CVE-2026-35191
QUIC Unvalidated Amplification Credit may be Over Accounted
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received.
Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack.
CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation
Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed.
The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC.
FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
3.7
QUIC Unvalidated Amplification Credit may be Over Accounted
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received.
Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack.
CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation
Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed.
The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC.
FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
- Record
CVE-2026-35191- CVSS 3.1
- 3.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-440
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-89002
3.7
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received.
Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack.
CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation
Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed.
The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC.
FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
- Record
EUVD-2026-89002- CVSS 3.1
- 3.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-5p85-47cf-3663
3.7
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be...
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received.
Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack.
CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation
Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed.
The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC.
FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
- Record
GHSA-5p85-47cf-3663- CVSS 3.1
- 3.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-440
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
3.7
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received.
Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack.
CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation
Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed.
The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC.
FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
- Record
CVE-2026-35191- CVSS 3.1
- 3.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-440
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBELL-CVE-2026-35191
3.7
- Record
BELL-CVE-2026-35191- CVSS 3.1
- 3.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
3.7
QUIC Unvalidated Amplification Credit may be Over Accounted
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received.
Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack.
CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation
Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed.
The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC.
FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
- Record
CVE-2026-35191- CVSS 3.1
- 3.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-440
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 16 moreShow less
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-35191
3.7
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received. Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack. CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed. The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC. FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-35191- CVSS 3.1
- 3.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-4419
8.2
openssl security update
OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: A certificate with many nameRelativeToCRLIssuer CRL distribution points causes disproportionate heap growth when OpenSSL caches X.509 extensions.
Impact summary: Receiving a crafted certificate from a malicious peer can lead to significant memory pressure and possible Denial of Service in clients or in servers that solicit client certificates.
CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Description: A certificate or a set of certificates that fits under the limit for size of certificates accepted from the peer (~100 KiB) can result in allocation of several hundred MiB of resident memory on the receiving side during a normal TLS handshake. This may be enough to crash the client or server, if multiple concurrent connections lead to similarly large memory allocations.
The fix postpones processing of the CRL distribution points extensions in certificates to the time when the processed value is required for CRL processing. This avoids keeping large memory allocations for a long time when such certificates are received.
FIPS impact: no The affected code is outside the FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-35189)
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received.
Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack.
CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation
Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed.
The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC.
FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.(CVE-2026-35191)
Issue summary: The QUIC stream reassembly algorithm performance deteriorates progressively as packets are arriving out of order. The worst case has a quadratic complexity proportional to the number of stream frames kept in the buffer for the received stream data.
Impact summary: A remote QUIC peer that completes the handshake can create a connection-scoped CPU pressure and potentially a Denial of Service using compliant STREAM frames inside the advertised receive window, with low attacker bandwidth.
CWE: CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity
Description: OpenSSL manages received QUIC stream fragments using a
doubly-linked list. While it optimizes for append operations (at the end of
the list), it falls back to a head-to-tail linear search for any fragment
that does not immediately follow the current tail.
By manipulating the sequence of offsets, an attacker can force the server to perform O(n^2) operations, consuming excessive CPU time for the QUIC process.
FIPS impact: no The…
- Record
OESA-2026-4419- CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:74162
7.4
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:74162- CVSS 3.1
- 7.4 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:74166
7.4
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:74166- CVSS 3.1
- 7.4 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-35191
3.7
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received. Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack. CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed. The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC. FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-35191- CVSS 3.1
- 3.7 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-105462 No score
CVE-2026-35191 affecting package cloud-hypervisor 52.0.152-1
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received.
Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack.
CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation
Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed.
The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC.
FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
- Record
AZL-105462- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-105531 No score
CVE-2026-35191 affecting package kata-containers 4.1.0.kata0-1
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received.
Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack.
CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation
Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed.
The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC.
FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
- Record
AZL-105531- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-105612 No score
CVE-2026-35191 affecting package openvmm 0.1.0-1
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received.
Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack.
CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation
Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed.
The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC.
FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
- Record
AZL-105612- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-105837 No score
CVE-2026-35191 affecting package rust 1.75.0-31
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received.
Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack.
CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation
Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed.
The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC.
FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
- Record
AZL-105837- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-105885 No score
CVE-2026-35191 affecting package rust 1.96.1-2
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received.
Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack.
CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation
Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed.
The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC.
FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
- Record
AZL-105885- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVMGASA-2026-0481 No score
Updated openssl package fixes security vulnerabilities
DTLS Retransmits Handshake Messages From a Stale Buffer Offset. (CVE-2026-84782) Excessive Memory Allocation in Relative CRLDP Processing. (CVE-2026-35189) QUIC Unvalidated Amplification Credit may be Over Accounted. (CVE-2026-35191) Potential CPU DoS via O(n^2) Fragment Reassembly in QUIC. (CVE-2026-42772) Timing Side-Channel in Scalar Multiplication for Non-NIST EC Curves. (CVE-2026-54872) QUIC STREAM Fragment Metadata DoS. (CVE-2026-54873) Non-Constant-Time SM2 Scalar Multiplication on ARM64 and RISC-V. (CVE-2026-54875) Out-of-Bounds Access After SSL_set_SSL_CTX() During a Handshake. (CVE-2026-72897) QUIC Connection-Level Flow Control is Not Enforced for Streams. (CVE-2026-75804) NULL Pointer Dereference in CMP Client Revocation Response Handling. (CVE-2026-75805) Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS. (CVE-2026-75806) Timing Side-Channel in SM2 Signature Generation. (CVE-2026-77696) QUIC: Unbounded RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID Backlog. (CVE-2026-84784)
- Record
MGASA-2026-0481- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:22102-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-35189: Excessive Memory Allocation in Relative CRLDP Processing (bsc#1280589).
- CVE-2026-35191: QUIC Unvalidated Amplification Credit may be Over Accounted (bsc#1280590).
- CVE-2026-54872: Timing Side-Channel in Scalar Multiplication for Non-NIST EC Curves (bsc#1280591).
- CVE-2026-54875: Non-Constant-Time SM2 Scalar Multiplication on ARM64 and RISC-V (bsc#1280592).
- CVE-2026-72897: Out-of-Bounds Access After SSL_set_SSL_CTX() During a Handshake (bsc#1280594).
- CVE-2026-75804: QUIC Connection-Level Flow Control is Not Enforced for Streams (bsc#1280595).
- CVE-2026-75805: NULL Pointer Dereference in CMP Client Revocation Response Handling (bsc#1280596).
- CVE-2026-75806: Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS (bsc#1280597).
- CVE-2026-77696: Timing Side-Channel in SM2 Signature Generation (bsc#1280598).
- CVE-2026-84782: DTLS Retransmits Handshake Messages From a Stale Buffer Offset (bsc#1280587).
- CVE-2026-84784: QUIC: Unbounded RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID Backlog (bsc#1280599).
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:22102-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:24188-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-35189: Excessive Memory Allocation in Relative CRLDP Processing (bsc#1280589).
- CVE-2026-35191: QUIC Unvalidated Amplification Credit may be Over Accounted (bsc#1280590).
- CVE-2026-54872: Timing Side-Channel in Scalar Multiplication for Non-NIST EC Curves (bsc#1280591).
- CVE-2026-54875: Non-Constant-Time SM2 Scalar Multiplication on ARM64 and RISC-V (bsc#1280592).
- CVE-2026-72897: Out-of-Bounds Access After SSL_set_SSL_CTX() During a Handshake (bsc#1280594).
- CVE-2026-75804: QUIC Connection-Level Flow Control is Not Enforced for Streams (bsc#1280595).
- CVE-2026-75805: NULL Pointer Dereference in CMP Client Revocation Response Handling (bsc#1280596).
