Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-44332

Fiber: Username Enumeration via Timing Oracle in BasicAuth Default Authorizer

5.3 MediumFix available

Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Prior to 3.3.0, the default Authorizer function in the BasicAuth middleware in middleware/basicauth/config.go uses short-circuit evaluation that skips password hash comparison for non-existent usernames, enabling reliable remote username enumeration through response timing differences. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.0.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.52%Unchanged since Jul 9, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 5.3

Fiber: Username Enumeration via Timing Oracle in BasicAuth Default Authorizer

Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Prior to 3.3.0, the default Authorizer function in the BasicAuth middleware in middleware/basicauth/config.go uses short-circuit evaluation that skips password hash comparison for non-existent usernames, enabling reliable remote username enumeration through response timing differences. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.0.

Record
CVE-2026-44332
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-203
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-42358 5.3

Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Prior to 3.3.0, the default Authorizer function in the BasicAuth middleware in middleware/basicauth/config.go uses short-circuit evaluation that skips password hash comparison for non-existent usernames, enabling reliable remote username enumeration through response timing differences. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.0.

Record
EUVD-2026-42358
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-g5vh-55hw-rxm8 5.3

GoFiber Vulnerable to Username Enumeration via Timing Oracle in BasicAuth Default Authorizer

Summary

The default Authorizer function in GoFiber's BasicAuth middleware uses short-circuit evaluation that skips password hash comparison for non-existent usernames. With bcrypt-hashed passwords (the primary use case), the timing difference between a valid and invalid username is approximately 1,000,000:1 (~100ms vs ~100ns), enabling reliable remote username enumeration.

Vulnerable Code

File: middleware/basicauth/config.go, lines 126-138

if cfg.Authorizer == nil {
    verifiers := make(map[string]func(string) bool, len(cfg.Users))
    for u, hpw := range cfg.Users {
        v, err := parseHashedPassword(hpw)
        if err != nil {
            panic(err)
        }
        verifiers[u] = v
    }
    cfg.Authorizer = func(user, pass string, _ fiber.Ctx) bool {
        verify, ok := verifiers[user]
        return ok && verify(pass)   // line 137: short-circuit skips verify() if user unknown
    }
}

Data Flow

  1. Attacker sends Authorization: Basic <base64(candidate:wrongpass)>
  2. BasicAuth middleware decodes credentials and calls cfg.Authorizer(user, pass, c)
  3. Map lookup verifiers[user] returns ok=false for non-existent users
  4. Go && short-circuit: false && verify(pass) returns immediately without calling verify()
  5. For valid users, verify(pass) executes bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword() (line 167: ~100ms at default cost 10)
  6. Timing difference: ~100ns (invalid user) vs ~100ms (valid user) = 1,000,000:1 ratio

Timing comparison by hash type:

| Hash Type | Valid User | Invalid User | Ratio | |-----------|-----------|--------------|-------| | bcrypt ($2) | ~100 ms | ~100 ns | 1,000,000:1 | | SHA-512 | ~1-5 us | ~100 ns | 10-50:1 | | SHA-256 | ~1-5 us | ~100 ns | 10-50:1 |

Impact

  • Username enumeration: Attacker reliably determines which usernames exist by measuring response latency
  • Targeted brute force: After enumerating valid usernames, password brute force is focused only on real accounts
  • Account discovery: In applications where usernames are sensitive (internal tools, admin panels), leaking their existence is itself a security issue

Notes

  • Password hash comparisons themselves are timing-safe: subtle.ConstantTimeCompare is used correctly for SHA-256 (line 185), SHA-512 (line 176), and bcrypt uses its own constant-time comparison
  • The fix is to always execute a dummy hash comparison for unknown users: bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword(dummyHash, []byte(pass)) and discard the result
  • This pattern matches CVE-2023-36456 (Authentik timing oracle) and similar findings in other auth libraries
Record
GHSA-g5vh-55hw-rxm8
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-203
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 5.3

Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Prior to 3.3.0, the default Authorizer function in the BasicAuth middleware in middleware/basicauth/config.go uses short-circuit evaluation that skips password hash comparison for non-existent usernames, enabling reliable remote username enumeration through response timing differences. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.0.

