CVE-2026-47213
BoxLite: Timeout Bypass Vulnerability
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code. In versions 0.8.2 and prior, Boxlite allows users to configure a timeout for services running inside the virtual machine. When the timeout is triggered, Boxlite sends a signal to kill the process. However, instead of using the uncatchable SIGKILL signal, Boxlite uses the catchable SIGALRM signal. Malicious code running inside the sandbox can exploit this vulnerability to continue running after the timeout is triggered, leading to resource exhaustion within the virtual machine and affecting the availability of the Boxlite service. This issue has been patched via commit 28159fc.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
6.5
BoxLite: Timeout Bypass Vulnerability
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code. In versions 0.8.2 and prior, Boxlite allows users to configure a timeout for services running inside the virtual machine. When the timeout is triggered, Boxlite sends a signal to kill the process. However, instead of using the uncatchable SIGKILL signal, Boxlite uses the catchable SIGALRM signal. Malicious code running inside the sandbox can exploit this vulnerability to continue running after the timeout is triggered, leading to resource exhaustion within the virtual machine and affecting the availability of the Boxlite service. This issue has been patched via commit 28159fc.
- Record
CVE-2026-47213- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-404
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-36197
6.5
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code. In versions 0.8.2 and prior, Boxlite allows users to configure a timeout for services running inside the virtual machine. When the timeout is triggered, Boxlite sends a signal to kill the process. However, instead of using the uncatchable SIGKILL signal, Boxlite uses the catchable SIGALRM signal. Malicious code running inside the sandbox can exploit this vulnerability to continue running after the timeout is triggered, leading to resource exhaustion within the virtual machine and affecting the availability of the Boxlite service. This issue has been patched via commit 28159fc.
- Record
EUVD-2026-36197- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-xjhv-pp2r-6f82
6.5
BoxLite has a Timeout Bypass Vulnerability
Summary
BoxLite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and run OCI containers within them. BoxLite allows users to configure a timeout for services running inside the virtual machine. When the timeout is triggered, BoxLite sends a signal to kill the process. However, instead of using the uncatchable SIGKILL signal, BoxLite uses the catchable SIGALRM signal. Malicious code running inside the sandbox can exploit this vulnerability to continue running after the timeout is triggered, leading to resource exhaustion within the virtual machine and affecting the availability of the BoxLite service.
Details
- ExecRequest with timeout_ms arrives at Execution service
File: guest/src/service/exec/mod.rs Function: spawn_execution() (line 315) Code:
// Step 3: Start timeout watcher (if requested)
if req.timeout_ms > 0 {
timeout::start_timeout_watcher(
state,
execution_id.clone(),
std::time::Duration::from_millis(req.timeout_ms),
);
}
Issue: Any nonzero timeout_ms triggers the timeout watcher. The host expects this to kill the process after the specified duration.
- Timeout watcher sends SIGALRM instead of SIGKILL
File: guest/src/service/exec/timeout.rs Function: start_timeout_watcher() (line 13) Code:
pub(super) fn start_timeout_watcher(
exec_state: ExecutionState,
exec_id: String,
timeout: Duration,
) {
tokio::spawn(async move {
tokio::time::sleep(timeout).await;
// Kill process with SIGKILL ← comment says SIGKILL
use nix::sys::signal::Signal;
if exec_state.kill(Signal::SIGALRM).await { // ← but sends SIGALRM
info!(execution_id = %exec_id, "killed on timeout");
}
});
}
Issue: The comment on line 21 explicitly states "Kill process with SIGKILL", but line 23 sends Signal::SIGALRM. SIGALRM (signal 14) is the POSIX alarm signal and is catchable/ignorable; SIGKILL (signal 9) cannot be caught or ignored. This is a code error — wrong signal constant used.
