CVE-2026-46695
BoxLite: Permission Bypass in boxlite Allows Modification of Read-Only Files
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code. Prior to version 0.9.0, Boxlite does not restrict the kernel capabilities available inside the container, malicious code can remount the directory in rw mode, thereby gaining write access to that directory. This allows malicious code to perform arbitrary write operations on directories that should be read-only. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.0.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
10.0
BoxLite: Permission Bypass in boxlite Allows Modification of Read-Only Files
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code. Prior to version 0.9.0, Boxlite does not restrict the kernel capabilities available inside the container, malicious code can remount the directory in rw mode, thereby gaining write access to that directory. This allows malicious code to perform arbitrary write operations on directories that should be read-only. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-46695- CVSS 3.1
- 10.0 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-284
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-36166
10.0
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code. Prior to version 0.9.0, Boxlite does not restrict the kernel capabilities available inside the container, malicious code can remount the directory in rw mode, thereby gaining write access to that directory. This allows malicious code to perform arbitrary write operations on directories that should be read-only. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.0.
- Record
EUVD-2026-36166- CVSS 3.1
- 10.0 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-g6ww-w5j2-r7x3
10.0
BoxLite: Permission Bypass Allows Modification of Read-Only Files
Summary
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code.
One of the core security features claimed by Boxlite is the ability to mount host directories in read-only mode (read_only=True) into the VM via the virtiofs protocol (a host-guest shared filesystem protocol designed specifically for virtual machines), so that untrusted code can only read but not modify host data. Since the underlying function of the lightweight VM library libkrun used by Boxlite does not support mounting in read-only mode, Boxlite chooses to implement read-only by adding the MS_RDONLY flag when mounting the directory after the VM starts.
However, because Boxlite does not restrict the kernel capabilities available inside the container, malicious code can remount the directory in rw mode, thereby gaining write access to that directory. This allows malicious code to perform arbitrary write operations on directories that should be read-only.
In typical usage scenarios of Boxlite, an attacker can leverage this vulnerability to gain code execution capability on the host. For example, in AI Agent scenarios, user code, virtual environments, credentials, configuration files, and other content are often mounted in read-only mode into the container. Malicious code inside the sandbox can modify this information, such as planting malicious code, to gain code execution capability on the host, which may further introduce supply chain risks.
Details
- User-Facing API Documents Read-Only Guarantee
File: boxlite/src/runtime/options.rs Function: VolumeSpec (line 223) Code:
/// Filesystem mount specification.
pub struct VolumeSpec {
pub host_path: String,
pub guest_path: String,
pub read_only: bool, // <-- operator sets this to restrict guest write access
}
Issue: The read_only field is documented (and in user-facing guides) as preventing the guest from writing to the host directory. The guarantee is "Agent can read but not write." This expectation is not met.
- read_only Stored in FsShare — Passed to krun Without Enforcement
File: boxlite/src/vmm/krun/engine.rs Function: Krun::create() (line 334) Code:
for share in config.fs_shares.shares() {
let path_str = share.host_path.to_str().ok_or_else(|| { ... })?;
tracing::info!(
" {} → {} ({})",
share.tag,
share.host_path.display(),
if share.read_only { "ro" } else { "rw" } // Logged but NOT passed to krun
);
ctx.add_virtiofs(&share.tag, path_str)?; // <-- read_only silently dropped
}
Issue: share.read_only is logged as "ro" or "rw" but is never passed to add_virtiofs. The actual hypervisor call receives only tag and host path.
- Hypervisor FFI Has No Read-Only Parameter
File: boxlite/src/vmm/krun/context.rs Function: add_virtiofs() (line 423) Code:
pub unsafe fn add_virtiofs(&self, mount_tag: &str, host_path: &str) -> BoxliteResult<()> {
let host_path_c = CString::new(host_path)
.map_err(|e| BoxliteError::Engine(format!("invalid host path: {e}")))?;
let mount_tag_c = CString::new(mount_tag)
.map_err(|e| BoxliteError::Engine(format!("invalid mount tag: {e}")))?;
check_status("krun_add_virtiofs", unsafe {
krun_add_virtiofs(self.ctx_id, mount_tag_c.as_ptr(), host_path_c.as_ptr())
// No read_only parameter — libkrun exposes the share as read-write to the guest
})
}
Issue: krun_add_virtiofs in the FFI (deps/libkrun-sys/src/lib.rs:35) takes only ctx_id, mount_tag, and host_path. There is no read-only flag. Libkrun exposes the virtiofs share to the guest with full read-write access at the device level.
