NULL dereference in check_delta_base()
- CVE-2026-28389: fix NULL dereference in dh/ecdh_cms_set_shared_info()
- CVE-2026-28390: fix NULL dereference in rsa_cms_decrypt()
- Record
CLSA-2026-1780683040- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1785839292 No score
openssl: Fix of 5 CVEs
- CVE-2026-7383: fix signed integer overflow when sizing Unicode output in ASN1_mbstring_ncopy()
- CVE-2026-9076: fix heap out-of-bounds read in kek_unwrap_key() check-byte validation
- CVE-2026-28388: fix NULL pointer dereference when delta CRL lacks the CRL Number extension
- CVE-2026-34180: avoid length truncation in ASN1_STRING_set() when called from asn1_ex_c2i()
- CVE-2026-42766: fix NULL dereference when keyDerivationAlgorithm is absent in CMS PasswordRecipientInfo
- Record
CLSA-2026-1785839292- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1788860468 No score
openssl: Fix of CVE-2026-28388
- CVE-2026-28388: check that a delta CRL carries a CRL Number extension before dereferencing it in check_delta_base(); prevents a NULL pointer dereference and denial of service when a malformed delta CRL is processed
- Record
CLSA-2026-1788860468- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVMGASA-2026-0091 No score
Updated openssl packages fix security vulnerabilities
Incorrect Failure Handling in RSA KEM RSASVE Encapsulation. (CVE-2026-31790) Potential Use-after-free in DANE Client Code. (CVE-2026-28387) NULL Pointer Dereference When Processing a Delta CRL. (CVE-2026-28388) Possible NULL Dereference When Processing CMS KeyAgreeRecipientInfo. (CVE-2026-28389) Possible NULL Dereference When Processing CMS KeyTransportRecipientInfo. (CVE-2026-28390) Heap Buffer Overflow in Hexadecimal Conversion. (CVE-2026-31789)
- Record
MGASA-2026-0091- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:10533-1 No score
libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-4.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-4.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:10533-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:20525-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
Security issues fixed:
- CVE-2026-2673: TLS 1.3 servers may choose unexpected key agreement group (bsc#1259652).
- CVE-2026-28387: potential use-after-free in DANE client code (bsc#1260441).
- CVE-2026-28388: NULL pointer dereference when processing a delta (bsc#1260442).
- CVE-2026-28389: possible NULL pointer dereference when processing CMS KeyAgreeRecipientInfo (bsc#1260443).
- CVE-2026-28390: NULL pointer dereference during processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyTransportRecipientInfo (bsc#1261678).
- CVE-2026-31789: heap buffer overflow in hexadecimal conversion (bsc#1260444).
- CVE-2026-31790: incorrect failure handling in RSA KEM RSASVE encapsulation (bsc#1260445).
Other updates and bugfixes:
- Enable MD2 in legacy provider (jsc#PED-15724).
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:20525-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:1213-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-28387: Potential use-after-free in DANE client code (bsc#1260441).
- CVE-2026-28388: NULL Pointer Dereference When Processing a Delta CRL (bsc#1260442).
- CVE-2026-28389: Possible NULL dereference when processing CMS KeyAgreeRecipientInfo (bsc#1260443).
- CVE-2026-31789: Heap buffer overflow in hexadecimal conversion (bsc#1260444).
- CVE-2026-31790: Incorrect failure handling in RSA KEM RSASVE encapsulation (bsc#1260445).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:1213-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:1214-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-28387: Potential use-after-free in DANE client code (bsc#1260441).
- CVE-2026-28388: NULL Pointer Dereference When Processing a Delta CRL (bsc#1260442).
- CVE-2026-28389: Possible NULL dereference when processing CMS KeyAgreeRecipientInfo (bsc#1260443).
- CVE-2026-31789: Heap buffer overflow in hexadecimal conversion (bsc#1260444).
- CVE-2026-31790: Incorrect failure handling in RSA KEM RSASVE encapsulation (bsc#1260445).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:1214-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:1215-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-28387: Potential use-after-free in DANE client code (bsc#1260441).
- CVE-2026-28388: NULL Pointer Dereference When Processing a Delta CRL (bsc#1260442).
- CVE-2026-28389: Possible NULL dereference when processing CMS KeyAgreeRecipientInfo (bsc#1260443).
- CVE-2026-31789: Heap buffer overflow in hexadecimal conversion (bsc#1260444).