Record
CVE-2026-44332
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-203
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 5.3

Fiber: Username Enumeration via Timing Oracle in BasicAuth Default Authorizer

Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Prior to 3.3.0, the default Authorizer function in the BasicAuth middleware in middleware/basicauth/config.go uses short-circuit evaluation that skips password hash comparison for non-existent usernames, enabling reliable remote username enumeration through response timing differences. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.0.

Record
CVE-2026-44332
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-203
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-g5vh-55hw-rxm8 5.3

GoFiber Vulnerable to Username Enumeration via Timing Oracle in BasicAuth Default Authorizer

Summary

The default Authorizer function in GoFiber's BasicAuth middleware uses short-circuit evaluation that skips password hash comparison for non-existent usernames. With bcrypt-hashed passwords (the primary use case), the timing difference between a valid and invalid username is approximately 1,000,000:1 (~100ms vs ~100ns), enabling reliable remote username enumeration.

Vulnerable Code

File: middleware/basicauth/config.go, lines 126-138

if cfg.Authorizer == nil {
    verifiers := make(map[string]func(string) bool, len(cfg.Users))
    for u, hpw := range cfg.Users {
        v, err := parseHashedPassword(hpw)
        if err != nil {
            panic(err)
        }
        verifiers[u] = v
    }
    cfg.Authorizer = func(user, pass string, _ fiber.Ctx) bool {
        verify, ok := verifiers[user]
        return ok && verify(pass)   // line 137: short-circuit skips verify() if user unknown
    }
}

Data Flow

  1. Attacker sends Authorization: Basic <base64(candidate:wrongpass)>
  2. BasicAuth middleware decodes credentials and calls cfg.Authorizer(user, pass, c)
  3. Map lookup verifiers[user] returns ok=false for non-existent users
  4. Go && short-circuit: false && verify(pass) returns immediately without calling verify()
  5. For valid users, verify(pass) executes bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword() (line 167: ~100ms at default cost 10)
  6. Timing difference: ~100ns (invalid user) vs ~100ms (valid user) = 1,000,000:1 ratio

Timing comparison by hash type:

| Hash Type | Valid User | Invalid User | Ratio | |-----------|-----------|--------------|-------| | bcrypt ($2) | ~100 ms | ~100 ns | 1,000,000:1 | | SHA-512 | ~1-5 us | ~100 ns | 10-50:1 | | SHA-256 | ~1-5 us | ~100 ns | 10-50:1 |

Impact

  • Username enumeration: Attacker reliably determines which usernames exist by measuring response latency
  • Targeted brute force: After enumerating valid usernames, password brute force is focused only on real accounts
  • Account discovery: In applications where usernames are sensitive (internal tools, admin panels), leaking their existence is itself a security issue

Notes

  • Password hash comparisons themselves are timing-safe: subtle.ConstantTimeCompare is used correctly for SHA-256 (line 185), SHA-512 (line 176), and bcrypt uses its own constant-time comparison
  • The fix is to always execute a dummy hash comparison for unknown users: bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword(dummyHash, []byte(pass)) and discard the result
  • This pattern matches CVE-2023-36456 (Authentik timing oracle) and similar findings in other auth libraries
Record
GHSA-g5vh-55hw-rxm8
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-203
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 5 moreShow less
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-44332 5.3

Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Prior to 3.3.0, the default Authorizer function in the BasicAuth middleware in middleware/basicauth/config.go uses short-circuit evaluation that skips password hash comparison for non-existent usernames, enabling reliable remote username enumeration through response timing differences. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.0.

Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-44332
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-5886 No score

GoFiber Vulnerable to Username Enumeration via Timing Oracle in BasicAuth Default Authorizer in github.com/gofiber/fiber

GoFiber Vulnerable to Username Enumeration via Timing Oracle in BasicAuth Default Authorizer in github.com/gofiber/fiber

Record
GO-2026-5886
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21551-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260727T201416 2026-07-27T20:14:16Z (jsc#PED-11136):

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-5046 CVE-2026-46385 GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w
  • GO-2026-5047 CVE-2026-46384 GHSA-mc57-h6j3-3hmv
  • GO-2026-5048 GHSA-mx64-mj3q-7prj
  • GO-2026-5051
  • GO-2026-5069 CVE-2026-30246 GHSA-35hp-hqmv-8qg8
  • GO-2026-5074 CVE-2026-45022 GHSA-389r-gv7p-r3rp
  • GO-2026-5105 CVE-2026-41506 GHSA-3xc5-wrhm-f963
  • GO-2026-5116 CVE-2026-44517 GHSA-49p4-px3h-rq49
  • GO-2026-5158 CVE-2026-41178 GHSA-5wrp-cwcj-q835
  • GO-2026-5198 CVE-2026-41642 GHSA-7235-89m6-f4px
  • GO-2026-5208 CVE-2026-40890 GHSA-77fj-vx54-gvh7
  • GO-2026-5266 CVE-2026-41643 GHSA-8rxh-r2p6-7f2q
  • GO-2026-5309 GHSA-c3wq-j5vh-68rc
  • GO-2026-5327 CVE-2026-2303 GHSA-cp6g-7hqx-qxhp
  • GO-2026-5336 CVE-2026-45571 GHSA-crhj-59gh-8x96
  • GO-2026-5346 CVE-2026-52845 GHSA-f59h-q822-g45g
  • GO-2026-5408 GHSA-gx7w-56w6-g48x
  • GO-2026-5426 CVE-2026-39883 GHSA-hfvc-g4fc-pqhx
  • GO-2026-5435 CVE-2026-35206 GHSA-hr2v-4r36-88hr
  • GO-2026-5452 CVE-2026-34783 GHSA-j6v5-g24h-vg4j
  • GO-2026-5463 CVE-2026-8276 GHSA-jcqv-2g3v-gm88
  • GO-2026-5471 CVE-2026-6993 GHSA-jj45-xvq5-rhh9
  • GO-2026-5490 CVE-2026-44740 GHSA-m3xc-h892-ggx6
  • GO-2026-5492 CVE-2026-45135 GHSA-m675-2p33-xv9g
  • GO-2026-5506 CVE-2026-29181 GHSA-mh2q-q3fh-2475
  • GO-2026-5525 CVE-2026-42285 GHSA-p3w2-64xm-833j
  • GO-2026-5543 CVE-2026-32952 GHSA-pjcq-xvwq-hhpj
  • GO-2026-5548 CVE-2026-44166 GHSA-pq7p-mc74-g65w
  • GO-2026-5566 CVE-2026-35205 GHSA-q5jf-9vfq-h4h7
  • GO-2026-5569 GHSA-q76j-gcg9-vxc6
  • GO-2026-5585 CVE-2026-42554 GHSA-qjv7-627w-8qjv
  • GO-2026-5593 CVE-2026-40611 GHSA-qqx8-2xmm-jrv8
  • GO-2026-5595 CVE-2026-52844 GHSA-qrp7-cvwr-j2c6
  • GO-2026-5597 CVE-2026-44973 GHSA-qw64-3x98-g7q2
  • GO-2026-5606 GHSA-r46f-3rpw-hxrv
  • GO-2026-5617 CVE-2026-42306 GHSA-rg2x-37c3-w2rh
