CVE-2026-48710
Starlette has missing Host header validation that poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks
Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing request.url and falls back to scope["server"] for malformed values.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
6.5
Starlette has missing Host header validation that poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks
Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing request.url and falls back to scope["server"] for malformed values.
- Record
CVE-2026-48710- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-444, CWE-1289
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-32016
6.5
Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing request.url and falls back to scope["server"] for malformed values.
- Record
EUVD-2026-32016- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr
6.5
Starlette has missing Host header validation that poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks
Summary
In affected versions, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed.
Details
When a client requests http://example.com/foo, it sends:
GET /foo HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Affected versions reconstructed the URL by concatenating http://{host}{path} and re-parsing the result. The Host value is only valid as a uri-host [ ":" port ] per RFC 9112 §3.2, where uri-host follows the restricted host grammar of RFC 3986 §3.2.2. When it contains characters outside that grammar - notably /, ?, or # - those characters move the path/query/fragment boundaries during re-parsing, so the parsed request.url.path no longer matches the path the server actually received. For example:
GET /foo HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com/abc?bar=
reconstructs to http://example.com/abc?bar=/foo, whose parsed path is /abc - even though routing used the real path /foo. The router still dispatches to /foo and the endpoint executes, but any middleware or code that reads request.url.path sees /abc, so path-based authorization checks can be bypassed.
Impact
Any application running an affected version that relies on request.url (or request.url.path) for security-sensitive decisions is affected. The most common case is middleware that gates access to certain path prefixes based on request.url.path. Deployments fronted by a proxy or load balancer are mitigated only if that proxy rejects or normalizes the malformed Host header before forwarding and the application does not trust attacker-controlled host headers (e.g. X-Forwarded-Host) elsewhere.
Mitigation
Upgrade to a patched version, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing request.url and falls back to scope["server"] for malformed values.
- Record
GHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-444, CWE-1289
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
CISA KEV No score
Kludex Starlette HTTP Request/Response Smuggling Vulnerability
Kludex Starlette contains a HTTP request/response smuggling vulnerability that could allow attackers to inject paths into the host part, prepending the actual path leading to issues such as authentication bypass when the authentication depends on the reconstructed URL’s path. This vulnerability could be chaned with CVE-2026-42271.
- Record
CVE-2026-48710- Weakness
- CWE-444
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
6.5
Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing request.url and falls back to scope["server"] for malformed values.
- Record
CVE-2026-48710- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-444, CWE-1289
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2026-48710
6.5
Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing request.url and falls back to scope["server"] for malformed values.
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2026-48710- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-03
Show 14 moreShow less
OSV
6.5
Starlette has missing Host header validation that poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks
Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing request.url and falls back to scope["server"] for malformed values.
- Record
CVE-2026-48710- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-444
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-48710
6.5
Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing request.url and falls back to scope["server"] for malformed values.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-48710- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr
6.5
Starlette has missing Host header validation that poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks
Summary
In affected versions, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed.
Details
When a client requests http://example.com/foo, it sends:
GET /foo HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Affected versions reconstructed the URL by concatenating http://{host}{path} and re-parsing the result. The Host value is only valid as a uri-host [ ":" port ] per RFC 9112 §3.2, where uri-host follows the restricted host grammar of RFC 3986 §3.2.2. When it contains characters outside that grammar - notably /, ?, or # - those characters move the path/query/fragment boundaries during re-parsing, so the parsed request.url.path no longer matches the path the server actually received. For example:
GET /foo HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com/abc?bar=
reconstructs to http://example.com/abc?bar=/foo, whose parsed path is /abc - even though routing used the real path /foo. The router still dispatches to /foo and the endpoint executes, but any middleware or code that reads request.url.path sees /abc, so path-based authorization checks can be bypassed.
Impact
Any application running an affected version that relies on request.url (or request.url.path) for security-sensitive decisions is affected. The most common case is middleware that gates access to certain path prefixes based on request.url.path. Deployments fronted by a proxy or load balancer are mitigated only if that proxy rejects or normalizes the malformed Host header before forwarding and the application does not trust attacker-controlled host headers (e.g. X-Forwarded-Host) elsewhere.