- CVE-2026-31790: Incorrect failure handling in RSA KEM RSASVE encapsulation (bsc#1260445).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:1215-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
opensslAlpine:v3.20 |
1.0.2 up to 3.3.7-r0 | 3.3.7-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.21 |
1.0.2 up to 3.3.7-r0 | 3.3.7-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.22 |
1.0.2 up to 3.5.6-r0 | 3.5.6-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.23 |
1.0.2 up to 3.5.6-r0 | 3.5.6-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.24 |
1.0.2 up to 3.5.6-r0 | 3.5.6-r0 |
opensslAzure Linux:3 |
before 3.3.5-5 | 3.3.5-5 |
openssl-fips-providerAzure Linux:3 |
through 3.1.2-2 | None known |
opensslAlpaquita:23 |
3.0.8-r4 up to 3.0.20-r0 | 3.0.20-r0 |
opensslAlpaquita:25 |
3.5.0-r0 up to 3.5.6-r0 | 3.5.6-r0 |
opensslAlpaquita:stream |
3.1.1-r1 up to 3.5.6-r0 | 3.5.6-r0 |
Show 199 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:23 |
3.0.8-r4 up to 3.0.20-r0 | 3.0.20-r0 |
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:25 |
3.5.0-r0 up to 3.5.6-r0 | 3.5.6-r0 |
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:stream |
3.1.1-r1 up to 3.5.6-r0 | 3.5.6-r0 |
opensslTuxCare:CentOS:8.4 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1g-15.el8.4.tuxcare.els18 | 1:1.1.1g-15.el8.4.tuxcare.els18 |
openssl-develTuxCare:CentOS:8.4 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1g-15.el8.4.tuxcare.els18 | 1:1.1.1g-15.el8.4.tuxcare.els18 |
openssl-libsTuxCare:CentOS:8.4 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1g-15.el8.4.tuxcare.els18 | 1:1.1.1g-15.el8.4.tuxcare.els18 |
openssl-perlTuxCare:CentOS:8.4 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1g-15.el8.4.tuxcare.els18 | 1:1.1.1g-15.el8.4.tuxcare.els18 |
openssl-staticTuxCare:CentOS:8.4 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1g-15.el8.4.tuxcare.els18 | 1:1.1.1g-15.el8.4.tuxcare.els18 |
opensslTuxCare:CentOS:8.5 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-5.el8.5.tuxcare.els17 | 1:1.1.1k-5.el8.5.tuxcare.els17 |
openssl-develTuxCare:CentOS:8.5 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-5.el8.5.tuxcare.els17 | 1:1.1.1k-5.el8.5.tuxcare.els17 |
openssl-libsTuxCare:CentOS:8.5 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-5.el8.5.tuxcare.els17 | 1:1.1.1k-5.el8.5.tuxcare.els17 |
openssl-perlTuxCare:CentOS:8.5 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-5.el8.5.tuxcare.els17 | 1:1.1.1k-5.el8.5.tuxcare.els17 |
openssl-staticTuxCare:CentOS:8.5 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-5.el8.5.tuxcare.els17 | 1:1.1.1k-5.el8.5.tuxcare.els17 |
libssl-devTuxCare:Debian:10 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1n-0+deb10u6+tuxcare.els3 | 1.1.1n-0+deb10u6+tuxcare.els3 |
libssl-docTuxCare:Debian:10 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1n-0+deb10u6+tuxcare.els3 | 1.1.1n-0+deb10u6+tuxcare.els3 |
libssl1.1TuxCare:Debian:10 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1n-0+deb10u6+tuxcare.els3 | 1.1.1n-0+deb10u6+tuxcare.els3 |
opensslTuxCare:Debian:10 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1n-0+deb10u6+tuxcare.els3 | 1.1.1n-0+deb10u6+tuxcare.els3 |
opensslTuxCare:OracleLinux:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
openssl-develTuxCare:OracleLinux:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
openssl-libsTuxCare:OracleLinux:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
openssl-perlTuxCare:OracleLinux:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
openssl-staticTuxCare:OracleLinux:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
opensslTuxCare:RHEL:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
openssl-develTuxCare:RHEL:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
openssl-libsTuxCare:RHEL:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
openssl-perlTuxCare:RHEL:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
openssl-staticTuxCare:RHEL:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
opensslTuxCare:CentOS:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
openssl-develTuxCare:CentOS:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
openssl-libsTuxCare:CentOS:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
openssl-perlTuxCare:CentOS:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
openssl-staticTuxCare:CentOS:7 |
before 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 | 1:1.0.2k-26.el7_9.tuxcare.els10 |
opensslTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.2 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els11 | 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els11 |
openssl-develTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.2 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els11 | 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els11 |
openssl-libsTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.2 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els11 | 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els11 |
openssl-perlTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.2 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els11 | 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els11 |
libssl-devTuxCare:Ubuntu:20.04 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+tuxcare.els4 | 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+tuxcare.els4 |
libssl-docTuxCare:Ubuntu:20.04 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+tuxcare.els4 | 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+tuxcare.els4 |
libssl1.1TuxCare:Ubuntu:20.04 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+tuxcare.els4 | 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+tuxcare.els4 |
opensslTuxCare:Ubuntu:20.04 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+tuxcare.els4 | 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+tuxcare.els4 |
libssl-devTuxCare:Ubuntu:18.04 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+tuxcare.els9 | 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+tuxcare.els9 |
libssl-docTuxCare:Ubuntu:18.04 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+tuxcare.els9 | 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+tuxcare.els9 |
libssl1.1TuxCare:Ubuntu:18.04 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+tuxcare.els9 | 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+tuxcare.els9 |
