Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-33752

Redirect-based SSRF leading to internal network access in curl_cffi (with TLS impersonation bypass)

8.6 HighPublic exploitFix available

curl_cffi is the a Python binding for curl. Prior to 0.15.0, curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl. Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.15.0.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.48%Up 0.5 points since Apr 7, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.6

Redirect-based SSRF leading to internal network access in curl_cffi (with TLS impersonation bypass)

curl_cffi is the a Python binding for curl. Prior to 0.15.0, curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl. Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.15.0.

Record
CVE-2026-33752
CVSS 3.1
8.6 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-19293 8.6

curl_cffi is the a Python binding for curl. Prior to 0.15.0, curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl. Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.15.0.

Record
EUVD-2026-19293
CVSS 3.1
8.6 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp 8.6

curl_cffi: Redirect-based SSRF leads to internal network access in curl_cffi (with TLS impersonation bypass)

Summary

curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl.

Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls.

Details

The issue comes from how curl_cffi handles outbound requests

  • User-supplied URLs are passed directly to libcurl without checking whether they resolve to internal IP ranges (e.g., 127.0.0.1, 169.254.0.0/16).
  • Redirects are automatically followed (CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION = 1) inside libcurl.
  • There is no validation of redirect destinations at the Python layer.

This means that even if an application only allows requests to external URLs, an attacker can

  • Provide a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server
  • Return a redirect response pointing to an internal service
  • Have curl_cffi follow that redirect automatically

As a result, internal endpoints (such as cloud instance metadata APIs) can be accessed.

Additionally, curl_cffi supports TLS fingerprint impersonation (e.g., impersonate="chrome"). In environments where outbound requests are filtered based on TLS fingerprinting, this can make such requests harder to detect or block

This behavior is similar to previously reported redirect-based SSRF issues such as CVE-2025-68616, where redirects allowed access to unintended internal resources.

PoC

  1. Direct internal request
import curl_cffi
resp = curl_cffi.get("http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/")
print(resp.text)
  1. Redirect to internal service Attacker server:
GET /test
→ 302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/

Victim code:

import curl_cffi
resp = curl_cffi.get("https://attacker.example/test")
print(resp.text)

Result

  • Initial request goes to attacker server
  • Redirect is returned
  • libcurl follows the redirect automatically
  • Internal metadata endpoint is accessed
  1. With TLS impersonation
import curl_cffi\
resp = curl_cffi.get(
    "https://attacker.example/test",
    impersonate="chrome")

In some environments, this may help the request bypass TLS-based filtering controls.

Impact

An attacker who can control the requested URL may be able to:

  • Access internal network services
  • Reach cloud metadata endpoints and retrieve sensitive information
  • Bypass certain outbound filtering mechanisms (depending on environment) This corresponds to CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery.
Record
GHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp
CVSS 3.1
8.6 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.6

curl_cffi is the a Python binding for curl. Prior to 0.15.0, curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl. Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.15.0.

Record
CVE-2026-33752
CVSS 3.1
8.6 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 8.6

Redirect-based SSRF leading to internal network access in curl_cffi (with TLS impersonation bypass)

curl_cffi is the a Python binding for curl. Prior to 0.15.0, curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl. Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.15.0.

Record
CVE-2026-33752
CVSS 3.1
8.6 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp 8.6

curl_cffi: Redirect-based SSRF leads to internal network access in curl_cffi (with TLS impersonation bypass)

Summary

curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl.

Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls.

Details

The issue comes from how curl_cffi handles outbound requests

  • User-supplied URLs are passed directly to libcurl without checking whether they resolve to internal IP ranges (e.g., 127.0.0.1, 169.254.0.0/16).
  • Redirects are automatically followed (CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION = 1) inside libcurl.
  • There is no validation of redirect destinations at the Python layer.

This means that even if an application only allows requests to external URLs, an attacker can

  • Provide a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server
  • Return a redirect response pointing to an internal service
  • Have curl_cffi follow that redirect automatically

As a result, internal endpoints (such as cloud instance metadata APIs) can be accessed.

Additionally, curl_cffi supports TLS fingerprint impersonation (e.g., impersonate="chrome"). In environments where outbound requests are filtered based on TLS fingerprinting, this can make such requests harder to detect or block

This behavior is similar to previously reported redirect-based SSRF issues such as CVE-2025-68616, where redirects allowed access to unintended internal resources.

