CVE-2026-48776
LangGraph SDK has unsafe URL path construction
LangGraph Python SDK is used to connect to running LangGraph API servers, manage assistants, threads and stream runs from Python applications. Versions 0.3.14 and prior have unsafe URL path construction through unsanitized caller-supplied identifier values used in HTTP request paths for resource operations. Without sanitization of those values, identifiers that contain characters with special meaning in URL paths could cause the resulting request to address a different resource (and potentially a different resource type) than the SDK method's call site indicates. In deployments where the SDK receives identifier values that originate from untrusted sources, this could result in unintended access, modification, or deletion of resources beyond the calling user's authorization scope. This issue is most consequential in deployments that forward end-user-supplied values directly into SDK identifier parameters without first validating them against an expected format (such as a UUID), and rely on URL-prefix-based authorization at an upstream layer (reverse proxy, edge gateway, WAF), where the authorization decision is made on the SDK call's intended path rather than on the final delivered request path. The issue has been fixed in version 0.3.15.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
4.2
LangGraph SDK has unsafe URL path construction
LangGraph Python SDK is used to connect to running LangGraph API servers, manage assistants, threads and stream runs from Python applications. Versions 0.3.14 and prior have unsafe URL path construction through unsanitized caller-supplied identifier values used in HTTP request paths for resource operations. Without sanitization of those values, identifiers that contain characters with special meaning in URL paths could cause the resulting request to address a different resource (and potentially a different resource type) than the SDK method's call site indicates. In deployments where the SDK receives identifier values that originate from untrusted sources, this could result in unintended access, modification, or deletion of resources beyond the calling user's authorization scope. This issue is most consequential in deployments that forward end-user-supplied values directly into SDK identifier parameters without first validating them against an expected format (such as a UUID), and rely on URL-prefix-based authorization at an upstream layer (reverse proxy, edge gateway, WAF), where the authorization decision is made on the SDK call's intended path rather than on the final delivered request path. The issue has been fixed in version 0.3.15.
- Record
CVE-2026-48776- CVSS 3.1
- 4.2 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-22, CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-37289
4.2
LangGraph Python SDK is used to connect to running LangGraph API servers, manage assistants, threads and stream runs from Python applications. Versions 0.3.14 and prior have unsafe URL path construction through unsanitized caller-supplied identifier values used in HTTP request paths for resource operations. Without sanitization of those values, identifiers that contain characters with special meaning in URL paths could cause the resulting request to address a different resource (and potentially a different resource type) than the SDK method's call site indicates. In deployments where the SDK receives identifier values that originate from untrusted sources, this could result in unintended access, modification, or deletion of resources beyond the calling user's authorization scope. This issue is most consequential in deployments that forward end-user-supplied values directly into SDK identifier parameters without first validating them against an expected format (such as a UUID), and rely on URL-prefix-based authorization at an upstream layer (reverse proxy, edge gateway, WAF), where the authorization decision is made on the SDK call's intended path rather than on the final delivered request path. The issue has been fixed in version 0.3.15.
- Record
EUVD-2026-37289- CVSS 3.1
- 4.2 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-w39p-vh2g-g8g5
4.2
LangGraph SDK has unsafe URL path construction
Summary
langgraph-sdk constructs HTTP request paths for resource operations by interpolating caller-supplied identifier values into URL templates. Without sanitization of those values, identifiers that contain characters with special meaning in URL paths could cause the resulting request to address a different resource (and potentially a different resource type) than the SDK method's call site indicates. In deployments where the SDK receives identifier values that originate from untrusted sources, this could result in unintended access, modification, or deletion of resources beyond the calling user's authorization scope.
This issue is most consequential in deployments that:
- forward end-user-supplied values directly into SDK identifier parameters without first validating them against an expected format (such as a UUID), and
- rely on URL-prefix-based authorization at an upstream layer (reverse proxy, edge gateway, WAF), where the authorization decision is made on the SDK call's intended path rather than on the final delivered request path.
There have no evidence of this behavior being triggered in the wild. This change is intended to reduce the surface available when caller-supplied identifier values originate from untrusted sources.
Affected users / systems
You may be affected if you:
- use
langgraph-sdk(Python) to address resources by identifier, and - pass identifier values into SDK methods that originate from end-user input, untrusted third-party callers, or any source that does not validate identifier format before the SDK call.
Applications that validate identifier values (for example, by parsing them as UUIDs and rejecting anything that does not parse) before passing them to SDK methods are not affected. Validated UUIDs round-trip through the SDK request path unchanged.
