CVE-2026-34172
Giskard Agents have Server-side template injection via ChatWorkflow.chat() using non-sandboxed Jinja2 Environment
Giskard is an open-source Python library for testing and evaluating agentic systems. Prior to versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1, ChatWorkflow.chat(message) passes its string argument directly as a Jinja2 template source to a non-sandboxed Environment. A developer who passes user input to this method enables full remote code execution via Jinja2 class traversal. The method name chat and parameter name message naturally invite passing user input directly, but the string is silently parsed as a Jinja2 template, not treated as plain text. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
7.7
Giskard Agents have Server-side template injection via ChatWorkflow.chat() using non-sandboxed Jinja2 Environment
Giskard is an open-source Python library for testing and evaluating agentic systems. Prior to versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1, ChatWorkflow.chat(message) passes its string argument directly as a Jinja2 template source to a non-sandboxed Environment. A developer who passes user input to this method enables full remote code execution via Jinja2 class traversal. The method name chat and parameter name message naturally invite passing user input directly, but the string is silently parsed as a Jinja2 template, not treated as plain text. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1.
- Record
CVE-2026-34172- CVSS 4.0
- 7.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-1336
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-17451
7.7
Giskard is an open-source Python library for testing and evaluating agentic systems. Prior to versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1, ChatWorkflow.chat(message) passes its string argument directly as a Jinja2 template source to a non-sandboxed Environment. A developer who passes user input to this method enables full remote code execution via Jinja2 class traversal. The method name chat and parameter name message naturally invite passing user input directly, but the string is silently parsed as a Jinja2 template, not treated as plain text. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1.
- Record
EUVD-2026-17451- CVSS 4.0
- 7.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-frv4-x25r-588m
7.7
Giskard Agents have Server-side template injection via ChatWorkflow.chat() using non-sandboxed Jinja2 Environment
Summary
ChatWorkflow.chat(message) passes its string argument directly as a Jinja2 template source to a non-sandboxed Environment. A developer who passes user input to this method enables full remote code execution via Jinja2 class traversal.
The method name chat and parameter name message naturally invite passing user input directly, but the string is silently parsed as a Jinja2 template, not treated as plain text.
Root Cause
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/workflow.py line ~261:
def chat(self, message: str | Message | MessageTemplate, role: Role = "user") -> Self:
if isinstance(message, str):
message = MessageTemplate(role=role, content_template=message)
The string becomes content_template, which is parsed by from_string():
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/templates/message.py lines 14-15:
def render(self, **kwargs: Any) -> Message:
template = _inline_env.from_string(self.content_template)
rendered_content = template.render(**kwargs)
The Jinja2 Environment is not sandboxed:
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/templates/environment.py line 37:
_inline_env = Environment(
autoescape=False,
# Not SandboxedEnvironment
)
Proof of Concept
from jinja2 import Environment
env = Environment() # Same as giskard's _inline_env
# Class traversal reaches os.popen
t = env.from_string("{{ ''.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__() | length }}")
print(t.render()) # 342 accessible subclasses
# Full RCE payload (subclass index varies by Python version)
# {{ ''.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__()[INDEX].__init__.__globals__['os'].popen('id').read() }}
A developer building a chatbot:
workflow = ChatWorkflow(generator=my_llm)
workflow = workflow.chat(user_input) # user_input parsed as Jinja2 template
result = await workflow.run() # RCE if user_input contains {{ payload }}
Note: using .with_inputs(var=user_data) is safe because variable values are not parsed as templates. The issue is only when user strings are passed directly to chat().
Impact
Remote code execution on the server hosting any application built with giskard-agents that passes user input to ChatWorkflow.chat(). Attacker can execute system commands, read files, access environment variables.
Affects giskard-agents <=0.3.3 and 1.0.x alpha. Patched in giskard-agents 0.3.4 (stable) and 1.0.2b1 (pre-release).
