Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-41481

LangChain: HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url SSRF Redirect Bypass

6.5 MediumFix available

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to langchain-text-splitters 1.1.2, HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() validated the initial URL using validate_safe_url() but then performed the fetch with requests.get() with redirects enabled (the default). Because redirect targets were not revalidated, a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server could redirect to internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints, bypassing SSRF protections. The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the calling application code. Whether this constitutes a data exfiltration path depends on the application: if it exposes Document contents (or derivatives) back to the requester who supplied the URL, sensitive data from internal endpoints could be leaked. Applications that store or process Documents internally without returning raw content to the requester are not directly exposed to data exfiltration through this issue. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.2.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
Required

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.26%Up 0.2 points since Apr 25, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 6.5

LangChain: HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url SSRF Redirect Bypass

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to langchain-text-splitters 1.1.2, HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() validated the initial URL using validate_safe_url() but then performed the fetch with requests.get() with redirects enabled (the default). Because redirect targets were not revalidated, a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server could redirect to internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints, bypassing SSRF protections. The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the calling application code. Whether this constitutes a data exfiltration path depends on the application: if it exposes Document contents (or derivatives) back to the requester who supplied the URL, sensitive data from internal endpoints could be leaked. Applications that store or process Documents internally without returning raw content to the requester are not directly exposed to data exfiltration through this issue. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.2.

Record
CVE-2026-41481
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918, CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-25634 6.5

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to langchain-text-splitters 1.1.2, HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() validated the initial URL using validate_safe_url() but then performed the fetch with requests.get() with redirects enabled (the default). Because redirect targets were not revalidated, a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server could redirect to internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints, bypassing SSRF protections. The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the calling application code. Whether this constitutes a data exfiltration path depends on the application: if it exposes Document contents (or derivatives) back to the requester who supplied the URL, sensitive data from internal endpoints could be leaked. Applications that store or process Documents internally without returning raw content to the requester are not directly exposed to data exfiltration through this issue. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.2.

Record
EUVD-2026-25634
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr 6.5

LangChain Text Splitters: HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url SSRF Redirect Bypass

Summary

HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() validated the initial URL using validate_safe_url() but then performed the fetch with requests.get() with redirects enabled (the default). Because redirect targets were not revalidated, a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server could redirect to internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints, bypassing SSRF protections.

The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the calling application code. Whether this constitutes a data exfiltration path depends on the application: if it exposes Document contents (or derivatives) back to the requester who supplied the URL, sensitive data from internal endpoints could be leaked. Applications that store or process Documents internally without returning raw content to the requester are not directly exposed to data exfiltration through this issue.

Affected versions

  • langchain-text-splitters < 1.1.2

Patched versions

  • langchain-text-splitters >= 1.1.2 (requires langchain-core >= 1.2.31)

Affected code

File: libs/text-splitters/langchain_text_splitters/html.py — split_text_from_url()

The vulnerable pattern validated the URL once then fetched with redirects enabled:

validate_safe_url(url, allow_private=False, allow_http=True)
response = requests.get(url, timeout=timeout, **kwargs)

Attack scenario

  1. A developer passes external URLs to split_text_from_url(), relying on its built-in validate_safe_url() check to block requests to internal networks.
  2. An attacker supplies a URL pointing to a public host they control. The URL passes validate_safe_url() (public hostname, public IP).
  3. The attacker's server responds with a 302 redirect to an internal endpoint (e.g., an unauthenticated internal admin API, or a cloud instance metadata service that does not require request headers — such as AWS IMDSv1).
  4. requests.get() follows the redirect automatically. The redirect target is not revalidated.
  5. The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the application.

