CVE-2026-41508
OWASP Coraza WAF: Truncated multipart body bypasses MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR (rule 200003) via silent io.ErrUnexpectedEOF handling
OWASP Coraza WAF is a golang modsecurity compatible web application firewall library. From 3.4.0 until 3.8.0, the multipart processor in internal/bodyprocessors/multipart.go treats io.ErrUnexpectedEOF as nonfatal without setting MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR. A remote attacker can submit a truncated multipart body that produces io.ErrUnexpectedEOF, causing parsing to stop without raising the strict-error signal used by the recommended defensive rule. Rules 200002 and 200003 do not fire, allowing multipart parser-disagreement payloads to reach a backend that interprets the truncated body differently. This issue is fixed in version 3.8.0.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
5.8
OWASP Coraza WAF: Truncated multipart body bypasses MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR (rule 200003) via silent io.ErrUnexpectedEOF handling
OWASP Coraza WAF is a golang modsecurity compatible web application firewall library. From 3.4.0 until 3.8.0, the multipart processor in internal/bodyprocessors/multipart.go treats io.ErrUnexpectedEOF as nonfatal without setting MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR. A remote attacker can submit a truncated multipart body that produces io.ErrUnexpectedEOF, causing parsing to stop without raising the strict-error signal used by the recommended defensive rule. Rules 200002 and 200003 do not fire, allowing multipart parser-disagreement payloads to reach a backend that interprets the truncated body differently. This issue is fixed in version 3.8.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-41508- CVSS 3.1
- 5.8 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-693, CWE-755
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-97828
5.8
OWASP Coraza WAF is a golang modsecurity compatible web application firewall library. From 3.4.0 until 3.8.0, the multipart processor in internal/bodyprocessors/multipart.go treats io.ErrUnexpectedEOF as nonfatal without setting MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR. A remote attacker can submit a truncated multipart body that produces io.ErrUnexpectedEOF, causing parsing to stop without raising the strict-error signal used by the recommended defensive rule. Rules 200002 and 200003 do not fire, allowing multipart parser-disagreement payloads to reach a backend that interprets the truncated body differently. This issue is fixed in version 3.8.0.
- Record
EUVD-2026-97828- CVSS 3.1
- 5.8 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-r3rm-qphw-hh76
5.8
Coraza: Truncated multipart body bypasses MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR (rule 200003) via silent io.ErrUnexpectedEOF handling
Root Cause
File: internal/bodyprocessors/multipart.go (since commit 3347961b, PR #1453 "feat: ignore unexpected EOF in MIME multipart request body processor", merged 2026-03-06, first shipped in v3.4.0).
The multipart body processor treats io.ErrUnexpectedEOF as a benign condition. Three sites are affected; all mishandle the error the same way.
File branch, filesystem-backed (lines 71–77)
sz, err := io.Copy(temp, p)
if err != nil {
if !errors.Is(err, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF) {
v.MultipartStrictError().(*collections.Single).Set("1")
return err
}
seenUnexpectedEOF = true // <-- flag never set for UnexpectedEOF
}
File branch, TinyGo path (lines 82–88)
sz, err := io.Copy(io.Discard, p)
if err != nil {
if !errors.Is(err, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF) {
v.MultipartStrictError().(*collections.Single).Set("1")
return err
}
seenUnexpectedEOF = true // <-- same gap
}
Field branch (lines 102–113)
data, err := io.ReadAll(p)
if err != nil {
if !errors.Is(err, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF) {
v.MultipartStrictError().(*collections.Single).Set("1")
return err
}
}
...
if errors.Is(err, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF) {
break // <-- exits loop with no flag set
}
The function then returns nil at line 116 for any body that ended prematurely. Consequences:
MULTIPART_STRICT_ERRORstays at its initial value0.REQBODY_ERRORis not propagated either (sinceProcessRequestreturnsnil).- Neither of the two canonical defensive rules shipped in
coraza.conf-recommendedfires:SecRule REQBODY_ERROR "!@eq 0" "id:200002,phase:2,deny,status:400,..." SecRule MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR "!@eq 0" "id:200003,phase:2,deny,status:400,..."