opensslTuxCare:Ubuntu:18.04 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+tuxcare.els9 | 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+tuxcare.els9 |
libssl-devTuxCare:Ubuntu:16.04 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.21+tuxcare.els15 | 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.21+tuxcare.els15 |
libssl-docTuxCare:Ubuntu:16.04 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.21+tuxcare.els15 | 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.21+tuxcare.els15 |
libssl1.0.0TuxCare:Ubuntu:16.04 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.21+tuxcare.els15 | 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.21+tuxcare.els15 |
opensslTuxCare:Ubuntu:16.04 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.21+tuxcare.els15 | 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.21+tuxcare.els15 |
openssl11TuxCare:RHEL:7 From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 | 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl11-develTuxCare:RHEL:7 From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 | 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl11-libsTuxCare:RHEL:7 From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 | 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl11-staticTuxCare:RHEL:7 From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 | 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl11TuxCare:OracleLinux:7 From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 | 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl11-develTuxCare:OracleLinux:7 From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 | 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl11-libsTuxCare:OracleLinux:7 From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 | 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl11-staticTuxCare:OracleLinux:7 From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 | 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl11TuxCare:CentOS:7 From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 | 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl11-develTuxCare:CentOS:7 From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 | 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl11-libsTuxCare:CentOS:7 From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 | 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl11-staticTuxCare:CentOS:7 From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 | 1:1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1 |
opensslTuxCare:CentOS:6 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.1e-63.el6.tuxcare.els15 | 1.0.1e-63.el6.tuxcare.els15 |
openssl-develTuxCare:CentOS:6 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.1e-63.el6.tuxcare.els15 | 1.0.1e-63.el6.tuxcare.els15 |
openssl-perlTuxCare:CentOS:6 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.1e-63.el6.tuxcare.els15 | 1.0.1e-63.el6.tuxcare.els15 |
openssl-staticTuxCare:CentOS:6 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.1e-63.el6.tuxcare.els15 | 1.0.1e-63.el6.tuxcare.els15 |
opensslTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6 |
before 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els11 | 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els11 |
openssl-develTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6 |
before 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els11 | 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els11 |
openssl-libsTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6 |
before 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els11 | 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els11 |
openssl-perlTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6 |
before 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els11 | 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els11 |
opensslDebian:12 |
before 3.0.19-1~deb12u2, plus listed versions 3.0.10-13.0.10-1~deb12u13.0.11-13.0.11-1~deb12u13.0.11-1~deb12u2 Show 15 moreShow less3.0.12-13.0.12-23.0.13-1~deb12u13.0.13-1~deb12u23.0.14-1~deb12u13.0.14-1~deb12u23.0.15-1~deb12u13.0.16-1~deb12u13.0.17-1~deb12u13.0.17-1~deb12u23.0.17-1~deb12u33.0.18-1~deb12u13.0.18-1~deb12u23.0.19-1~deb12u13.0.9-1 |
3.0.19-1~deb12u2 |
opensslDebian:13 |
before 3.5.5-1~deb13u2, plus listed versions 3.5.1-13.5.1-1+deb13u13.5.2-13.5.3-13.5.4-13.5.4-1~deb13u13.5.4-1~deb13u23.5.5-1~deb13u1 |
3.5.5-1~deb13u2 |
opensslDebian:14 |
before 3.6.2-1, plus listed versions 3.5.1-13.5.2-13.5.3-13.5.4-13.5.4-1~deb13u1 Show 16 moreShow less3.5.4-1~deb13u23.5.5-13.5.5-1~deb13u13.5.5-1~deb13u23.5.6-1~deb13u13.5.6-1~deb13u23.5.7-1~deb13u13.5.7-1~deb13u23.5.7-1~deb13u33.6.0-13.6.0-23.6.0~~alpha1-13.6.0~~beta1-13.6.1-13.6.1-23.6.1-3 |
3.6.2-1 |
AppBundlerJulia |
1.0.0 up to 1.0.1 | 1.0.1 |
OpenSSL_jllJulia |
before 3.0.20+0, 3.5.0+0 up to 3.5.6+0 | 3.0.20+03.5.6+0 |
Openresty_jllJulia |
All versions | None known |
opensslMageia:9 From an advisory covering 6 CVEs |
before 3.0.20-1.mga9 | 3.0.20-1.mga9 |
opensslopenEuler:24.03-LTS From an advisory covering 6 CVEs |
before 3.0.12-47.oe2403 | 3.0.12-47.oe2403 |
opensslopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1 From an advisory covering 6 CVEs |
before 3.0.12-47.oe2403sp1 | 3.0.12-47.oe2403sp1 |
opensslopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3 From an advisory covering 6 CVEs |
before 3.0.12-47.oe2403sp3 | 3.0.12-47.oe2403sp3 |
opensslopenEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1f-42.oe2003sp4 | 1.1.1f-42.oe2003sp4 |
opensslopenEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1wa-16.oe2203sp4 | 1.1.1wa-16.oe2203sp4 |
shimopenEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4 |
before 15-41.oe2003sp4 | 15-41.oe2003sp4 |
shimopenEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4 |
before 15.6-30.oe2203sp4 | 15.6-30.oe2203sp4 |
shimopenEuler:24.03-LTS |
before 15.7-26.oe2403 | 15.7-26.oe2403 |
shimopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1 |
before 15.7-26.oe2403sp1 | 15.7-26.oe2403sp1 |
shimopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3 |
before 15.7-26.oe2403sp3 | 15.7-26.oe2403sp3 |
compat-openssl11openEuler:24.03-LTS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1m-18.oe2403 | 1.1.1m-18.oe2403 |