Mitigation
Upgrade to a patched version, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing request.url and falls back to scope["server"] for malformed values.
- Record
GHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-1289, CWE-444
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-48710
6.5
Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit. Prior to version 1.0.1, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed. Users should upgrade to a version greater than or equal to version 1.0.1, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing request.url and falls back to scope["server"] for malformed values.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-48710- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1781052728 No score
TuxCare security update for starlette (1 CVE)
TuxCare rebuilt starlette to address 1 CVE. Fixed in 0.27.0.post3+tuxcare.
- Record
CLSA-2026-1781052728- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1789447406 No score
TuxCare security update for starlette (8 CVEs)
TuxCare rebuilt starlette to address 8 CVEs. Fixed in 0.25.0.post1+tuxcare.
- Record
CLSA-2026-1789447406- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1789648460 No score
TuxCare security update for starlette (1 CVE)
TuxCare rebuilt starlette to address 1 CVE. Fixed in 0.13.6.post6+tuxcare.
- Record
CLSA-2026-1789648460- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVMGASA-2026-0327 No score
Updated python-starlette package fixes security vulnerabilities
The updated package fixes security vulnerabilities: Proxy-Authorization header kept across hosts. (CVE-2024-28849) Starlette vulnerable to O(n^2) DoS via Range header merging in starlette.responses.FileResponse. (CVE-2025-62727) Security restriction bypass via malformed HTTP Host header. (CVE-2026-48710)
- Record
MGASA-2026-0327- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:11026-1 No score
python311-starlette-1.2.0-1.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the python311-starlette-1.2.0-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:11026-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:11044-1 No score
python311-google-adk-2.2.0-1.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the python311-google-adk-2.2.0-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:11044-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:20975-1 No score
Security update for python-starlette
This update for python-starlette fixes the following issues
- CVE-2025-54121: denial-of-service when parsing a multi-part form with large files (bsc#1246855).
- CVE-2025-62727: DoS via Range header merging (bsc#1252805).
- CVE-2026-48710: Missing Host header validation poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks (bsc#1266369).
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:20975-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-161 No score
BadHost: Missing Host header validation poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks
Starlette reconstructs the requested URL based on the HTTP Host request header and requested path, but does not perform any validation of the Host header value. This allows attackers to inject paths into the host part, prepending the actual path. However, routing in Starlette is based on the actual request path. This inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests may lead to issues such as authentication bypass when the authentication depends on the reconstructed URL’s path.
- Record
PYSEC-2026-161- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVROOT-APP-PYPI-CVE-2026-48710 No score
CVE-2026-48710 in starlette - Patched by Root
Root has patched CVE-2026-48710 in the starlette package for Root:PyPI. Multiple fixed versions available.
- Record
ROOT-APP-PYPI-CVE-2026-48710- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:22151-1 No score
Security update for python-starlette
This update for python-starlette fixes the following issues
- CVE-2025-54121: denial-of-service when parsing a multi-part form with large files (bsc#1246855).
- CVE-2025-62727: DoS via Range header merging (bsc#1252805).
