Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-40077

Beszel has an IDOR in hub API endpoints that read system ID from URL parameter

3.5 LowFix available

Beszel is a server monitoring platform. Prior to 0.18.7, some API endpoints in the Beszel hub accept a user-supplied system ID and proceed without further checks that the user should have access to that system. As a result, any authenticated user can access these routes for any system if they know the system's ID. System IDs are random 15 character alphanumeric strings, and are not exposed to all users. However, it is theoretically possible for an authenticated user to enumerate a valid system ID via web API. To use the containers endpoints, the user would also need to enumerate a container ID, which is 12 digit hexadecimal string. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.18.7.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.23%Up 0.2 points since Apr 10, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 3.5

Beszel has an IDOR in hub API endpoints that read system ID from URL parameter

Beszel is a server monitoring platform. Prior to 0.18.7, some API endpoints in the Beszel hub accept a user-supplied system ID and proceed without further checks that the user should have access to that system. As a result, any authenticated user can access these routes for any system if they know the system's ID. System IDs are random 15 character alphanumeric strings, and are not exposed to all users. However, it is theoretically possible for an authenticated user to enumerate a valid system ID via web API. To use the containers endpoints, the user would also need to enumerate a container ID, which is 12 digit hexadecimal string. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.18.7.

Record
CVE-2026-40077
CVSS 3.1
3.5 LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-184
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-21047 3.5

Beszel is a server monitoring platform. Prior to 0.18.7, some API endpoints in the Beszel hub accept a user-supplied system ID and proceed without further checks that the user should have access to that system. As a result, any authenticated user can access these routes for any system if they know the system's ID. System IDs are random 15 character alphanumeric strings, and are not exposed to all users. However, it is theoretically possible for an authenticated user to enumerate a valid system ID via web API. To use the containers endpoints, the user would also need to enumerate a container ID, which is 12 digit hexadecimal string. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.18.7.

Record
EUVD-2026-21047
CVSS 3.1
3.5 LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-5f5r-95pg-xrpm 3.5

Beszel has an IDOR in hub API endpoints that read system ID from URL parameter

Summary

Some API endpoints in the Beszel hub accept a user-supplied system ID and proceed without further checks that the user should have access to that system. As a result, any authenticated user can access these routes for any system if they know the system's ID.

System IDs are random 15 character alphanumeric strings, and are not exposed to all users. However, it is theoretically possible for an authenticated user to enumerate a valid system ID via web API. To use the containers endpoints, the user would also need to enumerate a container ID, which is 12 digit hexadecimal string.

Affected Component

  • File: internal/hub/api.go, lines 283–361
  • Endpoints:
    • GET /api/beszel/containers/logs?system=SYSTEM_ID&container=CONTAINER_ID
    • GET /api/beszel/containers/info?system=SYSTEM_ID&container=CONTAINER_ID
    • GET /api/beszel/systemd/info?system=SYSTEM_ID&service=SERVICE_NAME
    • POST /api/beszel/smart/refresh?system=SYSTEM_ID
  • Commit: c7261b56f1bfb9ae57ef0856a0052cabb2fd3b84

Vulnerable Code

The containerRequestHandler function retrieves a system by ID but never verifies the authenticated user is a member of that system:

// internal/hub/api.go:283-305
func (h *Hub) containerRequestHandler(e *core.RequestEvent, fetchFunc func(*systems.System, string) (string, error), responseKey string) error {
    systemID := e.Request.URL.Query().Get("system")
    containerID := e.Request.URL.Query().Get("container")

    if systemID == "" || containerID == "" {
        return e.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, map[string]string{"error": "system and container parameters are required"})
    }
    if !containerIDPattern.MatchString(containerID) {
        return e.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, map[string]string{"error": "invalid container parameter"})
    }

    system, err := h.sm.GetSystem(systemID)
    // ^^^ No authorization check: e.Auth.Id is never verified against system.users
    if err != nil {
        return e.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, map[string]string{"error": "system not found"})
    }

    data, err := fetchFunc(system, containerID)
    if err != nil {
        return e.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, map[string]string{"error": err.Error()})
    }

    return e.JSON(http.StatusOK, map[string]string{responseKey: data})
}

The same pattern applies to getSystemdInfo (lines 322–340) and refreshSmartData (lines 342–361).

