Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-42882

oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy: Security Issues in Resource Path Matching

9.4 CriticalFix available

oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy is an aws s3 proxy written in go. Prior to 5.0.0, s3-proxy contains an authentication bypass caused by inconsistent URL path interpretation between the authentication middleware and the bucket handler. The authentication middleware evaluates resource path patterns against the percent-encoded request URI (r.URL.RequestURI()), while the bucket handler constructs S3 object keys from the decoded path (r.URL.Path). This mismatch, combined with the glob library being invoked without a path separator (causing * to match across / boundaries), allows unauthenticated attackers to write to, read from, or delete objects in protected S3 namespaces. Exploitation is possible via three techniques: (1) using * patterns that match across path separators to reach protected routes via path traversal (e.g., /open/foo/drafts/../restricted/), (2) using percent-encoded slashes (%2F) to collapse multiple path segments into a single token at the auth layer while the decoded form resolves to a protected namespace at the storage layer, and (3) using dot-dot segments (../) under ** prefix patterns, where the raw path matches an open route while Go's URL parser resolves the traversal to a protected path before the bucket handler runs. An unauthenticated attacker with network access can perform unauthorized PUT, GET, or DELETE operations on objects in authentication-protected S3 namespaces. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.0.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

Exploit likelihood

0.55%Up 0.4 points since May 12, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 9.4

oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy: Security Issues in Resource Path Matching

oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy is an aws s3 proxy written in go. Prior to 5.0.0, s3-proxy contains an authentication bypass caused by inconsistent URL path interpretation between the authentication middleware and the bucket handler. The authentication middleware evaluates resource path patterns against the percent-encoded request URI (r.URL.RequestURI()), while the bucket handler constructs S3 object keys from the decoded path (r.URL.Path). This mismatch, combined with the glob library being invoked without a path separator (causing * to match across / boundaries), allows unauthenticated attackers to write to, read from, or delete objects in protected S3 namespaces. Exploitation is possible via three techniques: (1) using * patterns that match across path separators to reach protected routes via path traversal (e.g., /open/foo/drafts/../restricted/), (2) using percent-encoded slashes (%2F) to collapse multiple path segments into a single token at the auth layer while the decoded form resolves to a protected namespace at the storage layer, and (3) using dot-dot segments (../) under ** prefix patterns, where the raw path matches an open route while Go's URL parser resolves the traversal to a protected path before the bucket handler runs. An unauthenticated attacker with network access can perform unauthorized PUT, GET, or DELETE operations on objects in authentication-protected S3 namespaces. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.0.

Record
CVE-2026-42882
CVSS 3.1
9.4 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Weakness
CWE-22, CWE-863
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-29205 9.4

oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy is an aws s3 proxy written in go. Prior to 5.0.0, s3-proxy contains an authentication bypass caused by inconsistent URL path interpretation between the authentication middleware and the bucket handler. The authentication middleware evaluates resource path patterns against the percent-encoded request URI (r.URL.RequestURI()), while the bucket handler constructs S3 object keys from the decoded path (r.URL.Path). This mismatch, combined with the glob library being invoked without a path separator (causing * to match across / boundaries), allows unauthenticated attackers to write to, read from, or delete objects in protected S3 namespaces. Exploitation is possible via three techniques: (1) using * patterns that match across path separators to reach protected routes via path traversal (e.g., /open/foo/drafts/../restricted/), (2) using percent-encoded slashes (%2F) to collapse multiple path segments into a single token at the auth layer while the decoded form resolves to a protected namespace at the storage layer, and (3) using dot-dot segments (../) under ** prefix patterns, where the raw path matches an open route while Go's URL parser resolves the traversal to a protected path before the bucket handler runs. An unauthenticated attacker with network access can perform unauthorized PUT, GET, or DELETE operations on objects in authentication-protected S3 namespaces. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.0.

Record
EUVD-2026-29205
CVSS 3.1
9.4 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-rfgq-wgg8-662p 9.4

S3-Proxy has Security Issues in its Resource Path Matching Implementation

Background

The original concern is functional: a resource pattern should treat a percent-encoded segment like some%2Fvalue as a single opaque token rather than splitting it into two path segments at the decoded /. Investigation into why %2F was being decoded and how routes matched against the result surfaced three related security issues, documented below.

Rather than landing a fix directly, the problem space warrants discussion first. Different fixes carry different compliance and compatibility tradeoffs, and every viable option is a breaking change in some form. Aligning on a direction before committing to an implementation is the safer path.

Root cause: two different path representations

Go's net/http decodes percent-encoded characters when it parses an incoming URL: %2F becomes / in r.URL.Path, while the original encoded form is preserved in r.URL.RawPath. Two different parts of s3-proxy use different fields:

  • The auth middleware calls r.URL.RequestURI(), which returns the encoded form (from RawPath when available). It sees %2F as literal characters, not as path separators.
  • The bucket handler reads r.URL.Path to build the S3 key. It sees the decoded form, where %2F has already become /.

