Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-50553

Note Mark: Path traversal via unsanitized book/note slug in migrate export (sibling of GHSA-g49p)

8.6 HighFix available

Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. Prior to version 0.19.5, Note Mark validates book and note slug values with the OpenAPI/huma tag pattern:"[a-z0-9-]+". huma compiles this with regexp.MustCompile(s.Pattern) and tests it with patternRe.MatchString(str), an UNANCHORED match. Because the pattern is not anchored (^...$), any string that merely CONTAINS one [a-z0-9-] substring passes validation. A slug such as ../../../../../../tmp/escape is accepted and stored verbatim. The data-export CLI commands (note-mark migrate export and note-mark migrate export-v1) join these unsanitized slugs straight into the output path with path.Join / filepath.Join, then os.MkdirAll the directory and os.Create the note file. path.Join resolves the ../ segments, so the note content file is written OUTSIDE the configured export directory. The export process commonly runs as root (default in Docker / bare-metal admin usage), so this is a root-privilege arbitrary directory create + file write. This issue has been patched in version 0.19.5.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
Passive

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

0.46%Up 0.4 points since Jun 12, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.6

Note Mark: Path traversal via unsanitized book/note slug in migrate export (sibling of GHSA-g49p)

Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. Prior to version 0.19.5, Note Mark validates book and note slug values with the OpenAPI/huma tag pattern:"[a-z0-9-]+". huma compiles this with regexp.MustCompile(s.Pattern) and tests it with patternRe.MatchString(str), an UNANCHORED match. Because the pattern is not anchored (^...$), any string that merely CONTAINS one [a-z0-9-] substring passes validation. A slug such as ../../../../../../tmp/escape is accepted and stored verbatim. The data-export CLI commands (note-mark migrate export and note-mark migrate export-v1) join these unsanitized slugs straight into the output path with path.Join / filepath.Join, then os.MkdirAll the directory and os.Create the note file. path.Join resolves the ../ segments, so the note content file is written OUTSIDE the configured export directory. The export process commonly runs as root (default in Docker / bare-metal admin usage), so this is a root-privilege arbitrary directory create + file write. This issue has been patched in version 0.19.5.

Record
CVE-2026-50553
CVSS 4.0
8.6 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-20, CWE-22
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-71618 8.6

Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. Prior to version 0.19.5, Note Mark validates book and note slug values with the OpenAPI/huma tag pattern:"[a-z0-9-]+". huma compiles this with regexp.MustCompile(s.Pattern) and tests it with patternRe.MatchString(str), an UNANCHORED match. Because the pattern is not anchored (^...$), any string that merely CONTAINS one [a-z0-9-] substring passes validation. A slug such as ../../../../../../tmp/escape is accepted and stored verbatim. The data-export CLI commands (note-mark migrate export and note-mark migrate export-v1) join these unsanitized slugs straight into the output path with path.Join / filepath.Join, then os.MkdirAll the directory and os.Create the note file. path.Join resolves the ../ segments, so the note content file is written OUTSIDE the configured export directory. The export process commonly runs as root (default in Docker / bare-metal admin usage), so this is a root-privilege arbitrary directory create + file write. This issue has been patched in version 0.19.5.

Record
EUVD-2026-71618
CVSS 4.0
8.6 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh 8.6

Note Mark: Path traversal via unsanitized book/note slug in migrate export (sibling of GHSA-g49p)

Summary

Note Mark validates book and note slug values with the OpenAPI/huma tag pattern:"[a-z0-9-]+". huma compiles this with regexp.MustCompile(s.Pattern) and tests it with patternRe.MatchString(str), an UNANCHORED match. Because the pattern is not anchored (^...$), any string that merely CONTAINS one [a-z0-9-] substring passes validation. A slug such as ../../../../../../tmp/escape is accepted and stored verbatim.

The data-export CLI commands (note-mark migrate export and note-mark migrate export-v1) join these unsanitized slugs straight into the output path with path.Join / filepath.Join, then os.MkdirAll the directory and os.Create the note file. path.Join resolves the ../ segments, so the note content file is written OUTSIDE the configured export directory. The export process commonly runs as root (default in Docker / bare-metal admin usage), so this is a root-privilege arbitrary directory create + file write.

This is the unguarded sibling of GHSA-g49p-4qxj-88v3 (CVE class CWE-22 in the same export sinks). That fix added filepath.Base(asset.Name) to sanitize the asset filename, but the adjacent path components book.Slug and note.Slug — used in the very same path.Join calls in the same two export functions — were left raw, and their input-side pattern guard is bypassable as shown above.

