Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-33310

Intake has a Command Injection via shell() Expansion in Parameter Defaults

8.8 HighPublic exploitFix available

Intake is a package for finding, investigating, loading and disseminating data. Prior to version 2.0.9, the shell() syntax within parameter default values appears to be automatically expanded during the catalog parsing process. If a catalog contains a parameter default such as shell(<command>), the command may be executed when the catalog source is accessed. This means that if a user loads a malicious catalog YAML, embedded commands could execute on the host system. Version 2.0.9 mitigates the issue by making getshell False by default everywhere.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
Required

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

0.45%Up 0.4 points since Mar 25, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.8

Intake has a Command Injection via shell() Expansion in Parameter Defaults

Intake is a package for finding, investigating, loading and disseminating data. Prior to version 2.0.9, the shell() syntax within parameter default values appears to be automatically expanded during the catalog parsing process. If a catalog contains a parameter default such as shell(<command>), the command may be executed when the catalog source is accessed. This means that if a user loads a malicious catalog YAML, embedded commands could execute on the host system. Version 2.0.9 mitigates the issue by making getshell False by default everywhere.

Record
CVE-2026-33310
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-78, CWE-94
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-20087 8.8

Intake is a package for finding, investigating, loading and disseminating data. Prior to version 2.0.9, the shell() syntax within parameter default values appears to be automatically expanded during the catalog parsing process. If a catalog contains a parameter default such as shell(<command>), the command may be executed when the catalog source is accessed. This means that if a user loads a malicious catalog YAML, embedded commands could execute on the host system. Version 2.0.9 mitigates the issue by making getshell False by default everywhere.

Record
EUVD-2026-20087
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-37g4-qqqv-7m99 8.8

Intake has a Command Injection via shell() Expansion in Parameter Defaults

Summary

The shell() syntax within parameter default values appears to be automatically expanded during the catalog parsing process. If a catalog contains a parameter default such as shell(<command>), the command may be executed when the catalog source is accessed. This means that if a user loads a malicious catalog YAML, embedded commands could execute on the host system. This behavior could potentially be classified as OS Command Injection / Unsafe Shell Expansion.

Details

The issue appears to originate from how parameter default values are expanded when a catalog source is accessed.

During catalog loading and source access:

Intake resolves parameter default values The function responsible for expanding defaults processes the shell() syntax The shell expression triggers a subprocess execution Because this occurs during catalog evaluation, the command may execute before the user explicitly interacts with the dataset itself.

Affected logic appears to involve:

expand_defaults()

and related parameter parsing mechanisms.

PoC

exploit.yaml

metadata:
  version: 1
sources:
  rce_test:
    driver: csv
    description: "Testing shell expansion in parameters"
    args:
      urlpath: "{{ cmd_exec }}"
    parameters:
      cmd_exec:
        display_name: "Test Parameter"
        type: str
        default: "shell(touch /tmp/intake_rce_test)"

reproduce.py

import intake
import os

PROOF_FILE = "/tmp/intake_rce_test"

if os.path.exists(PROOF_FILE):
    os.remove(PROOF_FILE)

print(f"[*] Proof file exists before: {os.path.exists(PROOF_FILE)}")

try:
    cat = intake.open_catalog("exploit.yaml")

    print("Accessing source...")
    _ = cat["rce_test"]

except Exception as e:
    print(f" Error during execution: {e}")

if os.path.exists(PROOF_FILE):
    print(f" Command execution confirmed, Found: {PROOF_FILE}")
else:
    print("Command execution did not occur.")

Attack Scenario

A potential attack scenario could be:

  1. An attacker publishes a malicious Intake catalog YAML file
  2. The victim downloads or loads the catalog
  3. The victim accesses a source entry in the catalog
  4. Parameter defaults are expanded
  5. The shell() expression triggers execution of the embedded command

Impact

If this behavior is confirmed to be unintended, an attacker could distribute a malicious catalog file via:

  • Git repositories
  • shared datasets
  • URLs
  • data science workflows
  • Any user loading the catalog could unknowingly execute commands with their local user privileges.

Recommendation

Possible mitigations could include:

  • disabling shell() expansion by default
  • requiring an explicit opt-in flag (e.g., allow_shell=True)
  • restricting shell execution for catalogs loaded from untrusted sources Please let me know if additional information or testing is needed. I'm happy to assist with further analysis or validation.
Record
GHSA-37g4-qqqv-7m99
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-78, CWE-94
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.8

Intake is a package for finding, investigating, loading and disseminating data. Prior to version 2.0.9, the shell() syntax within parameter default values appears to be automatically expanded during the catalog parsing process. If a catalog contains a parameter default such as shell(<command>), the command may be executed when the catalog source is accessed. This means that if a user loads a malicious catalog YAML, embedded commands could execute on the host system. Version 2.0.9 mitigates the issue by making getshell False by default everywhere.

Record
CVE-2026-33310
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-78, CWE-94
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 8.8

Intake has a Command Injection via shell() Expansion in Parameter Defaults

Intake is a package for finding, investigating, loading and disseminating data. Prior to version 2.0.9, the shell() syntax within parameter default values appears to be automatically expanded during the catalog parsing process. If a catalog contains a parameter default such as shell(<command>), the command may be executed when the catalog source is accessed. This means that if a user loads a malicious catalog YAML, embedded commands could execute on the host system. Version 2.0.9 mitigates the issue by making getshell False by default everywhere.