Impact
- Potential unintended access, modification, or deletion of resources via SDK methods called for a different resource type, when caller-supplied identifier values are not validated.
- In deployments with prefix-based authorization at an upstream layer, the authorization decision and the final delivered request path may diverge.
- Confidentiality: disclosure of resource content beyond the authorization scope of the calling user.
- Integrity: modification or deletion of resources beyond the authorization scope of the calling user.
Patches / mitigation
The SDK now applies path-segment encoding to identifier values before they are interpolated into request URL templates. After this change, identifier values that contain characters with special meaning in URL paths are transmitted as encoded byte sequences and routed to the resource the SDK method's call site indicates.
Compatibility
Identifier values that match the standard UUID format, or any other format that contains only characters safe to transmit unencoded in URL path segments, round-trip through the SDK request path unchanged. Applications that already validate identifier inputs see no behavioral change.
Operational guidance
- Validate identifier values (typically as UUIDs) at the boundary where untrusted input enters the application, before passing them to SDK methods.
- For deployments relying on URL-prefix-based authorization upstream of LangGraph, prefer authorization at the LangGraph server layer or on parsed-and-validated request paths rather than on raw URL prefixes.
LangSmith / hosted deployments note
This issue affects the SDK that runs in caller applications. The LangGraph server runtime, including LangSmith-hosted deployments, receives ordinary HTTP requests on documented routes and is not itself affected by this issue. Applications that consume LangSmith-hosted services via langgraph-sdk and pass untrusted identifier values to SDK methods should upgrade.
First reported by: pucagit (CyStack).
- Record
GHSA-w39p-vh2g-g8g5- CVSS 3.1
- 4.2 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-22, CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
4.2
LangGraph Python SDK is used to connect to running LangGraph API servers, manage assistants, threads and stream runs from Python applications. Versions 0.3.14 and prior have unsafe URL path construction through unsanitized caller-supplied identifier values used in HTTP request paths for resource operations. Without sanitization of those values, identifiers that contain characters with special meaning in URL paths could cause the resulting request to address a different resource (and potentially a different resource type) than the SDK method's call site indicates. In deployments where the SDK receives identifier values that originate from untrusted sources, this could result in unintended access, modification, or deletion of resources beyond the calling user's authorization scope. This issue is most consequential in deployments that forward end-user-supplied values directly into SDK identifier parameters without first validating them against an expected format (such as a UUID), and rely on URL-prefix-based authorization at an upstream layer (reverse proxy, edge gateway, WAF), where the authorization decision is made on the SDK call's intended path rather than on the final delivered request path. The issue has been fixed in version 0.3.15.
- Record
CVE-2026-48776- CVSS 3.1
- 4.2 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-22, CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
4.2
LangGraph SDK has unsafe URL path construction
LangGraph Python SDK is used to connect to running LangGraph API servers, manage assistants, threads and stream runs from Python applications. Versions 0.3.14 and prior have unsafe URL path construction through unsanitized caller-supplied identifier values used in HTTP request paths for resource operations. Without sanitization of those values, identifiers that contain characters with special meaning in URL paths could cause the resulting request to address a different resource (and potentially a different resource type) than the SDK method's call site indicates. In deployments where the SDK receives identifier values that originate from untrusted sources, this could result in unintended access, modification, or deletion of resources beyond the calling user's authorization scope. This issue is most consequential in deployments that forward end-user-supplied values directly into SDK identifier parameters without first validating them against an expected format (such as a UUID), and rely on URL-prefix-based authorization at an upstream layer (reverse proxy, edge gateway, WAF), where the authorization decision is made on the SDK call's intended path rather than on the final delivered request path. The issue has been fixed in version 0.3.15.
- Record
CVE-2026-48776- CVSS 3.1
- 4.2 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-22, CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-w39p-vh2g-g8g5
4.2
LangGraph SDK has unsafe URL path construction
Summary
langgraph-sdk constructs HTTP request paths for resource operations by interpolating caller-supplied identifier values into URL templates. Without sanitization of those values, identifiers that contain characters with special meaning in URL paths could cause the resulting request to address a different resource (and potentially a different resource type) than the SDK method's call site indicates. In deployments where the SDK receives identifier values that originate from untrusted sources, this could result in unintended access, modification, or deletion of resources beyond the calling user's authorization scope.
