CVE-2026-3230
Improper key_share validation in TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- High
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
1.2
Improper key_share validation in TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.
- Record
CVE-2026-3230- CVSS 4.0
- 1.2 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/AU:Y/R:A/V:D/U:Clear - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-13209
1.2
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.
- Record
EUVD-2026-13209- CVSS 4.0
- 1.2 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/AU:Y/R:A/V:D/U:Clear - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-g3xr-5f55-cf5g
1.2
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in...
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.
- Record
GHSA-g3xr-5f55-cf5g- CVSS 4.0
- 1.2 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:A/V:D/RE:X/U:Clear - CVSS 3.1
- 2.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
1.2
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.
- Record
CVE-2026-3230- CVSS 4.0
- 1.2 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:A/V:D/RE:X/U:Clear - CVSS 3.1
- 2.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2026-3230
2.7
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2026-3230- CVSS 3.1
- 2.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-03
OSV
1.2
Improper key_share validation in TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.
- Record
CVE-2026-3230- CVSS 4.0
- 1.2 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/AU:Y/R:A/V:D/U:Clear - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-3230
2.7
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-3230- CVSS 3.1
- 2.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVJLSEC-2026-704
1.2
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in...
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.
- Record
JLSEC-2026-704- CVSS 4.0
- 1.2 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:A/V:D/RE:X/U:Clear - CVSS 3.1
- 2.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-3230
1.2
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-3230- CVSS 4.0
- 1.2 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/AU:Y/R:A/V:D/U:Clear - CVSS 3.1
- 2.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
wolfsslAlpine:v3.23 |
before 5.9.1-r0 | 5.9.1-r0 |
wolfsslAlpine:v3.24 |
before 5.9.0-r0 | 5.9.0-r0 |
wolfsslDebian:12 |
All versions, plus listed versions 5.5.4-25.5.4-2+deb12u15.5.4-2+deb12u25.5.4-2+deb12u35.5.4-2.1 Show 22 moreShow less5.6.4-15.6.4-25.6.6-15.6.6-1.15.6.6-1.25.6.6-1.35.6.6-1.3~exp15.7.0-0.15.7.0-0.25.7.0-0.35.7.2-0.15.7.2-0.25.7.2-0.35.7.2-0.45.8.2-15.8.2-1.15.8.2-1.25.8.4-15.9.0-0.15.9.0-0.25.9.1-0.15.9.2-1 |
None known |
wolfsslDebian:13 |
All versions, plus listed versions 5.7.2-0.15.7.2-0.1+deb13u15.7.2-0.1+deb13u25.7.2-0.25.7.2-0.3 Show 9 moreShow less5.7.2-0.45.8.2-15.8.2-1.15.8.2-1.25.8.4-15.9.0-0.15.9.0-0.25.9.1-0.15.9.2-1 |
None known |
wolfSSL_jllJulia |
before 5.9.2+0 | 5.9.2+0 |
wolfsslUbuntu:16.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 3.4.8+dfsg-1 |
None known |
wolfsslUbuntu:18.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 3.10.2+dfsg-23.12.0+dfsg-13.12.2+dfsg-13.13.0+dfsg-1 |
None known |
wolfsslUbuntu:20.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 4.1.0+dfsg-24.2.0+dfsg-14.2.0+dfsg-24.2.0+dfsg-34.3.0+dfsg-2 |
None known |
wolfsslUbuntu:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 4.6.0-35.0.0-15.1.1-15.2.0-15.2.0-2 |
None known |
wolfsslUbuntu:24.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 5.5.4-25.5.4-2.15.6.4-25.6.6-1.25.6.6-1.35.6.6-1.3build1 |
None known |
wolfsslUbuntu:25.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 5.7.2-0.1 |
None known |
wolfsslUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 5.7.2-0.15.8.2-1.25.8.4-15.9.1-0.1 |
None known |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, aliases, references | OSV | |
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-3230 is a low vulnerability (CVSS 1.2) in Wolfssl, published March 19, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.22%, the 12th percentile. Fixed in wolfssl 5.9.1-r0.
References
github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/9754
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3230
github.com/advisories/GHSA-g3xr-5f55-cf5g
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2026-3230
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/3xxx/CVE-2026-3230.json
github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-3230
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-3230
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3230