CVE-2026-33744
BentoML has Dockerfile Command Injection via system_packages in bentofile.yaml
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Prior to 1.4.37, the docker.system_packages field in bentofile.yaml accepts arbitrary strings that are interpolated directly into Dockerfile RUN commands without sanitization. Since system_packages is semantically a list of OS package names (data), users do not expect values to be interpreted as shell commands. A malicious bentofile.yaml achieves arbitrary command execution during bentoml containerize / docker build. Version 1.4.37 fixes the issue.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- Required
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
7.8
BentoML has Dockerfile Command Injection via system_packages in bentofile.yaml
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Prior to 1.4.37, the docker.system_packages field in bentofile.yaml accepts arbitrary strings that are interpolated directly into Dockerfile RUN commands without sanitization. Since system_packages is semantically a list of OS package names (data), users do not expect values to be interpreted as shell commands. A malicious bentofile.yaml achieves arbitrary command execution during bentoml containerize / docker build. Version 1.4.37 fixes the issue.
- Record
CVE-2026-33744- CVSS 3.1
- 7.8 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-94
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-16513
7.8
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Prior to 1.4.37, the docker.system_packages field in bentofile.yaml accepts arbitrary strings that are interpolated directly into Dockerfile RUN commands without sanitization. Since system_packages is semantically a list of OS package names (data), users do not expect values to be interpreted as shell commands. A malicious bentofile.yaml achieves arbitrary command execution during bentoml containerize / docker build. Version 1.4.37 fixes the issue.
- Record
EUVD-2026-16513- CVSS 3.1
- 7.8 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-jfjg-vc52-wqvf
7.8
BentoML has Dockerfile Command Injection via system_packages in bentofile.yaml
Summary
The docker.system_packages field in bentofile.yaml accepts arbitrary strings that are interpolated directly into Dockerfile RUN commands without sanitization. Since system_packages is semantically a list of OS package names (data), users do not expect values to be interpreted as shell commands. A malicious bentofile.yaml achieves arbitrary command execution during bentoml containerize / docker build.
Affected Component
src/_bentoml_sdk/images.py:85-89—.format(packages=" ".join(packages))into shell commandsrc/bentoml/_internal/container/frontend/dockerfile/templates/base_debian.j2:13—{{ __options__system_packages | join(' ') }}src/bentoml/_internal/bento/build_config.py:174— No validation onsystem_packages- All distro install commands in
src/bentoml/_internal/container/frontend/dockerfile/__init__.py
Affected Versions
All versions supporting docker.system_packages in bentofile.yaml, confirmed on 1.4.36.
Steps to Reproduce
- Create a project directory with:
service.py:
import bentoml
@bentoml.service
class MyService:
@bentoml.api
def predict(self) -> str:
return "hello"
bentofile.yaml:
service: "service:MyService"
docker:
system_packages:
- "curl && id > /tmp/bentoml-pwned #"
- Run:
bentoml build
- Examine the generated Dockerfile at
~/bentoml/bentos/my_service/<tag>/env/docker/Dockerfile. Line 41 will contain:
RUN apt-get install -q -y -o Dpkg::Options::=--force-confdef curl && id > /tmp/bentoml-pwned #
- Running
bentoml containerize my_service:<tag>will executeid > /tmp/bentoml-pwnedas root during the Docker build.
Root Cause
The system_packages field values are treated as package names (data) by the user but are string-formatted directly into shell commands in the Dockerfile:
# images.py:85-89
self.commands.append(
CONTAINER_METADATA[self.distro]["install_command"].format(
packages=" ".join(packages) # No escaping
)
)
Where install_command is "apt-get install -q -y -o Dpkg::Options::=--force-confdef {packages}".
A bash_quote filter (wrapping shlex.quote) exists in the codebase and is registered in both Jinja2 environments, but it is only applied to environment variable values, never to system_packages.