  • GO-2026-5660 CVE-2026-52846 GHSA-vcc4-2c75-vc9v
  • GO-2026-5666 CVE-2026-35204 GHSA-vmx8-mqv2-9gmg
  • GO-2026-5684 CVE-2026-42328 GHSA-w239-58x2-q8p5
  • GO-2026-5693 GHSA-w5pp-99ch-qj29
  • GO-2026-5730 GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c
  • GO-2026-5736 CVE-2026-44283 GHSA-x35m-3gp4-4fh5
  • GO-2026-5740 CVE-2026-44301 GHSA-x597-9fr4-5857
  • GO-2026-5748 CVE-2026-7482 GHSA-x8qc-fggm-mpqg
  • GO-2026-5750 CVE-2026-7020 GHSA-x99g-8v8j-25j2
  • GO-2026-5774 GHSA-3fxj-6jh8-hvhx
  • GO-2026-5775 GHSA-9g5q-2w5x-hmxf
  • GO-2026-5777 GHSA-rjr7-jggh-pgcp
  • GO-2026-5781
  • GO-2026-5841 GHSA-259r-337f-4rfw
  • GO-2026-5879 CVE-2026-50162 GHSA-8xwf-rjm4-xvhv
  • GO-2026-5880 CVE-2026-50163 GHSA-fxhp-mv3v-67qp
  • GO-2026-5882 CVE-2026-50151 GHSA-jxpm-75mh-9fp7
  • GO-2026-5884 GHSA-vh4v-2xq2-g5cg
  • GO-2026-5885 CVE-2026-48978 GHSA-xf85-363p-868w
  • GO-2026-5886 CVE-2026-44332 GHSA-g5vh-55hw-rxm8
  • GO-2026-5887 CVE-2026-45045 GHSA-gcfq-8gqf-4876
  • GO-2026-5912 CVE-2026-53624 GHSA-gv83-gqw6-9j2c
  • GO-2026-5954 CVE-2026-49838 GHSA-frrj-87jh-2772
  • GO-2026-5955 CVE-2026-49837 GHSA-gjrg-jjr3-56cm
  • GO-2026-5960 CVE-2026-54063 GHSA-h69g-9hx6-f3v4
  • GO-2026-5971 CVE-2026-37462 GHSA-pw7p-7fqv-hpj8
  • GO-2026-5983 CVE-2026-54448 GHSA-q3fv-x8vg-qqm4
  • GO-2026-6000 CVE-2026-50274 GHSA-74j5-xf3v-crq8
  • GO-2026-6058 CVE-2026-58442 GHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v
  • GO-2026-6059 CVE-2026-58431 GHSA-h56g-4qw7-2mxg
  • GO-2026-6060 CVE-2026-58426 GHSA-hg5r-vq93-9fv6
  • GO-2026-6061 GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf
  • GO-2026-6062 CVE-2026-58434 GHSA-j2w3-9c3r-g83q
  • GO-2026-6063 CVE-2026-58417 GHSA-jr5x-6h83-wrxf
  • GO-2026-6064 CVE-2026-55984 GHSA-m932-crvm-gcp5
  • GO-2026-6065 CVE-2026-55982 GHSA-mg4f-x9v4-6h2p
  • GO-2026-6066 CVE-2026-58507 GHSA-p4mj-98mv-xq26
  • GO-2026-6067 CVE-2026-58445 GHSA-pgqf-926r-548m
  • GO-2026-6068 CVE-2026-58427 GHSA-prr9-9mp4-5gp2
  • GO-2026-6069 CVE-2026-58510 GHSA-q423-49rw-g9mh
  • GO-2026-6070 CVE-2026-58432 GHSA-q9pg-jj6x-j9p6
  • GO-2026-6071 CVE-2026-59766 GHSA-qf2f-qh6p-7v89
  • GO-2026-6072 CVE-2026-56750 GHSA-rgv6-xp99-6mgj
  • GO-2026-6073 CVE-2026-58435…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21551-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23216-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260727T201416 2026-07-27T20:14:16Z (jsc#PED-11136):