PoC

  1. Direct internal request
import curl_cffi
resp = curl_cffi.get("http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/")
print(resp.text)
  1. Redirect to internal service Attacker server:
GET /test
→ 302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/

Victim code:

import curl_cffi
resp = curl_cffi.get("https://attacker.example/test")
print(resp.text)

Result

  • Initial request goes to attacker server
  • Redirect is returned
  • libcurl follows the redirect automatically
  • Internal metadata endpoint is accessed
  1. With TLS impersonation
import curl_cffi\
resp = curl_cffi.get(
    "https://attacker.example/test",
    impersonate="chrome")

In some environments, this may help the request bypass TLS-based filtering controls.

Impact

An attacker who can control the requested URL may be able to:

  • Access internal network services
  • Reach cloud metadata endpoints and retrieve sensitive information
  • Bypass certain outbound filtering mechanisms (depending on environment) This corresponds to CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery.
Record
GHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp
CVSS 3.1
8.6 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2431 8.6

curl_cffi: Redirect-based SSRF leads to internal network access in curl_cffi (with TLS impersonation bypass)

Summary

curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl.

Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls.

Details

The issue comes from how curl_cffi handles outbound requests

  • User-supplied URLs are passed directly to libcurl without checking whether they resolve to internal IP ranges (e.g., 127.0.0.1, 169.254.0.0/16).
  • Redirects are automatically followed (CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION = 1) inside libcurl.
  • There is no validation of redirect destinations at the Python layer.

This means that even if an application only allows requests to external URLs, an attacker can

  • Provide a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server
  • Return a redirect response pointing to an internal service
  • Have curl_cffi follow that redirect automatically

As a result, internal endpoints (such as cloud instance metadata APIs) can be accessed.

Additionally, curl_cffi supports TLS fingerprint impersonation (e.g., impersonate="chrome"). In environments where outbound requests are filtered based on TLS fingerprinting, this can make such requests harder to detect or block

This behavior is similar to previously reported redirect-based SSRF issues such as CVE-2025-68616, where redirects allowed access to unintended internal resources.

PoC

  1. Direct internal request
import curl_cffi
resp = curl_cffi.get("http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/")
print(resp.text)
  1. Redirect to internal service Attacker server:
GET /test
→ 302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/

Victim code:

import curl_cffi
resp = curl_cffi.get("https://attacker.example/test")
print(resp.text)

Result

  • Initial request goes to attacker server
  • Redirect is returned
  • libcurl follows the redirect automatically
  • Internal metadata endpoint is accessed
  1. With TLS impersonation
import curl_cffi\
resp = curl_cffi.get(
    "https://attacker.example/test",
    impersonate="chrome")

In some environments, this may help the request bypass TLS-based filtering controls.

Impact

An attacker who can control the requested URL may be able to:

  • Access internal network services
  • Reach cloud metadata endpoints and retrieve sensitive information
  • Bypass certain outbound filtering mechanisms (depending on environment) This corresponds to CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery.
Record
PYSEC-2026-2431
CVSS 3.1
8.6 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
curl-cffi
PyPI
before 0.15.0
0.15.0
curl-cffi
PyPI
before 0.15.0, plus listed versions
0.1.50.10.00.10.0b10.10.0b20.11.0
Show 45 moreShow less
0.11.0b10.11.0b20.11.10.11.20.11.30.11.40.12.00.12.0b10.12.1b10.12.1b20.13.00.13.0b10.14.00.14.0b10.14.0b20.14.0b30.14.0b40.14.0b50.15.0b10.15.0b20.15.0b30.15.0b40.15.0b50.15.0b60.15.0rc10.2.00.2.10.2.40.2.50.3.00.3.10.3.20.3.70.3.80.4.00.5.00.5.10.5.100.5.10b10.5.10b20.5.10b30.5.10b40.5.10b50.5.20.5.3
0.15.0

Public exploits

Links only. Every CVE stores no exploit code.

Public exploits
SourceLinkDate
PoC in GitHubredyank/CVE-2026-337522026-04-03

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV, PoC in GitHub

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-33752 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.6) in Lexiforest Curl Cffi, published April 3, 2026. Public exploit code exists. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.48%, the 41st percentile. Fixed in curl-cffi 0.15.0.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 39 versions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open