- exec_state.kill() passes the signal through unchanged
File: guest/src/service/exec/state.rs Function: kill() (line 325) Code:
pub async fn kill(&self, signal: nix::sys::signal::Signal) -> bool {
let inner = self.inner.lock().await;
if let Some(ref handle) = inner.handle {
handle.kill(signal).is_ok()
} else {
false
}
}
Issue: No override of the signal — the wrong signal (SIGALRM) is delivered directly to the process.
- ExecHandle.kill() delivers SIGALRM to the process
File: guest/src/service/exec/exec_handle.rs Function: kill() (line 335) Code:
pub fn kill(&self, signal: Signal) -> BoxliteResult<()> {
use nix::sys::signal::kill;
kill(self.pid, signal).map_err(|e| {
BoxliteError::Internal(format!(
"Failed to send signal {} to process {}: {}",
signal, self.pid, e
))
})
}
Issue: Sends SIGALRM (signal 14) to the process. Any process that has registered a custom SIGALRM handler (e.g., via signal(SIGALRM, handler)) or set SIGALRM to SIG_IGN will not be terminated.
As seen from the code, the developer indicated in the comments that SIGKILL should be sent to kill the timed-out process, but SIGALRM was used in the implementation, resulting in the vulnerability.
PoC
-
Install Boxlite following the official tutorial.
-
Run the following Python script:
#!/usr/bin/env python3 """ PoC: BoxLite Execution Timeout Bypass via SIGALRM Reproduces the vulnerability described in: "Hunt Report: Exec Timeout Enforcement Bypass via SIGALRM Misuse" Root cause: guest/src/service/exec/timeout.rs sends Signal::SIGALRM (signal 14, catchable/ignorable) instead of Signal::SIGKILL (signal 9, uncatchable). Exploitation: Any process that…
- Record
GHSA-xjhv-pp2r-6f82- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-404
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
6.5
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code. In versions 0.8.2 and prior, Boxlite allows users to configure a timeout for services running inside the virtual machine. When the timeout is triggered, Boxlite sends a signal to kill the process. However, instead of using the uncatchable SIGKILL signal, Boxlite uses the catchable SIGALRM signal. Malicious code running inside the sandbox can exploit this vulnerability to continue running after the timeout is triggered, leading to resource exhaustion within the virtual machine and affecting the availability of the Boxlite service. This issue has been patched via commit 28159fc.
- Record
CVE-2026-47213- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-404
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
6.5
BoxLite: Timeout Bypass Vulnerability
Boxlite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and launch OCI containers within them to run untrusted code. In versions 0.8.2 and prior, Boxlite allows users to configure a timeout for services running inside the virtual machine. When the timeout is triggered, Boxlite sends a signal to kill the process. However, instead of using the uncatchable SIGKILL signal, Boxlite uses the catchable SIGALRM signal. Malicious code running inside the sandbox can exploit this vulnerability to continue running after the timeout is triggered, leading to resource exhaustion within the virtual machine and affecting the availability of the Boxlite service. This issue has been patched via commit 28159fc.
- Record
CVE-2026-47213- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-404
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-xjhv-pp2r-6f82
6.5
BoxLite has a Timeout Bypass Vulnerability
Summary
BoxLite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and run OCI containers within them. BoxLite allows users to configure a timeout for services running inside the virtual machine. When the timeout is triggered, BoxLite sends a signal to kill the process. However, instead of using the uncatchable SIGKILL signal, BoxLite uses the catchable SIGALRM signal. Malicious code running inside the sandbox can exploit this vulnerability to continue running after the timeout is triggered, leading to resource exhaustion within the virtual machine and affecting the availability of the BoxLite service.
Details
- ExecRequest with timeout_ms arrives at Execution service
File: guest/src/service/exec/mod.rs Function: spawn_execution() (line 315) Code:
// Step 3: Start timeout watcher (if requested)
if req.timeout_ms > 0 {
timeout::start_timeout_watcher(
state,
execution_id.clone(),
std::time::Duration::from_millis(req.timeout_ms),
);
}
Issue: Any nonzero timeout_ms triggers the timeout watcher. The host expects this to kill the process after the specified duration.
