Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-54006

Open WebUI: Calendar event re-parenting allows writing events into another user's calendar

4.3 MediumFix available

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.6, POST /api/v1/calendars/events/{event_id}/update validates that the caller has write access to the calendar the event currently belongs to, but does not validate the destination calendar_id supplied in the request body. The model layer then persists the new calendar_id unconditionally. A regular user-role account can therefore create an event in their own calendar and immediately move it into any other user's calendar whose ID they know — bypassing the authorization check that create_event correctly performs. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.6.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.30%Up 0.3 points since Jun 12, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 4.3

Open WebUI: Calendar event re-parenting allows writing events into another user's calendar

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.6, POST /api/v1/calendars/events/{event_id}/update validates that the caller has write access to the calendar the event currently belongs to, but does not validate the destination calendar_id supplied in the request body. The model layer then persists the new calendar_id unconditionally. A regular user-role account can therefore create an event in their own calendar and immediately move it into any other user's calendar whose ID they know — bypassing the authorization check that create_event correctly performs. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.6.

Record
CVE-2026-54006
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-639
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-38535 4.3

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.6, POST /api/v1/calendars/events/{event_id}/update validates that the caller has write access to the calendar the event currently belongs to, but does not validate the destination calendar_id supplied in the request body. The model layer then persists the new calendar_id unconditionally. A regular user-role account can therefore create an event in their own calendar and immediately move it into any other user's calendar whose ID they know — bypassing the authorization check that create_event correctly performs. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.6.

Record
EUVD-2026-38535
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6 4.3

Open WebUI IDOR: Calendar event re-parenting allows writing events into another user's calendar

Summary

POST /api/v1/calendars/events/{event_id}/update validates that the caller has write access to the calendar the event currently belongs to, but does not validate the destination calendar_id supplied in the request body. The model layer then persists the new calendar_id unconditionally.

A regular user-role account can therefore create an event in their own calendar and immediately move it into any other user's calendar whose ID they know — bypassing the authorization check that create_event correctly performs. This is reachable on default configuration: ENABLE_CALENDAR and USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDAR both default to True.

Details

Sink — missing destination check

backend/open_webui/routers/calendar.py:283-297

@router.post('/events/{event_id}/update', response_model=CalendarEventModel)
async def update_event(
    request: Request, event_id: str, form_data: CalendarEventUpdateForm,
    user: UserModel = Depends(get_verified_user)
):
    await check_calendar_permission(request, user)
    event = await CalendarEvents.get_event_by_id(event_id)
    if not event:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail='Event not found')

    await _check_calendar_access(event.calendar_id, user, 'write')   # ← SOURCE only

    updated = await CalendarEvents.update_event_by_id(event_id, form_data)  # ← writes form_data.calendar_id
    ...

backend/open_webui/models/calendar.py:658-693 (update_event_by_id)

update_data = form_data.model_dump(exclude_unset=True)
for field in [
    'calendar_id',          # ← destination persisted with no ACL
    'title', 'description', 'start_at', 'end_at', 'all_day',
    'rrule', 'color', 'location', 'is_cancelled',
]:
    if field in update_data:
        setattr(event, field, update_data[field])

Reference — create_event does check the destination

backend/open_webui/routers/calendar.py:255

await _check_calendar_access(form_data.calendar_id, user, 'write')

Default-config gates (both True)

  • backend/open_webui/config.py:1658-1662 — ENABLE_CALENDAR defaults 'True'
  • backend/open_webui/config.py:1554 — USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDAR defaults 'True'
  • backend/open_webui/main.py:1457 — router mounted unconditionally

PoC

Verified end-to-end against the official ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main (v0.9.4) Docker image with two fresh user-role accounts.

1. Environment

git clone https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui.git
cd open-webui && docker compose up -d        # http://localhost:3000

Create the first account (admin), then via admin UI / POST /api/v1/auths/add create two user-role accounts: attacker and victim. Sign each in and capture their JWTs as $ATTACKER_TOKEN / $VICTIM_TOKEN.

2. Obtain the victim's calendar_id

Calendar IDs are UUIDv4 (models/calendar.py:316) and not enumerable. In practice an attacker obtains one via:

  • Read-only share — victim (or a group admin) grants the attacker read on a calendar; the ID is returned by GET /api/v1/calendars/.
  • Event invitation — victim adds the attacker as an attendee on any event; the event payload (CalendarEventModel, models/calendar.py:127) includes calendar_id.
  • Any side-channel (logs, screenshots, browser history).

