CVE-2026-50125
MKP: Unbounded Pod Log Read via Attacker-Controlled `limitBytes`/`tailLines` Causes Memory Exhaustion
MKP is a Model Context Protocol server for Kubernetes. Prior to 0.4.1, cmd/server/main.go exposes the default HTTP endpoint and pkg/mcp/server.go registers the unauthenticated get_resource tool, which accepts attacker-controlled limitBytes and tailLines values for the pods logs subresource. buildPodLogOpts() in pkg/k8s/subresource.go parses those values as unbounded int64 parameters, and defaultGetPodLogs() copies the returned Kubernetes log stream through io.Copy into an in-memory bytes.Buffer without an application-side cap. A remote attacker who can reach the default port 8080 MCP endpoint and select a pod with sufficiently large accumulated logs can send one tools/call request that causes large allocations and additional response copies, while the request-frequency limiter does not constrain per-request volume. This can exhaust process memory, terminate the MKP server, and deny the MCP service; observed testing showed more than one GiB of RSS growth while handling a 128 MiB requested stream. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.1.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
7.5
MKP: Unbounded Pod Log Read via Attacker-Controlled `limitBytes`/`tailLines` Causes Memory Exhaustion
MKP is a Model Context Protocol server for Kubernetes. Prior to 0.4.1, cmd/server/main.go exposes the default HTTP endpoint and pkg/mcp/server.go registers the unauthenticated get_resource tool, which accepts attacker-controlled limitBytes and tailLines values for the pods logs subresource. buildPodLogOpts() in pkg/k8s/subresource.go parses those values as unbounded int64 parameters, and defaultGetPodLogs() copies the returned Kubernetes log stream through io.Copy into an in-memory bytes.Buffer without an application-side cap. A remote attacker who can reach the default port 8080 MCP endpoint and select a pod with sufficiently large accumulated logs can send one tools/call request that causes large allocations and additional response copies, while the request-frequency limiter does not constrain per-request volume. This can exhaust process memory, terminate the MKP server, and deny the MCP service; observed testing showed more than one GiB of RSS growth while handling a 128 MiB requested stream. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-50125- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-82412
7.5
MKP is a Model Context Protocol server for Kubernetes. Prior to 0.4.1, cmd/server/main.go exposes the default HTTP endpoint and pkg/mcp/server.go registers the unauthenticated get_resource tool, which accepts attacker-controlled limitBytes and tailLines values for the pods logs subresource. buildPodLogOpts() in pkg/k8s/subresource.go parses those values as unbounded int64 parameters, and defaultGetPodLogs() copies the returned Kubernetes log stream through io.Copy into an in-memory bytes.Buffer without an application-side cap. A remote attacker who can reach the default port 8080 MCP endpoint and select a pod with sufficiently large accumulated logs can send one tools/call request that causes large allocations and additional response copies, while the request-frequency limiter does not constrain per-request volume. This can exhaust process memory, terminate the MKP server, and deny the MCP service; observed testing showed more than one GiB of RSS growth while handling a 128 MiB requested stream. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.1.
- Record
EUVD-2026-82412- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
7.5
MKP: Unbounded Pod Log Read via Attacker-Controlled `limitBytes`/`tailLines` Causes Memory Exhaustion
Unbounded Pod Log Read via Attacker-Controlled limitBytes/tailLines Causes Memory Exhaustion
Summary
The MKP (Model Context Protocol for Kubernetes) server exposes a get_resource MCP tool that proxies Kubernetes pod log requests. User-supplied limitBytes and tailLines parameters are parsed as unbounded int64 values and forwarded directly to the Kubernetes API. The server then reads the entire returned log stream into an in-memory bytes.Buffer using io.Copy without any application-side size cap. A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit this to exhaust the MKP server's memory by sending a single crafted tools/call request, leading to process termination (OOM kill) and denial of service. Dynamic reproduction confirmed the MKP process RSS grew from 25.8 MB to 1,179.3 MB (+1,153.4 MB) while handling one request with limitBytes=134217728.
Details
The vulnerability exists in pkg/k8s/subresource.go in the buildPodLogOpts() and defaultGetPodLogs() functions.