Vulnerable code

Slug input validation (backend/db/types.go, v0.19.4):

type CreateBook struct {
	Name     string `json:"name" required:"true" minLength:"1" maxLength:"80"`
	Slug     string `json:"slug" required:"true" minLength:"1" maxLength:"80" pattern:"[a-z0-9-]+"`
	IsPublic bool   `json:"isPublic,omitempty" default:"false"`
}

type CreateNote struct {
	Name string `json:"name" required:"true" minLength:"1" maxLength:"80"`
	Slug string `json:"slug" required:"true" minLength:"1" maxLength:"80" pattern:"[a-z0-9-]+"`
}

huma applies the pattern UNANCHORED (github.com/danielgtaylor/huma/[email protected]):

// schema.go
if s.Pattern != "" {
	s.patternRe = regexp.MustCompile(s.Pattern)

// validate.go
if s.patternRe != nil {
	if !s.patternRe.MatchString(str) {
		res.Add(path, v, s.msgPattern)

regexp.MatchString("[a-z0-9-]+", "../../../../tmp/escape") is true (it matches the tmp substring), so the traversal slug passes and BooksService.CreateBook / NotesService store it verbatim.

Export sinks (backend/cli/migrate.go, v0.19.4). The asset filename was sanitized by the GHSA-g49p fix; the sibling slug path components were not:

// commandMigrateExportDataV1 / commandMigrateExportData
for _, book := range user.Books {
	bookDir := path.Join(exportDir, user.Username, book.Slug)   // book.Slug raw
	for _, note := range book.Notes {
		noteDir := path.Join(bookDir, note.Slug)                // note.Slug raw
		if err := os.MkdirAll(noteDir, os.ModePerm); err != nil {
			return err
		}
		f, err := os.Create(path.Join(noteDir, "_index.md"))    // escapes exportDir

// the same functions DO sanitize the sibling asset name:
assetFileName := filepath.Base(asset.Name)
if assetFileName == "/" || assetFileName == "." {
	log.Printf("disallowed asset filename found '%s', skipping\n", asset.Name)
	continue
}
f, err := os.Create(path.Join(assetsDir, asset.ID.String()+"."+assetFileName))

Impact

A low-privilege authenticated user (any registered account that can create a book/note) sets a traversing slug. When an administrator later runs note-mark migrate export or export-v1 (a routine backup/migration operation, commonly as root in Docker), the exporter creates attacker-chosen directories and writes the note's _index.md to an arbitrary filesystem location outside the export directory. With root, this allows writing to /etc/cron.d/, systemd unit directories, or other startup paths, escalating to code execution as root. Same trust boundary and severity class as GHSA-g49p-4qxj-88v3.

Attack scenario

  1. Attacker registers / uses any…
Record
GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
CVSS 4.0
8.6 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-20, CWE-22
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.6

Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. Prior to version 0.19.5, Note Mark validates book and note slug values with the OpenAPI/huma tag pattern:"[a-z0-9-]+". huma compiles this with regexp.MustCompile(s.Pattern) and tests it with patternRe.MatchString(str), an UNANCHORED match. Because the pattern is not anchored (^...$), any string that merely CONTAINS one [a-z0-9-] substring passes validation. A slug such as ../../../../../../tmp/escape is accepted and stored verbatim. The data-export CLI commands (note-mark migrate export and note-mark migrate export-v1) join these unsanitized slugs straight into the output path with path.Join / filepath.Join, then os.MkdirAll the directory and os.Create the note file. path.Join resolves the ../ segments, so the note content file is written OUTSIDE the configured export directory. The export process commonly runs as root (default in Docker / bare-metal admin usage), so this is a root-privilege arbitrary directory create + file write. This issue has been patched in version 0.19.5.

Record
CVE-2026-50553
CVSS 4.0
8.6 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Weakness
CWE-20, CWE-22
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 8.6

Note Mark: Path traversal via unsanitized book/note slug in migrate export (sibling of GHSA-g49p)

Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. Prior to version 0.19.5, Note Mark validates book and note slug values with the OpenAPI/huma tag pattern:"[a-z0-9-]+". huma compiles this with regexp.MustCompile(s.Pattern) and tests it with patternRe.MatchString(str), an UNANCHORED match. Because the pattern is not anchored (^...$), any string that merely CONTAINS one [a-z0-9-] substring passes validation. A slug such as ../../../../../../tmp/escape is accepted and stored verbatim. The data-export CLI commands (note-mark migrate export and note-mark migrate export-v1) join these unsanitized slugs straight into the output path with path.Join / filepath.Join, then os.MkdirAll the directory and os.Create the note file. path.Join resolves the ../ segments, so the note content file is written OUTSIDE the configured export directory. The export process commonly runs as root (default in Docker / bare-metal admin usage), so this is a root-privilege arbitrary directory create + file write. This issue has been patched in version 0.19.5.

Record
CVE-2026-50553
CVSS 4.0
8.6 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-20, CWE-22
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh 8.6

Note Mark: Path traversal via unsanitized book/note slug in migrate export (sibling of GHSA-g49p)

Summary

Note Mark validates book and note slug values with the OpenAPI/huma tag pattern:"[a-z0-9-]+". huma compiles this with regexp.MustCompile(s.Pattern) and tests it with patternRe.MatchString(str), an UNANCHORED match. Because the pattern is not anchored (^...$), any string that merely CONTAINS one [a-z0-9-] substring passes validation. A slug such as ../../../../../../tmp/escape is accepted and stored verbatim.