For reproduction the maintainer can simply read it as the victim:

VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID=$(curl -s "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)[0]["id"])')

3. Control — direct create is correctly blocked

curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' \
  -X POST "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events/create" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d…
Record
GHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-639
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 4.3

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.6, POST /api/v1/calendars/events/{event_id}/update validates that the caller has write access to the calendar the event currently belongs to, but does not validate the destination calendar_id supplied in the request body. The model layer then persists the new calendar_id unconditionally. A regular user-role account can therefore create an event in their own calendar and immediately move it into any other user's calendar whose ID they know — bypassing the authorization check that create_event correctly performs. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.6.

Record
CVE-2026-54006
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-639
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 4.3

Open WebUI: Calendar event re-parenting allows writing events into another user's calendar

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.6, POST /api/v1/calendars/events/{event_id}/update validates that the caller has write access to the calendar the event currently belongs to, but does not validate the destination calendar_id supplied in the request body. The model layer then persists the new calendar_id unconditionally. A regular user-role account can therefore create an event in their own calendar and immediately move it into any other user's calendar whose ID they know — bypassing the authorization check that create_event correctly performs. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.6.

Record
CVE-2026-54006
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-639
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6 4.3

Open WebUI IDOR: Calendar event re-parenting allows writing events into another user's calendar

Summary

POST /api/v1/calendars/events/{event_id}/update validates that the caller has write access to the calendar the event currently belongs to, but does not validate the destination calendar_id supplied in the request body. The model layer then persists the new calendar_id unconditionally.

A regular user-role account can therefore create an event in their own calendar and immediately move it into any other user's calendar whose ID they know — bypassing the authorization check that create_event correctly performs. This is reachable on default configuration: ENABLE_CALENDAR and USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDAR both default to True.

Details

Sink — missing destination check

backend/open_webui/routers/calendar.py:283-297

@router.post('/events/{event_id}/update', response_model=CalendarEventModel)
async def update_event(
    request: Request, event_id: str, form_data: CalendarEventUpdateForm,
    user: UserModel = Depends(get_verified_user)
):
    await check_calendar_permission(request, user)
    event = await CalendarEvents.get_event_by_id(event_id)
    if not event:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail='Event not found')

    await _check_calendar_access(event.calendar_id, user, 'write')   # ← SOURCE only

    updated = await CalendarEvents.update_event_by_id(event_id, form_data)  # ← writes form_data.calendar_id
    ...

backend/open_webui/models/calendar.py:658-693 (update_event_by_id)

update_data = form_data.model_dump(exclude_unset=True)
for field in [
    'calendar_id',          # ← destination persisted with no ACL
    'title', 'description', 'start_at', 'end_at', 'all_day',
    'rrule', 'color', 'location', 'is_cancelled',
]:
    if field in update_data:
        setattr(event, field, update_data[field])

Reference — create_event does check the destination

backend/open_webui/routers/calendar.py:255

await _check_calendar_access(form_data.calendar_id, user, 'write')

Default-config gates (both True)

  • backend/open_webui/config.py:1658-1662 — ENABLE_CALENDAR defaults 'True'
  • backend/open_webui/config.py:1554 — USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDAR defaults 'True'
  • backend/open_webui/main.py:1457 — router mounted unconditionally

PoC

Verified end-to-end against the official ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main (v0.9.4) Docker image with two fresh user-role accounts.

1. Environment

git clone https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui.git
cd open-webui && docker compose up -d        # http://localhost:3000

Create the first account (admin), then via admin UI / POST /api/v1/auths/add create two user-role accounts: attacker and victim. Sign each in and capture their JWTs as $ATTACKER_TOKEN / $VICTIM_TOKEN.

2. Obtain the victim's calendar_id

Calendar IDs are UUIDv4 (models/calendar.py:316) and not enumerable. In practice an attacker obtains one via:

  • Read-only share — victim (or a group admin) grants the attacker read on a calendar; the ID is returned by GET /api/v1/calendars/.
  • Event invitation — victim adds the attacker as an attendee on any event; the event payload (CalendarEventModel, models/calendar.py:127) includes calendar_id.
  • Any side-channel (logs, screenshots, browser history).