compat-openssl11openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1m-18.oe2403sp1 | 1.1.1m-18.oe2403sp1 |
compat-openssl11openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1m-18.oe2403sp3 | 1.1.1m-18.oe2403sp3 |
edk2openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 202308-40.oe2403sp3 | 202308-40.oe2403sp3 |
edk2openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 202002-35.oe2003sp4 | 202002-35.oe2003sp4 |
edk2openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 202011-32.oe2203sp4 | 202011-32.oe2203sp4 |
edk2openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 202308-34.oe2403sp1 | 202308-34.oe2403sp1 |
opensslRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 23 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-config-fipsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 23 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-develRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 23 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-devel-engineRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 23 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 23 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 23 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 |
opensslRoot:Alpine:3.15 |
before 1.1.1w-r10073 | 1.1.1w-r100731.1.1w-r100761.1.1w-r100741.1.1w-r10075 |
rootio-opensslRoot:Alpine:3.15 |
before 1.1.1w-r10073 | 1.1.1w-r100731.1.1w-r100761.1.1w-r100741.1.1w-r10075 |
opensslRoot:Alpine:3.17 |
before 3.0.19-r00079 | 3.0.19-r000793.0.19-r000773.0.19-r00078 |
rootio-opensslRoot:Alpine:3.17 |
before 3.0.19-r00079 | 3.0.19-r000793.0.19-r000773.0.19-r00078 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150500.5.60.1 | 3.0.8-150500.5.60.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150500.5.60.1 | 3.0.8-150500.5.60.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150500.5.60.1 | 3.0.8-150500.5.60.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150500.5.60.1 | 3.0.8-150500.5.60.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150400.4.81.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.81.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150400.4.81.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.81.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150400.4.81.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.81.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150400.4.81.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.81.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150400.4.81.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.81.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150400.4.81.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.81.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.1.4-150600.5.45.1 | 3.1.4-150600.5.45.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.1.4-150600.5.45.1 | 3.1.4-150600.5.45.1 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Leap 15.6 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.1.4-150600.5.45.1 | 3.1.4-150600.5.45.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1d-150200.11.109.1 | 1.1.1d-150200.11.109.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1d-2.125.1 | 1.1.1d-2.125.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server LTSS Extended Security 12 SP5 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1d-2.125.1 | 1.1.1d-2.125.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-3.106.1 | 1.0.2p-3.106.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server LTSS Extended Security 12 SP5 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-3.106.1 | 1.0.2p-3.106.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1l-150400.7.90.1 | 1.1.1l-150400.7.90.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1l-150400.7.90.1 | 1.1.1l-150400.7.90.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1l-150400.7.90.1 | 1.1.1l-150400.7.90.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1l-150400.7.90.1 | 1.1.1l-150400.7.90.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1l-150400.7.90.1 | 1.1.1l-150400.7.90.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1l-150400.7.90.1 | 1.1.1l-150400.7.90.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1l-150500.17.51.1 | 1.1.1l-150500.17.51.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1l-150500.17.51.1 | 1.1.1l-150500.17.51.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1l-150500.17.51.1 | 1.1.1l-150500.17.51.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1l-150500.17.51.1 | 1.1.1l-150500.17.51.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1.1.1l-150500.17.51.1 | 1.1.1l-150500.17.51.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 |
openssl-1_0_0openSUSE:Leap 15.6 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.105.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 6 CVEs |
before 3.2.3-150700.5.31.1 | 3.2.3-150700.5.31.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1w-150700.11.16.1 | 1.1.1w-150700.11.16.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Development Tools 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1w-150700.11.16.1 | 1.1.1w-150700.11.16.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1w-150700.11.16.1 | 1.1.1w-150700.11.16.1 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1w-150600.5.26.2 | 1.1.1w-150600.5.26.2 |
openssl-1_1SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.1.1w-150600.5.26.2 | 1.1.1w-150600.5.26.2 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.1.4-slfo.1.1_9.1 | 3.1.4-slfo.1.1_9.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 3.1.4-12.1 | 3.1.4-12.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.7.1 | 3.5.0-160000.7.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.7.1 | 3.5.0-160000.7.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.7.1 | 3.5.0-160000.7.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSS From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-3.109.1 | 1.0.2p-3.109.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server LTSS Extended Security 12 SP5 From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-3.109.1 | 1.0.2p-3.109.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 |
openssl-1_0_0SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.108.1 |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS |
