CVE-2026-52837
Easy!Appointments has unauthenticated customer PII disclosure on booking reschedule page
Easy!Appointments is a self hosted appointment scheduler. In versions up to and including 1.5.2, the booking reschedule view at /index.php/booking/reschedule/{appointment_hash} (handled by Booking::index()) embeds the entire customer record as inline JavaScript (const vars = {... "customer_data": {...}, ...}) without authentication and without field whitelisting. Anyone in possession of the 12-character appointment_hash — which appears in plain text in reschedule emails, confirmation page URLs, and operator-side calendar links — can read every column of that customer's row in the ea_users table. Version 1.6.0 contains a patch.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
6.9
Easy!Appointments has unauthenticated customer PII disclosure on booking reschedule page
Easy!Appointments is a self hosted appointment scheduler. In versions up to and including 1.5.2, the booking reschedule view at /index.php/booking/reschedule/{appointment_hash} (handled by Booking::index()) embeds the entire customer record as inline JavaScript (const vars = {... "customer_data": {...}, ...}) without authentication and without field whitelisting. Anyone in possession of the 12-character appointment_hash — which appears in plain text in reschedule emails, confirmation page URLs, and operator-side calendar links — can read every column of that customer's row in the ea_users table. Version 1.6.0 contains a patch.
- Record
CVE-2026-52837- CVSS 4.0
- 6.9 Medium
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-200, CWE-639
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-43692
6.9
Easy!Appointments is a self hosted appointment scheduler. In versions up to and including 1.5.2, the booking reschedule view at /index.php/booking/reschedule/{appointment_hash} (handled by Booking::index()) embeds the entire customer record as inline JavaScript (const vars = {... "customer_data": {...}, ...}) without authentication and without field whitelisting. Anyone in possession of the 12-character appointment_hash — which appears in plain text in reschedule emails, confirmation page URLs, and operator-side calendar links — can read every column of that customer's row in the ea_users table. Version 1.6.0 contains a patch.
- Record
EUVD-2026-43692- CVSS 4.0
- 6.9 Medium
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-xgr6-pqjv-3pf8
6.9
Easy!Appointments has unauthenticated customer PII disclosure on booking reschedule page
Summary
The booking reschedule view at /index.php/booking/reschedule/{appointment_hash} (handled by Booking::index()) embeds the entire customer record as inline JavaScript (const vars = {... "customer_data": {...}, ...}) without authentication and without field whitelisting. Anyone in possession of the 12-character appointment_hash — which appears in plain text in reschedule emails, confirmation page URLs, and operator-side calendar links — can read every column of that customer's row in the ea_users table.
Verified against v1.5.2 with a Docker reproduction; a single anonymous GET to the reschedule URL returns 13 customer fields including email, phone, full address, custom fields, timezone, language, LDAP DN, and id_roles.
Details
Root cause
application/controllers/Booking.php at line 184 reads the hash from the request, fetches the appointment, then loads the customer with Customers_model::find() — which returns the full row, no projection. It then passes the full record into script_vars(), which inlines it into the response HTML as a JavaScript constant. The reschedule UI itself uses only first_name and last_name; everything else is exposed for no functional reason.
// application/controllers/Booking.php (v1.5.2)
$appointment_hash = html_vars('appointment_hash'); // line 184
if (!empty($appointment_hash)) {
$manage_mode = true;
$results = $this->appointments_model->get(['hash' => $appointment_hash]);
// ...
$appointment = $results[0];
$provider = $this->providers_model->find($appointment['id_users_provider']);
$customer = $this->customers_model->find($appointment['id_users_customer']); // ← full row, no projection
$customer_token = md5(uniqid(mt_rand(), true));
$this->cache->save('customer-token-' . $customer_token, $customer['id'], 600);
}
script_vars([
// ...
'customer_data' => $customer, // ← all PII inlined in HTML
'customer_token' => $customer_token,
]);
The URL pattern is in the CSRF exemption list (application/config/config.php, csrf_exclude_uris covers booking/.*) and no authentication middleware applies, by design — that's the intended customer-facing reschedule flow. The bug is the over-disclosure, not the lack of auth.
