CVE-2026-40262

Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. In versions 0.19.1 and prior, the asset delivery handler serves uploaded files inline and relies on magic-byte detection for content type, which does not identify text-based formats such as HTML, SVG, or XHTML. These files are served with an empty Content-Type, no X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff header, and inline disposition, allowing browsers to sniff and render active content. An authenticated user can upload an HTML or SVG file containing JavaScript as a note asset, and when a victim navigates to the asset URL, the script executes under the application's origin with access to the victim's authenticated session and API actions. This issue has been fixed in version 0.19.2.

Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. In versions 0.19.1 and prior, the asset delivery handler serves uploaded files inline and relies on magic-byte detection for content type, which does not identify text-based formats such as HTML, SVG, or XHTML. These files are served with an empty Content-Type, no X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff header, and inline disposition, allowing browsers to sniff and render active content. An authenticated user can upload an HTML or SVG file containing JavaScript as a note asset, and when a victim navigates to the asset URL, the script executes under the application's origin with access to the victim's authenticated session and API actions. This issue has been fixed in version 0.19.2.

Summary

A stored same-origin XSS vulnerability allows any authenticated user to upload an HTML, SVG, or XHTML file as a note asset and have it executed in a victim’s browser under the application’s origin. Because the application serves these files inline without a safe content type and without nosniff, browsers can sniff and render active content, giving the attacker access to authenticated Note Mark API actions as the victim.

Details

This issue results from three compounding flaws in the asset handling and delivery path.

1. Asset delivery can be used as an attack vector

The asset delivery route can be used to deliver attacker-controlled uploaded content directly to a victim by URL.

Relevant route:

• handlers/assets.go:40

huma.Get(api, "/api/notes/{noteID}/assets/{assetID}", h.GetNoteAssetContentByID)

This makes the uploaded asset reachable by direct navigation, which provides the delivery mechanism for the payload.

2. Text-based active content is served with an empty Content-Type

The asset handler relies on h2non/filetype for content-type detection:

• handlers/assets.go:147

kind, _ := filetype.Match(buf)
if kind != filetype.Unknown {
    contentType = kind.MIME.Value
}

The detection library uses magic-byte matching and does not identify text-based formats such as HTML, SVG, JavaScript, XML, or XHTML. For those files, filetype.Match returns Unknown, leaving Content-Type unset or empty.

As a result, uploaded active content is served without an authoritative MIME type.

3. Files are rendered inline and sniffed by the browser

The asset response is sent with inline disposition:

• handlers/assets.go:153

w.Header().Set("Content-Disposition", fmt.Sprintf("inline; filename=\"%s\"", asset.Name))

At the same time, the response does not set:

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

This combination is dangerous:

• the uploaded file contains attacker-controlled active markup
• the browser is instructed to render it inline
• the response does not provide a trustworthy content type
• content sniffing is not disabled

Under these conditions, browsers may detect HTML or SVG content and execute embedded JavaScript. Because the asset is served from the application’s own origin, the script runs with same-origin access to the application and its authenticated APIs.

This turns an uploaded asset into a stored XSS payload that executes when a victim opens the asset URL.

PoC

The issue can be reproduced by uploading a text-based active content file such as HTML or SVG as a note asset, then opening the served asset URL in a browser and observing that script executes in the context of the application origin.

Impact

• Type: Stored same-origin cross-site scripting (XSS)
• Who is impacted: Any user who can be induced to open a malicious asset URL, and any deployment allowing asset uploads
• Security impact: An attacker can execute JavaScript in the victim’s authenticated application context, allowing access to private notes, books, profile data, and authenticated API actions
• Privileges required: A valid low-privilege user account capable of uploading note assets
• User interaction: Required, because the victim must navigate to the malicious asset URL
• Scope: Changed, because attacker-controlled content executes in the victim’s origin and impacts other users rather than remaining confined to the attacker’s own account

Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. In versions 0.19.1 and prior, the asset delivery handler serves uploaded files inline and relies on magic-byte detection for content type, which does not identify text-based formats such as HTML, SVG, or XHTML. These files are served with an empty Content-Type, no X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff header, and inline disposition, allowing browsers to sniff and render active content. An authenticated user can upload an HTML or SVG file containing JavaScript as a note asset, and when a victim navigates to the asset URL, the script executes under the application's origin with access to the victim's authenticated session and API actions. This issue has been fixed in version 0.19.2.

Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. In versions 0.19.1 and prior, the asset delivery handler serves uploaded files inline and relies on magic-byte detection for content type, which does not identify text-based formats such as HTML, SVG, or XHTML. These files are served with an empty Content-Type, no X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff header, and inline disposition, allowing browsers to sniff and render active content. An authenticated user can upload an HTML or SVG file containing JavaScript as a note asset, and when a victim navigates to the asset URL, the script executes under the application's origin with access to the victim's authenticated session and API actions. This issue has been fixed in version 0.19.2.

Summary

A stored same-origin XSS vulnerability allows any authenticated user to upload an HTML, SVG, or XHTML file as a note asset and have it executed in a victim’s browser under the application’s origin. Because the application serves these files inline without a safe content type and without nosniff, browsers can sniff and render active content, giving the attacker access to authenticated Note Mark API actions as the victim.

Details

This issue results from three compounding flaws in the asset handling and delivery path.

1. Asset delivery can be used as an attack vector

The asset delivery route can be used to deliver attacker-controlled uploaded content directly to a victim by URL.

Relevant route:

• handlers/assets.go:40

huma.Get(api, "/api/notes/{noteID}/assets/{assetID}", h.GetNoteAssetContentByID)

This makes the uploaded asset reachable by direct navigation, which provides the delivery mechanism for the payload.

2. Text-based active content is served with an empty Content-Type

The asset handler relies on h2non/filetype for content-type detection:

• handlers/assets.go:147

kind, _ := filetype.Match(buf)
if kind != filetype.Unknown {
    contentType = kind.MIME.Value
}

The detection library uses magic-byte matching and does not identify text-based formats such as HTML, SVG, JavaScript, XML, or XHTML. For those files, filetype.Match returns Unknown, leaving Content-Type unset or empty.

As a result, uploaded active content is served without an authoritative MIME type.

3. Files are rendered inline and sniffed by the browser

The asset response is sent with inline disposition:

• handlers/assets.go:153

w.Header().Set("Content-Disposition", fmt.Sprintf("inline; filename=\"%s\"", asset.Name))

At the same time, the response does not set:

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

This combination is dangerous:

• the uploaded file contains attacker-controlled active markup
• the browser is instructed to render it inline
• the response does not provide a trustworthy content type
• content sniffing is not disabled

Under these conditions, browsers may detect HTML or SVG content and execute embedded JavaScript. Because the asset is served from the application’s own origin, the script runs with same-origin access to the application and its authenticated APIs.

This turns an uploaded asset into a stored XSS payload that executes when a victim opens the asset URL.

PoC

The issue can be reproduced by uploading a text-based active content file such as HTML or SVG as a note asset, then opening the served asset URL in a browser and observing that script executes in the context of the application origin.

Impact

• Type: Stored same-origin cross-site scripting (XSS)
• Who is impacted: Any user who can be induced to open a malicious asset URL, and any deployment allowing asset uploads
• Security impact: An attacker can execute JavaScript in the victim’s authenticated application context, allowing access to private notes, books, profile data, and authenticated API actions
• Privileges required: A valid low-privilege user account capable of uploading note assets
• User interaction: Required, because the victim must navigate to the malicious asset URL
• Scope: Changed, because attacker-controlled content executes in the victim’s origin and impacts other users rather than remaining confined to the attacker’s own account

Note Mark has Stored XSS via Unrestricted Asset Upload in github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

• Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

• GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
• GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
• GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
• GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
• GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
• GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
• GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
• GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
• GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
• GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
• GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
• GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
• GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
• GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
• GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
• GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
• GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
• GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
• GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
• GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
• GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
• GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
• GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
• GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
• GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
• GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
• GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
• GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
• GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
• GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
• GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
• GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
• GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
• GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
• GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
• GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
• GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
• GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
• GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
• GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
• GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
• GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
• GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
• GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
• GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
• GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
• GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
• GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
• GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
• GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
• GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
• GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
• GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
• GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
• GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
• GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
• GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
• GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
• GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
• GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
• GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
• GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
• GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
• GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
• GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
• GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
• GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
• GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
• GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
• GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
• GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
• GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
• GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
• GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
• GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
• GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
• GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…