- CVE-2026-75806: Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS (bsc#1280597).
- CVE-2026-77696: Timing Side-Channel in SM2 Signature Generation (bsc#1280598).
- CVE-2026-84782: DTLS Retransmits Handshake Messages From a Stale Buffer Offset (bsc#1280587).
- CVE-2026-84784: QUIC: Unbounded RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID Backlog (bsc#1280599).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:24188-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:24245-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-35189: Excessive Memory Allocation in Relative CRLDP Processing (bsc#1280589).
- CVE-2026-35191: QUIC Unvalidated Amplification Credit may be Over Accounted (bsc#1280590).
- CVE-2026-54872: Timing Side-Channel in Scalar Multiplication for Non-NIST EC Curves (bsc#1280591).
- CVE-2026-54875: Non-Constant-Time SM2 Scalar Multiplication on ARM64 and RISC-V (bsc#1280592).
- CVE-2026-72897: Out-of-Bounds Access After SSL_set_SSL_CTX() During a Handshake (bsc#1280594).
- CVE-2026-75804: QUIC Connection-Level Flow Control is Not Enforced for Streams (bsc#1280595).
- CVE-2026-75805: NULL Pointer Dereference in CMP Client Revocation Response Handling (bsc#1280596).
- CVE-2026-75806: Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS (bsc#1280597).
- CVE-2026-77696: Timing Side-Channel in SM2 Signature Generation (bsc#1280598).
- CVE-2026-84782: DTLS Retransmits Handshake Messages From a Stale Buffer Offset (bsc#1280587).
- CVE-2026-84784: QUIC: Unbounded RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID Backlog (bsc#1280599).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:24245-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:4414-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-35189: Excessive Memory Allocation in Relative CRLDP Processing (bsc#1280589).
- CVE-2026-35191: QUIC Unvalidated Amplification Credit may be Over Accounted (bsc#1280590).
- CVE-2026-54872: Timing Side-Channel in Scalar Multiplication for Non-NIST EC Curves (bsc#1280591).
- CVE-2026-54875: Non-Constant-Time SM2 Scalar Multiplication on ARM64 and RISC-V (bsc#1280592).
- CVE-2026-72897: Out-of-Bounds Access After SSL_set_SSL_CTX() During a Handshake (bsc#1280594).
- CVE-2026-75804: QUIC Connection-Level Flow Control is Not Enforced for Streams (bsc#1280595).
- CVE-2026-75805: NULL Pointer Dereference in CMP Client Revocation Response Handling (bsc#1280596).
- CVE-2026-75806: Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS (bsc#1280597).
- CVE-2026-77696: Timing Side-Channel in SM2 Signature Generation (bsc#1280598).
- CVE-2026-84782: DTLS Retransmits Handshake Messages From a Stale Buffer Offset (bsc#1280587).
- CVE-2026-84784: QUIC: Unbounded RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID Backlog (bsc#1280599).
