CVE-2026-32875
UltraJSON has an integer overflow handling large indent leads to buffer overflow or infinite loop
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
7.5
UltraJSON has an integer overflow handling large indent leads to buffer overflow or infinite loop
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-32875- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-190, CWE-787, CWE-835, CWE-190
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-13444
7.5
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.
- Record
EUVD-2026-13444- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-c8rr-9gxc-jprv
7.5
UltraJSON has an integer overflow handling large indent leads to buffer overflow or infinite loop
Summary
ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service.
(Note: A negative indent to ujson means add spaces after colons but do not add line breaks or indentation. It is unclear to the current maintainers whether this was ever even an intended feature or just a byproduct of the way it was written.)
Exploitability
To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. (Even with the fix for this vulnerability, such usage is strongly advised against since even a bug-free JSON serialiser would be vulnerable to denial of service simply by the attacker requesting indents that have the server needlessly filling out gigabytes of whitespace.)
A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. As far as the maintainers are aware, the infinite loop can not be reached for indentations from -1 to -65536 / max_recursion_depth_as_limited_by_stack_size but users of negative indents are encouraged to consider their service affected even if the infinite loop seems unreachable.
Example
import ujson
def example(depth, indent):
a = [0]
for i in range(1000):
a = [a]
ujson.dumps(a, indent=indent)
example(1, 2**30) # segfault
example(1000, -200) # infinite loop
Patches
ujson 5.12.0, containing 486bd4553dc471a1de11613bc7347a6b318e37ea, promotes the integer types where the overflow occurred, skips the indentation code path for negative indent (which was supposed to be a no-op) and places an artificial cap of 1000 on the indent parameter.
Workarounds
Users who don't wish to upgrade can either use a fixed indentation, no indentation or ensure indentation is non-negative and not enormous (below 2**31 / max_recursion_depth_as_limited_by_stack_size).
References
The original bug report can be found at https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/issues/700
This issue was independently discovered by @coco1629, @EthanKim88 and @vmfunc.
- Record
GHSA-c8rr-9gxc-jprv- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-190, CWE-787, CWE-835
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
7.5
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-32875- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-190, CWE-787, CWE-835
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2026-32875
7.5
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2026-32875- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-03
OSV
7.5
UltraJSON has an integer overflow handling large indent leads to buffer overflow or infinite loop
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-32875- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-190, CWE-787, CWE-835
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 9 moreShow less
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-32875
7.5
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-32875- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-c8rr-9gxc-jprv
7.5
UltraJSON has an integer overflow handling large indent leads to buffer overflow or infinite loop
Summary
ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service.
(Note: A negative indent to ujson means add spaces after colons but do not add line breaks or indentation. It is unclear to the current maintainers whether this was ever even an intended feature or just a byproduct of the way it was written.)
Exploitability
To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. (Even with the fix for this vulnerability, such usage is strongly advised against since even a bug-free JSON serialiser would be vulnerable to denial of service simply by the attacker requesting indents that have the server needlessly filling out gigabytes of whitespace.)
A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. As far as the maintainers are aware, the infinite loop can not be reached for indentations from -1 to -65536 / max_recursion_depth_as_limited_by_stack_size but users of negative indents are encouraged to consider their service affected even if the infinite loop seems unreachable.
Example
import ujson
def example(depth, indent):
a = [0]
for i in range(1000):
a = [a]
ujson.dumps(a, indent=indent)
example(1, 2**30) # segfault
example(1000, -200) # infinite loop
Patches
ujson 5.12.0, containing 486bd4553dc471a1de11613bc7347a6b318e37ea, promotes the integer types where the overflow occurred, skips the indentation code path for negative indent (which was supposed to be a no-op) and places an artificial cap of 1000 on the indent parameter.
Workarounds
Users who don't wish to upgrade can either use a fixed indentation, no indentation or ensure indentation is non-negative and not enormous (below 2**31 / max_recursion_depth_as_limited_by_stack_size).
References
The original bug report can be found at https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/issues/700
This issue was independently discovered by @coco1629, @EthanKim88 and @vmfunc.
- Record
GHSA-c8rr-9gxc-jprv- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-190, CWE-787, CWE-835
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-3607
7.5
python-ujson security update
UltraJSON
Security Fix(es):
UltraJSON (aka ujson) through 5.1.0 has a stack-based buffer overflow in Buffer_AppendIndentUnchecked (called from encode). Exploitation can, for example, use a large amount of indentation.(CVE-2021-45958)
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.(CVE-2026-32875)
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Prior to 5.12.1, when ujson.dump() writes to a file-like object and the write operation raises an exception, the serialized JSON string object is not decremented, leaking memory. Each failed write operation leaks the full size of the serialized payload. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.12.1.(CVE-2026-44660)
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Prior to 5.13.0, ujson.dumps() (or ujson.dump() or ujson.encode()) have a reject_bytes=False option. When set, they may accept malformed or truncated UTF-8 byte sequences, silently rewriting them into different Unicode characters instead of rejecting them. This leads to input validation bypass and data integrity issues. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.13.0.(CVE-2026-54911)
- Record
OESA-2026-3607- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-3608
7.5
python-ujson security update
UltraJSON
Security Fix(es):
UltraJSON (aka ujson) through 5.1.0 has a stack-based buffer overflow in Buffer_AppendIndentUnchecked (called from encode). Exploitation can, for example, use a large amount of indentation.(CVE-2021-45958)
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.(CVE-2026-32875)
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Prior to 5.12.1, when ujson.dump() writes to a file-like object and the write operation raises an exception, the serialized JSON string object is not decremented, leaking memory. Each failed write operation leaks the full size of the serialized payload. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.12.1.(CVE-2026-44660)
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Prior to 5.13.0, ujson.dumps() (or ujson.dump() or ujson.encode()) have a reject_bytes=False option. When set, they may accept malformed or truncated UTF-8 byte sequences, silently rewriting them into different Unicode characters instead of rejecting them. This leads to input validation bypass and data integrity issues. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.13.0.(CVE-2026-54911)
- Record
OESA-2026-3608- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-3720
7.5
python-ujson security update
UltraJSON
Security Fix(es):
UltraJSON (aka ujson) through 5.1.0 has a stack-based buffer overflow in Buffer_AppendIndentUnchecked (called from encode). Exploitation can, for example, use a large amount of indentation.(CVE-2021-45958)
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.(CVE-2026-32875)
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Prior to 5.12.1, when ujson.dump() writes to a file-like object and the write operation raises an exception, the serialized JSON string object is not decremented, leaking memory. Each failed write operation leaks the full size of the serialized payload. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.12.1.(CVE-2026-44660)
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Prior to 5.13.0, ujson.dumps() (or ujson.dump() or ujson.encode()) have a reject_bytes=False option. When set, they may accept malformed or truncated UTF-8 byte sequences, silently rewriting them into different Unicode characters instead of rejecting them. This leads to input validation bypass and data integrity issues. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.13.0.(CVE-2026-54911)
- Record
OESA-2026-3720- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2292
7.5
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.
