CVE-2026-34560
CI4MS: Logs Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS
CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding. This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page. This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
9.1
CI4MS: Logs Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS
CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding. This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page. This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-34560- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-79
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-18072
9.1
CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding. This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page. This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.
- Record
EUVD-2026-18072- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-r4v5-rwr2-q7r4
9.1
CI4MS: Logs Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS
Summary
Vulnerability: Stored DOM Blind XSS via Logs Interface Rendering (Administrative Context Execution)
- Stored Cross-Site Scripting (Blind XSS) via Unsafe Rendering of User-Controlled Logged Data
Description
The application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding.
This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page.
For example, accessing /backend/backup/restore/xss-payload-here causes an error that gets logged by the application. If the injected portion contains an XSS payload, it is stored inside the logs without sanitization and later rendered unsafely inside the logs management interface.
When an administrator views the logs page, the stored payload executes automatically in the administrative browser context, leading to stored blind cross-site scripting (Blind XSS).
Affected Functionality
- Application logging mechanism
- Logs storage and retrieval logic
- Logs rendering within administrative interface
- Any endpoint that logs unsanitized user-controlled input
Attack Scenario
- An attacker injects a malicious XSS payload into any user-controlled input that is logged by the application.
- Example: Visit
/backend/backup/restore/<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)> - The application throws an error and logs the malicious payload.
- The payload is stored within application logs.
- An administrator views the logs interface.
- The payload executes automatically in the administrator’s browser context.
Any method or endpoint that logs user-controlled input without sanitization will result in the same Blind XSS condition when viewed inside logs management.
Impact
- Persistent Stored Blind XSS
- Execution of arbitrary JavaScript in administrators’ browsers
- Privilege escalation when viewed by administrators
- Full administrator account takeover
- Full compromise of the entire application
Endpoints:
/backend/logs//backend/backup/restore/{payload}- Any other endpoint that logs xss payloads there
Steps To Reproduce (POC)
- Trigger an endpoint that logs user-controlled input, such as:
/backend/backup/restore/<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)> - Ensure the request generates an error and the payload is written into application logs
- Navigate to the logs interface as an administrator
- View the logged entry
- Notice the XSS payload executing automatically (Blind XSS)
Remediation
-
Avoid unsafe DOM manipulation methods: Do not use
.html(),innerHTML, or similar sink functions in client-side JavaScript or server-side templating (e.g., PHP). Even when user input flowing into these sinks is not immediately apparent, they can introduce Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities that an attacker may exploit. -
Apply output encoding: Implement HTML entity encoding on all user-controlled data before rendering it in the browser. This helps neutralize potentially malicious input.
-
Implement input sanitization: Ensure that all user-supplied input is properly sanitized before processing or output. Currently, no sanitization mechanisms are in place, which should be addressed as a priority.
-
Enforce security headers and cookie attributes:
- Content Security Policy (CSP): Define and enforce a strict CSP to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts.
- HttpOnly flag: Set the
HttpOnlyattribute on session cookies to prevent client-side script access. - SameSite attribute: Configure the
SameSitecookie attribute to mitigate Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) risks. - Secure flag: Ensure all cookies are transmitted only over HTTPS by enabling the
Secureattribute.
These measures collectively reduce the impact of XSS and…
- Record
GHSA-r4v5-rwr2-q7r4- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-79
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
9.1
CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding. This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page. This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-34560- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L - CVSS 3.1
- 9.0 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-79
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
9.1
CI4MS: Logs Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS
CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding. This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page. This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-34560- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-79
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-r4v5-rwr2-q7r4
9.1
CI4MS: Logs Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS
Summary
Vulnerability: Stored DOM Blind XSS via Logs Interface Rendering (Administrative Context Execution)
- Stored Cross-Site Scripting (Blind XSS) via Unsafe Rendering of User-Controlled Logged Data
Description
The application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding.
This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page.
For example, accessing /backend/backup/restore/xss-payload-here causes an error that gets logged by the application. If the injected portion contains an XSS payload, it is stored inside the logs without sanitization and later rendered unsafely inside the logs management interface.