Record
CVE-2026-33310
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-78, CWE-94
Updated
2026-11-11
OSVGHSA-37g4-qqqv-7m99 8.8

Intake has a Command Injection via shell() Expansion in Parameter Defaults

Summary

The shell() syntax within parameter default values appears to be automatically expanded during the catalog parsing process. If a catalog contains a parameter default such as shell(<command>), the command may be executed when the catalog source is accessed. This means that if a user loads a malicious catalog YAML, embedded commands could execute on the host system. This behavior could potentially be classified as OS Command Injection / Unsafe Shell Expansion.

Details

The issue appears to originate from how parameter default values are expanded when a catalog source is accessed.

During catalog loading and source access:

Intake resolves parameter default values The function responsible for expanding defaults processes the shell() syntax The shell expression triggers a subprocess execution Because this occurs during catalog evaluation, the command may execute before the user explicitly interacts with the dataset itself.

Affected logic appears to involve:

expand_defaults()

and related parameter parsing mechanisms.

PoC

exploit.yaml

metadata:
  version: 1
sources:
  rce_test:
    driver: csv
    description: "Testing shell expansion in parameters"
    args:
      urlpath: "{{ cmd_exec }}"
    parameters:
      cmd_exec:
        display_name: "Test Parameter"
        type: str
        default: "shell(touch /tmp/intake_rce_test)"

reproduce.py

import intake
import os

PROOF_FILE = "/tmp/intake_rce_test"

if os.path.exists(PROOF_FILE):
    os.remove(PROOF_FILE)

print(f"[*] Proof file exists before: {os.path.exists(PROOF_FILE)}")

try:
    cat = intake.open_catalog("exploit.yaml")

    print("Accessing source...")
    _ = cat["rce_test"]

except Exception as e:
    print(f" Error during execution: {e}")

if os.path.exists(PROOF_FILE):
    print(f" Command execution confirmed, Found: {PROOF_FILE}")
else:
    print("Command execution did not occur.")

Attack Scenario

A potential attack scenario could be:

  1. An attacker publishes a malicious Intake catalog YAML file
  2. The victim downloads or loads the catalog
  3. The victim accesses a source entry in the catalog
  4. Parameter defaults are expanded
  5. The shell() expression triggers execution of the embedded command

Impact

If this behavior is confirmed to be unintended, an attacker could distribute a malicious catalog file via:

  • Git repositories
  • shared datasets
  • URLs
  • data science workflows
  • Any user loading the catalog could unknowingly execute commands with their local user privileges.

Recommendation

Possible mitigations could include:

  • disabling shell() expansion by default
  • requiring an explicit opt-in flag (e.g., allow_shell=True)
  • restricting shell execution for catalogs loaded from untrusted sources Please let me know if additional information or testing is needed. I'm happy to assist with further analysis or validation.
Record
GHSA-37g4-qqqv-7m99
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-78, CWE-94
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2185 8.8

Intake is a package for finding, investigating, loading and disseminating data. Prior to version 2.0.9, the shell() syntax within parameter default values appears to be automatically expanded during the catalog parsing process. If a catalog contains a parameter default such as shell(<command>), the command may be executed when the catalog source is accessed. This means that if a user loads a malicious catalog YAML, embedded commands could execute on the host system. Version 2.0.9 mitigates the issue by making getshell False by default everywhere.

Record
PYSEC-2026-2185
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:10426-1 No score

python311-intake-2.0.9-1.1 on GA media

These are all security issues fixed in the python311-intake-2.0.9-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.

Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:10426-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
intake
PyPI
through 2.0.9 None known
intake
PyPI
through 2.0.9, plus listed versions
0.1.20.1.30.2.30.2.80.2.9
Show 33 moreShow less
0.3.00.3.10.4.00.4.10.4.20.4.30.4.40.5.00.5.10.5.20.5.30.5.40.5.50.6.00.6.10.6.20.6.30.6.40.6.50.6.60.6.70.6.80.7.02.0.02.0.0a12.0.0a22.0.12.0.32.0.42.0.52.0.62.0.72.0.8
None known
intake
PyPI
before 2.0.9, plus listed versions
0.1.20.1.30.2.30.2.80.2.9
Show 33 moreShow less
0.3.00.3.10.4.00.4.10.4.20.4.30.4.40.5.00.5.10.5.20.5.30.5.40.5.50.6.00.6.10.6.20.6.30.6.40.6.50.6.60.6.70.6.80.7.02.0.02.0.0a12.0.0a22.0.12.0.32.0.42.0.52.0.62.0.72.0.8
2.0.9
python-intake
openSUSE:Tumbleweed
before 2.0.9-1.1
2.0.9-1.1

Public exploits

Links only. Every CVE stores no exploit code.

Public exploits
SourceLinkDate
PoC in GitHubredyank/CVE-2026-333102026-04-03

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
factsOSV
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV, PoC in GitHub

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-33310 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.8) in Intake, published March 19, 2026. Public exploit code exists. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.45%, the 39th percentile. Fixed in intake 2.0.9.

References

MoveEnter Open