Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-44849

Portainer: Endpoint security bypass via Swarm service create/update

9.4 CriticalFix available

Portainer Community Edition is a lightweight service delivery platform for containerized applications that can be used to manage Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes and ACI environments. From 2.33.0 to before 2.33.8, 2.39.2, and 2.41.0, Portainer enforces seven EndpointSecuritySettings restrictions that administrators configure to restrict the container configurations non-admin users can launch: privileged mode, host PID namespace, device mapping, capabilities, sysctls, security-opt (Seccomp / AppArmor), and bind mounts. These restrictions are enforced on the standard container creation path, but several of them are not applied on the Docker Swarm service API. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.33.8, 2.39.2, and 2.41.0.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

0.43%Up 0.4 points since May 29, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 9.4

Portainer: Endpoint security bypass via Swarm service create/update

Portainer Community Edition is a lightweight service delivery platform for containerized applications that can be used to manage Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes and ACI environments. From 2.33.0 to before 2.33.8, 2.39.2, and 2.41.0, Portainer enforces seven EndpointSecuritySettings restrictions that administrators configure to restrict the container configurations non-admin users can launch: privileged mode, host PID namespace, device mapping, capabilities, sysctls, security-opt (Seccomp / AppArmor), and bind mounts. These restrictions are enforced on the standard container creation path, but several of them are not applied on the Docker Swarm service API. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.33.8, 2.39.2, and 2.41.0.

Record
CVE-2026-44849
CVSS 4.0
9.4 CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Weakness
CWE-862
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-33063 9.4

Portainer Community Edition is a lightweight service delivery platform for containerized applications that can be used to manage Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes and ACI environments. From 2.33.0 to before 2.33.8, 2.39.2, and 2.41.0, Portainer enforces seven EndpointSecuritySettings restrictions that administrators configure to restrict the container configurations non-admin users can launch: privileged mode, host PID namespace, device mapping, capabilities, sysctls, security-opt (Seccomp / AppArmor), and bind mounts. These restrictions are enforced on the standard container creation path, but several of them are not applied on the Docker Swarm service API. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.33.8, 2.39.2, and 2.41.0.

Record
EUVD-2026-33063
CVSS 4.0
9.4 CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-5fxq-qcf3-244w 9.4

Portainer has an endpoint security bypass via Swarm service create/update

Summary

Portainer enforces seven EndpointSecuritySettings restrictions that administrators configure to restrict the container configurations non-admin users can launch: privileged mode, host PID namespace, device mapping, capabilities, sysctls, security-opt (Seccomp / AppArmor), and bind mounts.

The vulnerability is exposed when a non-admin Portainer user (Standard User role, or any role granted endpoint-level access) has been given access to a Docker Swarm endpoint via Portainer RBAC. Admins and users without Swarm endpoint access are not affected.

These restrictions are enforced on the standard container creation path, but several of them are not applied on the Docker Swarm service API:

  • POST /services/create — 1 of 7 checks applied. CapabilityAdd, CapabilityDrop, Sysctls, and Privileges (Seccomp / AppArmor) are not parsed from the request body and are forwarded to the Docker daemon without validation.
  • POST /services/{id}/update — 0 of 7 checks applied. The route dispatches to the generic restrictedResourceOperation, which validates RBAC ownership but does not inspect the request body or call fetchEndpointSecuritySettings().

The EndpointSecuritySettings checks apply when the administrator has configured any of AllowContainerCapabilitiesForRegularUsers, AllowSysctlSettingForRegularUsers, AllowSecurityOptForRegularUsers, or AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers to restrict standard users.

A regular user with access to a Docker Swarm endpoint can:

  • Create a service with CapabilityAdd: ["SYS_ADMIN", "NET_ADMIN", "SYS_PTRACE", …] or Privileges.Seccomp.Mode: "unconfined".
  • Create a benign service that passes ownership checks, then update it to add CapabilityAdd: ["ALL"] plus a bind mount of /, scale to one replica, and access the host filesystem from the running container (e.g. via chroot /host).

In addition, the partial Mounts[] struct used by the bind-mount check inspects only the top-level Type field. A mount with Type: "volume" and VolumeOptions.DriverConfig.Options: {type: "none", o: "bind", device: "<host path>"} is forwarded to the Docker daemon unchanged; the local volume driver then materialises it as a bind-equivalent mount, bypassing AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers. The same field path is accepted by the standalone POST /volumes/create endpoint, which never had any AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers check on any branch.

