Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-34560

CI4MS: Logs Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS

9.1 CriticalFix available

CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding. This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page. This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Exploit likelihood

0.39%Up 0.4 points since Apr 2, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 9.1

CI4MS: Logs Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS

CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding. This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page. This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.

Record
CVE-2026-34560
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Weakness
CWE-79
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-18072 9.1

CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding. This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page. This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.

Record
EUVD-2026-18072
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-r4v5-rwr2-q7r4 9.1

CI4MS: Logs Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS

Summary

Vulnerability: Stored DOM Blind XSS via Logs Interface Rendering (Administrative Context Execution)

  • Stored Cross-Site Scripting (Blind XSS) via Unsafe Rendering of User-Controlled Logged Data

Description

The application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding.

This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page.

For example, accessing /backend/backup/restore/xss-payload-here causes an error that gets logged by the application. If the injected portion contains an XSS payload, it is stored inside the logs without sanitization and later rendered unsafely inside the logs management interface.

When an administrator views the logs page, the stored payload executes automatically in the administrative browser context, leading to stored blind cross-site scripting (Blind XSS).

Affected Functionality

  • Application logging mechanism
  • Logs storage and retrieval logic
  • Logs rendering within administrative interface
  • Any endpoint that logs unsanitized user-controlled input

Attack Scenario

  • An attacker injects a malicious XSS payload into any user-controlled input that is logged by the application.
  • Example: Visit /backend/backup/restore/<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>
  • The application throws an error and logs the malicious payload.
  • The payload is stored within application logs.
  • An administrator views the logs interface.
  • The payload executes automatically in the administrator’s browser context.

Any method or endpoint that logs user-controlled input without sanitization will result in the same Blind XSS condition when viewed inside logs management.

Impact

  • Persistent Stored Blind XSS
  • Execution of arbitrary JavaScript in administrators’ browsers
  • Privilege escalation when viewed by administrators
  • Full administrator account takeover
  • Full compromise of the entire application

Endpoints:

  • /backend/logs/
  • /backend/backup/restore/{payload}
  • Any other endpoint that logs xss payloads there

Steps To Reproduce (POC)

  1. Trigger an endpoint that logs user-controlled input, such as: /backend/backup/restore/<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>
  2. Ensure the request generates an error and the payload is written into application logs
  3. Navigate to the logs interface as an administrator
  4. View the logged entry
  5. Notice the XSS payload executing automatically (Blind XSS)

Remediation

  • Avoid unsafe DOM manipulation methods: Do not use .html(), innerHTML, or similar sink functions in client-side JavaScript or server-side templating (e.g., PHP). Even when user input flowing into these sinks is not immediately apparent, they can introduce Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities that an attacker may exploit.

  • Apply output encoding: Implement HTML entity encoding on all user-controlled data before rendering it in the browser. This helps neutralize potentially malicious input.

  • Implement input sanitization: Ensure that all user-supplied input is properly sanitized before processing or output. Currently, no sanitization mechanisms are in place, which should be addressed as a priority.

  • Enforce security headers and cookie attributes:

    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Define and enforce a strict CSP to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts.
    • HttpOnly flag: Set the HttpOnly attribute on session cookies to prevent client-side script access.
    • SameSite attribute: Configure the SameSite cookie attribute to mitigate Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) risks.
    • Secure flag: Ensure all cookies are transmitted only over HTTPS by enabling the Secure attribute.

    These measures collectively reduce the impact of XSS and…

Record
GHSA-r4v5-rwr2-q7r4
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Weakness
CWE-79
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 9.1

CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding. This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page. This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.

Record
CVE-2026-34560
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
CVSS 3.1
9.0 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-79
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 9.1

CI4MS: Logs Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS

CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding. This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page. This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.

Record
CVE-2026-34560
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Weakness
CWE-79
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-r4v5-rwr2-q7r4 9.1

CI4MS: Logs Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS

Summary

Vulnerability: Stored DOM Blind XSS via Logs Interface Rendering (Administrative Context Execution)

  • Stored Cross-Site Scripting (Blind XSS) via Unsafe Rendering of User-Controlled Logged Data

Description

The application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding.

