CVE-2026-33017
Langflow has Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Public Flow Build Endpoint
Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. In versions prior to 1.9.0, the POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow endpoint allows building public flows without requiring authentication. When the optional data parameter is supplied, the endpoint uses attacker-controlled flow data (containing arbitrary Python code in node definitions) instead of the stored flow data from the database. This code is passed to exec() with zero sandboxing, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution. This is distinct from CVE-2025-3248, which fixed /api/v1/validate/code by adding authentication. The build_public_tmp endpoint is designed to be unauthenticated (for public flows) but incorrectly accepts attacker-supplied flow data containing arbitrary executable code. This issue has been fixed in version 1.9.0.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
9.3
Langflow has Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Public Flow Build Endpoint
Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. In versions prior to 1.9.0, the POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow endpoint allows building public flows without requiring authentication. When the optional data parameter is supplied, the endpoint uses attacker-controlled flow data (containing arbitrary Python code in node definitions) instead of the stored flow data from the database. This code is passed to exec() with zero sandboxing, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution. This is distinct from CVE-2025-3248, which fixed /api/v1/validate/code by adding authentication. The build_public_tmp endpoint is designed to be unauthenticated (for public flows) but incorrectly accepts attacker-supplied flow data containing arbitrary executable code. This issue has been fixed in version 1.9.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-33017- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L - Weakness
- CWE-94, CWE-95, CWE-306
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-13556
9.3
Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. In versions prior to 1.9.0, the POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow endpoint allows building public flows without requiring authentication. When the optional data parameter is supplied, the endpoint uses attacker-controlled flow data (containing arbitrary Python code in node definitions) instead of the stored flow data from the database. This code is passed to exec() with zero sandboxing, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution. This is distinct from CVE-2025-3248, which fixed /api/v1/validate/code by adding authentication. The build_public_tmp endpoint is designed to be unauthenticated (for public flows) but incorrectly accepts attacker-supplied flow data containing arbitrary executable code. This issue has been fixed in version 1.9.0.
- Record
EUVD-2026-13556- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-vwmf-pq79-vjvx
9.3
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in Langflow via Public Flow Build Endpoint
Summary
The POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow endpoint allows building public flows without requiring authentication. When the optional data parameter is supplied, the endpoint uses attacker-controlled flow data (containing arbitrary Python code in node definitions) instead of the stored flow data from the database. This code is passed to exec() with zero sandboxing, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution.
This is distinct from CVE-2025-3248, which fixed /api/v1/validate/code by adding authentication. The build_public_tmp endpoint is designed to be unauthenticated (for public flows) but incorrectly accepts attacker-supplied flow data containing arbitrary executable code.
Affected Code
Vulnerable Endpoint (No Authentication)
File: src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/chat.py, lines 580-657
@router.post("/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow")
async def build_public_tmp(
*,
flow_id: uuid.UUID,
data: Annotated[FlowDataRequest | None, Body(embed=True)] = None, # ATTACKER CONTROLLED
request: Request,
# ... NO Depends(get_current_active_user) -- MISSING AUTH ...
):
"""Build a public flow without requiring authentication."""
client_id = request.cookies.get("client_id")
owner_user, new_flow_id = await verify_public_flow_and_get_user(flow_id=flow_id, client_id=client_id)
job_id = await start_flow_build(
flow_id=new_flow_id,
data=data, # Attacker's data passed directly to graph builder
current_user=owner_user,
...
)
Compare with the authenticated build endpoint at line 138, which requires current_user: CurrentActiveUser.