Source — unbounded parameter parsing (pkg/k8s/subresource.go:171–181):
// pkg/k8s/subresource.go
defaultLimitBytes := int64(32 * 1024) // 32 KB — only used when parameters map is nil
...
if limitBytes, ok := parameters["limitBytes"]; ok {
if b, err := strconv.ParseInt(limitBytes, 10, 64); err == nil {
podLogOpts.LimitBytes = &b // no upper-bound check
}
}
if tailLines, ok := parameters["tailLines"]; ok {
if lines, err := strconv.ParseInt(tailLines, 10, 64); err == nil {
podLogOpts.TailLines = &lines // no upper-bound check
}
}
When the parameters map is non-nil (always true for attacker-supplied input), buildPodLogOpts() is called at pkg/k8s/subresource.go:94–96 and overwrites the 32 KB default entirely. The attacker can therefore supply any positive int64 value (up to 2147483647 or 9223372036854775807) as limitBytes.
Sink — unbounded in-memory copy (pkg/k8s/subresource.go:114–115):
buf := new(bytes.Buffer)
_, err = io.Copy(buf, podLogs) // entire Kubernetes stream copied into RAM
The stream from Kubernetes is read without limit into a heap-allocated bytes.Buffer. Subsequent JSON serialisation and MCP response wrapping create additional copies, meaning the actual RSS increase is a multiple of the raw log size (observed: ~9×).
Attack path (source → sink):
| Step | Location | Description |
|------|----------|-------------|
| 1 | cmd/server/main.go:30 | Server binds to :8080 on all interfaces; no authentication by default |
| 2 | pkg/mcp/server.go:131 | NewGetResourceTool() registered unconditionally (no --read-write required) |
| 3 | pkg/mcp/get_resource.go:28–38 | Attacker-controlled parameters map parsed from CallToolRequest |
| 4 | pkg/mcp/get_resource.go:76 | client.GetResource(..., parameters) called |
| 5 | pkg/k8s/subresource.go:32–33 | resource=pods + subresource=logs routes into getPodLogs |
| 6 | pkg/k8s/subresource.go:171–181 | limitBytes / tailLines parsed without upper bound (source) |
| 7 | pkg/k8s/subresource.go:114–115 | io.Copy(buf, podLogs) loads full stream into bytes.Buffer (sink) |
The rate limiter (pkg/ratelimit/config.go:16–17) caps only request frequency (120 req/min) and places no limit on per-request data volume, providing no meaningful mitigation.
Suggested remediation:
+const (
+ maxPodLogTailLines int64 = 1000
+ maxPodLogLimitBytes int64 = 1024 * 1024 // 1 MB hard cap
+)
+
buf := new(bytes.Buffer)
-_, err = io.Copy(buf, podLogs)
+limitedLogs := &io.LimitedReader{R: podLogs, N: maxPodLogLimitBytes + 1}
+_, err = io.Copy(buf, limitedLogs)
+if limitedLogs.N == 0 {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("pod logs exceed maximum size of %d bytes", maxPodLogLimitBytes)
+}
if limitBytes, ok := parameters["limitBytes"]; ok {
if b, err := strconv.ParseInt(limitBytes, 10, 64); err == nil {
+ if b <= 0 || b > maxPodLogLimitBytes {
+ …
- Record
GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
7.5
MKP is a Model Context Protocol server for Kubernetes. Prior to 0.4.1, cmd/server/main.go exposes the default HTTP endpoint and pkg/mcp/server.go registers the unauthenticated get_resource tool, which accepts attacker-controlled limitBytes and tailLines values for the pods logs subresource. buildPodLogOpts() in pkg/k8s/subresource.go parses those values as unbounded int64 parameters, and defaultGetPodLogs() copies the returned Kubernetes log stream through io.Copy into an in-memory bytes.Buffer without an application-side cap. A remote attacker who can reach the default port 8080 MCP endpoint and select a pod with sufficiently large accumulated logs can send one tools/call request that causes large allocations and additional response copies, while the request-frequency limiter does not constrain per-request volume. This can exhaust process memory, terminate the MKP server, and deny the MCP service; observed testing showed more than one GiB of RSS growth while handling a 128 MiB requested stream. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-50125- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
7.5
MKP: Unbounded Pod Log Read via Attacker-Controlled `limitBytes`/`tailLines` Causes Memory Exhaustion