Meanwhile, the standard PocketBase collection API enforces proper membership checks:

// internal/hub/collections.go:56-57
systemsMemberRule := authenticatedRule + " && users.id ?= @request.auth.id"
systemMemberRule  := authenticatedRule + " && system.users.id ?= @request.auth.id"

These rules are only applied to the PocketBase collection endpoints, not to the custom routes registered on apiAuth.

PoC

The proof: The standard PocketBase API returns 404 (system not found) for unassigned systems. The custom endpoints resolve the system, contact the agent, and return data — proving the authorization check is missing.

Step 1: Start the hub

cd ~/Evidence/henrygd/beszel/finding418/docker-poc/
docker compose up -d

Wait a few seconds, then verify:

curl -s http://localhost:8090/api/health

Expected: {"message":"API is healthy.","code":200,"data":{}}

Step 2: Create User A (admin)

Open http://localhost:8090 in a browser and create the first user:

Step 3: Create User B (readonly)

In the Beszel UI, go to Users and add a new user:

Step 4: Authenticate as User A

TOKEN_A=$(curl -s http://localhost:8090/api/collections/users/auth-with-password \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"identity":"[email protected]","password":"testpassword1"}' \
  | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['token'])")

echo "TOKEN_A=$TOKEN_A"

Step 5: Get…

Record
GHSA-5f5r-95pg-xrpm
CVSS 3.1
3.5 LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-184
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 3.5

Beszel is a server monitoring platform. Prior to 0.18.7, some API endpoints in the Beszel hub accept a user-supplied system ID and proceed without further checks that the user should have access to that system. As a result, any authenticated user can access these routes for any system if they know the system's ID. System IDs are random 15 character alphanumeric strings, and are not exposed to all users. However, it is theoretically possible for an authenticated user to enumerate a valid system ID via web API. To use the containers endpoints, the user would also need to enumerate a container ID, which is 12 digit hexadecimal string. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.18.7.

Record
CVE-2026-40077
CVSS 3.1
3.5 LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS 3.1
3.1 LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-184
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 3.5

Beszel has an IDOR in hub API endpoints that read system ID from URL parameter

Beszel is a server monitoring platform. Prior to 0.18.7, some API endpoints in the Beszel hub accept a user-supplied system ID and proceed without further checks that the user should have access to that system. As a result, any authenticated user can access these routes for any system if they know the system's ID. System IDs are random 15 character alphanumeric strings, and are not exposed to all users. However, it is theoretically possible for an authenticated user to enumerate a valid system ID via web API. To use the containers endpoints, the user would also need to enumerate a container ID, which is 12 digit hexadecimal string. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.18.7.

Record
CVE-2026-40077
CVSS 3.1
3.5 LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-184
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-5f5r-95pg-xrpm 3.5

Beszel has an IDOR in hub API endpoints that read system ID from URL parameter

Summary

Some API endpoints in the Beszel hub accept a user-supplied system ID and proceed without further checks that the user should have access to that system. As a result, any authenticated user can access these routes for any system if they know the system's ID.

System IDs are random 15 character alphanumeric strings, and are not exposed to all users. However, it is theoretically possible for an authenticated user to enumerate a valid system ID via web API. To use the containers endpoints, the user would also need to enumerate a container ID, which is 12 digit hexadecimal string.

Affected Component

  • File: internal/hub/api.go, lines 283–361
  • Endpoints:
    • GET /api/beszel/containers/logs?system=SYSTEM_ID&container=CONTAINER_ID
    • GET /api/beszel/containers/info?system=SYSTEM_ID&container=CONTAINER_ID
    • GET /api/beszel/systemd/info?system=SYSTEM_ID&service=SERVICE_NAME
    • POST /api/beszel/smart/refresh?system=SYSTEM_ID
  • Commit: c7261b56f1bfb9ae57ef0856a0052cabb2fd3b84

Vulnerable Code

The containerRequestHandler function retrieves a system by ID but never verifies the authenticated user is a member of that system:

// internal/hub/api.go:283-305
func (h *Hub) containerRequestHandler(e *core.RequestEvent, fetchFunc func(*systems.System, string) (string, error), responseKey string) error {
    systemID := e.Request.URL.Query().Get("system")
    containerID := e.Request.URL.Query().Get("container")

    if systemID == "" || containerID == "" {
        return e.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, map[string]string{"error": "system and container parameters are required"})
    }
    if !containerIDPattern.MatchString(containerID) {
        return e.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, map[string]string{"error": "invalid container parameter"})
    }

    system, err := h.sm.GetSystem(systemID)
    // ^^^ No authorization check: e.Auth.Id is never verified against system.users
    if err != nil {
        return e.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, map[string]string{"error": "system not found"})
    }

    data, err := fetchFunc(system, containerID)
    if err != nil {
        return e.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, map[string]string{"error": err.Error()})
    }

    return e.JSON(http.StatusOK, map[string]string{responseKey: data})
}

The same pattern applies to getSystemdInfo (lines 322–340) and refreshSmartData (lines 342–361).

Meanwhile, the standard PocketBase collection API enforces proper membership checks:

// internal/hub/collections.go:56-57
systemsMemberRule := authenticatedRule + " && users.id ?= @request.auth.id"
systemMemberRule  := authenticatedRule + " && system.users.id ?= @request.auth.id"

These rules are only applied to the PocketBase collection endpoints, not to the custom routes registered on apiAuth.

PoC

The proof: The standard PocketBase API returns 404 (system not found) for unassigned systems. The custom endpoints resolve the system, contact the agent, and return data — proving the authorization check is missing.

Step 1: Start the hub

cd ~/Evidence/henrygd/beszel/finding418/docker-poc/
docker compose up -d

Wait a few seconds, then verify:

curl -s http://localhost:8090/api/health

Expected: {"message":"API is healthy.","code":200,"data":{}}

Step 2: Create User A (admin)

Open http://localhost:8090 in a browser and create the first user:

Step 3: Create User B (readonly)

In the Beszel UI, go to Users and add a new user:

Step 4: Authenticate as User A

TOKEN_A=$(curl -s http://localhost:8090/api/collections/users/auth-with-password \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"identity":"[email protected]","password":"testpassword1"}' \
  | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['token'])")

echo "TOKEN_A=$TOKEN_A"

Step 5: Get…

Record
GHSA-5f5r-95pg-xrpm
CVSS 3.1
3.5 LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-184
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-5141 No score

Beszel has an IDOR in hub API endpoints that read system ID from URL parameter in github.com/henrygd/beszel

Beszel has an IDOR in hub API endpoints that read system ID from URL parameter in github.com/henrygd/beszel

Record
GO-2026-5141
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
  • GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
  • GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
  • GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
  • GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
  • GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
  • GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
  • GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
  • GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
  • GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
  • GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
  • GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
  • GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
  • GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
  • GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
  • GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
  • GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
  • GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
  • GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
  • GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
  • GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
  • GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
  • GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
  • GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
  • GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
  • GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
  • GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
  • GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
  • GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
  • GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
  • GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
  • GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
  • GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
  • GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
  • GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
  • GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
  • GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
  • GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
  • GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
  • GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
  • GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
  • GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
  • GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
  • GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
  • GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
  • GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
  • GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
  • GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
  • GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
  • GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
  • GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
  • GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
  • GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
  • GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
  • GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
  • GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
  • GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
  • GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
  • GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
  • GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
  • GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
  • GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
  • GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
  • GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
  • GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
  • GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
  • GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
  • GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
  • GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
  • GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
  • GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
  • GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
  • GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
  • GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
  • GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
  • GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
  • GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/henrygd/beszel
Go
 through 0.18.6
0.18.7
github.com/henrygd/beszel
Go
 before 0.18.7
0.18.7
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 1734 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1
0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-40077 is a low vulnerability (CVSS 3.5) in Beszel, published April 9, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.23%, the 13th percentile. Fixed in github.com/henrygd/beszel 0.18.7.

References

Show 194 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 1,540 references and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

Pages All vulnerabilities Browse Docs Sources Guide Get API key
MoveEnter Open