Notes:

  • The core issue is a bypass of an explicitly provided SSRF protection. split_text_from_url() included validate_safe_url() specifically to be safe with untrusted URLs — the redirect loophole defeated that guarantee.
  • Cloud metadata endpoints that require special headers (AWS IMDSv2, GCP, Azure) are not reachable through this bug because the attacker does not control request headers. AWS IMDSv1, which requires no headers, is reachable.
  • Data exfiltration requires the application to return Document contents to the party that supplied the URL. The SSRF itself — forcing the server to issue a request to an internal endpoint — does not require this.

Fix

The fix replaces requests.get() with an SSRF-safe httpx transport (SSRFSafeSyncTransport from langchain-core) that validates DNS results and pins connections to validated IPs on every request, including redirect targets, eliminating redirect-based bypasses.

Additionally, split_text_from_url() has been deprecated. Users should fetch HTML content themselves and pass it to split_text() directly.

Record
GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 6.5

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to langchain-text-splitters 1.1.2, HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() validated the initial URL using validate_safe_url() but then performed the fetch with requests.get() with redirects enabled (the default). Because redirect targets were not revalidated, a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server could redirect to internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints, bypassing SSRF protections. The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the calling application code. Whether this constitutes a data exfiltration path depends on the application: if it exposes Document contents (or derivatives) back to the requester who supplied the URL, sensitive data from internal endpoints could be leaked. Applications that store or process Documents internally without returning raw content to the requester are not directly exposed to data exfiltration through this issue. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.2.

Record
CVE-2026-41481
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 6.5

LangChain: HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url SSRF Redirect Bypass

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to langchain-text-splitters 1.1.2, HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() validated the initial URL using validate_safe_url() but then performed the fetch with requests.get() with redirects enabled (the default). Because redirect targets were not revalidated, a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server could redirect to internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints, bypassing SSRF protections. The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the calling application code. Whether this constitutes a data exfiltration path depends on the application: if it exposes Document contents (or derivatives) back to the requester who supplied the URL, sensitive data from internal endpoints could be leaked. Applications that store or process Documents internally without returning raw content to the requester are not directly exposed to data exfiltration through this issue. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.2.

Record
CVE-2026-41481
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr 6.5

LangChain Text Splitters: HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url SSRF Redirect Bypass

Summary

HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() validated the initial URL using validate_safe_url() but then performed the fetch with requests.get() with redirects enabled (the default). Because redirect targets were not revalidated, a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server could redirect to internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints, bypassing SSRF protections.

The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the calling application code. Whether this constitutes a data exfiltration path depends on the application: if it exposes Document contents (or derivatives) back to the requester who supplied the URL, sensitive data from internal endpoints could be leaked. Applications that store or process Documents internally without returning raw content to the requester are not directly exposed to data exfiltration through this issue.

Affected versions

  • langchain-text-splitters < 1.1.2

Patched versions

  • langchain-text-splitters >= 1.1.2 (requires langchain-core >= 1.2.31)

Affected code

File: libs/text-splitters/langchain_text_splitters/html.py — split_text_from_url()

The vulnerable pattern validated the URL once then fetched with redirects enabled:

validate_safe_url(url, allow_private=False, allow_http=True)
response = requests.get(url, timeout=timeout, **kwargs)

Attack scenario

  1. A developer passes external URLs to split_text_from_url(), relying on its built-in validate_safe_url() check to block requests to internal networks.
  2. An attacker supplies a URL pointing to a public host they control. The URL passes validate_safe_url() (public hostname, public IP).
  3. The attacker's server responds with a 302 redirect to an internal endpoint (e.g., an unauthenticated internal admin API, or a cloud instance metadata service that does not require request headers — such as AWS IMDSv1).
  4. requests.get() follows the redirect automatically. The redirect target is not revalidated.
  5. The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the application.

Notes:

  • The core issue is a bypass of an explicitly provided SSRF protection. split_text_from_url() included validate_safe_url() specifically to be safe with untrusted URLs — the redirect loophole defeated that guarantee.
  • Cloud metadata endpoints that require special headers (AWS IMDSv2, GCP, Azure) are not reachable through this bug because the attacker does not control request headers. AWS IMDSv1, which requires no headers, is reachable.
  • Data exfiltration requires the application to return Document contents to the party that supplied the URL. The SSRF itself — forcing the server to issue a request to an internal endpoint — does not require this.