- Read-Only Enforcement Is Delegated to Guest Agent (Zone 0)
File: boxlite/src/volumes/guest_volume.rs Function: build_guest_mounts() (line 184) Code:
…
- Record
GHSA-g6ww-w5j2-r7x3- CVSS 3.1
- 10.0 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-284
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
10.0
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code. Prior to version 0.9.0, Boxlite does not restrict the kernel capabilities available inside the container, malicious code can remount the directory in rw mode, thereby gaining write access to that directory. This allows malicious code to perform arbitrary write operations on directories that should be read-only. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-46695- CVSS 3.1
- 10.0 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-284
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
10.0
BoxLite: Permission Bypass in boxlite Allows Modification of Read-Only Files
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code. Prior to version 0.9.0, Boxlite does not restrict the kernel capabilities available inside the container, malicious code can remount the directory in rw mode, thereby gaining write access to that directory. This allows malicious code to perform arbitrary write operations on directories that should be read-only. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-46695- CVSS 3.1
- 10.0 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-284
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-g6ww-w5j2-r7x3
10.0
BoxLite: Permission Bypass Allows Modification of Read-Only Files
Summary
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code.
One of the core security features claimed by Boxlite is the ability to mount host directories in read-only mode (read_only=True) into the VM via the virtiofs protocol (a host-guest shared filesystem protocol designed specifically for virtual machines), so that untrusted code can only read but not modify host data. Since the underlying function of the lightweight VM library libkrun used by Boxlite does not support mounting in read-only mode, Boxlite chooses to implement read-only by adding the MS_RDONLY flag when mounting the directory after the VM starts.
However, because Boxlite does not restrict the kernel capabilities available inside the container, malicious code can remount the directory in rw mode, thereby gaining write access to that directory. This allows malicious code to perform arbitrary write operations on directories that should be read-only.
In typical usage scenarios of Boxlite, an attacker can leverage this vulnerability to gain code execution capability on the host. For example, in AI Agent scenarios, user code, virtual environments, credentials, configuration files, and other content are often mounted in read-only mode into the container. Malicious code inside the sandbox can modify this information, such as planting malicious code, to gain code execution capability on the host, which may further introduce supply chain risks.
Details
- User-Facing API Documents Read-Only Guarantee
File: boxlite/src/runtime/options.rs Function: VolumeSpec (line 223) Code:
/// Filesystem mount specification.
pub struct VolumeSpec {
pub host_path: String,
pub guest_path: String,
pub read_only: bool, // <-- operator sets this to restrict guest write access
}
Issue: The read_only field is documented (and in user-facing guides) as preventing the guest from writing to the host directory. The guarantee is "Agent can read but not write." This expectation is not met.
- read_only Stored in FsShare — Passed to krun Without Enforcement
File: boxlite/src/vmm/krun/engine.rs Function: Krun::create() (line 334) Code:
for share in config.fs_shares.shares() {
let path_str = share.host_path.to_str().ok_or_else(|| { ... })?;
tracing::info!(
" {} → {} ({})",
share.tag,
share.host_path.display(),
if share.read_only { "ro" } else { "rw" } // Logged but NOT passed to krun
);
ctx.add_virtiofs(&share.tag, path_str)?; // <-- read_only silently dropped
}
Issue: share.read_only is logged as "ro" or "rw" but is never passed to add_virtiofs. The actual hypervisor call receives only tag and host path.
- Hypervisor FFI Has No Read-Only Parameter
File: boxlite/src/vmm/krun/context.rs Function: add_virtiofs() (line 423) Code:
pub unsafe fn add_virtiofs(&self, mount_tag: &str, host_path: &str) -> BoxliteResult<()> {
let host_path_c = CString::new(host_path)
.map_err(|e| BoxliteError::Engine(format!("invalid host path: {e}")))?;
let mount_tag_c = CString::new(mount_tag)
.map_err(|e| BoxliteError::Engine(format!("invalid mount tag: {e}")))?;
check_status("krun_add_virtiofs", unsafe {
krun_add_virtiofs(self.ctx_id, mount_tag_c.as_ptr(), host_path_c.as_ptr())
// No read_only parameter — libkrun exposes the share as read-write to the guest
})
}
Issue: krun_add_virtiofs in the FFI (deps/libkrun-sys/src/lib.rs:35) takes only ctx_id, mount_tag, and host_path. There is no read-only flag. Libkrun exposes the virtiofs share to the guest with full read-write access at the device level.
- Read-Only Enforcement Is Delegated to Guest Agent (Zone 0)
File: boxlite/src/volumes/guest_volume.rs Function: build_guest_mounts() (line 184) Code:
…
- Record
GHSA-g6ww-w5j2-r7x3- CVSS 3.1
- 10.0 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-284
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 4 moreShow less
OSVPYSEC-2026-299
10.0
BoxLite: Permission Bypass Allows Modification of Read-Only Files
Summary
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code.