Code Execution Chain
When attacker-supplied data is provided, it flows through:
start_flow_build(data=attacker_data)→generate_flow_events()--build.py:81create_graph()→build_graph_from_data(payload=data.model_dump())--build.py:298Graph.from_payload(payload)parses attacker nodes --base.py:1168add_nodes_and_edges()→initialize()→_build_graph()--base.py:270,527_instantiate_components_in_vertices()iterates nodes --base.py:1323vertex.instantiate_component()→instantiate_class(vertex)--loading.py:28code = custom_params.pop("code")extracts attacker code --loading.py:43eval_custom_component_code(code)→create_class(code, class_name)--eval.py:9prepare_global_scope(module)--validate.py:323exec(compiled_code, exec_globals)-- ARBITRARY CODE EXECUTION --validate.py:397
Unsandboxed exec() in prepare_global_scope
File: src/lfx/src/lfx/custom/validate.py, lines 340-397
def prepare_global_scope(module):
exec_globals = globals().copy()
# Imports are resolved first (any module can be imported)
for node in imports:
module_obj = importlib.import_module(module_name) # line 352
exec_globals[variable_name] = module_obj
# Then ALL top-level definitions are executed (Assign, ClassDef, FunctionDef)
if definitions:
combined_module = ast.Module(body=definitions, type_ignores=[])
compiled_code = compile(combined_module, "<string>", "exec")
exec(compiled_code, exec_globals) # line 397 - ARBITRARY CODE EXECUTION
Critical detail: prepare_global_scope executes ast.Assign nodes. An attacker's code like _x = os.system("id") is an assignment and will be executed during graph building -- before the flow even "runs."
Prerequisites
- Target Langflow instance has at least one public flow (common for demos, chatbots, shared workflows)
- Attacker knows the public flow's UUID (discoverable via shared links/URLs)
- No authentication required -- only a
client_idcookie (any arbitrary string value)
When AUTO_LOGIN=true (the default), all prerequisites can be met by an unauthenticated attacker:
GET /api/v1/auto_login→ obtain superuser token- `POST…
- Record
GHSA-vwmf-pq79-vjvx- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:A - CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-94, CWE-95, CWE-306
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
CISA KEV No score
Langflow Code Injection Vulnerability
Langflow contains a code injection vulnerability that could allow building public flows without requiring authentication.
- Record
CVE-2026-33017- Weakness
- CWE-94, CWE-95, CWE-306
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
9.3
Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. In versions prior to 1.9.0, the POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow endpoint allows building public flows without requiring authentication. When the optional data parameter is supplied, the endpoint uses attacker-controlled flow data (containing arbitrary Python code in node definitions) instead of the stored flow data from the database. This code is passed to exec() with zero sandboxing, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution. This is distinct from CVE-2025-3248, which fixed /api/v1/validate/code by adding authentication. The build_public_tmp endpoint is designed to be unauthenticated (for public flows) but incorrectly accepts attacker-supplied flow data containing arbitrary executable code. This issue has been fixed in version 1.9.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-33017- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-94, CWE-95, CWE-306
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
9.3
Langflow has Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Public Flow Build Endpoint
Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. In versions prior to 1.9.0, the POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow endpoint allows building public flows without requiring authentication. When the optional data parameter is supplied, the endpoint uses attacker-controlled flow data (containing arbitrary Python code in node definitions) instead of the stored flow data from the database. This code is passed to exec() with zero sandboxing, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution. This is distinct from CVE-2025-3248, which fixed /api/v1/validate/code by adding authentication. The build_public_tmp endpoint is designed to be unauthenticated (for public flows) but incorrectly accepts attacker-supplied flow data containing arbitrary executable code. This issue has been fixed in version 1.9.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-33017- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L - Weakness
- CWE-306, CWE-94, CWE-95
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-vwmf-pq79-vjvx
9.3
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in Langflow via Public Flow Build Endpoint
Summary
The POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow endpoint allows building public flows without requiring authentication. When the optional data parameter is supplied, the endpoint uses attacker-controlled flow data (containing arbitrary Python code in node definitions) instead of the stored flow data from the database. This code is passed to exec() with zero sandboxing, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution.
This is distinct from CVE-2025-3248, which fixed /api/v1/validate/code by adding authentication. The build_public_tmp endpoint is designed to be unauthenticated (for public flows) but incorrectly accepts attacker-supplied flow data containing arbitrary executable code.