This issue is most consequential in deployments that:
- forward end-user-supplied values directly into SDK identifier parameters without first validating them against an expected format (such as a UUID), and
- rely on URL-prefix-based authorization at an upstream layer (reverse proxy, edge gateway, WAF), where the authorization decision is made on the SDK call's intended path rather than on the final delivered request path.
There have no evidence of this behavior being triggered in the wild. This change is intended to reduce the surface available when caller-supplied identifier values originate from untrusted sources.
Affected users / systems
You may be affected if you:
- use
langgraph-sdk(Python) to address resources by identifier, and - pass identifier values into SDK methods that originate from end-user input, untrusted third-party callers, or any source that does not validate identifier format before the SDK call.
Applications that validate identifier values (for example, by parsing them as UUIDs and rejecting anything that does not parse) before passing them to SDK methods are not affected. Validated UUIDs round-trip through the SDK request path unchanged.
Impact
- Potential unintended access, modification, or deletion of resources via SDK methods called for a different resource type, when caller-supplied identifier values are not validated.
- In deployments with prefix-based authorization at an upstream layer, the authorization decision and the final delivered request path may diverge.
- Confidentiality: disclosure of resource content beyond the authorization scope of the calling user.
- Integrity: modification or deletion of resources beyond the authorization scope of the calling user.
Patches / mitigation
The SDK now applies path-segment encoding to identifier values before they are interpolated into request URL templates. After this change, identifier values that contain characters with special meaning in URL paths are transmitted as encoded byte sequences and routed to the resource the SDK method's call site indicates.
Compatibility
Identifier values that match the standard UUID format, or any other format that contains only characters safe to transmit unencoded in URL path segments, round-trip through the SDK request path unchanged. Applications that already validate identifier inputs see no behavioral change.
Operational guidance
- Validate identifier values (typically as UUIDs) at the boundary where untrusted input enters the application, before passing them to SDK methods.
- For deployments relying on URL-prefix-based authorization upstream of LangGraph, prefer authorization at the LangGraph server layer or on parsed-and-validated request paths rather than on raw URL prefixes.
LangSmith / hosted deployments note
This issue affects the SDK that runs in caller applications. The LangGraph server runtime, including LangSmith-hosted deployments, receives ordinary HTTP requests on documented routes and is not itself affected by this issue. Applications that consume LangSmith-hosted services via langgraph-sdk and pass untrusted identifier values to SDK methods should upgrade.
First reported by: pucagit (CyStack).
- Record
GHSA-w39p-vh2g-g8g5- CVSS 3.1
- 4.2 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-22, CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2194
9.1
LangGraph Python SDK is used to connect to running LangGraph API servers, manage assistants, threads and stream runs from Python applications. Versions 0.3.14 and prior have unsafe URL path construction through unsanitized caller-supplied identifier values used in HTTP request paths for resource operations. Without sanitization of those values, identifiers that contain characters with special meaning in URL paths could cause the resulting request to address a different resource (and potentially a different resource type) than the SDK method's call site indicates. In deployments where the SDK receives identifier values that originate from untrusted sources, this could result in unintended access, modification, or deletion of resources beyond the calling user's authorization scope. This issue is most consequential in deployments that forward end-user-supplied values directly into SDK identifier parameters without first validating them against an expected format (such as a UUID), and rely on URL-prefix-based authorization at an upstream layer (reverse proxy, edge gateway, WAF), where the authorization decision is made on the SDK call's intended path rather than on the final delivered request path. The issue has been fixed in version 0.3.15.
- Record
PYSEC-2026-2194- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2575
4.2
LangGraph SDK has unsafe URL path construction
Summary
langgraph-sdk constructs HTTP request paths for resource operations by interpolating caller-supplied identifier values into URL templates. Without sanitization of those values, identifiers that contain characters with special meaning in URL paths could cause the resulting request to address a different resource (and potentially a different resource type) than the SDK method's call site indicates. In deployments where the SDK receives identifier values that originate from untrusted sources, this could result in unintended access, modification, or deletion of resources beyond the calling user's authorization scope.
This issue is most consequential in deployments that:
- forward end-user-supplied values directly into SDK identifier parameters without first validating them against an expected format (such as a UUID), and
- rely on URL-prefix-based authorization at an upstream layer (reverse proxy, edge gateway, WAF), where the authorization decision is made on the SDK call's intended path rather than on the final delivered request path.
There have no evidence of this behavior being triggered in the wild. This change is intended to reduce the surface available when caller-supplied identifier values originate from untrusted sources.
Affected users / systems
You may be affected if you:
- use
langgraph-sdk(Python) to address resources by identifier, and - pass identifier values into SDK methods that originate from end-user input, untrusted third-party callers, or any source that does not validate identifier format before the SDK call.
