CVE-2026-48794
Authelia has an Edge Case Access Control Rule Mismatch
Authelia is an open-source authentication and authorization server providing two-factor authentication and single sign-on (SSO) for applications via a web portal. In versions 4.36.0 through 4.39.19, due to lack of canonicalization of domains in very specific edge cases, an access control rule may be skipped when it should match a request. The specific conditions that could lead to a security issue for vulnerability are: 1. The specific target resource of the attack must be using the forwarded authorization integration; 2. The requested domain must have two additional segments compared to a session domain i.e. a.b.example.com is requested, but the session domain is example.com; 3. There access control rules must specify two separate rules which both contain inexact domain matches such as *.b.example.com and *.example.com i.e. wildcards, username matches, group matches; 4. The rules must be in order of most specific domain to least specific domain; 5. The second rule must be more permissive than the first rule; 6. The attacker must specifically request a URL for the more specific domain, with the second part containing one or more capitalized letters i.e. https://a.B.example.com and no other segment with capitalized letters; 7. The integration used must not be the Envoy ExtAuthz integration; and 8. The proxy must not canonicalize the requested host name in the relevant header before sending it to the relevant authorization endpoint. The kind of configuration used to produce this issue and result in a bypass rule being matched has long been highly discouraged. Essentially hosts which should be bypassed entirely should not be secured by having the proxy check them with the authorization handlers. Upgrade to 4.39.20 to receive a patch.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
Authelia has an Edge Case Access Control Rule Mismatch
Authelia is an open-source authentication and authorization server providing two-factor authentication and single sign-on (SSO) for applications via a web portal. In versions 4.36.0 through 4.39.19, due to lack of canonicalization of domains in very specific edge cases, an access control rule may be skipped when it should match a request. The specific conditions that could lead to a security issue for vulnerability are: 1. The specific target resource of the attack must be using the forwarded authorization integration; 2. The requested domain must have two additional segments compared to a session domain i.e. a.b.example.com is requested, but the session domain is example.com; 3. There access control rules must specify two separate rules which both contain inexact domain matches such as *.b.example.com and *.example.com i.e. wildcards, username matches, group matches; 4. The rules must be in order of most specific domain to least specific domain; 5. The second rule must be more permissive than the first rule; 6. The attacker must specifically request a URL for the more specific domain, with the second part containing one or more capitalized letters i.e. https://a.B.example.com and no other segment with capitalized letters; 7. The integration used must not be the Envoy ExtAuthz integration; and 8. The proxy must not canonicalize the requested host name in the relevant header before sending it to the relevant authorization endpoint. The kind of configuration used to produce this issue and result in a bypass rule being matched has long been highly discouraged. Essentially hosts which should be bypassed entirely should not be secured by having the proxy check them with the authorization handlers. Upgrade to 4.39.20 to receive a patch.
- Record
CVE-2026-48794- CVSS 4.0
- 1.3 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P - Weakness
- CWE-178, CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-38083
Authelia is an open-source authentication and authorization server providing two-factor authentication and single sign-on (SSO) for applications via a web portal. In versions 4.36.0 through 4.39.19, due to lack of canonicalization of domains in very specific edge cases, an access control rule may be skipped when it should match a request. The specific conditions that could lead to a security issue for vulnerability are: 1. The specific target resource of the attack must be using the forwarded authorization integration; 2. The requested domain must have two additional segments compared to a session domain i.e. a.b.example.com is requested, but the session domain is example.com; 3. There access control rules must specify two separate rules which both contain inexact domain matches such as *.b.example.com and *.example.com i.e. wildcards, username matches, group matches; 4. The rules must be in order of most specific domain to least specific domain; 5. The second rule must be more permissive than the first rule; 6. The attacker must specifically request a URL for the more specific domain, with the second part containing one or more capitalized letters i.e. https://a.B.example.com and no other segment with capitalized letters; 7. The integration used must not be the Envoy ExtAuthz integration; and 8. The proxy must not canonicalize the requested host name in the relevant header before sending it to the relevant authorization endpoint. The kind of configuration used to produce this issue and result in a bypass rule being matched has long been highly discouraged. Essentially hosts which should be bypassed entirely should not be secured by having the proxy check them with the authorization handlers. Upgrade to 4.39.20 to receive a patch.