This undermines the administrator's configured security policy on Swarm-enabled endpoints.

Affected Versions

The vulnerability exists in every Portainer release with Docker Swarm support — the service-creation path has never checked CapabilityAdd, CapabilityDrop, Sysctls, or Privileges, and the service-update path has never performed any EndpointSecuritySettings validation. The VolumeOptions.DriverConfig field has never been parsed by the partial service struct on any branch, so the volume-driver-bind variant (service create/update and direct /volumes/create) shares the same affected range.

Fixes are included in the next release of each supported branch:

| Branch | First vulnerable | Fixed in | |---------------------|------------------|------------| | 2.33.x (LTS) | 2.33.0 | 2.33.8 | | 2.39.x (LTS) | 2.39.0 | 2.39.2 | | 2.40.x (STS) | 2.40.0 | 2.41.0 |

Portainer LTS branches receive fixes for 6 months plus a 3-month overlap after the next LTS ships. STS releases are supported only until the next STS ships — the 2.40.x STS line ends with the 2.41.0 release. All releases prior to 2.33.0 are end-of-life and will not receive a fix; users on EOL versions should upgrade to a supported LTS branch.

Workarounds

Administrators who cannot immediately upgrade can reduce exposure with the following measures. None of these replaces the fix.

  • **Temporarily revoke Swarm endpoint access for non-admin…
Record
GHSA-5fxq-qcf3-244w
CVSS 4.0
9.4 CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-862
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 9.4

Portainer Community Edition is a lightweight service delivery platform for containerized applications that can be used to manage Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes and ACI environments. From 2.33.0 to before 2.33.8, 2.39.2, and 2.41.0, Portainer enforces seven EndpointSecuritySettings restrictions that administrators configure to restrict the container configurations non-admin users can launch: privileged mode, host PID namespace, device mapping, capabilities, sysctls, security-opt (Seccomp / AppArmor), and bind mounts. These restrictions are enforced on the standard container creation path, but several of them are not applied on the Docker Swarm service API. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.33.8, 2.39.2, and 2.41.0.

Record
CVE-2026-44849
CVSS 4.0
9.4 CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-862
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 9.4

Portainer: Endpoint security bypass via Swarm service create/update

Portainer Community Edition is a lightweight service delivery platform for containerized applications that can be used to manage Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes and ACI environments. From 2.33.0 to before 2.33.8, 2.39.2, and 2.41.0, Portainer enforces seven EndpointSecuritySettings restrictions that administrators configure to restrict the container configurations non-admin users can launch: privileged mode, host PID namespace, device mapping, capabilities, sysctls, security-opt (Seccomp / AppArmor), and bind mounts. These restrictions are enforced on the standard container creation path, but several of them are not applied on the Docker Swarm service API. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.33.8, 2.39.2, and 2.41.0.

Record
CVE-2026-44849
CVSS 4.0
9.4 CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Weakness
CWE-862
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-5fxq-qcf3-244w 9.4

Portainer has an endpoint security bypass via Swarm service create/update

Summary

Portainer enforces seven EndpointSecuritySettings restrictions that administrators configure to restrict the container configurations non-admin users can launch: privileged mode, host PID namespace, device mapping, capabilities, sysctls, security-opt (Seccomp / AppArmor), and bind mounts.

The vulnerability is exposed when a non-admin Portainer user (Standard User role, or any role granted endpoint-level access) has been given access to a Docker Swarm endpoint via Portainer RBAC. Admins and users without Swarm endpoint access are not affected.

These restrictions are enforced on the standard container creation path, but several of them are not applied on the Docker Swarm service API:

  • POST /services/create — 1 of 7 checks applied. CapabilityAdd, CapabilityDrop, Sysctls, and Privileges (Seccomp / AppArmor) are not parsed from the request body and are forwarded to the Docker daemon without validation.
  • POST /services/{id}/update — 0 of 7 checks applied. The route dispatches to the generic restrictedResourceOperation, which validates RBAC ownership but does not inspect the request body or call fetchEndpointSecuritySettings().

The EndpointSecuritySettings checks apply when the administrator has configured any of AllowContainerCapabilitiesForRegularUsers, AllowSysctlSettingForRegularUsers, AllowSecurityOptForRegularUsers, or AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers to restrict standard users.