When an administrator views the logs page, the stored payload executes automatically in the administrative browser context, leading to stored blind cross-site scripting (Blind XSS).
Affected Functionality
- Application logging mechanism
- Logs storage and retrieval logic
- Logs rendering within administrative interface
- Any endpoint that logs unsanitized user-controlled input
Attack Scenario
- An attacker injects a malicious XSS payload into any user-controlled input that is logged by the application.
- Example: Visit
/backend/backup/restore/<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)> - The application throws an error and logs the malicious payload.
- The payload is stored within application logs.
- An administrator views the logs interface.
- The payload executes automatically in the administrator’s browser context.
Any method or endpoint that logs user-controlled input without sanitization will result in the same Blind XSS condition when viewed inside logs management.
Impact
- Persistent Stored Blind XSS
- Execution of arbitrary JavaScript in administrators’ browsers
- Privilege escalation when viewed by administrators
- Full administrator account takeover
- Full compromise of the entire application
Endpoints:
/backend/logs//backend/backup/restore/{payload}- Any other endpoint that logs xss payloads there
Steps To Reproduce (POC)
- Trigger an endpoint that logs user-controlled input, such as:
/backend/backup/restore/<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)> - Ensure the request generates an error and the payload is written into application logs
- Navigate to the logs interface as an administrator
- View the logged entry
- Notice the XSS payload executing automatically (Blind XSS)
Remediation
-
Avoid unsafe DOM manipulation methods: Do not use
.html(),innerHTML, or similar sink functions in client-side JavaScript or server-side templating (e.g., PHP). Even when user input flowing into these sinks is not immediately apparent, they can introduce Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities that an attacker may exploit. -
Apply output encoding: Implement HTML entity encoding on all user-controlled data before rendering it in the browser. This helps neutralize potentially malicious input.
-
Implement input sanitization: Ensure that all user-supplied input is properly sanitized before processing or output. Currently, no sanitization mechanisms are in place, which should be addressed as a priority.
-
Enforce security headers and cookie attributes:
- Content Security Policy (CSP): Define and enforce a strict CSP to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts.
- HttpOnly flag: Set the
HttpOnlyattribute on session cookies to prevent client-side script access. - SameSite attribute: Configure the
SameSitecookie attribute to mitigate Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) risks. - Secure flag: Ensure all cookies are transmitted only over HTTPS by enabling the
Secureattribute.
These measures collectively reduce the impact of XSS and…
- Record
GHSA-r4v5-rwr2-q7r4- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-79
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
ci4-cms-erp/ci4msPackagist |
through 0.28.6.0 | 0.31.0.0 |
ci4-cms-erp/ci4msPackagist |
before 0.31.0.0, plus listed versions 0.21.00.21.10.21.20.21.30.21.3.1 Show 42 moreShow less0.21.3.20.21.3.30.21.3.40.21.3.50.21.3.60.21.3.70.23.0.00.23.0.10.23.0.20.23.1.00.24.0.00.24.0.160.24.0.180.24.0.190.24.0.200.24.0.270.24.0.420.24.0.450.24.0.600.25.0.00.25.0.10.25.0.20.25.0.300.25.0.390.25.0.430.25.1.00.25.2.00.25.3.00.26.0.00.26.1.00.26.2.00.26.3.00.26.3.10.26.3.20.26.3.30.26.3.40.27.0.00.28.0.00.28.3.00.28.4.00.28.5.00.28.6.0 |
0.31.0.0 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-34560 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.1) in Ci4-cms-erp Ci4ms, published April 1, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.39%, the 33rd percentile. Fixed in ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms 0.31.0.0.
References
github.com/ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms/security/advisories/GHSA-r4v5-rwr2-q7r4
github.com/ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms/releases/tag/0.31.0.0
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34560
github.com/advisories/GHSA-r4v5-rwr2-q7r4
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/34xxx/CVE-2026-34560.json
github.com/ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.