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-5046 CVE-2026-46385 GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w
  • GO-2026-5047 CVE-2026-46384 GHSA-mc57-h6j3-3hmv
  • GO-2026-5048 GHSA-mx64-mj3q-7prj
  • GO-2026-5051
  • GO-2026-5069 CVE-2026-30246 GHSA-35hp-hqmv-8qg8
  • GO-2026-5074 CVE-2026-45022 GHSA-389r-gv7p-r3rp
  • GO-2026-5105 CVE-2026-41506 GHSA-3xc5-wrhm-f963
  • GO-2026-5116 CVE-2026-44517 GHSA-49p4-px3h-rq49
  • GO-2026-5158 CVE-2026-41178 GHSA-5wrp-cwcj-q835
  • GO-2026-5198 CVE-2026-41642 GHSA-7235-89m6-f4px
  • GO-2026-5208 CVE-2026-40890 GHSA-77fj-vx54-gvh7
  • GO-2026-5266 CVE-2026-41643 GHSA-8rxh-r2p6-7f2q
  • GO-2026-5309 GHSA-c3wq-j5vh-68rc
  • GO-2026-5327 CVE-2026-2303 GHSA-cp6g-7hqx-qxhp
  • GO-2026-5336 CVE-2026-45571 GHSA-crhj-59gh-8x96
  • GO-2026-5346 CVE-2026-52845 GHSA-f59h-q822-g45g
  • GO-2026-5408 GHSA-gx7w-56w6-g48x
  • GO-2026-5426 CVE-2026-39883 GHSA-hfvc-g4fc-pqhx
  • GO-2026-5435 CVE-2026-35206 GHSA-hr2v-4r36-88hr
  • GO-2026-5452 CVE-2026-34783 GHSA-j6v5-g24h-vg4j
  • GO-2026-5463 CVE-2026-8276 GHSA-jcqv-2g3v-gm88
  • GO-2026-5471 CVE-2026-6993 GHSA-jj45-xvq5-rhh9
  • GO-2026-5490 CVE-2026-44740 GHSA-m3xc-h892-ggx6
  • GO-2026-5492 CVE-2026-45135 GHSA-m675-2p33-xv9g
  • GO-2026-5506 CVE-2026-29181 GHSA-mh2q-q3fh-2475
  • GO-2026-5525 CVE-2026-42285 GHSA-p3w2-64xm-833j
  • GO-2026-5543 CVE-2026-32952 GHSA-pjcq-xvwq-hhpj
  • GO-2026-5548 CVE-2026-44166 GHSA-pq7p-mc74-g65w
  • GO-2026-5566 CVE-2026-35205 GHSA-q5jf-9vfq-h4h7
  • GO-2026-5569 GHSA-q76j-gcg9-vxc6
  • GO-2026-5585 CVE-2026-42554 GHSA-qjv7-627w-8qjv
  • GO-2026-5593 CVE-2026-40611 GHSA-qqx8-2xmm-jrv8
  • GO-2026-5595 CVE-2026-52844 GHSA-qrp7-cvwr-j2c6
  • GO-2026-5597 CVE-2026-44973 GHSA-qw64-3x98-g7q2
  • GO-2026-5606 GHSA-r46f-3rpw-hxrv
  • GO-2026-5617 CVE-2026-42306 GHSA-rg2x-37c3-w2rh
  • GO-2026-5660 CVE-2026-52846 GHSA-vcc4-2c75-vc9v
  • GO-2026-5666 CVE-2026-35204 GHSA-vmx8-mqv2-9gmg
  • GO-2026-5684 CVE-2026-42328 GHSA-w239-58x2-q8p5
  • GO-2026-5693 GHSA-w5pp-99ch-qj29
  • GO-2026-5730 GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c
  • GO-2026-5736 CVE-2026-44283 GHSA-x35m-3gp4-4fh5