Source-to-Sink
- Source: HTTP GET to
/index.php/booking/reschedule/{appointment_hash}— unauthenticated; hash read viahtml_vars('appointment_hash')(Booking.php:184). - Intermediate:
appointments_model->get(['hash' => $hash])→ row fetched;customers_model->find($appointment['id_users_customer'])returns the full customers row. - Sink:
script_vars(['customer_data' => $customer, ...])(Booking.php:254-270) emits inlineconst vars = {..., "customer_data": {...}, ...}JavaScript in the response HTML.
Fields disclosed
Confirmed in PoC output (canary values used as markers):
customer_data: {
"id": 4,
"first_name": "Victim",
"last_name": "Tester",
"email": "[email protected]",
"phone_number": "+1-555-0100",
"address": "100 Privacy Lane",
"city": "Sensitiveville",
"zip_code": "00001",
"timezone": "UTC",
"language": "english",
"custom_field_1": "CFLD1-CANARY",
"is_private": "0",
"ldap_dn": null,
"id_roles": 3
}
Fields that would also leak when populated: mobile_number, state, notes (free-form, operators often store sensitive context here), custom_field_2–custom_field_5, ldap_dn.
Proof of Concept
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# poc_001_easyapp_pii_disclosure.py — exploit mode (extract from attached PoC)
import argparse, json, re, sys, requests
PII_FIELDS = ["email","phone_number","mobile_number","address","city","state",
"zip_code","notes","custom_field_1","custom_field_2","custom_field_3",
"custom_field_4","custom_field_5","ldap_dn"]
def exploit(target, hash_):
url =…
- Record
GHSA-xgr6-pqjv-3pf8- CVSS 4.0
- 6.9 Medium
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-200, CWE-639
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
6.9
Easy!Appointments is a self hosted appointment scheduler. In versions up to and including 1.5.2, the booking reschedule view at /index.php/booking/reschedule/{appointment_hash} (handled by Booking::index()) embeds the entire customer record as inline JavaScript (const vars = {... "customer_data": {...}, ...}) without authentication and without field whitelisting. Anyone in possession of the 12-character appointment_hash — which appears in plain text in reschedule emails, confirmation page URLs, and operator-side calendar links — can read every column of that customer's row in the ea_users table. Version 1.6.0 contains a patch.
- Record
CVE-2026-52837- CVSS 4.0
- 6.9 Medium
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - Weakness
- CWE-200, CWE-639
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
6.9
Easy!Appointments has unauthenticated customer PII disclosure on booking reschedule page
Easy!Appointments is a self hosted appointment scheduler. In versions up to and including 1.5.2, the booking reschedule view at /index.php/booking/reschedule/{appointment_hash} (handled by Booking::index()) embeds the entire customer record as inline JavaScript (const vars = {... "customer_data": {...}, ...}) without authentication and without field whitelisting. Anyone in possession of the 12-character appointment_hash — which appears in plain text in reschedule emails, confirmation page URLs, and operator-side calendar links — can read every column of that customer's row in the ea_users table. Version 1.6.0 contains a patch.
- Record
CVE-2026-52837- CVSS 4.0
- 6.9 Medium
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-200, CWE-639
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-xgr6-pqjv-3pf8
6.9
Easy!Appointments has unauthenticated customer PII disclosure on booking reschedule page
Summary
The booking reschedule view at /index.php/booking/reschedule/{appointment_hash} (handled by Booking::index()) embeds the entire customer record as inline JavaScript (const vars = {... "customer_data": {...}, ...}) without authentication and without field whitelisting. Anyone in possession of the 12-character appointment_hash — which appears in plain text in reschedule emails, confirmation page URLs, and operator-side calendar links — can read every column of that customer's row in the ea_users table.
Verified against v1.5.2 with a Docker reproduction; a single anonymous GET to the reschedule URL returns 13 customer fields including email, phone, full address, custom fields, timezone, language, LDAP DN, and id_roles.