before 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm13, plus listed versions 1.0.1e-3ubuntu11.0.1e-4ubuntu11.0.1e-4ubuntu21.0.1e-4ubuntu31.0.1e-4ubuntu4 Show 35 moreShow less1.0.1f-1ubuntu11.0.1f-1ubuntu21.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11.0.1f-1ubuntu2.21.0.1f-1ubuntu2.31.0.1f-1ubuntu2.41.0.1f-1ubuntu2.51.0.1f-1ubuntu2.71.0.1f-1ubuntu2.81.0.1f-1ubuntu2.111.0.1f-1ubuntu2.121.0.1f-1ubuntu2.151.0.1f-1ubuntu2.161.0.1f-1ubuntu2.171.0.1f-1ubuntu2.181.0.1f-1ubuntu2.191.0.1f-1ubuntu2.201.0.1f-1ubuntu2.211.0.1f-1ubuntu2.221.0.1f-1ubuntu2.231.0.1f-1ubuntu2.241.0.1f-1ubuntu2.251.0.1f-1ubuntu2.261.0.1f-1ubuntu2.271.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm11.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm21.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm31.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm41.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm51.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm61.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm71.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm91.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm101.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm111.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm12 |
1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm13 |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS |
before 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm15, plus listed versions 1.0.2d-0ubuntu11.0.2d-0ubuntu21.0.2e-1ubuntu11.0.2f-2ubuntu11.0.2g-1ubuntu2 Show 33 moreShow less1.0.2g-1ubuntu31.0.2g-1ubuntu41.0.2g-1ubuntu4.11.0.2g-1ubuntu4.21.0.2g-1ubuntu4.41.0.2g-1ubuntu4.51.0.2g-1ubuntu4.61.0.2g-1ubuntu4.81.0.2g-1ubuntu4.91.0.2g-1ubuntu4.101.0.2g-1ubuntu4.111.0.2g-1ubuntu4.121.0.2g-1ubuntu4.131.0.2g-1ubuntu4.141.0.2g-1ubuntu4.151.0.2g-1ubuntu4.161.0.2g-1ubuntu4.171.0.2g-1ubuntu4.181.0.2g-1ubuntu4.191.0.2g-1ubuntu4.201.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm11.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm21.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm31.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm41.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm51.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm61.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm71.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm91.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm101.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm111.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm121.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm131.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm14 |
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm15 |
edk2Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0~20150106.5c2d456b-20~20160104.c2a892d7-10~20160408.ffea0a2c-20~20160408.ffea0a2c-2ubuntu0.10~20160408.ffea0a2c-2ubuntu0.20~20160408.ffea0a2c-2ubuntu0.2+esm10~20160408.ffea0a2c-2ubuntu0.2+esm30~20160408.ffea0a2c-2ubuntu0.2+esm4 |
None known |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.10.25~dfsg2-2ubuntu14.2.2~dfsg-14.2.3~dfsg-14.2.4~dfsg-1ubuntu14.2.4~dfsg-2 Show 7 moreShow less4.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu14.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu44.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.14.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.24.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2+esm14.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2+esm24.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2+esm3 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:16.04:LTS |
before 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.15, plus listed versions 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.9.11.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.13.11.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.15.11.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.16.11.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.17.1 Show 13 moreShow less1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.18.11.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.19.31.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.11.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.21.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.31.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.61.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.71.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.91.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.101.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.111.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.121.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.131.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.14 |
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.15 |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:FIPS:16.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6~ppa11.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6~ppa21.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6~ppa31.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.61.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6.11.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6.21.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6.3 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS |
before 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm8, plus listed versions 1.0.2g-1ubuntu131.0.2g-1ubuntu141.0.2n-1ubuntu11.1.0g-2ubuntu11.1.0g-2ubuntu2 Show 29 moreShow less1.1.0g-2ubuntu31.1.0g-2ubuntu41.1.0g-2ubuntu4.11.1.0g-2ubuntu4.31.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.11.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.21.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.31.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.41.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.51.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.61.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.71.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.81.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.91.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.101.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.131.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.141.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.151.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.171.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.191.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.201.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.211.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.221.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.231.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm11.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm31.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm41.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm51.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm61.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm7 |