Affected Code
Vulnerable Endpoint (No Authentication)
File: src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/chat.py, lines 580-657
@router.post("/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow")
async def build_public_tmp(
*,
flow_id: uuid.UUID,
data: Annotated[FlowDataRequest | None, Body(embed=True)] = None, # ATTACKER CONTROLLED
request: Request,
# ... NO Depends(get_current_active_user) -- MISSING AUTH ...
):
"""Build a public flow without requiring authentication."""
client_id = request.cookies.get("client_id")
owner_user, new_flow_id = await verify_public_flow_and_get_user(flow_id=flow_id, client_id=client_id)
job_id = await start_flow_build(
flow_id=new_flow_id,
data=data, # Attacker's data passed directly to graph builder
current_user=owner_user,
...
)
Compare with the authenticated build endpoint at line 138, which requires current_user: CurrentActiveUser.
Code Execution Chain
When attacker-supplied data is provided, it flows through:
start_flow_build(data=attacker_data)→generate_flow_events()--build.py:81create_graph()→build_graph_from_data(payload=data.model_dump())--build.py:298Graph.from_payload(payload)parses attacker nodes --base.py:1168add_nodes_and_edges()→initialize()→_build_graph()--base.py:270,527_instantiate_components_in_vertices()iterates nodes --base.py:1323vertex.instantiate_component()→instantiate_class(vertex)--loading.py:28code = custom_params.pop("code")extracts attacker code --loading.py:43eval_custom_component_code(code)→create_class(code, class_name)--eval.py:9prepare_global_scope(module)--validate.py:323exec(compiled_code, exec_globals)-- ARBITRARY CODE EXECUTION --validate.py:397
Unsandboxed exec() in prepare_global_scope
File: src/lfx/src/lfx/custom/validate.py, lines 340-397
def prepare_global_scope(module):
exec_globals = globals().copy()
# Imports are resolved first (any module can be imported)
for node in imports:
module_obj = importlib.import_module(module_name) # line 352
exec_globals[variable_name] = module_obj
# Then ALL top-level definitions are executed (Assign, ClassDef, FunctionDef)
if definitions:
combined_module = ast.Module(body=definitions, type_ignores=[])
compiled_code = compile(combined_module, "<string>", "exec")
exec(compiled_code, exec_globals) # line 397 - ARBITRARY CODE EXECUTION
Critical detail: prepare_global_scope executes ast.Assign nodes. An attacker's code like _x = os.system("id") is an assignment and will be executed during graph building -- before the flow even "runs."
Prerequisites
- Target Langflow instance has at least one public flow (common for demos, chatbots, shared workflows)
- Attacker knows the public flow's UUID (discoverable via shared links/URLs)
- No authentication required -- only a
client_idcookie (any arbitrary string value)
When AUTO_LOGIN=true (the default), all prerequisites can be met by an unauthenticated attacker:
GET /api/v1/auto_login→ obtain superuser token- `POST…
- Record
GHSA-vwmf-pq79-vjvx- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:A - CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-306, CWE-94, CWE-95
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-379
9.3
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in Langflow via Public Flow Build Endpoint
Summary
The POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow endpoint allows building public flows without requiring authentication. When the optional data parameter is supplied, the endpoint uses attacker-controlled flow data (containing arbitrary Python code in node definitions) instead of the stored flow data from the database. This code is passed to exec() with zero sandboxing, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution.
This is distinct from CVE-2025-3248, which fixed /api/v1/validate/code by adding authentication. The build_public_tmp endpoint is designed to be unauthenticated (for public flows) but incorrectly accepts attacker-supplied flow data containing arbitrary executable code.