- Record
EUVD-2026-38083- CVSS 4.0
- 1.3 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-j748-h363-wqj8
Authelia has an Edge Case Access Control Rule Mismatch
Impact
CVSSv4 Baseline Score: Low 2.4
CVSSv4 Weighted Score: Low 1.3
The full CVSSv4 Vector for this vulnerability is:
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:H/IR:L/AR:L/MAV:N/MAC:H/MAT:P/MPR:L/MVC:L/MVI:N/MVA:N/MSC:L/MSI:N/MSA:N/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:L/U:Amber
CVSSv3.1 Baseline Score: Low 3.1
CVSSv3.1 Overall Score: Low 3.4
The full CVSSv3.1 Vector equivalent for this vulnerability is:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:C/CR:H/IR:L/AR:L/MAV:N/MAC:H/MPR:L/MUI:X/MS:U/MC:L/MI:N/MA:N
The weighted severity rating is a result of no indication this is currently being exploited being available at the time of the publish date, in addition to the fact it's unlikely that it is being exploited currently. The vectors have been picked based on the scenario most likely to exist in real configurations.
In addition to the weighting our assessment considers the fact the configuration scenario required for this vulnerability to be exploited is highly unlikely and an attacker is unlikely in most scenarios to be able to determine if the exploit is available and if it was successful except in rare situations. Though the visibility to the attacker was not reflected in our assessment.
Summary
Due to lack of canonicalization of domains in very specific edge cases an access control rule may be skipped when it should match a request.
Details
This attack vector must be executed in a highly specific scenario which we do not believe any user would find themselves in. In an abundance of caution we are issuing this advisory and would appreciate any users who find this configuration report it to us with both the access control section, and sessions section so that we can best advise the community of the actual impact.
The specific conditions that could lead to a security issue for vulnerability are as follows:
- The specific target resource of the attack must be using the forwarded authorization integration.
- The requested domain must have two additional segments compared to a session domain i.e.
a.b.example.comis requested, but the session domain isexample.com. - There access control rules must specify two separate rules which both contain inexact domain matches such as
*.b.example.comand*.example.comi.e. wildcards, username matches, group matches. - The rules must be in order of most specific domain to least specific domain.
- The second rule must be more permissive than the first rule.
- The second rule must also match all criteria of the given request.
- The attacker must specifically request a URL for the more specific domain, with the second part containing one or more capitalized letters i.e.
https://a.B.example.comand no other segment with capitalized letters. - The integration used must not be the Envoy ExtAuthz integration.
- The proxy must not canonicalize the requested host name in the relevant header before sending it to the relevant authorization endpoint.
The kind of configuration used to produce this issue and result in a bypass rule being matched has long been highly discouraged. Essentially hosts which should be bypassed entirely should not be secured by having the proxy check them with the authorization handlers.
It should also be noted this has been heavily mitigated due to another bug where the session domain would not match if any part of the configured session domain was capitalized (fixed in https://github.com/authelia/authelia/commit/368631ecc5a9c6bcf2ff5f892ad443b890dd945e, it should be expressly noted this commit does not contain a fix for a CVE). This bug would prevent the request from succeeding in any way. This bug will also be fixed after this vulnerability is fixed, and the bug where session domains would not match has no security impact other than heavily mitigating the access control vulnerability.
Patches
Upgrade to 4.39.20.