1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm8 |
openssl1.0Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS |
before 1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.13+esm4, plus listed versions 1.0.2n-1ubuntu21.0.2n-1ubuntu31.0.2n-1ubuntu41.0.2n-1ubuntu51.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1 Show 15 moreShow less1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.21.0.2n-1ubuntu5.31.0.2n-1ubuntu5.41.0.2n-1ubuntu5.51.0.2n-1ubuntu5.61.0.2n-1ubuntu5.71.0.2n-1ubuntu5.81.0.2n-1ubuntu5.91.0.2n-1ubuntu5.101.0.2n-1ubuntu5.111.0.2n-1ubuntu5.121.0.2n-1ubuntu5.131.0.2n-1ubuntu5.13+esm11.0.2n-1ubuntu5.13+esm21.0.2n-1ubuntu5.13+esm3 |
1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.13+esm4 |
edk2Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0~20170911.5dfba97c-10~20171010.234dbcef-10~20171027.76fd5a66-10~20171205.a9212288-10~20180105.0bc94c74-1 Show 8 moreShow less0~20180205.c0d9813c-10~20180205.c0d9813c-20~20180205.c0d9813c-2ubuntu0.10~20180205.c0d9813c-2ubuntu0.20~20180205.c0d9813c-2ubuntu0.30~20180205.c0d9813c-2ubuntu0.3+esm10~20180205.c0d9813c-2ubuntu0.3+esm20~20180205.c0d9813c-2ubuntu0.3+esm3 |
None known |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 6.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu16.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu26.12.0~dfsg-1ubuntu16.12.0~dfsg-2ubuntu16.12.0~dfsg-2ubuntu2 Show 10 moreShow less8.10.0~dfsg-28.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.28.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.38.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.48.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm18.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm28.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm38.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm48.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm58.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm6 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:18.04:LTS |
before 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.23.8, plus listed versions 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.5.11.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.6.11.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.7.11.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.9.11.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.9.2 Show 15 moreShow less1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.9.31.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.13.21.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.151.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.15.11.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.15.21.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.171.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.201.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.211.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.221.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.231.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.23.31.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.23.41.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.23.51.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.23.61.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.23.7 |
1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.23.8 |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:FIPS:18.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.3.11.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.15.2 |
None known |
edk2Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0~20190606.20d2e5a1-2ubuntu10~20190828.37eef910-30~20190828.37eef910-40~20191122.bd85bf54-10~20191122.bd85bf54-1ubuntu1 Show 11 moreShow less0~20191122.bd85bf54-20~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu10~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu20~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu30~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.10~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.20~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.30~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.40~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.50~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.60~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.6+esm1 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS |
before 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+esm3, plus listed versions 1.1.1c-1ubuntu41.1.1d-2ubuntu31.1.1d-2ubuntu61.1.1f-1ubuntu11.1.1f-1ubuntu2 Show 23 moreShow less1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.11.1.1f-1ubuntu2.21.1.1f-1ubuntu2.31.1.1f-1ubuntu2.41.1.1f-1ubuntu2.51.1.1f-1ubuntu2.81.1.1f-1ubuntu2.91.1.1f-1ubuntu2.101.1.1f-1ubuntu2.111.1.1f-1ubuntu2.121.1.1f-1ubuntu2.131.1.1f-1ubuntu2.151.1.1f-1ubuntu2.161.1.1f-1ubuntu2.171.1.1f-1ubuntu2.181.1.1f-1ubuntu2.191.1.1f-1ubuntu2.201.1.1f-1ubuntu2.211.1.1f-1ubuntu2.221.1.1f-1ubuntu2.231.1.1f-1ubuntu2.241.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+esm11.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+esm2 |
1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+esm3 |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:20.04:LTS |