Mitigation
Update to 0.3.4 (or 1.0.2b1 for the pre-release branch) which includes the fix.
The fix replaces the unsandboxed Jinja2 Environment with SandboxedEnvironment, which blocks attribute access to dunder methods and prevents class traversal chains. SandboxedEnvironment blocks access to attributes starting with _, preventing the __class__.__mro__ traversal chain.
- Record
GHSA-frv4-x25r-588m- CVSS 4.0
- 7.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-1336
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
7.7
Giskard is an open-source Python library for testing and evaluating agentic systems. Prior to versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1, ChatWorkflow.chat(message) passes its string argument directly as a Jinja2 template source to a non-sandboxed Environment. A developer who passes user input to this method enables full remote code execution via Jinja2 class traversal. The method name chat and parameter name message naturally invite passing user input directly, but the string is silently parsed as a Jinja2 template, not treated as plain text. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1.
- Record
CVE-2026-34172- CVSS 4.0
- 7.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 8.8 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-1336
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
7.7
Giskard Agents have Server-side template injection via ChatWorkflow.chat() using non-sandboxed Jinja2 Environment
Giskard is an open-source Python library for testing and evaluating agentic systems. Prior to versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1, ChatWorkflow.chat(message) passes its string argument directly as a Jinja2 template source to a non-sandboxed Environment. A developer who passes user input to this method enables full remote code execution via Jinja2 class traversal. The method name chat and parameter name message naturally invite passing user input directly, but the string is silently parsed as a Jinja2 template, not treated as plain text. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.4 and 1.0.2b1.
- Record
CVE-2026-34172- CVSS 4.0
- 7.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-1336
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-frv4-x25r-588m
7.7
Giskard Agents have Server-side template injection via ChatWorkflow.chat() using non-sandboxed Jinja2 Environment
Summary
ChatWorkflow.chat(message) passes its string argument directly as a Jinja2 template source to a non-sandboxed Environment. A developer who passes user input to this method enables full remote code execution via Jinja2 class traversal.
The method name chat and parameter name message naturally invite passing user input directly, but the string is silently parsed as a Jinja2 template, not treated as plain text.
Root Cause
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/workflow.py line ~261:
def chat(self, message: str | Message | MessageTemplate, role: Role = "user") -> Self:
if isinstance(message, str):
message = MessageTemplate(role=role, content_template=message)
The string becomes content_template, which is parsed by from_string():
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/templates/message.py lines 14-15:
def render(self, **kwargs: Any) -> Message:
template = _inline_env.from_string(self.content_template)
rendered_content = template.render(**kwargs)
The Jinja2 Environment is not sandboxed:
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/templates/environment.py line 37:
_inline_env = Environment(
autoescape=False,
# Not SandboxedEnvironment
)
Proof of Concept
from jinja2 import Environment
env = Environment() # Same as giskard's _inline_env
# Class traversal reaches os.popen
t = env.from_string("{{ ''.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__() | length }}")
print(t.render()) # 342 accessible subclasses
# Full RCE payload (subclass index varies by Python version)
# {{ ''.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__()[INDEX].__init__.__globals__['os'].popen('id').read() }}
A developer building a chatbot:
workflow = ChatWorkflow(generator=my_llm)
workflow = workflow.chat(user_input) # user_input parsed as Jinja2 template
result = await workflow.run() # RCE if user_input contains {{ payload }}
Note: using .with_inputs(var=user_data) is safe because variable values are not parsed as templates. The issue is only when user strings are passed directly to chat().
Impact
Remote code execution on the server hosting any application built with giskard-agents that passes user input to ChatWorkflow.chat(). Attacker can execute system commands, read files, access environment variables.
Affects giskard-agents <=0.3.3 and 1.0.x alpha. Patched in giskard-agents 0.3.4 (stable) and 1.0.2b1 (pre-release).