All other error branches in the same function (lines 27, 48, 66, 84, 104) correctly set MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR before returning; this is an inconsistency introduced in #1453, not a systemic issue.
Context — why the error is swallowed
PR #1453 was introduced to support SecRequestBodyLimitAction ProcessPartial: when a body is cut off because it hit the configured request-body limit, the parser should still surface the parts it did receive. The PR legitimately needs to avoid return err on ErrUnexpectedEOF. But it also silenced the strict-error flag, which is the wrong compromise — the flag is exactly how operators observe that something was incomplete. The fix should keep the non-fatal break and still set MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR, letting the operator decide (via rule 200003 or their own policy) whether partial processing is acceptable.
Impact
Rule 200003 is Coraza's blanket defense against multipart parser-inconsistency evasions — attack classes where the body is crafted so Coraza's Go mime/multipart reader and the backend's multipart parser (PHP, Node, Java, legacy libmodsecurity, etc.) disagree about where fields start or end. The rule fails-closed on any malformed body, so the operator does not need to enumerate every parser-disagreement trick. That defense is now void for any evasion that also truncates the body.
Examples of what becomes reachable:
- Smuggling a second field past the truncation boundary that the backend's more permissive parser still extracts.
- Hiding payload bytes after a deliberately malformed
Content-Dispositionheader that the Go parser refuses but the backend accepts. - Generic CRS evasion chains that depend on rule 200003 as a catch-all.
The fix is tiny and low-risk. The impact is disproportionately large because rule 200003 is the only defense-in-depth rule for multipart in the recommended config — there is no secondary signal.
Proof of Concept
Start a Coraza-wrapped HTTP server shipping the canonical defensive rules from coraza.conf-recommended:
SecRuleEngine On
SecRequestBodyAccess On
SecRule REQBODY_ERROR "!@eq 0" \
…
- Record
GHSA-r3rm-qphw-hh76- CVSS 3.1
- 5.8 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-20, CWE-693, CWE-755
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
5.8
OWASP Coraza WAF is a golang modsecurity compatible web application firewall library. From 3.4.0 until 3.8.0, the multipart processor in internal/bodyprocessors/multipart.go treats io.ErrUnexpectedEOF as nonfatal without setting MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR. A remote attacker can submit a truncated multipart body that produces io.ErrUnexpectedEOF, causing parsing to stop without raising the strict-error signal used by the recommended defensive rule. Rules 200002 and 200003 do not fire, allowing multipart parser-disagreement payloads to reach a backend that interprets the truncated body differently. This issue is fixed in version 3.8.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-41508- CVSS 3.1
- 5.8 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-693, CWE-755
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
5.8
OWASP Coraza WAF: Truncated multipart body bypasses MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR (rule 200003) via silent io.ErrUnexpectedEOF handling
OWASP Coraza WAF is a golang modsecurity compatible web application firewall library. From 3.4.0 until 3.8.0, the multipart processor in internal/bodyprocessors/multipart.go treats io.ErrUnexpectedEOF as nonfatal without setting MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR. A remote attacker can submit a truncated multipart body that produces io.ErrUnexpectedEOF, causing parsing to stop without raising the strict-error signal used by the recommended defensive rule. Rules 200002 and 200003 do not fire, allowing multipart parser-disagreement payloads to reach a backend that interprets the truncated body differently. This issue is fixed in version 3.8.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-41508- CVSS 3.1
- 5.8 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-693, CWE-755
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-r3rm-qphw-hh76
5.8
Coraza: Truncated multipart body bypasses MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR (rule 200003) via silent io.ErrUnexpectedEOF handling
Root Cause
File: internal/bodyprocessors/multipart.go (since commit 3347961b, PR #1453 "feat: ignore unexpected EOF in MIME multipart request body processor", merged 2026-03-06, first shipped in v3.4.0).
The multipart body processor treats io.ErrUnexpectedEOF as a benign condition. Three sites are affected; all mishandle the error the same way.