before 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.24.3, plus listed versions 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.71.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.7.21.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.121.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.131.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.13.1 Show 10 moreShow less1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.161.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.171.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.181.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.191.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.201.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.211.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.221.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.241.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.24.11.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.24.2 |
1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.24.3 |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:FIPS:20.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.2.81.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.7.1 |
None known |
edk2Ubuntu:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2021.08~rc0-22021.08-32021.11~rc1-12021.11-12021.11-2 Show 12 moreShow less2022.02~rc1-12022.02~rc1-1ubuntu12022.02-12022.02-22022.02-32022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.12022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.22022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.32022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.42022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.52022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.62022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.7 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:22.04:LTS |
before 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.23, plus listed versions 1.1.1l-1ubuntu13.0.0-1ubuntu13.0.1-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu1.1 Show 18 moreShow less3.0.2-0ubuntu1.23.0.2-0ubuntu1.43.0.2-0ubuntu1.53.0.2-0ubuntu1.63.0.2-0ubuntu1.73.0.2-0ubuntu1.83.0.2-0ubuntu1.93.0.2-0ubuntu1.103.0.2-0ubuntu1.123.0.2-0ubuntu1.133.0.2-0ubuntu1.143.0.2-0ubuntu1.153.0.2-0ubuntu1.163.0.2-0ubuntu1.173.0.2-0ubuntu1.183.0.2-0ubuntu1.193.0.2-0ubuntu1.203.0.2-0ubuntu1.21 |
3.0.2-0ubuntu1.23 |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 12.22.5~dfsg-5ubuntu112.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu112.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu312.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu212.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3 Show 7 moreShow less12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.112.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.212.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.312.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.412.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.512.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.612.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6+esm2 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:FIPS-preview:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.10+Fips13.0.2-0ubuntu1.12+Fips1 |
None known |
openssl-fipsUbuntu:Pro:FIPS-preview:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 3.0.5-0ubuntu0.1+Fips2.1 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:22.04:LTS |
before 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.23+Fips1, plus listed versions 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.10+Fips13.0.2-0ubuntu1.12+Fips13.0.2-0ubuntu1.14+Fips13.0.2-0ubuntu1.15+Fips13.0.2-0ubuntu1.16+Fips1 Show 5 moreShow less3.0.2-0ubuntu1.17+Fips13.0.2-0ubuntu1.18+Fips13.0.2-0ubuntu1.19+Fips13.0.2-0ubuntu1.20+Fips13.0.2-0ubuntu1.21+Fips1 |
3.0.2-0ubuntu1.23+Fips1 |
openssl-fipsUbuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 3.0.5-0ubuntu0.1+Fips2.13.0.5-0ubuntu0.2+Fips1 |
None known |
edk2Ubuntu:24.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2023.05-22023.11-22023.11-32023.11-42023.11-5 Show 13 moreShow less2023.11-62023.11-82024.02-12024.02-22024.02-2ubuntu0.12024.02-2ubuntu0.32024.02-2ubuntu0.42024.02-2ubuntu0.52024.02-2ubuntu0.62024.02-2ubuntu0.72024.02-2ubuntu0.82024.02-2ubuntu0.92024.02-2ubuntu0.10 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:24.04:LTS |
before 3.0.13-0ubuntu3.9, plus listed versions 3.0.10-1ubuntu23.0.10-1ubuntu2.13.0.10-1ubuntu33.0.10-1ubuntu43.0.13-0ubuntu2 Show 8 moreShow less3.0.13-0ubuntu33.0.13-0ubuntu3.13.0.13-0ubuntu3.23.0.13-0ubuntu3.33.0.13-0ubuntu3.43.0.13-0ubuntu3.53.0.13-0ubuntu3.63.0.13-0ubuntu3.7 |
3.0.13-0ubuntu3.9 |
openssl-fipsUbuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:24.04:LTS |
before 3.0.13-0ubuntu3.12+Fips1, plus listed versions 3.0.13-0ubuntu3+Fips13.0.13-0ubuntu3.6+Fips1 |
3.0.13-0ubuntu3.12+Fips1 |
edk2Ubuntu:25.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.02-3ubuntu22025.02-82025.02-8ubuntu12025.02-8ubuntu22025.02-8ubuntu32025.02-8ubuntu3.12025.02-8ubuntu3.2 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:25.10 |
before 3.5.3-1ubuntu3.3, plus listed versions 3.4.1-1ubuntu33.5.0-2ubuntu13.5.2-1ubuntu13.5.3-1ubuntu23.5.3-1ubuntu3 |
3.5.3-1ubuntu3.3 |
edk2Ubuntu:26.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.11-3ubuntu72025.11-3ubuntu82026.05-2ubuntu12026.05-2ubuntu22026.05-2ubuntu3 |
None known |
edk2-hweUbuntu:26.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.11-3ubuntu82025.11-3ubuntu92026.05-2ubuntu12026.05-2ubuntu22026.05-2ubuntu3 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:26.10 |
before 3.5.5-1ubuntu3 | 3.5.5-1ubuntu3 |
edk2Ubuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.02-8ubuntu32025.11-3ubuntu62025.11-3ubuntu72025.11-3ubuntu7.22025.11-3ubuntu7.3 |
None known |
edk2-hweUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.11-3ubuntu62025.11-3ubuntu82025.11-3ubuntu8.2 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
before 3.5.5-1ubuntu3, plus listed versions 3.5.3-1ubuntu23.5.5-1ubuntu1 |
3.5.5-1ubuntu3 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Tumbleweed From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 3.5.3-4.1 | 3.5.3-4.1 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Leap 16.0 From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.7.1 | 3.5.0-160000.7.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected | ||
| facts | OSV | |
| affected | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-28388 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.5) in Openssl, published April 7, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.92%, the 60th percentile. Fixed in openssl 3.3.7-r0.