All three issues stem from this mismatch, combined with how glob patterns are compiled. The examples below use PUT for concreteness, but the auth bypass applies to any HTTP method — a config that restricts GET or DELETE on a namespace is equally affected, meaning an attacker could read from or delete objects in a protected namespace without credentials.

A note on RFC 3986

RFC 3986 §2.2 states that / and %2F are not equivalent in a URI path:

URIs that differ in the replacement of a reserved character with its corresponding percent-encoded octet are not equivalent.

/ is a reserved gen-delim used as a path segment separator. %2F is its percent-encoded form and, by the RFC, should be treated as data within a segment — not as a separator. So:

  • /foo/bar/baz → three segments: foo, bar, baz
  • /foo%2Fbar/baz → two segments: foo/bar (opaque data), baz

The original functional concern (wanting foo%2Fbar to match as a single token against a single-segment wildcard) is therefore RFC-correct behaviour. Go's r.URL.Path violates this by decoding %2F to /, collapsing the two representations into one. This is the underlying tension that makes fixing these issues non-trivial: the simplest security fix makes s3-proxy more RFC non-compliant, while the RFC-correct fix requires a more significant refactor.

A note on breaking changes

Any of the proposed fixes for these issues should be treated as a breaking change. Each option alters how path patterns in existing configs are interpreted — whether by changing how * matches segments, by shifting which path representation auth matches against, or by normalising paths before they reach the router. Operators upgrading to a fixed version will need to review their resource path definitions, and a clear migration note in the changelog is essential regardless of which approach is chosen.

One way to avoid a hard breaking change would be to introduce a new field — for example route: — that carries the fixed semantics, while keeping the existing path: field with its current behaviour (and marking it deprecated). Operators could migrate resource definitions incrementally, and the security fix would be available immediately without requiring a coordinated config update across all deployments. The obvious cost of this approach is maintaining two parallel implementations, duplicated test coverage, and the ongoing burden of supporting a deprecated code path until it can eventually be removed.

Issue 1 — * in resource paths matches across /

Background

Resource paths are matched using github.com/gobwas/glob. The call site is:

//…
Record
GHSA-rfgq-wgg8-662p
CVSS 3.1
9.4 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Weakness
CWE-22, CWE-863
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 9.4

oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy is an aws s3 proxy written in go. Prior to 5.0.0, s3-proxy contains an authentication bypass caused by inconsistent URL path interpretation between the authentication middleware and the bucket handler. The authentication middleware evaluates resource path patterns against the percent-encoded request URI (r.URL.RequestURI()), while the bucket handler constructs S3 object keys from the decoded path (r.URL.Path). This mismatch, combined with the glob library being invoked without a path separator (causing * to match across / boundaries), allows unauthenticated attackers to write to, read from, or delete objects in protected S3 namespaces. Exploitation is possible via three techniques: (1) using * patterns that match across path separators to reach protected routes via path traversal (e.g., /open/foo/drafts/../restricted/), (2) using percent-encoded slashes (%2F) to collapse multiple path segments into a single token at the auth layer while the decoded form resolves to a protected namespace at the storage layer, and (3) using dot-dot segments (../) under ** prefix patterns, where the raw path matches an open route while Go's URL parser resolves the traversal to a protected path before the bucket handler runs. An unauthenticated attacker with network access can perform unauthorized PUT, GET, or DELETE operations on objects in authentication-protected S3 namespaces. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.0.

Record
CVE-2026-42882
CVSS 3.1
9.4 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Weakness
CWE-22, CWE-863
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 9.4

oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy: Security Issues in Resource Path Matching

oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy is an aws s3 proxy written in go. Prior to 5.0.0, s3-proxy contains an authentication bypass caused by inconsistent URL path interpretation between the authentication middleware and the bucket handler. The authentication middleware evaluates resource path patterns against the percent-encoded request URI (r.URL.RequestURI()), while the bucket handler constructs S3 object keys from the decoded path (r.URL.Path). This mismatch, combined with the glob library being invoked without a path separator (causing * to match across / boundaries), allows unauthenticated attackers to write to, read from, or delete objects in protected S3 namespaces. Exploitation is possible via three techniques: (1) using * patterns that match across path separators to reach protected routes via path traversal (e.g., /open/foo/drafts/../restricted/), (2) using percent-encoded slashes (%2F) to collapse multiple path segments into a single token at the auth layer while the decoded form resolves to a protected namespace at the storage layer, and (3) using dot-dot segments (../) under ** prefix patterns, where the raw path matches an open route while Go's URL parser resolves the traversal to a protected path before the bucket handler runs. An unauthenticated attacker with network access can perform unauthorized PUT, GET, or DELETE operations on objects in authentication-protected S3 namespaces. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.0.