MKP is a Model Context Protocol server for Kubernetes. Prior to 0.4.1, cmd/server/main.go exposes the default HTTP endpoint and pkg/mcp/server.go registers the unauthenticated get_resource tool, which accepts attacker-controlled limitBytes and tailLines values for the pods logs subresource. buildPodLogOpts() in pkg/k8s/subresource.go parses those values as unbounded int64 parameters, and defaultGetPodLogs() copies the returned Kubernetes log stream through io.Copy into an in-memory bytes.Buffer without an application-side cap. A remote attacker who can reach the default port 8080 MCP endpoint and select a pod with sufficiently large accumulated logs can send one tools/call request that causes large allocations and additional response copies, while the request-frequency limiter does not constrain per-request volume. This can exhaust process memory, terminate the MKP server, and deny the MCP service; observed testing showed more than one GiB of RSS growth while handling a 128 MiB requested stream. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-50125- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
7.5
MKP: Unbounded Pod Log Read via Attacker-Controlled `limitBytes`/`tailLines` Causes Memory Exhaustion
Unbounded Pod Log Read via Attacker-Controlled limitBytes/tailLines Causes Memory Exhaustion
Summary
The MKP (Model Context Protocol for Kubernetes) server exposes a get_resource MCP tool that proxies Kubernetes pod log requests. User-supplied limitBytes and tailLines parameters are parsed as unbounded int64 values and forwarded directly to the Kubernetes API. The server then reads the entire returned log stream into an in-memory bytes.Buffer using io.Copy without any application-side size cap. A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit this to exhaust the MKP server's memory by sending a single crafted tools/call request, leading to process termination (OOM kill) and denial of service. Dynamic reproduction confirmed the MKP process RSS grew from 25.8 MB to 1,179.3 MB (+1,153.4 MB) while handling one request with limitBytes=134217728.
Details
The vulnerability exists in pkg/k8s/subresource.go in the buildPodLogOpts() and defaultGetPodLogs() functions.
Source — unbounded parameter parsing (pkg/k8s/subresource.go:171–181):
// pkg/k8s/subresource.go
defaultLimitBytes := int64(32 * 1024) // 32 KB — only used when parameters map is nil
...
if limitBytes, ok := parameters["limitBytes"]; ok {
if b, err := strconv.ParseInt(limitBytes, 10, 64); err == nil {
podLogOpts.LimitBytes = &b // no upper-bound check
}
}
if tailLines, ok := parameters["tailLines"]; ok {
if lines, err := strconv.ParseInt(tailLines, 10, 64); err == nil {
podLogOpts.TailLines = &lines // no upper-bound check
}
}
When the parameters map is non-nil (always true for attacker-supplied input), buildPodLogOpts() is called at pkg/k8s/subresource.go:94–96 and overwrites the 32 KB default entirely. The attacker can therefore supply any positive int64 value (up to 2147483647 or 9223372036854775807) as limitBytes.
Sink — unbounded in-memory copy (pkg/k8s/subresource.go:114–115):
buf := new(bytes.Buffer)
_, err = io.Copy(buf, podLogs) // entire Kubernetes stream copied into RAM
The stream from Kubernetes is read without limit into a heap-allocated bytes.Buffer. Subsequent JSON serialisation and MCP response wrapping create additional copies, meaning the actual RSS increase is a multiple of the raw log size (observed: ~9×).
Attack path (source → sink):
| Step | Location | Description |
|------|----------|-------------|
| 1 | cmd/server/main.go:30 | Server binds to :8080 on all interfaces; no authentication by default |
| 2 | pkg/mcp/server.go:131 | NewGetResourceTool() registered unconditionally (no --read-write required) |
| 3 | pkg/mcp/get_resource.go:28–38 | Attacker-controlled parameters map parsed from CallToolRequest |
| 4 | pkg/mcp/get_resource.go:76 | client.GetResource(..., parameters) called |
| 5 | pkg/k8s/subresource.go:32–33 | resource=pods + subresource=logs routes into getPodLogs |
| 6 | pkg/k8s/subresource.go:171–181 | limitBytes / tailLines parsed without upper bound (source) |
| 7 | pkg/k8s/subresource.go:114–115 | io.Copy(buf, podLogs) loads full stream into bytes.Buffer (sink) |
The rate limiter (pkg/ratelimit/config.go:16–17) caps only request frequency (120 req/min) and places no limit on per-request data volume, providing no meaningful mitigation.