- CVE-2026-48710: Missing Host header validation poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks (bsc#1266369).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:22151-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
- encode starlette
- kludex starlette
- red hat exploit intelligence
- red hat openshift lightspeed
- red hat ai inference server
- red hat ai inference server 3.3
- red hat ansible automation platform 2
- red hat ansible automation platform 2.6
- red hat ansible automation platform 2.7
- red hat enterprise linux ai (rhel ai) 3
- red hat migration toolkit for applications 8.2
- red hat openshift ai (rhoai)
Show 12 moreShow less
- red hat openshift ai 3.3
- red hat openshift ai 3.4
- red hat satellite 6.17
- red hat satellite 6.18
- red hat satellite 6.19
- redhat ai inference server
- redhat ansible automation platform
- redhat enterprise linux ai
- redhat migration toolkit for applications
- redhat openshift ai
- redhat openshift lightspeed
- redhat satellite
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
starlettePyPI |
through 1.0.0 | 1.0.1 |
py3-starletteAlpine:v3.24 |
0.8.3 up to 1.1.0-r0 | 1.1.0-r0 |
starletteTuxCare:PyPI |
0.27.0 up to 0.27.0.post3+tuxcare, plus listed versions 0.27.0.post1+tuxcare0.27.0.post2+tuxcare |
0.27.0.post3+tuxcare |
starletteTuxCare:PyPI From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
0.25.0 up to 0.25.0.post1+tuxcare | 0.25.0.post1+tuxcare |
starletteTuxCare:PyPI |
0.13.6 up to 0.13.6.post6+tuxcare, plus listed versions 0.13.6.post1+tuxcare0.13.6.post2+tuxcare0.13.6.post3+tuxcare0.13.6.post4+tuxcare0.13.6.post5+tuxcare |
0.13.6.post6+tuxcare |
starletteDebian:12 |
before 0.26.1-1+deb12u1, plus listed versions 0.26.1-1 |
0.26.1-1+deb12u1 |
starletteDebian:13 |
before 0.46.1-3+deb13u2, plus listed versions 0.46.1-30.46.1-3+deb13u1 |
0.46.1-3+deb13u2 |
starletteDebian:14 |
before 1.1.0-1, plus listed versions 0.46.1-30.50.0-11.0.0-1 |
1.1.0-1 |
starlettePyPI |
before 1.0.1, plus listed versions 0.1.00.1.10.1.100.1.110.1.12 Show 45 moreShow less0.1.130.1.140.1.150.1.160.1.170.1.20.1.30.1.40.1.50.1.60.1.70.1.80.1.90.10.00.10.10.10.20.10.30.10.40.10.50.10.60.10.70.11.00.11.10.11.20.11.30.11.40.12.00.12.0b10.12.0b20.12.0b30.12.10.12.100.12.110.12.120.12.130.12.20.12.30.12.40.12.50.12.60.12.70.12.80.12.90.13.00.13.1 |
1.0.1 |
python-starletteMageia:10 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 0.46.0-3.1.mga10 | 0.46.0-3.1.mga10 |
Show 12 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
starletteRoot:PyPI |
before 0.27.0+aikido.11 | 0.27.0+aikido.110.22.0+aikido.70.19.0+aikido.10.19.1+aikido.10.21.0+aikido.10.27.0+aikido.10.36.1+aikido.10.36.2+aikido.10.45.3+aikido.100.45.3+aikido.110.45.3+aikido.50.45.3+aikido.60.45.3+aikido.70.45.3+aikido.80.45.3+aikido.90.9.9+aikido.10.38.6+aikido.10.45.0+aikido.10.9.9+aikido.20.45.1+aikido.10.47.0+aikido.30.49.2+aikido.10.45.2+aikido.20.49.3+aikido.10.44.0+aikido.10.43.0+aikido.10.46.0+aikido.20.41.0+aikido.10.51.0+aikido.10.52.0+aikido.10.38.5+aikido.10.49.0+aikido.10.38.4+aikido.10.38.2+aikido.10.22.0+aikido.30.47.2+aikido.20.47.1+aikido.20.41.2+aikido.20.41.3+aikido.20.41.3+aikido.30.47.2+aikido.30.47.1+aikido.30.41.3+aikido.50.41.3+aikido.60.49.3+aikido.30.46.2+aikido.60.45.3+aikido.130.52.1+aikido.20.49.1+aikido.20.49.2+aikido.30.48.0+aikido.50.47.3+aikido.50.45.3+aikido.140.49.3+aikido.40.49.2+aikido.40.41.3+aikido.70.46.2+aikido.70.52.1+aikido.30.22.0+aikido.50.49.1+aikido.31.0.0+aikido.30.45.3+aikido.150.50.0+aikido.30.22.0+aikido.60.27.0+aikido.100.37.2+aikido.20.39.2+aikido.20.13.1+aikido.10.13.8+aikido.1 |
rootio-starletteRoot:PyPI |
before 0.22.0+aikido.4 | 0.22.0+aikido.40.21.0+aikido.20.19.0+aikido.20.19.1+aikido.20.41.3+aikido.40.43.0+aikido.20.44.0+aikido.20.45.0+aikido.20.47.2+aikido.40.45.3+aikido.120.45.1+aikido.20.46.0+aikido.30.47.1+aikido.40.47.0+aikido.40.49.1+aikido.10.49.2+aikido.20.49.3+aikido.20.49.0+aikido.20.51.0+aikido.20.52.0+aikido.20.9.9+aikido.30.52.1+aikido.10.45.2+aikido.3 |
python-starletteSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 0.41.3-160000.3.1 | 0.41.3-160000.3.1 |
python-starletteSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 0.41.3-160000.3.1 | 0.41.3-160000.3.1 |
starletteUbuntu:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.14.1-10.16.0-10.18.0-1 |
None known |
starletteUbuntu:24.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.30.0-10.31.1-1 |
None known |
starletteUbuntu:25.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.46.1-20.46.1-3 |
None known |
starletteUbuntu:26.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.50.0-11.1.0-11.3.1-11.7.0-2 |