File branch, filesystem-backed (lines 71–77)
sz, err := io.Copy(temp, p)
if err != nil {
if !errors.Is(err, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF) {
v.MultipartStrictError().(*collections.Single).Set("1")
return err
}
seenUnexpectedEOF = true // <-- flag never set for UnexpectedEOF
}
File branch, TinyGo path (lines 82–88)
sz, err := io.Copy(io.Discard, p)
if err != nil {
if !errors.Is(err, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF) {
v.MultipartStrictError().(*collections.Single).Set("1")
return err
}
seenUnexpectedEOF = true // <-- same gap
}
Field branch (lines 102–113)
data, err := io.ReadAll(p)
if err != nil {
if !errors.Is(err, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF) {
v.MultipartStrictError().(*collections.Single).Set("1")
return err
}
}
...
if errors.Is(err, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF) {
break // <-- exits loop with no flag set
}
The function then returns nil at line 116 for any body that ended prematurely. Consequences:
MULTIPART_STRICT_ERRORstays at its initial value0.REQBODY_ERRORis not propagated either (sinceProcessRequestreturnsnil).- Neither of the two canonical defensive rules shipped in
coraza.conf-recommendedfires:SecRule REQBODY_ERROR "!@eq 0" "id:200002,phase:2,deny,status:400,..." SecRule MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR "!@eq 0" "id:200003,phase:2,deny,status:400,..."
All other error branches in the same function (lines 27, 48, 66, 84, 104) correctly set MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR before returning; this is an inconsistency introduced in #1453, not a systemic issue.
Context — why the error is swallowed
PR #1453 was introduced to support SecRequestBodyLimitAction ProcessPartial: when a body is cut off because it hit the configured request-body limit, the parser should still surface the parts it did receive. The PR legitimately needs to avoid return err on ErrUnexpectedEOF. But it also silenced the strict-error flag, which is the wrong compromise — the flag is exactly how operators observe that something was incomplete. The fix should keep the non-fatal break and still set MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR, letting the operator decide (via rule 200003 or their own policy) whether partial processing is acceptable.
Impact
Rule 200003 is Coraza's blanket defense against multipart parser-inconsistency evasions — attack classes where the body is crafted so Coraza's Go mime/multipart reader and the backend's multipart parser (PHP, Node, Java, legacy libmodsecurity, etc.) disagree about where fields start or end. The rule fails-closed on any malformed body, so the operator does not need to enumerate every parser-disagreement trick. That defense is now void for any evasion that also truncates the body.
Examples of what becomes reachable:
- Smuggling a second field past the truncation boundary that the backend's more permissive parser still extracts.
- Hiding payload bytes after a deliberately malformed
Content-Dispositionheader that the Go parser refuses but the backend accepts. - Generic CRS evasion chains that depend on rule 200003 as a catch-all.
The fix is tiny and low-risk. The impact is disproportionately large because rule 200003 is the only defense-in-depth rule for multipart in the recommended config — there is no secondary signal.
Proof of Concept
Start a Coraza-wrapped HTTP server shipping the canonical defensive rules from coraza.conf-recommended:
SecRuleEngine On
SecRequestBodyAccess On
SecRule REQBODY_ERROR "!@eq 0" \
…
- Record
GHSA-r3rm-qphw-hh76- CVSS 3.1
- 5.8 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-20, CWE-693, CWE-755
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-6670 No score
Coraza: Truncated multipart body bypasses MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR (rule 200003) via silent io.ErrUnexpectedEOF handling in github.com/corazawaf/coraza
Coraza: Truncated multipart body bypasses MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR (rule 200003) via silent io.ErrUnexpectedEOF handling in github.com/corazawaf/coraza
- Record
GO-2026-6670- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3Go |
3.4.0 to 3.7.0 | 3.8.0 |
github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3Go |
3.4.0 up to 3.8.0 | 3.8.0 |
github.com/corazawaf/corazaGo |
All versions | None known |
github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v2Go |
All versions | None known |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-41508 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 5.8) in Corazawaf Coraza, published October 6, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.50%, the 42nd percentile. Fixed in github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3 3.8.0.
References
github.com/corazawaf/coraza/security/advisories/GHSA-r3rm-qphw-hh76
github.com/corazawaf/coraza/commit/f94c81bec209f658120c418448d0590a549b71df
github.com/corazawaf/coraza/releases/tag/v3.8.0
github.com/advisories/GHSA-r3rm-qphw-hh76
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/41xxx/CVE-2026-41508.json
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41508
github.com/corazawaf/coraza
Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.