Other non-security fixes:
- Add a conflicts with previous crypto-policies versions (bsc#1281125)
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:4414-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUSN-8847-1 No score
openssl vulnerabilities
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain certificate revocation list distribution point names. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to consume excessive memory, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2026-35189)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled QUIC unvalidated amplification credit accounting. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-35191)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly implemented scalar multiplication for non-NIST elliptic curves. An attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a timing side-channel attack and obtain sensitive information. (CVE-2026-54872)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly implemented SM2 scalar multiplication on ARM64 and RISC-V architectures. An attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a timing side-channel attack and obtain sensitive information. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-54875)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled SSL context switching during a TLS handshake. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause an out-of-bounds read, resulting in a denial of service or obtaining sensitive information. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-72897)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly enforced QUIC connection- level flow control for streams. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to consume excessive memory, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-75804)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled a NULL pointer in CMP client revocation response processing. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2026-75805)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD records before authentication. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2026-75806)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly implemented SM2 signature generation. An attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a timing side-channel attack and obtain sensitive information. (CVE-2026-77696)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled DTLS retransmission of handshake messages. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause incorrect handshake behavior or a denial of service. (CVE-2026-84782)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled QUIC RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to consume excessive memory, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-84784)
- Record
USN-8847-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
cloud-hypervisorAzure Linux:3 |
through 52.0.152-1 | None known |
kata-containersAzure Linux:3 |
through 4.1.0.kata0-1 | None known |
openvmmAzure Linux:3 |
through 0.1.0-1 | None known |
rustAzure Linux:3 |
through 1.75.0-31 | None known |
rustAzure Linux:3 |
1.85.0 to 1.96.1-2 | None known |
opensslAlpaquita:25 |
3.5.0-r0 up to 3.5.9-r0 | 3.5.9-r0 |
opensslAlpaquita:stream |
3.5.0-r0 up to 3.5.9-r0 | 3.5.9-r0 |
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:25 |
3.5.0-r0 up to 3.5.9-r0 | 3.5.9-r0 |
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:stream |
3.5.0-r0 up to 3.5.9-r0 | 3.5.9-r0 |
opensslDebian:13 |
before 3.5.7-1~deb13u3, plus listed versions 3.5.1-13.5.1-1+deb13u13.5.2-13.5.3-13.5.4-1 Show 9 moreShow less3.5.4-1~deb13u13.5.4-1~deb13u23.5.5-13.5.5-1~deb13u13.5.5-1~deb13u23.5.6-1~deb13u13.5.6-1~deb13u23.5.7-1~deb13u13.5.7-1~deb13u2 |
3.5.7-1~deb13u3 |
Show 28 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
opensslDebian:14 |
before 3.6.5-1, plus listed versions 3.5.1-13.5.2-13.5.3-13.5.4-13.5.4-1~deb13u1 Show 19 moreShow less3.5.4-1~deb13u23.5.5-13.5.5-1~deb13u13.5.5-1~deb13u23.5.6-1~deb13u13.5.6-1~deb13u23.5.7-1~deb13u13.5.7-1~deb13u23.5.7-1~deb13u33.6.0-13.6.0-23.6.0~~alpha1-13.6.0~~beta1-13.6.1-13.6.1-23.6.1-33.6.2-13.6.3-13.6.4-1 |
3.6.5-1 |
opensslMageia:10 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 3.5.9-1.mga10 | 3.5.9-1.mga10 |
opensslopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP4 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 3.5.6-8.oe2403sp4 | 3.5.6-8.oe2403sp4 |
opensslRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-config-fipsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-develRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-devel-engineRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-fips-provider-upstreamRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 |
openssl3Red Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 |
openssl3-develRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 |
openssl3-devel-engineRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 |
openssl3-libsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.11.1 | 3.5.0-160000.11.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.11.1 | 3.5.0-160000.11.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.11.1 | 3.5.0-160000.11.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-150700.5.53.2 | 3.5.0-150700.5.53.2 |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 12.22.5~dfsg-5ubuntu112.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu112.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu312.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu212.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3 Show 7 moreShow less12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.112.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.212.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.312.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.412.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.512.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.612.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6+esm2 |
None known |
edk2Ubuntu:26.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.11-3ubuntu72025.11-3ubuntu82026.05-2ubuntu12026.05-2ubuntu22026.05-2ubuntu3 |
None known |
edk2-hweUbuntu:26.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.11-3ubuntu82025.11-3ubuntu92026.05-2ubuntu12026.05-2ubuntu22026.05-2ubuntu3 |