Applications that validate identifier values (for example, by parsing them as UUIDs and rejecting anything that does not parse) before passing them to SDK methods are not affected. Validated UUIDs round-trip through the SDK request path unchanged.
Impact
- Potential unintended access, modification, or deletion of resources via SDK methods called for a different resource type, when caller-supplied identifier values are not validated.
- In deployments with prefix-based authorization at an upstream layer, the authorization decision and the final delivered request path may diverge.
- Confidentiality: disclosure of resource content beyond the authorization scope of the calling user.
- Integrity: modification or deletion of resources beyond the authorization scope of the calling user.
Patches / mitigation
The SDK now applies path-segment encoding to identifier values before they are interpolated into request URL templates. After this change, identifier values that contain characters with special meaning in URL paths are transmitted as encoded byte sequences and routed to the resource the SDK method's call site indicates.
Compatibility
Identifier values that match the standard UUID format, or any other format that contains only characters safe to transmit unencoded in URL path segments, round-trip through the SDK request path unchanged. Applications that already validate identifier inputs see no behavioral change.
Operational guidance
- Validate identifier values (typically as UUIDs) at the boundary where untrusted input enters the application, before passing them to SDK methods.
- For deployments relying on URL-prefix-based authorization upstream of LangGraph, prefer authorization at the LangGraph server layer or on parsed-and-validated request paths rather than on raw URL prefixes.
LangSmith / hosted deployments note
This issue affects the SDK that runs in caller applications. The LangGraph server runtime, including LangSmith-hosted deployments, receives ordinary HTTP requests on documented routes and is not itself affected by this issue. Applications that consume LangSmith-hosted services via langgraph-sdk and pass untrusted identifier values to SDK methods should upgrade.
First reported by: pucagit (CyStack).
- Record
PYSEC-2026-2575- CVSS 3.1
- 4.2 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVROOT-APP-PYPI-CVE-2026-48776 No score
CVE-2026-48776 in langgraph-sdk - Patched by Root
Root has patched CVE-2026-48776 in the langgraph-sdk package for Root:PyPI. Multiple fixed versions available.
- Record
ROOT-APP-PYPI-CVE-2026-48776- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
langgraph-sdkPyPI |
before 0.3.15 | 0.3.15 |
langgraph-sdkPyPI |
before 0.3.15, plus listed versions 0.1.00.1.10.1.100.1.110.1.12 Show 45 moreShow less0.1.140.1.160.1.170.1.180.1.20.1.200.1.210.1.220.1.230.1.240.1.250.1.260.1.270.1.280.1.290.1.30.1.300.1.310.1.320.1.330.1.340.1.350.1.360.1.370.1.380.1.390.1.40.1.400.1.420.1.430.1.440.1.450.1.460.1.470.1.480.1.50.1.500.1.510.1.530.1.550.1.560.1.570.1.580.1.590.1.6 |
0.3.15 |
langgraphPyPI |
before 0.3.15, plus listed versions 0.0.100.0.110.0.120.0.130.0.14 Show 45 moreShow less0.0.150.0.160.0.170.0.180.0.190.0.200.0.210.0.220.0.230.0.240.0.250.0.260.0.270.0.280.0.290.0.300.0.310.0.320.0.330.0.340.0.350.0.360.0.370.0.380.0.390.0.400.0.410.0.420.0.430.0.440.0.450.0.460.0.470.0.480.0.490.0.500.0.510.0.520.0.530.0.540.0.550.0.560.0.570.0.580.0.59 |
0.3.15 |
langgraph-sdkRoot:PyPI |
before 0.3.13+aikido.1 | 0.3.13+aikido.10.3.14+aikido.10.3.14+aikido.20.3.13+aikido.20.3.14+aikido.3 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-48776 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 4.2) in Langchain Langgraph-sdk, published June 16, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.22%, the 12th percentile. Fixed in langgraph-sdk 0.3.15.
References
github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/security/advisories/GHSA-w39p-vh2g-g8g5
github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/releases/tag/sdk%3D%3D0.3.15
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48776
github.com/advisories/GHSA-w39p-vh2g-g8g5
github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph
github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/langgraph-sdk/PYSEC-2026-2575.yaml
github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/langgraph/PYSEC-2026-2194.yaml
pypi.org/project/langgraph-sdk
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/48xxx/CVE-2026-48776.json
Left out here: 171 versions. The JSON record has them.