  • GO-2026-5740 CVE-2026-44301 GHSA-x597-9fr4-5857
  • GO-2026-5748 CVE-2026-7482 GHSA-x8qc-fggm-mpqg
  • GO-2026-5750 CVE-2026-7020 GHSA-x99g-8v8j-25j2
  • GO-2026-5774 GHSA-3fxj-6jh8-hvhx
  • GO-2026-5775 GHSA-9g5q-2w5x-hmxf
  • GO-2026-5777 GHSA-rjr7-jggh-pgcp
  • GO-2026-5781
  • GO-2026-5841 GHSA-259r-337f-4rfw
  • GO-2026-5879 CVE-2026-50162 GHSA-8xwf-rjm4-xvhv
  • GO-2026-5880 CVE-2026-50163 GHSA-fxhp-mv3v-67qp
  • GO-2026-5882 CVE-2026-50151 GHSA-jxpm-75mh-9fp7
  • GO-2026-5884 GHSA-vh4v-2xq2-g5cg
  • GO-2026-5885 CVE-2026-48978 GHSA-xf85-363p-868w
  • GO-2026-5886 CVE-2026-44332 GHSA-g5vh-55hw-rxm8
  • GO-2026-5887 CVE-2026-45045 GHSA-gcfq-8gqf-4876
  • GO-2026-5912 CVE-2026-53624 GHSA-gv83-gqw6-9j2c
  • GO-2026-5954 CVE-2026-49838 GHSA-frrj-87jh-2772
  • GO-2026-5955 CVE-2026-49837 GHSA-gjrg-jjr3-56cm
  • GO-2026-5960 CVE-2026-54063 GHSA-h69g-9hx6-f3v4
  • GO-2026-5971 CVE-2026-37462 GHSA-pw7p-7fqv-hpj8
  • GO-2026-5983 CVE-2026-54448 GHSA-q3fv-x8vg-qqm4
  • GO-2026-6000 CVE-2026-50274 GHSA-74j5-xf3v-crq8
  • GO-2026-6058 CVE-2026-58442 GHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v
  • GO-2026-6059 CVE-2026-58431 GHSA-h56g-4qw7-2mxg
  • GO-2026-6060 CVE-2026-58426 GHSA-hg5r-vq93-9fv6
  • GO-2026-6061 GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf
  • GO-2026-6062 CVE-2026-58434 GHSA-j2w3-9c3r-g83q
  • GO-2026-6063 CVE-2026-58417 GHSA-jr5x-6h83-wrxf
  • GO-2026-6064 CVE-2026-55984 GHSA-m932-crvm-gcp5
  • GO-2026-6065 CVE-2026-55982 GHSA-mg4f-x9v4-6h2p
  • GO-2026-6066 CVE-2026-58507 GHSA-p4mj-98mv-xq26
  • GO-2026-6067 CVE-2026-58445 GHSA-pgqf-926r-548m
  • GO-2026-6068 CVE-2026-58427 GHSA-prr9-9mp4-5gp2
  • GO-2026-6069 CVE-2026-58510 GHSA-q423-49rw-g9mh
  • GO-2026-6070 CVE-2026-58432 GHSA-q9pg-jj6x-j9p6
  • GO-2026-6071 CVE-2026-59766 GHSA-qf2f-qh6p-7v89
  • GO-2026-6072 CVE-2026-56750 GHSA-rgv6-xp99-6mgj
  • GO-2026-6073 CVE-2026-58435…
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23216-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23227-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260727T201416 2026-07-27T20:14:16Z (jsc#PED-11136):