Commit:…
- Record
GHSA-j748-h363-wqj8- CVSS 4.0
- 2.3 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-178, CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
Authelia is an open-source authentication and authorization server providing two-factor authentication and single sign-on (SSO) for applications via a web portal. In versions 4.36.0 through 4.39.19, due to lack of canonicalization of domains in very specific edge cases, an access control rule may be skipped when it should match a request. The specific conditions that could lead to a security issue for vulnerability are: 1. The specific target resource of the attack must be using the forwarded authorization integration; 2. The requested domain must have two additional segments compared to a session domain i.e. a.b.example.com is requested, but the session domain is example.com; 3. There access control rules must specify two separate rules which both contain inexact domain matches such as *.b.example.com and *.example.com i.e. wildcards, username matches, group matches; 4. The rules must be in order of most specific domain to least specific domain; 5. The second rule must be more permissive than the first rule; 6. The attacker must specifically request a URL for the more specific domain, with the second part containing one or more capitalized letters i.e. https://a.B.example.com and no other segment with capitalized letters; 7. The integration used must not be the Envoy ExtAuthz integration; and 8. The proxy must not canonicalize the requested host name in the relevant header before sending it to the relevant authorization endpoint. The kind of configuration used to produce this issue and result in a bypass rule being matched has long been highly discouraged. Essentially hosts which should be bypassed entirely should not be secured by having the proxy check them with the authorization handlers. Upgrade to 4.39.20 to receive a patch.
- Record
CVE-2026-48794- CVSS 4.0
- 1.3 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - Weakness
- CWE-178, CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
Authelia has an Edge Case Access Control Rule Mismatch
Authelia is an open-source authentication and authorization server providing two-factor authentication and single sign-on (SSO) for applications via a web portal. In versions 4.36.0 through 4.39.19, due to lack of canonicalization of domains in very specific edge cases, an access control rule may be skipped when it should match a request. The specific conditions that could lead to a security issue for vulnerability are: 1. The specific target resource of the attack must be using the forwarded authorization integration; 2. The requested domain must have two additional segments compared to a session domain i.e. a.b.example.com is requested, but the session domain is example.com; 3. There access control rules must specify two separate rules which both contain inexact domain matches such as *.b.example.com and *.example.com i.e. wildcards, username matches, group matches; 4. The rules must be in order of most specific domain to least specific domain; 5. The second rule must be more permissive than the first rule; 6. The attacker must specifically request a URL for the more specific domain, with the second part containing one or more capitalized letters i.e. https://a.B.example.com and no other segment with capitalized letters; 7. The integration used must not be the Envoy ExtAuthz integration; and 8. The proxy must not canonicalize the requested host name in the relevant header before sending it to the relevant authorization endpoint. The kind of configuration used to produce this issue and result in a bypass rule being matched has long been highly discouraged. Essentially hosts which should be bypassed entirely should not be secured by having the proxy check them with the authorization handlers. Upgrade to 4.39.20 to receive a patch.
- Record
CVE-2026-48794- CVSS 4.0
- 1.3 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P - Weakness
- CWE-178, CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-j748-h363-wqj8
Authelia has an Edge Case Access Control Rule Mismatch
Impact
CVSSv4 Baseline Score: Low 2.4
CVSSv4 Weighted Score: Low 1.3
The full CVSSv4 Vector for this vulnerability is:
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:H/IR:L/AR:L/MAV:N/MAC:H/MAT:P/MPR:L/MVC:L/MVI:N/MVA:N/MSC:L/MSI:N/MSA:N/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:L/U:Amber
CVSSv3.1 Baseline Score: Low 3.1
CVSSv3.1 Overall Score: Low 3.4
The full CVSSv3.1 Vector equivalent for this vulnerability is:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:C/CR:H/IR:L/AR:L/MAV:N/MAC:H/MPR:L/MUI:X/MS:U/MC:L/MI:N/MA:N
The weighted severity rating is a result of no indication this is currently being exploited being available at the time of the publish date, in addition to the fact it's unlikely that it is being exploited currently. The vectors have been picked based on the scenario most likely to exist in real configurations.
In addition to the weighting our assessment considers the fact the configuration scenario required for this vulnerability to be exploited is highly unlikely and an attacker is unlikely in most scenarios to be able to determine if the exploit is available and if it was successful except in rare situations. Though the visibility to the attacker was not reflected in our assessment.