None known |
edk2Ubuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.02-8ubuntu32025.11-3ubuntu62025.11-3ubuntu72025.11-3ubuntu7.22025.11-3ubuntu7.3 |
None known |
edk2-hweUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.11-3ubuntu62025.11-3ubuntu82025.11-3ubuntu8.2 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
before 3.5.5-1ubuntu3.6, plus listed versions 3.5.3-1ubuntu23.5.5-1ubuntu13.5.5-1ubuntu33.5.5-1ubuntu3.23.5.5-1ubuntu3.33.5.5-1ubuntu3.43.5.5-1ubuntu3.5 |
3.5.5-1ubuntu3.6 |
opensslUbuntu:22.04:LTS From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.30, plus listed versions 1.1.1l-1ubuntu13.0.0-1ubuntu13.0.1-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu1.1 Show 22 moreShow less3.0.2-0ubuntu1.23.0.2-0ubuntu1.43.0.2-0ubuntu1.53.0.2-0ubuntu1.63.0.2-0ubuntu1.73.0.2-0ubuntu1.83.0.2-0ubuntu1.93.0.2-0ubuntu1.103.0.2-0ubuntu1.123.0.2-0ubuntu1.133.0.2-0ubuntu1.143.0.2-0ubuntu1.153.0.2-0ubuntu1.163.0.2-0ubuntu1.173.0.2-0ubuntu1.183.0.2-0ubuntu1.193.0.2-0ubuntu1.203.0.2-0ubuntu1.213.0.2-0ubuntu1.233.0.2-0ubuntu1.253.0.2-0ubuntu1.263.0.2-0ubuntu1.29 |
3.0.2-0ubuntu1.30 |
opensslUbuntu:24.04:LTS From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.0.13-0ubuntu3.16, plus listed versions 3.0.10-1ubuntu23.0.10-1ubuntu2.13.0.10-1ubuntu33.0.10-1ubuntu43.0.13-0ubuntu2 Show 12 moreShow less3.0.13-0ubuntu33.0.13-0ubuntu3.13.0.13-0ubuntu3.23.0.13-0ubuntu3.33.0.13-0ubuntu3.43.0.13-0ubuntu3.53.0.13-0ubuntu3.63.0.13-0ubuntu3.73.0.13-0ubuntu3.93.0.13-0ubuntu3.113.0.13-0ubuntu3.123.0.13-0ubuntu3.15 |
3.0.13-0ubuntu3.16 |
opensslUbuntu:26.04:LTS From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.5.5-1ubuntu3.6, plus listed versions 3.5.3-1ubuntu23.5.5-1ubuntu13.5.5-1ubuntu33.5.5-1ubuntu3.23.5.5-1ubuntu3.33.5.5-1ubuntu3.43.5.5-1ubuntu3.5 |
3.5.5-1ubuntu3.6 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Leap 16.0 From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.11.1 | 3.5.0-160000.11.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-35191 is a low vulnerability (CVSS 3.7) in Openssl, published September 29, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.72%, the 54th percentile. Fixed in openssl 3.5.9-r0.
References
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e44292e58b090014232ef75bd400393851b24d1a
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2de4c35fb13fc58f43fd8dc1d261700472ce72e5
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/0fe4442d4f8ea3af8a174046dae176e0d4717239
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35191
github.com/advisories/GHSA-5p85-47cf-3663
Show 150 moreShow less
docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2026-35191
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/35xxx/CVE-2026-35191.json
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-35191
advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2026-0481.html
bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36358
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/22/7
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/29/28
lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2026/msg00444.html
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8847-1
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8861-1
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-4419
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35189
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42772
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54872
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54873
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54875
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72897
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-75804
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-75805
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-75806
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-77696
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84782
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84784
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:74162
images.redhat.com
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75806
access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42772
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54875
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35189
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35191
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-77696
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84784
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75804
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54873
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54872
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75805
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72897
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84782
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_74162.json
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543242
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35189
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2b93c73b2c70ddc4c61c5e4bfaaa6bd71379eb84
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3842516cc15e8b2cf55747011045e77547e71d89
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/8e0efc7549b7ff8246d40e585e3fd604f728473f
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/c72ae182cac17a82e4246c6ecd4e9c4ec3586ec9
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543257
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35191
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543249
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42772
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/32d0ed8afe1b8c3e7ece725b44663da3d7087a09
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ca8402e273af4de5b3f04fa61a0f0c02ce3ae20e
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/eb2becc0a4baea7f3050a247834d0e5c2ebe1773
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f42ae513bbda513b3c121d54834040ee4a0eae1a
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543250
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54872
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1a5bee8dc57430a2be69cd1ffe7fec6a62f4f179
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3f7e1363dccec6f7732bb9e9fa471bb6e4aa68cb