Affected Code
Vulnerable Endpoint (No Authentication)
File: src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/chat.py, lines 580-657
@router.post("/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow")
async def build_public_tmp(
*,
flow_id: uuid.UUID,
data: Annotated[FlowDataRequest | None, Body(embed=True)] = None, # ATTACKER CONTROLLED
request: Request,
# ... NO Depends(get_current_active_user) -- MISSING AUTH ...
):
"""Build a public flow without requiring authentication."""
client_id = request.cookies.get("client_id")
owner_user, new_flow_id = await verify_public_flow_and_get_user(flow_id=flow_id, client_id=client_id)
job_id = await start_flow_build(
flow_id=new_flow_id,
data=data, # Attacker's data passed directly to graph builder
current_user=owner_user,
...
)
Compare with the authenticated build endpoint at line 138, which requires current_user: CurrentActiveUser.
Code Execution Chain
When attacker-supplied data is provided, it flows through:
start_flow_build(data=attacker_data)→generate_flow_events()--build.py:81create_graph()→build_graph_from_data(payload=data.model_dump())--build.py:298Graph.from_payload(payload)parses attacker nodes --base.py:1168add_nodes_and_edges()→initialize()→_build_graph()--base.py:270,527_instantiate_components_in_vertices()iterates nodes --base.py:1323vertex.instantiate_component()→instantiate_class(vertex)--loading.py:28code = custom_params.pop("code")extracts attacker code --loading.py:43eval_custom_component_code(code)→create_class(code, class_name)--eval.py:9prepare_global_scope(module)--validate.py:323exec(compiled_code, exec_globals)-- ARBITRARY CODE EXECUTION --validate.py:397
Unsandboxed exec() in prepare_global_scope
File: src/lfx/src/lfx/custom/validate.py, lines 340-397
def prepare_global_scope(module):
exec_globals = globals().copy()
# Imports are resolved first (any module can be imported)
for node in imports:
module_obj = importlib.import_module(module_name) # line 352
exec_globals[variable_name] = module_obj
# Then ALL top-level definitions are executed (Assign, ClassDef, FunctionDef)
if definitions:
combined_module = ast.Module(body=definitions, type_ignores=[])
compiled_code = compile(combined_module, "<string>", "exec")
exec(compiled_code, exec_globals) # line 397 - ARBITRARY CODE EXECUTION
Critical detail: prepare_global_scope executes ast.Assign nodes. An attacker's code like _x = os.system("id") is an assignment and will be executed during graph building -- before the flow even "runs."
Prerequisites
- Target Langflow instance has at least one public flow (common for demos, chatbots, shared workflows)
- Attacker knows the public flow's UUID (discoverable via shared links/URLs)
- No authentication required -- only a
client_idcookie (any arbitrary string value)
When AUTO_LOGIN=true (the default), all prerequisites can be met by an unauthenticated attacker:
GET /api/v1/auto_login→ obtain superuser token 2.…
- Record
PYSEC-2026-379- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:A - CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
langflowPyPI |
through 1.8.2 | 1.9.0 |
langflowPyPI |
before 1.9.0, plus listed versions 0.0.310.0.320.0.330.0.400.0.44 Show 45 moreShow less0.0.450.0.460.0.520.0.530.0.540.0.550.0.560.0.570.0.580.0.610.0.620.0.630.0.640.0.650.0.660.0.670.0.680.0.690.0.700.0.710.0.720.0.730.0.740.0.750.0.760.0.780.0.790.0.800.0.810.0.830.0.840.0.850.0.860.0.870.0.880.0.890.1.00.1.20.1.30.1.40.1.50.1.60.1.70.2.00.2.1 |
1.9.0 |
Public exploits
Links only. Every CVE stores no exploit code.