- Record
PYSEC-2026-2292- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVROOT-APP-PYPI-CVE-2026-32875
7.5
CVE-2026-32875 in ujson - Patched by Root
Root has patched CVE-2026-32875 in the ujson package for Root:PyPI. Multiple fixed versions available.
- Record
ROOT-APP-PYPI-CVE-2026-32875- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-32875
7.5
UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-32875- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVMGASA-2026-0073 No score
Updated python-ujson packages fix security vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-32874 ujson 5.4.0 to 5.11.0 inclusive contains an accumulating memory leak in JSON parsing large (outside of the range [-2^63, 2^64 - 1]) integers. ujson 5.4.0 to 5.11.0 has an integer overflow while handling a large indent which leads to a buffer overflow or infinite loop.
- Record
MGASA-2026-0073- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
ujsonPyPI |
5.1.0 to 5.11.0 | 5.12.0 |
py3-ujsonAlpine:v3.23 |
before 5.12.0-r0 | 5.12.0-r0 |
py3-ujsonAlpine:v3.24 |
before 5.12.0-r0 | 5.12.0-r0 |
ujsonDebian:12 |
All versions, plus listed versions 5.10.0-15.11.0-15.11.0-25.11.0-35.13.0-15.7.0-15.8.0-15.9.0-1 |
None known |
ujsonDebian:13 |
All versions, plus listed versions 5.10.0-15.11.0-15.11.0-25.11.0-35.13.0-1 |
None known |
ujsonDebian:14 |
before 5.13.0-1, plus listed versions 5.10.0-15.11.0-15.11.0-25.11.0-3 |
5.13.0-1 |
ujsonPyPI |
5.1.0 up to 5.12.0, plus listed versions 5.10.05.11.05.2.05.3.05.4.0 Show 5 moreShow less5.5.05.6.05.7.05.8.05.9.0 |
5.12.0 |
python-ujsonMageia:9 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 5.7.0-1.1.mga9 | 5.7.0-1.1.mga9 |
python-ujsonopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 5.1.0-6.oe2403sp1 | 5.1.0-6.oe2403sp1 |
python-ujsonopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 5.1.0-7.oe2403sp3 | 5.1.0-7.oe2403sp3 |
Show 7 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
python-ujsonopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP4 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 5.1.0-6.oe2403sp4 | 5.1.0-6.oe2403sp4 |
ujsonRoot:PyPI |
before 5.10.0+aikido.5 | 5.10.0+aikido.55.8.0+aikido.45.10.0+aikido.65.8.0+aikido.55.8.0+aikido.65.10.0+aikido.7 |
ujsonUbuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS |
before 5.1.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm2, plus listed versions 4.0.2-14.0.2-1build14.2.0-15.1.0-15.1.0-1build15.1.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
5.1.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm2 |
ujsonUbuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS |
before 5.9.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1, plus listed versions 5.8.0-15.8.0-1build15.9.0-15.9.0-1build1 |
5.9.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
ujsonUbuntu:25.10 |
before 5.10.0-1ubuntu0.1, plus listed versions 5.10.0-1build2 |
5.10.0-1ubuntu0.1 |
ujsonUbuntu:26.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 5.11.0-3build15.13.0-1 |
None known |
ujsonUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
before 5.11.0-3ubuntu0.1, plus listed versions 5.10.0-1build25.10.0-1build35.11.0-35.11.0-3build1 |
5.11.0-3ubuntu0.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| affected, aliases, references | OSV | |
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-32875 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.5) in Ultrajson, published March 18, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.49%, the 42nd percentile. Fixed in ujson 5.12.0.
References
github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/security/advisories/GHSA-c8rr-9gxc-jprv
github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/issues/700
github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/commit/486bd4553dc471a1de11613bc7347a6b318e37ea
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32875
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2449400
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-32875.json
Show 19 moreShow less
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32875
github.com/advisories/GHSA-c8rr-9gxc-jprv
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2026-32875
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/32xxx/CVE-2026-32875.json
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-32875
github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson
advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2026-0073.html
bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35258
github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/security/advisories/GHSA-wgvc-ghv9-3pmm
lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/3FAXR2DP4Q5GMDURV7CAFQ5YGYAOMVNL
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3607
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-45958
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44660
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54911
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3608
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3720
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-32875
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32875
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8219-1