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7d83bc7764999dfd91b83b4f0815b45390422afd
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/8166827a78aad164a07aa86dea2b425403ced471
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543244
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54873
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1f643b8bc735487b500a1f68a7fb3a22d5e38e23
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/279e7ee1392af98785746788168749491c74bd53
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3ea6213e050e938ecbbf8c4eff32bec2736780eb
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7127fb10888b49711c63128a09e524c0d2d5d0b2
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543256
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54875
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3f01bbc28f7e08211fcdc797fd43816504f94257
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/469f3e42629f4a0b5631796e20c66c92c138a3e8
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9794ed473764839275cb701b4850f3c24d929c28
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/dddad955d5ff3e9507619cf4e0f13e9988e2197c
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543259
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72897
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/00646e5085a0d12d29e0d2f9b9bc5f7111a50922
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4135f553c9d3ba4a09fe752f5d30af2a6a092b2e
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9c54d209486f6b1ad79fe2179c40f13200fa4f61
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e87ed26b298a74d8ba61a53e9c7bcd1acac6b814
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543254
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75804
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2e8f54666b3fb7b05ff5f58aa6cac9285163654e
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4533ee8a5686c953ed3b644738ac4bdf20806538
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/64d3102fb5b54311e92517f26ba00169d719e74a
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f9eaecf5bdd6692da052bc65b0332af2a938ac03
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543247
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75805
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7588db7fef14209c3caa3a101d11a02006b19166
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7ca0ccb5172a577e9b87267d77bfe21e5481a5e7
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9eb2a8a9b86136cdb39d6d7d50644dd66941cdc3
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/abf02872a4b71767ecc72293424420f5b009190f
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543260
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75806
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/04728a289a823e68137f88da016cb9ede307217d
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/050b275cd671a6eed1d6457642d41a5a77aab972
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3a4589d015a9049d47b66f186cf50a8711343a1d
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5af82fefbaf2b5fec2fc0e1d87f112844902f01d
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543258
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-77696
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1c4aed808a7aea32d2d013049c2e0d9fef164fc9
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/20b20628d39b2dcc4677194bd68c7c060fa598cb
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/419f5cb519721dceed393dbc524d79e487c72e64
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/6b90445a56b99a328ac1feba058abf976504f440
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2537080
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-84782
openssl-library.org/news/vulnerabilities
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543261
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-84784
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4685c914b0d410b1034f40b547c95bc95e7a380a
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9a30fe0fba195c14e5b87bf93c0d0fdb70373806
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/dba3c48d653c64fcbc9070a17a0ee2b3e2f3af1f
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e9e5155833fa968bee50024bf9ca3a185ab599fe
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:74166
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_74166.json
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202624188-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1280587
bugzilla.suse.com/1280589
bugzilla.suse.com/1280590
bugzilla.suse.com/1280591
bugzilla.suse.com/1280592
bugzilla.suse.com/1280594
bugzilla.suse.com/1280595
bugzilla.suse.com/1280596
bugzilla.suse.com/1280597
bugzilla.suse.com/1280598
bugzilla.suse.com/1280599
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35189
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35191
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54872
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54875
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72897
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75804
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75805
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75806
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-77696
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84782
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84784
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202624245-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20264414-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1281125
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-35191
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-35189
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-54872
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-54875
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-72897
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-75804
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-75805
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-75806
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-77696
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-84782
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-84784
Left out here: the rest of 1 source description. The JSON record has them.