CVE-2026-35405

libp2p-rust is the official rust language Implementation of the libp2p networking stack. Prior to 0.17.1, libp2p-rendezvous server has no limit on how many namespaces a single peer can register. A malicious peer can just keep registering unique namespaces in a loop and the server happily accepts every single one allocating memory for each registration with no pushback. Keep doing this long enough (or with multiple sybil peers) and the server process gets OOM killed. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.17.1.

libp2p-rust is the official rust language Implementation of the libp2p networking stack. Prior to 0.17.1, libp2p-rendezvous server has no limit on how many namespaces a single peer can register. A malicious peer can just keep registering unique namespaces in a loop and the server happily accepts every single one allocating memory for each registration with no pushback. Keep doing this long enough (or with multiple sybil peers) and the server process gets OOM killed. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.17.1.

Summary

found that libp2p-rendezvous server has no limit on how many namespaces a single peer can register. a malicious peer can just keep registering unique namespaces in a loop and the server happily accepts every single one allocating memory for each registration with no pushback. keep doing this long enough (or with multiple sybil peers) and the server process gets OOM killed.

no auth required. any peer on the network can do this.

Details

the bug is in Registrations::add() inside protocols/rendezvous/src/server.rs.

the store uses a BiMap keyed on (PeerId, Namespace) so yes, a peer can't register the same namespace twice. but there's nothing stopping it from registering 10,000 different namespaces. each unique one gets its own entry in:

• registrations_for_peer (BiMap)
• registrations (HashMap)
• next_expiry (FuturesUnordered a new heap-allocated BoxFuture per registration)

namespace strings are only validated for length (MAX_NAMESPACE = 255), not count. there's no max_registrations_per_peer anywhere in Config or the rest of the codebase.

making it worse MAX_TTL = 72 hours. so every registration just sits there for up to 3 days. disconnecting doesn't clean anything up either, entries only go away when the TTL fires.

protocols/rendezvous/src/server.rs
  └── Registrations::add()   ← no per-peer count check anywhere

protocols/rendezvous/src/lib.rs
  ├── MAX_NAMESPACE = 255    ← length capped, count is not
  └── MAX_TTL = 72h          ← entries persist a long time

fix would be adding something like max_registrations_per_peer to Config and checking it at the top of add() before inserting anything.

PoC

tested on libp2p v0.56.1, built from source.

step 1 - start the rendezvous server (uses the example from the repo):

cargo run --manifest-path examples/rendezvous/Cargo.toml --bin rendezvous-example

step 2 - run the flood client (attached as rzv-flood.rs):

cargo run --manifest-path examples/rendezvous/Cargo.toml --bin rzv-flood

it connects as a single peer and registers 10,000 unique namespaces (flood-00000000 through flood-00009999), chaining each registration on the confirmed Registered event from the previous one.

server accepted every single one. not one rejection.

memory on the server side (via ps aux RSS column):

baseline:       ~18 MB
mid flood:      ~26 MB  
after 10k regs: ~28 MB

that's from one peer. scale to 100 sybil peers doing the same thing and you're looking at ~1GB. 1000 peers and the server is dead.

<img width="1032" height="124" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f778f179-2aa1-4485-940c-25e218733fa8" />

server RSS climbing during the flood

<img width="553" height="760" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/691b0f52-dda0-443f-a3c2-98c8c6336f2f" />

10,000 registrations confirmed, zero rejected

Impact

any node running libp2p-rendezvous server-side is affected. rendezvous servers are typically well-known, publicly reachable nodes taking one down disrupts peer discovery for all clients depending on it. any rust-libp2p based project that deploys a rendezvous point is at risk.

no special position on the network needed. no crypto work. just open a connection and send REGISTER in a loop.