Mitigation
Update to 0.3.4 (or 1.0.2b1 for the pre-release branch) which includes the fix.
The fix replaces the unsandboxed Jinja2 Environment with SandboxedEnvironment, which blocks attribute access to dunder methods and prevents class traversal chains. SandboxedEnvironment blocks access to attributes starting with _, preventing the __class__.__mro__ traversal chain.
- Record
GHSA-frv4-x25r-588m- CVSS 4.0
- 7.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-1336
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2487
7.7
Giskard Agents have Server-side template injection via ChatWorkflow.chat() using non-sandboxed Jinja2 Environment
Summary
ChatWorkflow.chat(message) passes its string argument directly as a Jinja2 template source to a non-sandboxed Environment. A developer who passes user input to this method enables full remote code execution via Jinja2 class traversal.
The method name chat and parameter name message naturally invite passing user input directly, but the string is silently parsed as a Jinja2 template, not treated as plain text.
Root Cause
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/workflow.py line ~261:
def chat(self, message: str | Message | MessageTemplate, role: Role = "user") -> Self:
if isinstance(message, str):
message = MessageTemplate(role=role, content_template=message)
The string becomes content_template, which is parsed by from_string():
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/templates/message.py lines 14-15:
def render(self, **kwargs: Any) -> Message:
template = _inline_env.from_string(self.content_template)
rendered_content = template.render(**kwargs)
The Jinja2 Environment is not sandboxed:
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/templates/environment.py line 37:
_inline_env = Environment(
autoescape=False,
# Not SandboxedEnvironment
)
Proof of Concept
from jinja2 import Environment
env = Environment() # Same as giskard's _inline_env
# Class traversal reaches os.popen
t = env.from_string("{{ ''.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__() | length }}")
print(t.render()) # 342 accessible subclasses
# Full RCE payload (subclass index varies by Python version)
# {{ ''.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__()[INDEX].__init__.__globals__['os'].popen('id').read() }}
A developer building a chatbot:
workflow = ChatWorkflow(generator=my_llm)
workflow = workflow.chat(user_input) # user_input parsed as Jinja2 template
result = await workflow.run() # RCE if user_input contains {{ payload }}
Note: using .with_inputs(var=user_data) is safe because variable values are not parsed as templates. The issue is only when user strings are passed directly to chat().
Impact
Remote code execution on the server hosting any application built with giskard-agents that passes user input to ChatWorkflow.chat(). Attacker can execute system commands, read files, access environment variables.
Affects giskard-agents <=0.3.3 and 1.0.x alpha. Patched in giskard-agents 0.3.4 (stable) and 1.0.2b1 (pre-release).
Mitigation
Update to 0.3.4 (or 1.0.2b1 for the pre-release branch) which includes the fix.
The fix replaces the unsandboxed Jinja2 Environment with SandboxedEnvironment, which blocks attribute access to dunder methods and prevents class traversal chains. SandboxedEnvironment blocks access to attributes starting with _, preventing the __class__.__mro__ traversal chain.
- Record
PYSEC-2026-2487- CVSS 4.0
- 7.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
giskard-agentsPyPI |
through 0.3.3 | 0.3.4 |
giskard-agentsPyPI |
1.0.1a1 to 1.0.2a1 | 1.0.2b1 |
giskard-agentsPyPI |
before 0.3.4, plus listed versions 0.3.00.3.10.3.20.3.3 |
0.3.4 |
giskard-agentsPyPI |
1.0.1a1 up to 1.0.2b1, plus listed versions 1.0.2a1 |
1.0.2b1 |
giskard-agentsPyPI |
before 0.3.4, 1.0.1a1 up to 1.0.2b1, plus listed versions 0.3.00.3.10.3.20.3.31.0.2a1 |
0.3.41.0.2b1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-34172 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.7) in Giskard Giskard-agent, published March 27, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.64%, the 50th percentile. Fixed in giskard-agents 0.3.4.