This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page.

For example, accessing /backend/backup/restore/xss-payload-here causes an error that gets logged by the application. If the injected portion contains an XSS payload, it is stored inside the logs without sanitization and later rendered unsafely inside the logs management interface.

When an administrator views the logs page, the stored payload executes automatically in the administrative browser context, leading to stored blind cross-site scripting (Blind XSS).

Affected Functionality

  • Application logging mechanism
  • Logs storage and retrieval logic
  • Logs rendering within administrative interface
  • Any endpoint that logs unsanitized user-controlled input

Attack Scenario

  • An attacker injects a malicious XSS payload into any user-controlled input that is logged by the application.
  • Example: Visit /backend/backup/restore/<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>
  • The application throws an error and logs the malicious payload.
  • The payload is stored within application logs.
  • An administrator views the logs interface.
  • The payload executes automatically in the administrator’s browser context.

Any method or endpoint that logs user-controlled input without sanitization will result in the same Blind XSS condition when viewed inside logs management.

Impact

  • Persistent Stored Blind XSS
  • Execution of arbitrary JavaScript in administrators’ browsers
  • Privilege escalation when viewed by administrators
  • Full administrator account takeover
  • Full compromise of the entire application

Endpoints:

  • /backend/logs/
  • /backend/backup/restore/{payload}
  • Any other endpoint that logs xss payloads there

Steps To Reproduce (POC)

  1. Trigger an endpoint that logs user-controlled input, such as: /backend/backup/restore/<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>
  2. Ensure the request generates an error and the payload is written into application logs
  3. Navigate to the logs interface as an administrator
  4. View the logged entry
  5. Notice the XSS payload executing automatically (Blind XSS)

Remediation

  • Avoid unsafe DOM manipulation methods: Do not use .html(), innerHTML, or similar sink functions in client-side JavaScript or server-side templating (e.g., PHP). Even when user input flowing into these sinks is not immediately apparent, they can introduce Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities that an attacker may exploit.

  • Apply output encoding: Implement HTML entity encoding on all user-controlled data before rendering it in the browser. This helps neutralize potentially malicious input.

  • Implement input sanitization: Ensure that all user-supplied input is properly sanitized before processing or output. Currently, no sanitization mechanisms are in place, which should be addressed as a priority.

  • Enforce security headers and cookie attributes:

    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Define and enforce a strict CSP to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts.
    • HttpOnly flag: Set the HttpOnly attribute on session cookies to prevent client-side script access.
    • SameSite attribute: Configure the SameSite cookie attribute to mitigate Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) risks.
    • Secure flag: Ensure all cookies are transmitted only over HTTPS by enabling the Secure attribute.

    These measures collectively reduce the impact of XSS and…

Record
GHSA-r4v5-rwr2-q7r4
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Weakness
CWE-79
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
Packagist
through 0.28.6.0
0.31.0.0
ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
Packagist
before 0.31.0.0, plus listed versions
0.21.00.21.10.21.20.21.30.21.3.1
Show 42 moreShow less
0.21.3.20.21.3.30.21.3.40.21.3.50.21.3.60.21.3.70.23.0.00.23.0.10.23.0.20.23.1.00.24.0.00.24.0.160.24.0.180.24.0.190.24.0.200.24.0.270.24.0.420.24.0.450.24.0.600.25.0.00.25.0.10.25.0.20.25.0.300.25.0.390.25.0.430.25.1.00.25.2.00.25.3.00.26.0.00.26.1.00.26.2.00.26.3.00.26.3.10.26.3.20.26.3.30.26.3.40.27.0.00.28.0.00.28.3.00.28.4.00.28.5.00.28.6.0
0.31.0.0

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-34560 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.1) in Ci4-cms-erp Ci4ms, published April 1, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.39%, the 33rd percentile. Fixed in ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms 0.31.0.0.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open