Researchers

Discovered by:

• Ramesh Adhikari (CoE-CNDS Lab, VJTI, Mumbai, India)
• Dr. Faruk Kazi (CoE-CNDS Lab, VJTI, Mumbai, India)

Organization: Centre of Excellence in Complex & Nonlinear Dynamical Systems (CoE-CNDS Lab), Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute (VJTI), Mumbai, India

We have not disclosed this to any other vendor or made it public. We are reporting directly to the rust-libp2p security team through this advisory.

libp2p-rust is the official rust language Implementation of the libp2p networking stack. Prior to 0.17.1, libp2p-rendezvous server has no limit on how many namespaces a single peer can register. A malicious peer can just keep registering unique namespaces in a loop and the server happily accepts every single one allocating memory for each registration with no pushback. Keep doing this long enough (or with multiple sybil peers) and the server process gets OOM killed. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.17.1.

Summary

found that libp2p-rendezvous server has no limit on how many namespaces a single peer can register. a malicious peer can just keep registering unique namespaces in a loop and the server happily accepts every single one allocating memory for each registration with no pushback. keep doing this long enough (or with multiple sybil peers) and the server process gets OOM killed.

no auth required. any peer on the network can do this.

Details

the bug is in Registrations::add() inside protocols/rendezvous/src/server.rs.

the store uses a BiMap keyed on (PeerId, Namespace) so yes, a peer can't register the same namespace twice. but there's nothing stopping it from registering 10,000 different namespaces. each unique one gets its own entry in:

• registrations_for_peer (BiMap)
• registrations (HashMap)
• next_expiry (FuturesUnordered a new heap-allocated BoxFuture per registration)

namespace strings are only validated for length (MAX_NAMESPACE = 255), not count. there's no max_registrations_per_peer anywhere in Config or the rest of the codebase.

making it worse MAX_TTL = 72 hours. so every registration just sits there for up to 3 days. disconnecting doesn't clean anything up either, entries only go away when the TTL fires.

protocols/rendezvous/src/server.rs
  └── Registrations::add()   ← no per-peer count check anywhere

protocols/rendezvous/src/lib.rs
  ├── MAX_NAMESPACE = 255    ← length capped, count is not
  └── MAX_TTL = 72h          ← entries persist a long time

fix would be adding something like max_registrations_per_peer to Config and checking it at the top of add() before inserting anything.

PoC

tested on libp2p v0.56.1, built from source.

step 1 - start the rendezvous server (uses the example from the repo):

cargo run --manifest-path examples/rendezvous/Cargo.toml --bin rendezvous-example

step 2 - run the flood client (attached as rzv-flood.rs):

cargo run --manifest-path examples/rendezvous/Cargo.toml --bin rzv-flood

it connects as a single peer and registers 10,000 unique namespaces (flood-00000000 through flood-00009999), chaining each registration on the confirmed Registered event from the previous one.

server accepted every single one. not one rejection.

memory on the server side (via ps aux RSS column):

baseline:       ~18 MB
mid flood:      ~26 MB  
after 10k regs: ~28 MB

that's from one peer. scale to 100 sybil peers doing the same thing and you're looking at ~1GB. 1000 peers and the server is dead.

<img width="1032" height="124" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f778f179-2aa1-4485-940c-25e218733fa8" />

server RSS climbing during the flood

<img width="553" height="760" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/691b0f52-dda0-443f-a3c2-98c8c6336f2f" />

10,000 registrations confirmed, zero rejected

Impact

any node running libp2p-rendezvous server-side is affected. rendezvous servers are typically well-known, publicly reachable nodes taking one down disrupts peer discovery for all clients depending on it. any rust-libp2p based project that deploys a rendezvous point is at risk.

no special position on the network needed. no crypto work. just open a connection and send REGISTER in a loop.

Researchers

Discovered by:

• Ramesh Adhikari (CoE-CNDS Lab, VJTI, Mumbai, India)
• Dr. Faruk Kazi (CoE-CNDS Lab, VJTI, Mumbai, India)

Organization: Centre of Excellence in Complex & Nonlinear Dynamical Systems (CoE-CNDS Lab), Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute (VJTI), Mumbai, India

We have not disclosed this to any other vendor or made it public. We are reporting directly to the rust-libp2p security team through this advisory.