Details
Root cause
application/controllers/Booking.php at line 184 reads the hash from the request, fetches the appointment, then loads the customer with Customers_model::find() — which returns the full row, no projection. It then passes the full record into script_vars(), which inlines it into the response HTML as a JavaScript constant. The reschedule UI itself uses only first_name and last_name; everything else is exposed for no functional reason.
// application/controllers/Booking.php (v1.5.2)
$appointment_hash = html_vars('appointment_hash'); // line 184
if (!empty($appointment_hash)) {
$manage_mode = true;
$results = $this->appointments_model->get(['hash' => $appointment_hash]);
// ...
$appointment = $results[0];
$provider = $this->providers_model->find($appointment['id_users_provider']);
$customer = $this->customers_model->find($appointment['id_users_customer']); // ← full row, no projection
$customer_token = md5(uniqid(mt_rand(), true));
$this->cache->save('customer-token-' . $customer_token, $customer['id'], 600);
}
script_vars([
// ...
'customer_data' => $customer, // ← all PII inlined in HTML
'customer_token' => $customer_token,
]);
The URL pattern is in the CSRF exemption list (application/config/config.php, csrf_exclude_uris covers booking/.*) and no authentication middleware applies, by design — that's the intended customer-facing reschedule flow. The bug is the over-disclosure, not the lack of auth.
Source-to-Sink
- Source: HTTP GET to
/index.php/booking/reschedule/{appointment_hash}— unauthenticated; hash read viahtml_vars('appointment_hash')(Booking.php:184). - Intermediate:
appointments_model->get(['hash' => $hash])→ row fetched;customers_model->find($appointment['id_users_customer'])returns the full customers row. - Sink:
script_vars(['customer_data' => $customer, ...])(Booking.php:254-270) emits inlineconst vars = {..., "customer_data": {...}, ...}JavaScript in the response HTML.
Fields disclosed
Confirmed in PoC output (canary values used as markers):
customer_data: {
"id": 4,
"first_name": "Victim",
"last_name": "Tester",
"email": "[email protected]",
"phone_number": "+1-555-0100",
"address": "100 Privacy Lane",
"city": "Sensitiveville",
"zip_code": "00001",
"timezone": "UTC",
"language": "english",
"custom_field_1": "CFLD1-CANARY",
"is_private": "0",
"ldap_dn": null,
"id_roles": 3
}
Fields that would also leak when populated: mobile_number, state, notes (free-form, operators often store sensitive context here), custom_field_2–custom_field_5, ldap_dn.
Proof of Concept
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# poc_001_easyapp_pii_disclosure.py — exploit mode (extract from attached PoC)
import argparse, json, re, sys, requests
PII_FIELDS = ["email","phone_number","mobile_number","address","city","state",
"zip_code","notes","custom_field_1","custom_field_2","custom_field_3",
"custom_field_4","custom_field_5","ldap_dn"]
def exploit(target, hash_):
url =…
- Record
GHSA-xgr6-pqjv-3pf8- CVSS 4.0
- 6.9 Medium
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-200, CWE-639
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
alextselegidis/easyappointmentsPackagist |
through 1.5.2 | None known |
alextselegidis/easyappointmentsPackagist |
through 1.5.2, plus listed versions 1.1.01.1.0-beta.11.1.0-beta.21.1.11.2.0 Show 18 moreShow less1.2.0-alpha.11.2.0-beta.11.2.11.3.01.3.0-alpha.11.3.0-beta.11.3.0-beta.21.3.11.3.1-beta.11.3.21.3.2-beta.11.4.01.4.0-beta.11.4.11.4.21.4.2-beta.11.4.31.4.3-beta.1 |
None known |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-52837 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 6.9) in Alextselegidis Easyappointments, published July 14, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.46%, the 40th percentile. No source names a fixed version.
References
github.com/alextselegidis/easyappointments/security/advisories/GHSA-xgr6-pqjv-3pf8
github.com/alextselegidis/easyappointments/commit/40bb0b31b531540bc9006efce4220eb0a437ed2b
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52837
github.com/alextselegidis/easyappointments/releases/tag/1.6.0
github.com/advisories/GHSA-xgr6-pqjv-3pf8
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/52xxx/CVE-2026-52837.json
github.com/alextselegidis/easyappointments
Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.