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-5046 CVE-2026-46385 GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w
  • GO-2026-5047 CVE-2026-46384 GHSA-mc57-h6j3-3hmv
  • GO-2026-5048 GHSA-mx64-mj3q-7prj
  • GO-2026-5051
  • GO-2026-5069 CVE-2026-30246 GHSA-35hp-hqmv-8qg8
  • GO-2026-5074 CVE-2026-45022 GHSA-389r-gv7p-r3rp
  • GO-2026-5105 CVE-2026-41506 GHSA-3xc5-wrhm-f963
  • GO-2026-5116 CVE-2026-44517 GHSA-49p4-px3h-rq49
  • GO-2026-5158 CVE-2026-41178 GHSA-5wrp-cwcj-q835
  • GO-2026-5198 CVE-2026-41642 GHSA-7235-89m6-f4px
  • GO-2026-5208 CVE-2026-40890 GHSA-77fj-vx54-gvh7
  • GO-2026-5266 CVE-2026-41643 GHSA-8rxh-r2p6-7f2q
  • GO-2026-5309 GHSA-c3wq-j5vh-68rc
  • GO-2026-5327 CVE-2026-2303 GHSA-cp6g-7hqx-qxhp
  • GO-2026-5336 CVE-2026-45571 GHSA-crhj-59gh-8x96
  • GO-2026-5346 CVE-2026-52845 GHSA-f59h-q822-g45g
  • GO-2026-5408 GHSA-gx7w-56w6-g48x
  • GO-2026-5426 CVE-2026-39883 GHSA-hfvc-g4fc-pqhx
  • GO-2026-5435 CVE-2026-35206 GHSA-hr2v-4r36-88hr
  • GO-2026-5452 CVE-2026-34783 GHSA-j6v5-g24h-vg4j
  • GO-2026-5463 CVE-2026-8276 GHSA-jcqv-2g3v-gm88
  • GO-2026-5471 CVE-2026-6993 GHSA-jj45-xvq5-rhh9
  • GO-2026-5490 CVE-2026-44740 GHSA-m3xc-h892-ggx6
  • GO-2026-5492 CVE-2026-45135 GHSA-m675-2p33-xv9g
  • GO-2026-5506 CVE-2026-29181 GHSA-mh2q-q3fh-2475
  • GO-2026-5525 CVE-2026-42285 GHSA-p3w2-64xm-833j
  • GO-2026-5543 CVE-2026-32952 GHSA-pjcq-xvwq-hhpj
  • GO-2026-5548 CVE-2026-44166 GHSA-pq7p-mc74-g65w
  • GO-2026-5566 CVE-2026-35205 GHSA-q5jf-9vfq-h4h7
  • GO-2026-5569 GHSA-q76j-gcg9-vxc6
  • GO-2026-5585 CVE-2026-42554 GHSA-qjv7-627w-8qjv
  • GO-2026-5593 CVE-2026-40611 GHSA-qqx8-2xmm-jrv8
  • GO-2026-5595 CVE-2026-52844 GHSA-qrp7-cvwr-j2c6
  • GO-2026-5597 CVE-2026-44973 GHSA-qw64-3x98-g7q2
  • GO-2026-5606 GHSA-r46f-3rpw-hxrv
  • GO-2026-5617 CVE-2026-42306 GHSA-rg2x-37c3-w2rh
  • GO-2026-5660 CVE-2026-52846 GHSA-vcc4-2c75-vc9v
  • GO-2026-5666 CVE-2026-35204 GHSA-vmx8-mqv2-9gmg
  • GO-2026-5684 CVE-2026-42328 GHSA-w239-58x2-q8p5
  • GO-2026-5693 GHSA-w5pp-99ch-qj29
  • GO-2026-5730 GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c
  • GO-2026-5736 CVE-2026-44283 GHSA-x35m-3gp4-4fh5
  • GO-2026-5740 CVE-2026-44301 GHSA-x597-9fr4-5857
  • GO-2026-5748 CVE-2026-7482 GHSA-x8qc-fggm-mpqg
  • GO-2026-5750 CVE-2026-7020 GHSA-x99g-8v8j-25j2
  • GO-2026-5774 GHSA-3fxj-6jh8-hvhx
  • GO-2026-5775 GHSA-9g5q-2w5x-hmxf
  • GO-2026-5777 GHSA-rjr7-jggh-pgcp
  • GO-2026-5781
  • GO-2026-5841 GHSA-259r-337f-4rfw
  • GO-2026-5879 CVE-2026-50162 GHSA-8xwf-rjm4-xvhv
  • GO-2026-5880 CVE-2026-50163 GHSA-fxhp-mv3v-67qp
  • GO-2026-5882 CVE-2026-50151 GHSA-jxpm-75mh-9fp7
  • GO-2026-5884 GHSA-vh4v-2xq2-g5cg
  • GO-2026-5885 CVE-2026-48978 GHSA-xf85-363p-868w
