CVE-2026-53712

SCRAM (Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism) is part of the family of Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL, RFC 4422) authentication mechanisms. Prior to 3.3, a flaw in com.ongres.scram:scram-client and com.ongres.scram:scram-common allows an attacker capable of a TLS man-in-the-middle attack to silently downgrade a connection from SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS with channel binding to standard SCRAM-SHA-256 without channel binding when TlsServerEndpoint processes an X.509 certificate using a modern signature algorithm such as Ed25519; getChannelBindingData() can return an empty byte array after NoSuchAlgorithmException, and the ScramClient builder treats that as absent channel-binding data. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.

SCRAM (Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism) is part of the family of Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL, RFC 4422) authentication mechanisms. Prior to 3.3, a flaw in com.ongres.scram:scram-client and com.ongres.scram:scram-common allows an attacker capable of a TLS man-in-the-middle attack to silently downgrade a connection from SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS with channel binding to standard SCRAM-SHA-256 without channel binding when TlsServerEndpoint processes an X.509 certificate using a modern signature algorithm such as Ed25519; getChannelBindingData() can return an empty byte array after NoSuchAlgorithmException, and the ScramClient builder treats that as absent channel-binding data. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.

Summary

A flaw in com.ongres.scram:scram-client allows an attacker capable of performing a TLS man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack to silently downgrade a connection from SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS (with channel binding) to standard SCRAM-SHA-256 (without channel binding), bypassing strict client-side enforcement policies.

Component Breakdown

This occurs due to a two-part failure in TlsServerEndpoint when a server presents an X.509 certificate using a modern signature algorithm that lacks traditional WITH naming structures (such as Ed25519 or post-quantum algorithms):

1. The internal hash derivation method fails to parse the algorithm name, swallows the resulting NoSuchAlgorithmException, and silently returns an empty byte array via the deprecated getChannelBindingData()` API.
2. The client builder mistakenly interprets this empty byte array as an environmental absence of channel binding data rather than a cryptographic failure, falling back to non-channel-bound authentication.

Impact & Scope

This issue only impacts deployments where the downstream application layer explicitly enforces strict channel binding enforcement (e.g., channelBinding=require in pgJDBC).

Drivers operating under a "prefer" or "allow" policy (used by default) are structurally insulated from an unhandled exception since a fallback to standard SCRAM is within their expected configuration.

Remediation

Update your project configuration to pull in version 3.3 or later of the SCRAM library, which introduces strict exception propagation and explicit policy controls.

If you are interacting with the ScramClient builder API directly (e.g., writing a custom driver or database extension):

• Migrate Deprecated APIs: Stop using TlsServerEndpoint.getChannelBindingData(). Transition immediately to TlsServerEndpoint.getChannelBindingHash(), which correctly propagates NoSuchAlgorithmException up the stack.
• Adopt Explicit Policies: Leverage the newly introduced ChannelBindingPolicy API during client construction. Do not rely on implicit parameter presence to dictate your security boundaries.

ScramClient client = ScramClient.builder()
    .advertisedMechanisms(serverMechanisms)
    .username(user)
    .password(pass)
    // Explicitly enforce strict boundaries if needed.
    .channelBindingPolicy(ChannelBindingPolicy.REQUIRE) 
    .channelBinding(TlsServerEndpoint.TLS_SERVER_END_POINT, certHash)
    .build();

SCRAM (Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism) is part of the family of Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL, RFC 4422) authentication mechanisms. Prior to 3.3, a flaw in com.ongres.scram:scram-client and com.ongres.scram:scram-common allows an attacker capable of a TLS man-in-the-middle attack to silently downgrade a connection from SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS with channel binding to standard SCRAM-SHA-256 without channel binding when TlsServerEndpoint processes an X.509 certificate using a modern signature algorithm such as Ed25519; getChannelBindingData() can return an empty byte array after NoSuchAlgorithmException, and the ScramClient builder treats that as absent channel-binding data. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.

SCRAM (Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism) is part of the family of Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL, RFC 4422) authentication mechanisms. Prior to 3.3, a flaw in com.ongres.scram:scram-client and com.ongres.scram:scram-common allows an attacker capable of a TLS man-in-the-middle attack to silently downgrade a connection from SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS with channel binding to standard SCRAM-SHA-256 without channel binding when TlsServerEndpoint processes an X.509 certificate using a modern signature algorithm such as Ed25519; getChannelBindingData() can return an empty byte array after NoSuchAlgorithmException, and the ScramClient builder treats that as absent channel-binding data. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.

Summary

A flaw in com.ongres.scram:scram-client allows an attacker capable of performing a TLS man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack to silently downgrade a connection from SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS (with channel binding) to standard SCRAM-SHA-256 (without channel binding), bypassing strict client-side enforcement policies.

Component Breakdown

This occurs due to a two-part failure in TlsServerEndpoint when a server presents an X.509 certificate using a modern signature algorithm that lacks traditional WITH naming structures (such as Ed25519 or post-quantum algorithms):

1. The internal hash derivation method fails to parse the algorithm name, swallows the resulting NoSuchAlgorithmException, and silently returns an empty byte array via the deprecated getChannelBindingData()` API.
2. The client builder mistakenly interprets this empty byte array as an environmental absence of channel binding data rather than a cryptographic failure, falling back to non-channel-bound authentication.

Impact & Scope

This issue only impacts deployments where the downstream application layer explicitly enforces strict channel binding enforcement (e.g., channelBinding=require in pgJDBC).

Drivers operating under a "prefer" or "allow" policy (used by default) are structurally insulated from an unhandled exception since a fallback to standard SCRAM is within their expected configuration.

Remediation

Update your project configuration to pull in version 3.3 or later of the SCRAM library, which introduces strict exception propagation and explicit policy controls.

If you are interacting with the ScramClient builder API directly (e.g., writing a custom driver or database extension):

• Migrate Deprecated APIs: Stop using TlsServerEndpoint.getChannelBindingData(). Transition immediately to TlsServerEndpoint.getChannelBindingHash(), which correctly propagates NoSuchAlgorithmException up the stack.
• Adopt Explicit Policies: Leverage the newly introduced ChannelBindingPolicy API during client construction. Do not rely on implicit parameter presence to dictate your security boundaries.

ScramClient client = ScramClient.builder()
    .advertisedMechanisms(serverMechanisms)
    .username(user)
    .password(pass)
    // Explicitly enforce strict boundaries if needed.
    .channelBindingPolicy(ChannelBindingPolicy.REQUIRE) 
    .channelBinding(TlsServerEndpoint.TLS_SERVER_END_POINT, certHash)
    .build();