Record
CVE-2026-42882
CVSS 3.1
9.4 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Weakness
CWE-22, CWE-863
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-rfgq-wgg8-662p 9.4

S3-Proxy has Security Issues in its Resource Path Matching Implementation

Background

The original concern is functional: a resource pattern should treat a percent-encoded segment like some%2Fvalue as a single opaque token rather than splitting it into two path segments at the decoded /. Investigation into why %2F was being decoded and how routes matched against the result surfaced three related security issues, documented below.

Rather than landing a fix directly, the problem space warrants discussion first. Different fixes carry different compliance and compatibility tradeoffs, and every viable option is a breaking change in some form. Aligning on a direction before committing to an implementation is the safer path.

Root cause: two different path representations

Go's net/http decodes percent-encoded characters when it parses an incoming URL: %2F becomes / in r.URL.Path, while the original encoded form is preserved in r.URL.RawPath. Two different parts of s3-proxy use different fields:

  • The auth middleware calls r.URL.RequestURI(), which returns the encoded form (from RawPath when available). It sees %2F as literal characters, not as path separators.
  • The bucket handler reads r.URL.Path to build the S3 key. It sees the decoded form, where %2F has already become /.

All three issues stem from this mismatch, combined with how glob patterns are compiled. The examples below use PUT for concreteness, but the auth bypass applies to any HTTP method — a config that restricts GET or DELETE on a namespace is equally affected, meaning an attacker could read from or delete objects in a protected namespace without credentials.

A note on RFC 3986

RFC 3986 §2.2 states that / and %2F are not equivalent in a URI path:

URIs that differ in the replacement of a reserved character with its corresponding percent-encoded octet are not equivalent.

/ is a reserved gen-delim used as a path segment separator. %2F is its percent-encoded form and, by the RFC, should be treated as data within a segment — not as a separator. So:

  • /foo/bar/baz → three segments: foo, bar, baz
  • /foo%2Fbar/baz → two segments: foo/bar (opaque data), baz

The original functional concern (wanting foo%2Fbar to match as a single token against a single-segment wildcard) is therefore RFC-correct behaviour. Go's r.URL.Path violates this by decoding %2F to /, collapsing the two representations into one. This is the underlying tension that makes fixing these issues non-trivial: the simplest security fix makes s3-proxy more RFC non-compliant, while the RFC-correct fix requires a more significant refactor.

A note on breaking changes

Any of the proposed fixes for these issues should be treated as a breaking change. Each option alters how path patterns in existing configs are interpreted — whether by changing how * matches segments, by shifting which path representation auth matches against, or by normalising paths before they reach the router. Operators upgrading to a fixed version will need to review their resource path definitions, and a clear migration note in the changelog is essential regardless of which approach is chosen.

One way to avoid a hard breaking change would be to introduce a new field — for example route: — that carries the fixed semantics, while keeping the existing path: field with its current behaviour (and marking it deprecated). Operators could migrate resource definitions incrementally, and the security fix would be available immediately without requiring a coordinated config update across all deployments. The obvious cost of this approach is maintaining two parallel implementations, duplicated test coverage, and the ongoing burden of supporting a deprecated code path until it can eventually be removed.

Issue 1 — * in resource paths matches across /

Background

Resource paths are matched using github.com/gobwas/glob. The call site is:

//…
Record
GHSA-rfgq-wgg8-662p
CVSS 3.1
9.4 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Weakness
CWE-22, CWE-863
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-5616 No score

S3-Proxy has Security Issues in its Resource Path Matching Implementation in github.com/oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy

S3-Proxy has Security Issues in its Resource Path Matching Implementation in github.com/oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy

Record
GO-2026-5616
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
  • GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
  • GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
  • GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
  • GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
  • GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
  • GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
  • GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
  • GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
  • GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
  • GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
  • GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
  • GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
  • GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
  • GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
  • GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
  • GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
  • GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
  • GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
  • GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
  • GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
  • GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
  • GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
  • GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
  • GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
  • GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
  • GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
  • GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
  • GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
  • GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
  • GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
  • GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
  • GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
  • GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
  • GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
  • GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
  • GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
  • GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
  • GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
  • GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
  • GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
  • GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
  • GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
  • GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
  • GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
  • GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
  • GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
  • GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
  • GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
  • GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
  • GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
  • GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
  • GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
  • GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
  • GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
  • GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
  • GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
  • GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
  • GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
  • GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
  • GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
  • GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
  • GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
  • GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
  • GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
  • GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
  • GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
  • GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
  • GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
  • GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
  • GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
  • GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
  • GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
  • GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
  • GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
  • GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
  • GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy
Go
 before 0.0.0-20260424211602-1320e4abd46a
0.0.0-20260424211602-1320e4abd46a
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 1734 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1
0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-42882 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.4) in Oxyno-zeta S3-proxy, published May 5, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.55%, the 46th percentile. Fixed in github.com/oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy 0.0.0-20260424211602-1320e4abd46a.

References

Show 194 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 1,541 references and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

Pages All vulnerabilities Browse Docs Sources Guide Get API key
MoveEnter Open