Impact
- Malicious repositories: An attacker publishes an ML project with a crafted
bentofile.yaml. Anyone who clones and builds it gets arbitrary code execution duringdocker build. - CI/CD compromise: Automated pipelines running
bentoml containerizeon PRs that modifybentofile.yamlare vulnerable. - BentoCloud: If BentoCloud builds images from user-supplied
bentofile.yaml, this could achieve RCE on cloud infrastructure. - Supply chain: Shared bentos or model repos in the BentoML ecosystem can contain malicious configs.
Suggested Fix
Option 1: Input validation (recommended)
Add a regex validator to system_packages in build_config.py:
import re
VALID_PACKAGE_NAME = re.compile(r'^[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9.+\-_:]*$')
def _validate_system_packages(instance, attribute, value):
if value is None:
return
for pkg in value:
if not VALID_PACKAGE_NAME.match(pkg):
raise BentoMLException(
f"Invalid system package name: {pkg!r}. "
"Package names may only contain alphanumeric characters, "
"dots, plus signs, hyphens, underscores, and colons."
)
system_packages: t.Optional[t.List[str]] = attr.field(
default=None, validator=_validate_system_packages
)
Option 2: Output escaping
Apply shlex.quote() to each package name before interpolation in images.py:system_packages() and apply the bash_quote Jinja2 filter in base_debian.j2.
- Record
GHSA-jfjg-vc52-wqvf- CVSS 3.1
- 7.8 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-94
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
7.8
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Prior to 1.4.37, the docker.system_packages field in bentofile.yaml accepts arbitrary strings that are interpolated directly into Dockerfile RUN commands without sanitization. Since system_packages is semantically a list of OS package names (data), users do not expect values to be interpreted as shell commands. A malicious bentofile.yaml achieves arbitrary command execution during bentoml containerize / docker build. Version 1.4.37 fixes the issue.
- Record
CVE-2026-33744- CVSS 3.1
- 7.8 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-94
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
7.8
BentoML has Dockerfile Command Injection via system_packages in bentofile.yaml
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Prior to 1.4.37, the docker.system_packages field in bentofile.yaml accepts arbitrary strings that are interpolated directly into Dockerfile RUN commands without sanitization. Since system_packages is semantically a list of OS package names (data), users do not expect values to be interpreted as shell commands. A malicious bentofile.yaml achieves arbitrary command execution during bentoml containerize / docker build. Version 1.4.37 fixes the issue.
- Record
CVE-2026-33744- CVSS 3.1
- 7.8 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-94
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-jfjg-vc52-wqvf
7.8
BentoML has Dockerfile Command Injection via system_packages in bentofile.yaml
Summary
The docker.system_packages field in bentofile.yaml accepts arbitrary strings that are interpolated directly into Dockerfile RUN commands without sanitization. Since system_packages is semantically a list of OS package names (data), users do not expect values to be interpreted as shell commands. A malicious bentofile.yaml achieves arbitrary command execution during bentoml containerize / docker build.
Affected Component
src/_bentoml_sdk/images.py:85-89—.format(packages=" ".join(packages))into shell commandsrc/bentoml/_internal/container/frontend/dockerfile/templates/base_debian.j2:13—{{ __options__system_packages | join(' ') }}src/bentoml/_internal/bento/build_config.py:174— No validation onsystem_packages- All distro install commands in
src/bentoml/_internal/container/frontend/dockerfile/__init__.py
Affected Versions
All versions supporting docker.system_packages in bentofile.yaml, confirmed on 1.4.36.
Steps to Reproduce
- Create a project directory with:
service.py:
import bentoml
@bentoml.service
class MyService:
@bentoml.api
def predict(self) -> str:
return "hello"
bentofile.yaml:
service: "service:MyService"
docker:
system_packages:
- "curl && id > /tmp/bentoml-pwned #"
- Run:
bentoml build
- Examine the generated Dockerfile at
~/bentoml/bentos/my_service/<tag>/env/docker/Dockerfile. Line 41 will contain:
RUN apt-get install -q -y -o Dpkg::Options::=--force-confdef curl && id > /tmp/bentoml-pwned #
- Running
bentoml containerize my_service:<tag>will executeid > /tmp/bentoml-pwnedas root during the Docker build.