References
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260407.txt
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/602542f2c0c2d5edb47128f93eac10b62aeeefb3
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d3a901e8d9f021f3e67d6cfbc12e768129862726
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a9d187dd1000130100fa7ab915f8513532cb3bb8
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5a0b4930779cd2408880979db765db919da55139
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/59c3b3158553ab53275bbbccca5cb305d591cf2e
Show 194 moreShow less
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-032379.html
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28388
github.com/advisories/GHSA-rpg5-467j-c25q
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2026-28388
docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2026-28388
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/centos8.4els/CLSA-2026-1777297012.html
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/centos8.5els/CLSA-2026-1777396609.html
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/debian10els/CLSA-2026-1777999127.html
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/oraclelinux7els/CLSA-2026-1778020035.html
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/rhel7els/CLSA-2026-1778020314.html
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/centos7els/CLSA-2026-1778061272.html
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/almalinux9.2esu/CLSA-2026-1778071148.html
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28387
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28389
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28390
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31789
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/ubuntu20.04els/CLSA-2026-1778583971.html
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/ubuntu18.04els/CLSA-2026-1778787445.html
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/ubuntu16.04els/CLSA-2026-1779094874.html
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/rhel7els/CLSA-2026-1780682107.html
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-3711
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3996
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0464
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5535
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69419
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69421
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/oraclelinux7els/CLSA-2026-1780682108.html
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/centos7els/CLSA-2026-1780683040.html
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/centos6els/CLSA-2026-1785839292.html
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34180
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42766
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7383
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-9076
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/tuxcare9.6esu/CLSA-2026-1788860468.html
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/28xxx/CVE-2026-28388.json
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-28388
advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2026-0091.html
bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35331
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/07/11
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2041
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31790
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2042
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2043
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2044
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2045
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2078
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2079
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2080
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2081
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2082
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2189
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22795
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2190
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2191
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2619
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2620
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2621
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2622
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7261
images.redhat.com
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-9232
access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-9231
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-9230
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11187
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69421
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69420
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69419
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69418
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-68160
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-66199
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15469
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15468
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15467
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-31790
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-31789
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28389
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28388
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28387
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28386
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28390
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-22795
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-2673
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-22796
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_7261.json
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2396054
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9230
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2396055
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9231
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2396056
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9232
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430375
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11187
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-11187
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430376
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15467
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430377
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15468
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15468
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430378
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15469
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15469
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430379
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66199
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66199
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430380
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68160
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68160
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430381
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69418
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69418
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430386
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430388
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69420
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69420
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430387
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69421
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2447327
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2673
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2157c9d81f7b0bd7dfa25b960e928ec28e8dd63f
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/85977e013f32ceb96aa034c0e741adddc1a05e34
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260313.txt
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430389
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22795
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430390
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22796
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451099
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28386
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451098
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28387
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451097
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28388
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451096
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28389
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2456314
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28390
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/01194a8f1941115cd0383bfa91c736dd3993c8bc
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2e39b7a6993be445fddb9fbce316fa756e0397b6
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/af2a5fecd3e71a29e7568f9c1453dec5cebbaff4
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ea7b4ea4f9f853521ba34830cbcadc970d2e0788
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/fd2f1a6cf53b9ceeca723a001aa4b825d7c7ee75
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451095
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31789
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451094
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31790
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261213-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1260441
bugzilla.suse.com/1260442
bugzilla.suse.com/1260443
bugzilla.suse.com/1260444
bugzilla.suse.com/1260445
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28387
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28388
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28389
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-31789
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-31790
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261214-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261215-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261216-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261255-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261256-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261257-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261290-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261291-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261375-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1261678
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28390
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261386-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261577-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621037-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621065-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621107-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1259652
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-2673
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202621186-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262396-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1260446
bugzilla.suse.com/1266340
bugzilla.suse.com/1266341
bugzilla.suse.com/1266342
bugzilla.suse.com/1266349
bugzilla.suse.com/1266357
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34180
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42766
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45447
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-28388
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8155-1
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8155-2
Left out here: 6 references and the rest of 10 source descriptions. The JSON record has them. Left out on purpose, here and in the API, to keep responses small: 15 source records.