For reproduction the maintainer can simply read it as the victim:

VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID=$(curl -s "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)[0]["id"])')

3. Control — direct create is correctly blocked

curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' \
  -X POST "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events/create" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d…
Record
GHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-639
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2722 4.3

Open WebUI IDOR: Calendar event re-parenting allows writing events into another user's calendar

Summary

POST /api/v1/calendars/events/{event_id}/update validates that the caller has write access to the calendar the event currently belongs to, but does not validate the destination calendar_id supplied in the request body. The model layer then persists the new calendar_id unconditionally.

A regular user-role account can therefore create an event in their own calendar and immediately move it into any other user's calendar whose ID they know — bypassing the authorization check that create_event correctly performs. This is reachable on default configuration: ENABLE_CALENDAR and USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDAR both default to True.

Details

Sink — missing destination check

backend/open_webui/routers/calendar.py:283-297

@router.post('/events/{event_id}/update', response_model=CalendarEventModel)
async def update_event(
    request: Request, event_id: str, form_data: CalendarEventUpdateForm,
    user: UserModel = Depends(get_verified_user)
):
    await check_calendar_permission(request, user)
    event = await CalendarEvents.get_event_by_id(event_id)
    if not event:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail='Event not found')

    await _check_calendar_access(event.calendar_id, user, 'write')   # ← SOURCE only

    updated = await CalendarEvents.update_event_by_id(event_id, form_data)  # ← writes form_data.calendar_id
    ...

backend/open_webui/models/calendar.py:658-693 (update_event_by_id)

update_data = form_data.model_dump(exclude_unset=True)
for field in [
    'calendar_id',          # ← destination persisted with no ACL
    'title', 'description', 'start_at', 'end_at', 'all_day',
    'rrule', 'color', 'location', 'is_cancelled',
]:
    if field in update_data:
        setattr(event, field, update_data[field])

Reference — create_event does check the destination

backend/open_webui/routers/calendar.py:255

await _check_calendar_access(form_data.calendar_id, user, 'write')

Default-config gates (both True)

  • backend/open_webui/config.py:1658-1662 — ENABLE_CALENDAR defaults 'True'
  • backend/open_webui/config.py:1554 — USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDAR defaults 'True'
  • backend/open_webui/main.py:1457 — router mounted unconditionally

PoC

Verified end-to-end against the official ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main (v0.9.4) Docker image with two fresh user-role accounts.

1. Environment

git clone https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui.git
cd open-webui && docker compose up -d        # http://localhost:3000

Create the first account (admin), then via admin UI / POST /api/v1/auths/add create two user-role accounts: attacker and victim. Sign each in and capture their JWTs as $ATTACKER_TOKEN / $VICTIM_TOKEN.

2. Obtain the victim's calendar_id

Calendar IDs are UUIDv4 (models/calendar.py:316) and not enumerable. In practice an attacker obtains one via:

  • Read-only share — victim (or a group admin) grants the attacker read on a calendar; the ID is returned by GET /api/v1/calendars/.
  • Event invitation — victim adds the attacker as an attendee on any event; the event payload (CalendarEventModel, models/calendar.py:127) includes calendar_id.
  • Any side-channel (logs, screenshots, browser history).

For reproduction the maintainer can simply read it as the victim:

VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID=$(curl -s "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)[0]["id"])')

3. Control — direct create is correctly blocked

curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' \
  -X POST "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events/create" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d…
Record
PYSEC-2026-2722
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
open-webui
PyPI
through 0.9.5
0.9.6
open-webui
PyPI
before 0.9.6, plus listed versions
0.1.1240.1.1250.2.00.2.10.2.2
Show 45 moreShow less
0.2.30.2.40.2.50.3.00.3.10.3.100.3.120.3.130.3.140.3.150.3.160.3.170.3.17.dev20.3.17.dev30.3.17.dev40.3.17.dev50.3.180.3.190.3.20.3.200.3.210.3.220.3.230.3.240.3.250.3.260.3.270.3.27.dev10.3.27.dev20.3.27.dev30.3.280.3.290.3.30.3.300.3.30.dev10.3.30.dev20.3.310.3.31.dev10.3.320.3.330.3.33.dev10.3.340.3.350.3.40.3.5
0.9.6

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-54006 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 4.3) in Openwebui Open Webui, published June 17, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.30%, the 22nd percentile. Fixed in open-webui 0.9.6.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 107 versions and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open