Root Cause
The system_packages field values are treated as package names (data) by the user but are string-formatted directly into shell commands in the Dockerfile:
# images.py:85-89
self.commands.append(
CONTAINER_METADATA[self.distro]["install_command"].format(
packages=" ".join(packages) # No escaping
)
)
Where install_command is "apt-get install -q -y -o Dpkg::Options::=--force-confdef {packages}".
A bash_quote filter (wrapping shlex.quote) exists in the codebase and is registered in both Jinja2 environments, but it is only applied to environment variable values, never to system_packages.
Impact
- Malicious repositories: An attacker publishes an ML project with a crafted
bentofile.yaml. Anyone who clones and builds it gets arbitrary code execution duringdocker build. - CI/CD compromise: Automated pipelines running
bentoml containerizeon PRs that modifybentofile.yamlare vulnerable. - BentoCloud: If BentoCloud builds images from user-supplied
bentofile.yaml, this could achieve RCE on cloud infrastructure. - Supply chain: Shared bentos or model repos in the BentoML ecosystem can contain malicious configs.
Suggested Fix
Option 1: Input validation (recommended)
Add a regex validator to system_packages in build_config.py:
import re
VALID_PACKAGE_NAME = re.compile(r'^[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9.+\-_:]*$')
def _validate_system_packages(instance, attribute, value):
if value is None:
return
for pkg in value:
if not VALID_PACKAGE_NAME.match(pkg):
raise BentoMLException(
f"Invalid system package name: {pkg!r}. "
"Package names may only contain alphanumeric characters, "
"dots, plus signs, hyphens, underscores, and colons."
)
system_packages: t.Optional[t.List[str]] = attr.field(
default=None, validator=_validate_system_packages
)
Option 2: Output escaping
Apply shlex.quote() to each package name before interpolation in images.py:system_packages() and apply the bash_quote Jinja2 filter in base_debian.j2.
- Record
GHSA-jfjg-vc52-wqvf- CVSS 3.1
- 7.8 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-94
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-157
7.8
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Prior to 1.4.37, the docker.system_packages field in bentofile.yaml accepts arbitrary strings that are interpolated directly into Dockerfile RUN commands without sanitization. Since system_packages is semantically a list of OS package names (data), users do not expect values to be interpreted as shell commands. A malicious bentofile.yaml achieves arbitrary command execution during bentoml containerize / docker build. Version 1.4.37 fixes the issue.
- Record
PYSEC-2026-157- CVSS 3.1
- 7.8 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
bentomlPyPI |
through 1.4.36 | 1.4.37 |
bentomlPyPI |
before 1.4.37, plus listed versions 0.0.10.0.20.0.30.0.50.0.6a0 Show 45 moreShow less0.0.70.0.7.dev00.0.80.0.8.post10.0.90.1.10.1.20.10.00.10.10.11.00.11.dev00.12.00.12.10.13.00.13.10.13.20.2.00.2.10.2.20.3.00.3.10.3.30.3.40.4.00.4.10.4.20.4.30.4.40.4.50.4.70.4.80.4.90.5.00.5.10.5.20.5.30.5.40.5.50.5.60.5.70.5.80.6.00.6.10.6.20.6.3 |
1.4.37 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-33744 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.8) in Bentoml, published March 26, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.26%, the 17th percentile. Fixed in bentoml 1.4.37.
References
github.com/bentoml/BentoML/security/advisories/GHSA-jfjg-vc52-wqvf
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33744
github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/bentoml/PYSEC-2026-157.yaml
github.com/advisories/GHSA-jfjg-vc52-wqvf
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/33xxx/CVE-2026-33744.json
github.com/bentoml/BentoML
Left out here: 166 versions. The JSON record has them.