  • GO-2026-5886 CVE-2026-44332 GHSA-g5vh-55hw-rxm8
  • GO-2026-5887 CVE-2026-45045 GHSA-gcfq-8gqf-4876
  • GO-2026-5912 CVE-2026-53624 GHSA-gv83-gqw6-9j2c
  • GO-2026-5954 CVE-2026-49838 GHSA-frrj-87jh-2772
  • GO-2026-5955 CVE-2026-49837 GHSA-gjrg-jjr3-56cm
  • GO-2026-5960 CVE-2026-54063 GHSA-h69g-9hx6-f3v4
  • GO-2026-5971 CVE-2026-37462 GHSA-pw7p-7fqv-hpj8
  • GO-2026-5983 CVE-2026-54448 GHSA-q3fv-x8vg-qqm4
  • GO-2026-6000 CVE-2026-50274 GHSA-74j5-xf3v-crq8
  • GO-2026-6058 CVE-2026-58442 GHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v
  • GO-2026-6059 CVE-2026-58431 GHSA-h56g-4qw7-2mxg
  • GO-2026-6060 CVE-2026-58426 GHSA-hg5r-vq93-9fv6
  • GO-2026-6061 GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf
  • GO-2026-6062 CVE-2026-58434 GHSA-j2w3-9c3r-g83q
  • GO-2026-6063 CVE-2026-58417 GHSA-jr5x-6h83-wrxf
  • GO-2026-6064 CVE-2026-55984 GHSA-m932-crvm-gcp5
  • GO-2026-6065 CVE-2026-55982 GHSA-mg4f-x9v4-6h2p
  • GO-2026-6066 CVE-2026-58507 GHSA-p4mj-98mv-xq26
  • GO-2026-6067 CVE-2026-58445 GHSA-pgqf-926r-548m
  • GO-2026-6068 CVE-2026-58427 GHSA-prr9-9mp4-5gp2
  • GO-2026-6069 CVE-2026-58510 GHSA-q423-49rw-g9mh
  • GO-2026-6070 CVE-2026-58432 GHSA-q9pg-jj6x-j9p6
  • GO-2026-6071 CVE-2026-59766 GHSA-qf2f-qh6p-7v89
  • GO-2026-6072 CVE-2026-56750 GHSA-rgv6-xp99-6mgj
  • GO-2026-6073 CVE-2026-58435…
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23227-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3
Go
 through 3.2.0
3.3.0
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3
Go
 before 3.3.0
3.3.0
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0
From an advisory covering 77 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260727T201416-160000.1.1
0.0.20260727T201416-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0
From an advisory covering 77 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260727T201416-160000.1.1
0.0.20260727T201416-160000.1.1
golang-github-gofiber-fiber
Ubuntu:26.10
 All versions, plus listed versions
3.3.0-13.4.0-13.5.0-13.5.0-4
 None known
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 77 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260727T201416-160000.1.1
0.0.20260727T201416-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-44332 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 5.3) in Gofiber Fiber, published July 2, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.52%, the 44th percentile. Fixed in github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3 3.3.0.

References

Show 83 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

Pages All vulnerabilities Browse Docs Sources Guide Get API key
MoveEnter Open