Fix

The fix replaces requests.get() with an SSRF-safe httpx transport (SSRFSafeSyncTransport from langchain-core) that validates DNS results and pins connections to validated IPs on every request, including redirect targets, eliminating redirect-based bypasses.

Additionally, split_text_from_url() has been deprecated. Users should fetch HTML content themselves and pass it to split_text() directly.

Record
GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 4 moreShow less
OSVPYSEC-2026-77 6.5

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to langchain-text-splitters 1.1.2, HTMLHeaderTextSplitter.split_text_from_url() validated the initial URL using validate_safe_url() but then performed the fetch with requests.get() with redirects enabled (the default). Because redirect targets were not revalidated, a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server could redirect to internal, localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints, bypassing SSRF protections. The response body is parsed and returned as Document objects to the calling application code. Whether this constitutes a data exfiltration path depends on the application: if it exposes Document contents (or derivatives) back to the requester who supplied the URL, sensitive data from internal endpoints could be leaked. Applications that store or process Documents internally without returning raw content to the requester are not directly exposed to data exfiltration through this issue. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.2.

Record
PYSEC-2026-77
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1779670108 No score

TuxCare security update for langchain-text-splitters (2 CVEs)

TuxCare rebuilt langchain-text-splitters to address 2 CVEs. Fixed in 0.3.11.post1+tuxcare.

Record
CLSA-2026-1779670108
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVROOT-APP-PYPI-CVE-2026-41481 No score

CVE-2026-41481 in rootio-langchain-text-splitters - Patched by Root

Root has patched CVE-2026-41481 in the rootio-langchain-text-splitters package for Root:PyPI. Multiple fixed versions available.

Record
ROOT-APP-PYPI-CVE-2026-41481
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVROOT-APP-PYPI-GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr No score

GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr in rootio-langchain-text-splitters - Patched by Root

Root has patched GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr in the rootio-langchain-text-splitters package for Root:PyPI. Multiple fixed versions available.

Record
ROOT-APP-PYPI-GHSA-fv5p-p927-qmxr
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
langchain-text-splitters
PyPI
before 1.1.2
1.1.2
langchain-text-splitters
TuxCare:PyPI
0.3.11 up to 0.3.11.post1+tuxcare
0.3.11.post1+tuxcare
langchain-text-splitters
PyPI
before 1.1.2, plus listed versions
0.0.10.0.20.2.00.2.10.2.2
Show 21 moreShow less
0.2.40.3.00.3.0.dev00.3.0.dev10.3.10.3.100.3.110.3.20.3.30.3.40.3.50.3.60.3.6rc10.3.6rc20.3.70.3.80.3.91.0.01.0.0a11.1.01.1.1
1.1.2
rootio-langchain-text-splitters
Root:PyPI
before 1.1.1+root.io.2
1.1.1+root.io.21.1.0+root.io.21.1.0+root.io.31.1.1+root.io.30.3.11+root.io.3
langchain-text-splitters
Root:PyPI
before 1.1.1+aikido.2
1.1.1+aikido.21.1.0+aikido.21.1.0+aikido.31.1.1+aikido.30.3.11+aikido.30.3.11+aikido.2
rootio-langchain-text-splitters
Root:PyPI
before 1.1.1+root.io.1
1.1.1+root.io.10.3.11+root.io.11.1.0+root.io.11.1.1+root.io.21.1.0+root.io.21.1.0+root.io.31.1.1+root.io.30.3.11+root.io.20.3.11+root.io.3

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-41481 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 6.5) in Langchain Langchain-text-splitters, published April 16, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.26%, the 17th percentile. Fixed in langchain-text-splitters 1.1.2.

References

MoveEnter Open