| Source | Link | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Metasploit | Langflow Unauth RCE | 2026-03-20 |
| PoC in GitHub | MaxMnMl/langflow-CVE-2026-33017-poc | 2026-03-21 |
| PoC in GitHub | SimoesCTT/Sovereign-Echo-33017 | 2026-03-21 |
| PoC in GitHub | omer-efe-curkus/CVE-2026-33017-Langflow-RCE-PoC | 2026-03-21 |
| PoC in GitHub | rootdirective-sec/CVE-2026-33017-Lab | 2026-03-26 |
| PoC in GitHub | z4yd3/PoC-CVE-2026-33017 | 2026-03-27 |
| PoC in GitHub | EQSTLab/CVE-2026-33017 | 2026-03-31 |
| PoC in GitHub | masterwok/PoC-CVE-2026-33017 | 2026-04-07 |
| PoC in GitHub | 0xBlackash/CVE-2026-33017 | 2026-04-19 |
| PoC in GitHub | Jorrit-VM/CVE-2026-33017 | 2026-04-20 |
Show 18 moreShow less
| Source | Link | Date |
|---|---|---|
| PoC in GitHub | arensballiu/CVE-2026-33017-langflow-rce | 2026-05-22 |
| PoC in GitHub | c0gnit00/CVE-2026-33017 | 2026-07-02 |
| PoC in GitHub | diamorphine666/CVE-2026-33017-Exploit | 2026-07-04 |
| PoC in GitHub | yayip/CVE-2026-33017 | 2026-07-04 |
| Exploit-DB | Langflow 1.9.0 - RCE | 2026-07-08 |
| PoC in GitHub | Usman0220/CVE-2026-33017-Langflow-RCE | 2026-07-08 |
| PoC in GitHub | 1337or420/CVE-2026-33017-Langflow-RCE | 2026-07-17 |
| PoC in GitHub | CerberusMrXi/Langflow-cve-2026-33017-exploit | 2026-07-19 |
| PoC in GitHub | Dynamo2k1/CVE-2026-33017 | 2026-07-23 |
| PoC in GitHub | TatoSec/CVE-2026-33017-Langflop | 2026-08-05 |
| PoC in GitHub | NSK-394/kavach-loop | 2026-08-10 |
| PoC in GitHub | lxxexxbxx/CVE-2026-33017 | 2026-08-13 |
| PoC in GitHub | sonnelon/CVE-2026-33017-PoC | 2026-08-13 |
| PoC in GitHub | yym8538/CVE-2026-33017 | 2026-08-21 |
| PoC in GitHub | ahseven/CVE-2026-33017-PoC-Reverse-Shell | 2026-08-28 |
| PoC in GitHub | e4zyy/Project-CVE-2026-33017 | 2026-08-28 |
| PoC in GitHub | maxprog-svg/CVE-2026-33017 | 2026-09-01 |
| Nuclei | Langflow < 1.9.0 - Remote Code Execution |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| exploits, exploits_more | PoC in GitHub | |
| exploitation | ||
| exploits, exploits_more | ||
| exploits | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, Exploit-DB, GitHub Advisories, CISA KEV, Metasploit, Nuclei, NVD, OSV, PoC in GitHub |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-33017 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.3) in Langflow, published March 17, 2026. CISA lists it as known to be exploited, since March 25, 2026. EUVD reports exploitation since March 25, 2026. Public exploit code exists. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 96.4%, the 99th percentile. Fixed in langflow 1.9.0.
References
github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-vwmf-pq79-vjvx
github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/73b6612e3ef25fdae0a752d75b0fabd47328d4f0
github.com/advisories/GHSA-rvqx-wpfh-mfx7
sysdig.com/blog/cve-2026-33017-how-attackers-compromised-langflow-ai-pipelines-in-20-hours
medium.com/@aviral23/cve-2026-33017-how-i-found-an-unauthenticated-rce-in-langflow-by-reading-the-code-they-already-dc96cdce5896
cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-33017
Show 9 moreShow less
github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases/tag/1.8.2
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33017
github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12160
github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/issues/12345
cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-33017
github.com/advisories/GHSA-vwmf-pq79-vjvx
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/33xxx/CVE-2026-33017.json
github.com/langflow-ai/langflow
pypi.org/project/langflow
Left out here: 243 versions and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them. The full exploit list has 3 more links.