A regular user with access to a Docker Swarm endpoint can:

  • Create a service with CapabilityAdd: ["SYS_ADMIN", "NET_ADMIN", "SYS_PTRACE", …] or Privileges.Seccomp.Mode: "unconfined".
  • Create a benign service that passes ownership checks, then update it to add CapabilityAdd: ["ALL"] plus a bind mount of /, scale to one replica, and access the host filesystem from the running container (e.g. via chroot /host).

In addition, the partial Mounts[] struct used by the bind-mount check inspects only the top-level Type field. A mount with Type: "volume" and VolumeOptions.DriverConfig.Options: {type: "none", o: "bind", device: "<host path>"} is forwarded to the Docker daemon unchanged; the local volume driver then materialises it as a bind-equivalent mount, bypassing AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers. The same field path is accepted by the standalone POST /volumes/create endpoint, which never had any AllowBindMountsForRegularUsers check on any branch.

This undermines the administrator's configured security policy on Swarm-enabled endpoints.

Affected Versions

The vulnerability exists in every Portainer release with Docker Swarm support — the service-creation path has never checked CapabilityAdd, CapabilityDrop, Sysctls, or Privileges, and the service-update path has never performed any EndpointSecuritySettings validation. The VolumeOptions.DriverConfig field has never been parsed by the partial service struct on any branch, so the volume-driver-bind variant (service create/update and direct /volumes/create) shares the same affected range.

Fixes are included in the next release of each supported branch:

| Branch | First vulnerable | Fixed in | |---------------------|------------------|------------| | 2.33.x (LTS) | 2.33.0 | 2.33.8 | | 2.39.x (LTS) | 2.39.0 | 2.39.2 | | 2.40.x (STS) | 2.40.0 | 2.41.0 |

Portainer LTS branches receive fixes for 6 months plus a 3-month overlap after the next LTS ships. STS releases are supported only until the next STS ships — the 2.40.x STS line ends with the 2.41.0 release. All releases prior to 2.33.0 are end-of-life and will not receive a fix; users on EOL versions should upgrade to a supported LTS branch.

Workarounds

Administrators who cannot immediately upgrade can reduce exposure with the following measures. None of these replaces the fix.

  • **Temporarily revoke Swarm endpoint access for non-admin…
Record
GHSA-5fxq-qcf3-244w
CVSS 4.0
9.4 CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-862
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-5143 No score

Portainer has an endpoint security bypass via Swarm service create/update in github.com/portainer/portainer

Portainer has an endpoint security bypass via Swarm service create/update in github.com/portainer/portainer.

NOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions.

(If this is causing false-positive reports from vulnerability scanners, please suggest an edit to the report.)

The additional affected modules and versions are: github.com/portainer/portainer from v2.33.0 before v2.33.8, from v2.39.0 before v2.39.2, from v2.40.0 before v2.41.0.

Record
GO-2026-5143
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
  • GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
  • GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
  • GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
  • GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
  • GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
  • GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
  • GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
  • GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
  • GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
  • GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
  • GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
  • GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
  • GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
  • GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
  • GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
  • GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
  • GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
  • GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
  • GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
  • GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
  • GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
  • GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
  • GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
  • GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
  • GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
  • GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
  • GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
  • GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
  • GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
  • GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
  • GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
  • GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
  • GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
  • GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
  • GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
  • GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
  • GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
  • GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
  • GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
  • GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
  • GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
  • GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
  • GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
  • GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
  • GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
  • GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
  • GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
  • GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
  • GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
  • GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
  • GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
  • GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
  • GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
  • GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
  • GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
  • GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
  • GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
  • GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
  • GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
  • GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
  • GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
  • GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
  • GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
  • GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
  • GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
  • GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
  • GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
  • GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
  • GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
  • GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
  • GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
  • GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
  • GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
  • GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
  • GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
  • GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/portainer/portainer
Go
2.33.0 up to 2.33.8
2.33.8
github.com/portainer/portainer
Go
2.39.0 up to 2.39.2
2.39.2
github.com/portainer/portainer
Go
2.40.0 up to 2.41.0
2.41.0
github.com/portainer/portainer
Go
All versions None known
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 1734 CVEs
before 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1
0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-44849 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.4) in Portainer, published May 14, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.43%, the 37th percentile. Fixed in github.com/portainer/portainer 2.33.8.

References

Show 194 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 1,542 references and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open