None known |
starletteUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.46.1-30.50.0-1 |
None known |
python-starletteopenSUSE:Tumbleweed |
before 1.2.0-1.1 | 1.2.0-1.1 |
python-google-adkopenSUSE:Tumbleweed |
before 2.2.0-1.1 | 2.2.0-1.1 |
python-starletteopenSUSE:Leap 16.0 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 0.41.3-160000.3.1 | 0.41.3-160000.3.1 |
Public exploits
Links only. Every CVE stores no exploit code.
| Source | Link | Date |
|---|---|---|
| PoC in GitHub | eris-ths/supply-chain-guard | 2026-04-01 |
| PoC in GitHub | xtremebeing/starlette-host-header-lab | 2026-05-27 |
| PoC in GitHub | Bhanunamikaze/BadHost-CVE-2026-48710-Exploit | 2026-05-28 |
| PoC in GitHub | sb-ox/repro-OXDEV-77637-uv-workspace | 2026-08-03 |
| PoC in GitHub | CuteeCat/CVE-2026-48710 | 2026-08-11 |
| Nuclei | Starlette - Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected | ||
| exploitation | ||
| affected, aliases, exploits, references | OSV | |
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, CISA KEV, Nuclei, NVD, OSV, PoC in GitHub |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-48710 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 6.5) in Encode Starlette, published May 22, 2026. CISA lists it as known to be exploited, since September 2, 2026. EUVD reports exploitation since September 2, 2026. Public exploit code exists. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 70.3%, the 99th percentile. Fixed in starlette 1.0.1.
References
github.com/Kludex/starlette/security/advisories/GHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr
github.com/Kludex/starlette/commit/764dab0dcfb9033d75442d7a359645c9f94648c6
badhost.org
github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/starlette/PYSEC-2026-161.yaml
ostif.org/disclosing-the-badhost-vulnerability-in-starlette
secwest.net/starlette
Show 45 moreShow less
x41-dsec.de/lab/advisories/x41-2026-002-starlette
wiz.io/blog/ai-infrastructure-honeypot
cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-48710
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48710
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481742
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-48710.json
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30089
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30088
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24866
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23346
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:43038
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:37275
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:60520
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34456
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:44696
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22993
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26226
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:51357
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22992
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34532
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34526
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:63337
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48710
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48710
github.com/advisories/GHSA-86qp-5c8j-p5mr
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2026-48710
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/48xxx/CVE-2026-48710.json
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-48710
github.com/Kludex/starlette
advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2026-0327.html
bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35637
lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/HWLLKAJQCNBN46LPLDAYBM2FU65WBX72
lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2026/msg00213.html
github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/security/advisories/GHSA-cxjh-pqwp-8mfp
lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/FET4KWO46IN64G35ZF7HGJJBIM4OF3YC
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202622151-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1246855
bugzilla.suse.com/1252805
bugzilla.suse.com/1266369
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54121
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-62727
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48710
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-48710
github.com/Kludex/starlette/pull/3279
cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
Left out here: 141 versions. The JSON record has them.