One of the core security features claimed by Boxlite is the ability to mount host directories in read-only mode (read_only=True) into the VM via the virtiofs protocol (a host-guest shared filesystem protocol designed specifically for virtual machines), so that untrusted code can only read but not modify host data. Since the underlying function of the lightweight VM library libkrun used by Boxlite does not support mounting in read-only mode, Boxlite chooses to implement read-only by adding the MS_RDONLY flag when mounting the directory after the VM starts.
However, because Boxlite does not restrict the kernel capabilities available inside the container, malicious code can remount the directory in rw mode, thereby gaining write access to that directory. This allows malicious code to perform arbitrary write operations on directories that should be read-only.
In typical usage scenarios of Boxlite, an attacker can leverage this vulnerability to gain code execution capability on the host. For example, in AI Agent scenarios, user code, virtual environments, credentials, configuration files, and other content are often mounted in read-only mode into the container. Malicious code inside the sandbox can modify this information, such as planting malicious code, to gain code execution capability on the host, which may further introduce supply chain risks.
Details
- User-Facing API Documents Read-Only Guarantee
File: boxlite/src/runtime/options.rs Function: VolumeSpec (line 223) Code:
/// Filesystem mount specification.
pub struct VolumeSpec {
pub host_path: String,
pub guest_path: String,
pub read_only: bool, // <-- operator sets this to restrict guest write access
}
Issue: The read_only field is documented (and in user-facing guides) as preventing the guest from writing to the host directory. The guarantee is "Agent can read but not write." This expectation is not met.
- read_only Stored in FsShare — Passed to krun Without Enforcement
File: boxlite/src/vmm/krun/engine.rs Function: Krun::create() (line 334) Code:
for share in config.fs_shares.shares() {
let path_str = share.host_path.to_str().ok_or_else(|| { ... })?;
tracing::info!(
" {} → {} ({})",
share.tag,
share.host_path.display(),
if share.read_only { "ro" } else { "rw" } // Logged but NOT passed to krun
);
ctx.add_virtiofs(&share.tag, path_str)?; // <-- read_only silently dropped
}
Issue: share.read_only is logged as "ro" or "rw" but is never passed to add_virtiofs. The actual hypervisor call receives only tag and host path.
- Hypervisor FFI Has No Read-Only Parameter
File: boxlite/src/vmm/krun/context.rs Function: add_virtiofs() (line 423) Code:
pub unsafe fn add_virtiofs(&self, mount_tag: &str, host_path: &str) -> BoxliteResult<()> {
let host_path_c = CString::new(host_path)
.map_err(|e| BoxliteError::Engine(format!("invalid host path: {e}")))?;
let mount_tag_c = CString::new(mount_tag)
.map_err(|e| BoxliteError::Engine(format!(" invalid mount tag: {e}")))?;
check_status("krun_add_virtiofs", unsafe {
krun_add_virtiofs(self.ctx_id, mount_tag_c.as_ptr(), host_path_c.as_ptr())
// No read_only parameter — libkrun exposes the share as read-write to the guest
})
}
Issue: krun_add_virtiofs in the FFI (deps/libkrun-sys/src/lib.rs:35) takes only ctx_id, mount_tag, and host_path. There is no read-only flag. Libkrun exposes the virtiofs share to the guest with full read-write access at the device level.
- Read-Only Enforcement Is Delegated to Guest Agent (Zone 0)
File: boxlite/src/volumes/guest_volume.rs Function: build_guest_mounts() (line 184) Code:…
- Record
PYSEC-2026-299- CVSS 3.1
- 10.0 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRUSTSEC-2026-0147
10.0
Read-only volume remount bypass via guest CAP_SYS_ADMIN
Affected versions of boxlite mount host directories shared via virtiofs
as guest-side read-only by setting MS_RDONLY from the guest. Because the
default guest capability set included CAP_SYS_ADMIN, untrusted code
running inside a sandbox could execute mount -o remount,rw <path> to
re-flag the share as read-write and then write through to the host
filesystem — fully escaping the read-only contract boxlite advertised
to callers.
The fix in v0.9.0 enforces read-only at the hypervisor level via
krun_add_virtiofs3 (so the guest's MS_RDONLY is no longer the
authoritative gate) and drops CAP_SYS_ADMIN from the default guest
capability set (matching Docker's defaults).
This is a sandbox-escape bug: boxlite is a sandboxing runtime, so the
read-only invariant is part of its security contract. CVSS rated 10.0 by
the upstream advisory.
- Record
RUSTSEC-2026-0147- CVSS 3.1
- 10.0 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-5392 No score
BoxLite: Permission Bypass Allows Modification of Read-Only Files in github.com/boxlite-ai/boxlite/sdks/go
BoxLite: Permission Bypass Allows Modification of Read-Only Files in github.com/boxlite-ai/boxlite/sdks/go
- Record
GO-2026-5392- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1 No score
Security update for govulncheck-vulndb
This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:
- Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).
Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:
- GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
- GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
- GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
- GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
- GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
- GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
- GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
- GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
- GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
- GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
- GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
- GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
- GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
- GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
- GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
- GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
- GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
- GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
- GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
- GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
- GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
- GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
- GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
- GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
- GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
- GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
- GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
- GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
- GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
- GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
- GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
- GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
- GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
- GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
- GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
- GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
- GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
- GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
- GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
- GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
- GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
- GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
- GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
- GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
- GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
- GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
- GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
- GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
- GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
- GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
- GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
- GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
- GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
- GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
- GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
- GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
- GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
- GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
- GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
- GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
- GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
- GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
- GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
- GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
- GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
- GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
- GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
- GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
- GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
- GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
- GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
- GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
- GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
- GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
- GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
- GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
- GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
boxlitePyPI |
before 0.9.0 | 0.9.0 |
@boxlite-ai/boxlitenpm |
before 0.9.0 | 0.9.0 |
github.com/boxlite-ai/boxlite/sdks/goGo |
before 0.9.0 | 0.9.0 |
boxlitecrates.io |
before 0.9.0 | 0.9.0 |
boxlite-clicrates.io |
before 0.9.0 | 0.9.0 |
boxlitePyPI |
before 0.9.0, plus listed versions 0.5.100.5.110.5.120.5.130.5.14 Show 6 moreShow less0.5.90.6.00.7.00.7.40.7.50.8.2 |
0.9.0 |
boxlitePyPI |
before 0.9.0, plus listed versions 0.5.100.5.110.5.120.5.130.5.14 Show 13 moreShow less0.5.20.5.30.5.40.5.50.5.60.5.70.5.80.5.90.6.00.7.00.7.40.7.50.8.2 |
0.9.0 |
boxlitecrates.io |
0.0.0-0 up to 0.9.0 | 0.9.0 |
govulncheck-vulndbopenSUSE:Leap 16.0 From an advisory covering 1734 CVEs |
before 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1 | 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-46695 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 10.0) in Boxlite-ai Boxlite, published May 16, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.29%, the 21st percentile. Fixed in boxlite 0.9.0.
References
github.com/boxlite-ai/boxlite/security/advisories/GHSA-g6ww-w5j2-r7x3
github.com/boxlite-ai/boxlite/pull/454
github.com/boxlite-ai/boxlite/releases/tag/v0.9.0
rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0147.html
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46695
github.com/advisories/GHSA-g6ww-w5j2-r7x3
Show 194 moreShow less
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/46xxx/CVE-2026-46695.json
github.com/boxlite-ai/boxlite
pypi.org/project/boxlite
crates.io/crates/boxlite
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11063
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11066
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11067
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11068
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11069
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11070
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11071
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11072
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11073
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11074
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11075
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11076
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11077
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11078
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11079
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11080
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11081
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11082
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11083
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11084
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18871
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18872
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18873
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18874
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18875
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18876
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18877
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18878
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18879
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18883
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18884
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18885
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18886
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18887
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18888
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18889
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18890
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18891
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18892
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18893
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18894
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18895
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18896
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18897
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18898
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18900
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18901
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18902
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18903
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18904
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18905
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18906
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18907
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18908
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18909
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18911
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18912
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18915
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18916
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18917
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18918
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-21258
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-8400
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25320
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-45786
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-26154
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-32199
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-34620
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43630
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43631
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43632
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43633
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43634
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43635
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43636
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43637
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-47108
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12886
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-21635
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-25621
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-41260
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-41265
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-44905
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-52284
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-53412
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58259
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58260
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58267
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58269
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-6717
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0426
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10543
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10545
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10630
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10678
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10954
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11374
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11375
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11393
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11579
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11621
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11776
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11777
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11794
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12044
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12419
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12421
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12559
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12689
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12756
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13281
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13324
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13352
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13353
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13357
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13425
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13523
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13767
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13821
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13888
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14273
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14350
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14435
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14443
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14525
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14573
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14764
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14822
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14986
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14987
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15107
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15558
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-21613
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22873
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23266
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23267
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-26625
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-27093
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-2786
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-2842
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-2843
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-31133
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-34410
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-34429
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-34430
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41115
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41117
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41118
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41410
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41436
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41443
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-44001
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-44004
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-44005
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47906
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47910
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47911
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47912
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47913
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47914
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-48731
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-49221
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4953
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-50180
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-50946
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-51667
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-5187
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52490
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52565
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52881
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52894
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52931
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53514
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53857
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53884
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53910
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54123
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54286
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54287
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54288
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54289
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54290
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54291
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54293
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54376
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54410
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54458
Left out here: 1,544 references and the rest of 4 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.