Suggested remediation:
+const (
+ maxPodLogTailLines int64 = 1000
+ maxPodLogLimitBytes int64 = 1024 * 1024 // 1 MB hard cap
+)
+
buf := new(bytes.Buffer)
-_, err = io.Copy(buf, podLogs)
+limitedLogs := &io.LimitedReader{R: podLogs, N: maxPodLogLimitBytes + 1}
+_, err = io.Copy(buf, limitedLogs)
+if limitedLogs.N == 0 {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("pod logs exceed maximum size of %d bytes", maxPodLogLimitBytes)
+}
if limitBytes, ok := parameters["limitBytes"]; ok {
if b, err := strconv.ParseInt(limitBytes, 10, 64); err == nil {
+ if b <= 0 || b > maxPodLogLimitBytes {
+ …
- Record
GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-5978 No score
MKP: Unbounded Pod Log Read via Attacker-Controlled `limitBytes`/`tailLines` Causes Memory Exhaustion in github.com/StacklokLabs/mkp
MKP: Unbounded Pod Log Read via Attacker-Controlled limitBytes/tailLines Causes Memory Exhaustion in github.com/StacklokLabs/mkp
- Record
GO-2026-5978- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1 No score
Security update for govulncheck-vulndb
This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:
- Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).
Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:
- GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
- GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
- GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
- GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
- GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
- GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
- GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
- GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
- GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
- GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
- GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
- GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
- GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
- GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
- GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
- GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
- GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
- GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
- GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
- GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
- GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
- GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
- GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
- GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
- GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
- GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
- GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
- GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
- GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
- GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
- GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
- GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
- GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
- GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
- GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
- GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
- GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
- GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
- GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
- GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
- GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
- GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
- GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
- GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
- GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
- GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
- GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
- GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
- GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
- GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
- GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
- GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
- GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
- GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
- GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
- GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
- GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
- GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
- GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
- GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
- GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
- GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
- GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
- GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
- GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
- GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
- GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
- GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
- GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
- GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
- GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
- GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
- GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
- GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
- GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
- GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
- GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
github.com/StacklokLabs/mkpGo |
before 0.4.1 | 0.4.1 |
govulncheck-vulndbopenSUSE:Leap 16.0 From an advisory covering 1734 CVEs |
before 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1 | 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-50125 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.5) in Stackloklabs Mkp, published July 14, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.49%, the 42nd percentile. Fixed in github.com/StacklokLabs/mkp 0.4.1.
References
github.com/StacklokLabs/mkp/security/advisories/GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
github.com/StacklokLabs/mkp/commit/37bf6bac862aa3b1c71b8aa1b8364eae7818962d
github.com/advisories/GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/50xxx/CVE-2026-50125.json
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-50125
github.com/StacklokLabs/mkp
Show 194 moreShow less
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11063
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11066
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11067
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11068
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11069
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11070
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11071
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11072
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11073
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11074
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11075
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11076
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11077
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11078
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11079
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11080
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11081
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11082
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11083
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11084
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18871
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18872
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18873
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18874
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18875
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18876
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18877
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18878
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18879
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18883
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18884
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18885
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18886
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18887
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18888
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18889
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18890
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18891
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18892
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18893
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18894
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18895
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18896
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18897
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18898
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18900
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18901
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18902
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18903
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18904
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18905
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18906
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18907
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18908
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18909
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18911
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18912
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18915
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18916
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18917
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18918
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-21258
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-8400
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25320
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-45786
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-26154
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-32199
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-34620
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43630
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43631
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43632
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43633
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43634
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43635
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43636
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43637
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-47108
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12886
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-21635
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-25621
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-41260
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-41265
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-44905
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-52284
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-53412
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58259
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58260
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58267
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58269
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-6717
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0426
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10543
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10545
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10630
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10678
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10954
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11374
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11375
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11393
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11579
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11621
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11776
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11777
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11794
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12044
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12419
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12421
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12559
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12689
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12756
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13281
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13324
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13352
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13353
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13357
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13425
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13523
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13767
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13821
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13888
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14273
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14350
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14435
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14443
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14525
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14573
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14764
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14822
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14986
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14987
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15107
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15558
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-21613
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22873
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23266
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23267
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-26625
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-27093
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-2786
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-2842
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-2843
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-31133
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-34410
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-34429
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-34430
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41115
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41117
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41118
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41410
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41436
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41443
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-44001
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-44004
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-44005
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47906
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47910
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47911
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47912
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47913
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47914
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-48731
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-49221
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4953
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-50180
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-50946
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-51667
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-5187
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52490
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52565
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52881
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52894
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52931
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53514
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53857
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53884
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53910
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54123
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54286
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54287
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54288
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54289
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54290
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54291
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54293
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54376
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54410
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54458
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54463
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54467
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54468
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54469
Left out here: 1,540 references and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.