Summary
Due to lack of canonicalization of domains in very specific edge cases an access control rule may be skipped when it should match a request.
Details
This attack vector must be executed in a highly specific scenario which we do not believe any user would find themselves in. In an abundance of caution we are issuing this advisory and would appreciate any users who find this configuration report it to us with both the access control section, and sessions section so that we can best advise the community of the actual impact.
The specific conditions that could lead to a security issue for vulnerability are as follows:
- The specific target resource of the attack must be using the forwarded authorization integration.
- The requested domain must have two additional segments compared to a session domain i.e.
a.b.example.comis requested, but the session domain isexample.com. - There access control rules must specify two separate rules which both contain inexact domain matches such as
*.b.example.comand*.example.comi.e. wildcards, username matches, group matches. - The rules must be in order of most specific domain to least specific domain.
- The second rule must be more permissive than the first rule.
- The second rule must also match all criteria of the given request.
- The attacker must specifically request a URL for the more specific domain, with the second part containing one or more capitalized letters i.e.
https://a.B.example.comand no other segment with capitalized letters. - The integration used must not be the Envoy ExtAuthz integration.
- The proxy must not canonicalize the requested host name in the relevant header before sending it to the relevant authorization endpoint.
The kind of configuration used to produce this issue and result in a bypass rule being matched has long been highly discouraged. Essentially hosts which should be bypassed entirely should not be secured by having the proxy check them with the authorization handlers.
It should also be noted this has been heavily mitigated due to another bug where the session domain would not match if any part of the configured session domain was capitalized (fixed in https://github.com/authelia/authelia/commit/368631ecc5a9c6bcf2ff5f892ad443b890dd945e, it should be expressly noted this commit does not contain a fix for a CVE). This bug would prevent the request from succeeding in any way. This bug will also be fixed after this vulnerability is fixed, and the bug where session domains would not match has no security impact other than heavily mitigating the access control vulnerability.
Patches
Upgrade to 4.39.20.
Commit:…
- Record
GHSA-j748-h363-wqj8- CVSS 4.0
- 2.3 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-178, CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-5819 No score
Authelia has an Edge Case Access Control Rule Mismatch in github.com/authelia/authelia
Authelia has an Edge Case Access Control Rule Mismatch in github.com/authelia/authelia
- Record
GO-2026-5819- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1 No score
Security update for govulncheck-vulndb
This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:
- Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).
Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:
- GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
- GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
- GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
- GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
- GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
- GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
- GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
- GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
- GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
- GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
- GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
- GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
- GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
- GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
- GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
- GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
- GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
- GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
- GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
- GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
- GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
- GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
- GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
- GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
- GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
- GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
- GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
- GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
- GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
- GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
- GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
- GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
- GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
- GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
- GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
- GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
- GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
- GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
- GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
- GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
- GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
- GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
- GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
- GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
- GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
- GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
- GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
- GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
- GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
- GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
- GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
- GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
- GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
- GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
- GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
- GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
- GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
- GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
- GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
- GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
- GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
- GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
- GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
- GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
- GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
- GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
- GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
- GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
- GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
- GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
- GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
- GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
- GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
- GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
- GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
- GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
- GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
github.com/authelia/authelia/v4Go |
4.36.0 to 4.39.19 | 4.39.20 |
github.com/authelia/authelia/v4Go |
4.36.0 up to 4.39.20 | 4.39.20 |
github.com/authelia/autheliaGo |
All versions | None known |
govulncheck-vulndbopenSUSE:Leap 16.0 From an advisory covering 1734 CVEs |
before 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1 | 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-48794 is a low vulnerability (CVSS 1.3) in Authelia, published June 19, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.41%, the 36th percentile. Fixed in github.com/authelia/authelia/v4 4.39.20.
References
github.com/authelia/authelia/security/advisories/GHSA-j748-h363-wqj8
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48794
Show 194 moreShow less
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11063
Left out here: 1,540 references and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.