- Timeout watcher sends SIGALRM instead of SIGKILL
File: guest/src/service/exec/timeout.rs Function: start_timeout_watcher() (line 13) Code:
pub(super) fn start_timeout_watcher(
exec_state: ExecutionState,
exec_id: String,
timeout: Duration,
) {
tokio::spawn(async move {
tokio::time::sleep(timeout).await;
// Kill process with SIGKILL ← comment says SIGKILL
use nix::sys::signal::Signal;
if exec_state.kill(Signal::SIGALRM).await { // ← but sends SIGALRM
info!(execution_id = %exec_id, "killed on timeout");
}
});
}
Issue: The comment on line 21 explicitly states "Kill process with SIGKILL", but line 23 sends Signal::SIGALRM. SIGALRM (signal 14) is the POSIX alarm signal and is catchable/ignorable; SIGKILL (signal 9) cannot be caught or ignored. This is a code error — wrong signal constant used.
- exec_state.kill() passes the signal through unchanged
File: guest/src/service/exec/state.rs Function: kill() (line 325) Code:
pub async fn kill(&self, signal: nix::sys::signal::Signal) -> bool {
let inner = self.inner.lock().await;
if let Some(ref handle) = inner.handle {
handle.kill(signal).is_ok()
} else {
false
}
}
Issue: No override of the signal — the wrong signal (SIGALRM) is delivered directly to the process.
- ExecHandle.kill() delivers SIGALRM to the process
File: guest/src/service/exec/exec_handle.rs Function: kill() (line 335) Code:
pub fn kill(&self, signal: Signal) -> BoxliteResult<()> {
use nix::sys::signal::kill;
kill(self.pid, signal).map_err(|e| {
BoxliteError::Internal(format!(
"Failed to send signal {} to process {}: {}",
signal, self.pid, e
))
})
}
Issue: Sends SIGALRM (signal 14) to the process. Any process that has registered a custom SIGALRM handler (e.g., via signal(SIGALRM, handler)) or set SIGALRM to SIG_IGN will not be terminated.
As seen from the code, the developer indicated in the comments that SIGKILL should be sent to kill the timed-out process, but SIGALRM was used in the implementation, resulting in the vulnerability.
PoC
-
Install Boxlite following the official tutorial.
-
Run the following Python script:
#!/usr/bin/env python3 """ PoC: BoxLite Execution Timeout Bypass via SIGALRM Reproduces the vulnerability described in: "Hunt Report: Exec Timeout Enforcement Bypass via SIGALRM Misuse" Root cause: guest/src/service/exec/timeout.rs sends Signal::SIGALRM (signal 14, catchable/ignorable) instead of Signal::SIGKILL (signal 9, uncatchable). Exploitation: Any process that…
- Record
GHSA-xjhv-pp2r-6f82- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-404
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2400
6.5
BoxLite has a Timeout Bypass Vulnerability
Summary
BoxLite is a sandbox service that allows users to create lightweight virtual machines (Boxes) and run OCI containers within them. BoxLite allows users to configure a timeout for services running inside the virtual machine. When the timeout is triggered, BoxLite sends a signal to kill the process. However, instead of using the uncatchable SIGKILL signal, BoxLite uses the catchable SIGALRM signal. Malicious code running inside the sandbox can exploit this vulnerability to continue running after the timeout is triggered, leading to resource exhaustion within the virtual machine and affecting the availability of the BoxLite service.
Details
- ExecRequest with timeout_ms arrives at Execution service
File: guest/src/service/exec/mod.rs Function: spawn_execution() (line 315) Code:
// Step 3: Start timeout watcher (if requested)
if req.timeout_ms > 0 {
timeout::start_timeout_watcher(
state,
execution_id.clone(),
std::time::Duration::from_millis(req.timeout_ms),
);
}
Issue: Any nonzero timeout_ms triggers the timeout watcher. The host expects this to kill the process after the specified duration.