The data-export CLI commands (note-mark migrate export and note-mark migrate export-v1) join these unsanitized slugs straight into the output path with path.Join / filepath.Join, then os.MkdirAll the directory and os.Create the note file. path.Join resolves the ../ segments, so the note content file is written OUTSIDE the configured export directory. The export process commonly runs as root (default in Docker / bare-metal admin usage), so this is a root-privilege arbitrary directory create + file write.

This is the unguarded sibling of GHSA-g49p-4qxj-88v3 (CVE class CWE-22 in the same export sinks). That fix added filepath.Base(asset.Name) to sanitize the asset filename, but the adjacent path components book.Slug and note.Slug — used in the very same path.Join calls in the same two export functions — were left raw, and their input-side pattern guard is bypassable as shown above.

Vulnerable code

Slug input validation (backend/db/types.go, v0.19.4):

type CreateBook struct {
	Name     string `json:"name" required:"true" minLength:"1" maxLength:"80"`
	Slug     string `json:"slug" required:"true" minLength:"1" maxLength:"80" pattern:"[a-z0-9-]+"`
	IsPublic bool   `json:"isPublic,omitempty" default:"false"`
}

type CreateNote struct {
	Name string `json:"name" required:"true" minLength:"1" maxLength:"80"`
	Slug string `json:"slug" required:"true" minLength:"1" maxLength:"80" pattern:"[a-z0-9-]+"`
}

huma applies the pattern UNANCHORED (github.com/danielgtaylor/huma/[email protected]):

// schema.go
if s.Pattern != "" {
	s.patternRe = regexp.MustCompile(s.Pattern)

// validate.go
if s.patternRe != nil {
	if !s.patternRe.MatchString(str) {
		res.Add(path, v, s.msgPattern)

regexp.MatchString("[a-z0-9-]+", "../../../../tmp/escape") is true (it matches the tmp substring), so the traversal slug passes and BooksService.CreateBook / NotesService store it verbatim.

Export sinks (backend/cli/migrate.go, v0.19.4). The asset filename was sanitized by the GHSA-g49p fix; the sibling slug path components were not:

// commandMigrateExportDataV1 / commandMigrateExportData
for _, book := range user.Books {
	bookDir := path.Join(exportDir, user.Username, book.Slug)   // book.Slug raw
	for _, note := range book.Notes {
		noteDir := path.Join(bookDir, note.Slug)                // note.Slug raw
		if err := os.MkdirAll(noteDir, os.ModePerm); err != nil {
			return err
		}
		f, err := os.Create(path.Join(noteDir, "_index.md"))    // escapes exportDir

// the same functions DO sanitize the sibling asset name:
assetFileName := filepath.Base(asset.Name)
if assetFileName == "/" || assetFileName == "." {
	log.Printf("disallowed asset filename found '%s', skipping\n", asset.Name)
	continue
}
f, err := os.Create(path.Join(assetsDir, asset.ID.String()+"."+assetFileName))

Impact

A low-privilege authenticated user (any registered account that can create a book/note) sets a traversing slug. When an administrator later runs note-mark migrate export or export-v1 (a routine backup/migration operation, commonly as root in Docker), the exporter creates attacker-chosen directories and writes the note's _index.md to an arbitrary filesystem location outside the export directory. With root, this allows writing to /etc/cron.d/, systemd unit directories, or other startup paths, escalating to code execution as root. Same trust boundary and severity class as GHSA-g49p-4qxj-88v3.

Attack scenario

  1. Attacker registers / uses any…
Record
GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
CVSS 4.0
8.6 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-20, CWE-22
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-5949 No score

Note Mark: Path traversal via unsanitized book/note slug in migrate export (sibling of GHSA-g49p) in github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend

Note Mark: Path traversal via unsanitized book/note slug in migrate export (sibling of GHSA-g49p) in github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend

Record
GO-2026-5949
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
  • GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
  • GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
  • GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
  • GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
  • GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
  • GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
  • GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
  • GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
  • GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
  • GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
  • GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
  • GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
  • GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
  • GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
  • GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
  • GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
  • GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
  • GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
  • GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
  • GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
  • GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
  • GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
  • GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
  • GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
  • GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
  • GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
  • GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
  • GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
  • GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
  • GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
  • GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
  • GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
  • GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
  • GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
  • GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
  • GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
  • GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
  • GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
  • GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
  • GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
  • GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
  • GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
  • GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
  • GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
  • GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
  • GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
  • GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
  • GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
  • GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
  • GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
  • GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
  • GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
  • GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
  • GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
  • GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
  • GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
  • GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
  • GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
  • GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
  • GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
  • GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
  • GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
  • GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
  • GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
  • GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
  • GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
  • GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
  • GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
  • GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
  • GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
  • GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
  • GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
  • GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
  • GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
  • GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
  • GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend
Go
 before 0.0.0-20260601210719-67b7de04308a
0.0.0-20260601210719-67b7de04308a
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 1734 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1
0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-50553 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.6) in Enchant97 Note-mark, published July 9, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.46%, the 39th percentile. Fixed in github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend 0.0.0-20260601210719-67b7de04308a.

References

Show 194 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 1,541 references and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

Pages All vulnerabilities Browse Docs Sources Guide Get API key
MoveEnter Open