- Timeout watcher sends SIGALRM instead of SIGKILL
File: guest/src/service/exec/timeout.rs Function: start_timeout_watcher() (line 13) Code:
pub(super) fn start_timeout_watcher(
exec_state: ExecutionState,
exec_id: String,
timeout: Duration,
) {
tokio::spawn(async move {
tokio::time::sleep(timeout).await;
// Kill process with SIGKILL ← comment says SIGKILL
use nix::sys::signal::Signal;
if exec_state.kill(Signal::SIGALRM).await { // ← but sends SIGALRM
info!(execution_id = %exec_id, "killed on timeout");
}
});
}
Issue: The comment on line 21 explicitly states "Kill process with SIGKILL", but line 23 sends Signal::SIGALRM. SIGALRM (signal 14) is the POSIX alarm signal and is catchable/ignorable; SIGKILL (signal 9) cannot be caught or ignored. This is a code error — wrong signal constant used.
- exec_state.kill() passes the signal through unchanged
File: guest/src/service/exec/state.rs Function: kill() (line 325) Code:
pub async fn kill(&self, signal: nix::sys::signal::Signal) -> bool {
let inner = self.inner.lock().await;
if let Some(ref handle) = inner.handle {
handle.kill(signal).is_ok()
} else {
false
}
}
Issue: No override of the signal — the wrong signal (SIGALRM) is delivered directly to the process.
- ExecHandle.kill() delivers SIGALRM to the process
File: guest/src/service/exec/exec_handle.rs Function: kill() (line 335) Code:
pub fn kill(&self, signal: Signal) -> BoxliteResult<()> {
use nix::sys::signal::kill;
kill(self.pid, signal).map_err(|e| {
BoxliteError::Internal(format!(
"Failed to send signal {} to process {}: {}",
signal, self.pid, e
))
})
}
Issue: Sends SIGALRM (signal 14) to the process. Any process that has registered a custom SIGALRM handler (e.g., via signal(SIGALRM, handler)) or set SIGALRM to SIG_IGN will not be terminated.
As seen from the code, the developer indicated in the comments that SIGKILL should be sent to kill the timed-out process, but SIGALRM was used in the implementation, resulting in the vulnerability.
PoC
-
Install Boxlite following the official tutorial.
-
Run the following Python script:
#!/usr/bin/env python3 """ PoC: BoxLite Execution Timeout Bypass via SIGALRM Reproduces the vulnerability described in: "Hunt Report: Exec Timeout Enforcement Bypass via SIGALRM Misuse" Root cause: guest/src/service/exec/timeout.rs sends Signal::SIGALRM (signal 14, catchable/ignorable) instead of Signal::SIGKILL (signal 9, uncatchable). Exploitation: Any process that…
- Record
PYSEC-2026-2400- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
boxlitePyPI |
through 0.8.2 | None known |
boxlitePyPI |
through 0.8.2, plus listed versions 0.5.100.5.110.5.120.5.130.5.14 Show 5 moreShow less0.5.90.6.00.7.00.7.40.7.5 |
None known |
boxlitePyPI |
through 0.8.2, plus listed versions 0.5.100.5.110.5.120.5.130.5.14 Show 12 moreShow less0.5.20.5.30.5.40.5.50.5.60.5.70.5.80.5.90.6.00.7.00.7.40.7.5 |
None known |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| aliases | EUVD | |
| first indexed | CVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-47213 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 6.5) in Boxlite-ai Boxlite, published May 29, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.27%, the 19th percentile. No source names a fixed version.
References
github.com/boxlite-ai/boxlite/security/advisories/GHSA-xjhv-pp2r-6f82
github.com/boxlite-ai/boxlite/commit/28159fc5b6b6fd5037e18a58fc4644c882e3c581
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47213
github.com/advisories/GHSA-xjhv-pp2r-6f82
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/47xxx/CVE-2026-47213.json
github.com/boxlite-ai/boxlite
pypi.org/project/boxlite
Left out here: the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.