CVE-2026-54549
Meta Ads MCP: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in `upload_ad_image` via Unrestricted `image_url` Fetch
Meta Ads MCP is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that lets AI assistants run Meta Ads. Prior to version 1.0.115, the upload_ad_image tool in meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py passes an attacker-controlled image_url to try_multiple_download_methods() in meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py, where httpx.AsyncClient uses follow_redirects=True and performs HTTP requests without validating the scheme, host, or resolved IP address. In a streamable-http deployment, a network caller can use any non-empty authorization value because Meta credential validation occurs after the image download, then direct the server to loopback services, private-network addresses, cloud metadata endpoints, or redirect-chained internal targets. The resulting server-side request forgery can expose internal data, invoke state-changing internal services, or disrupt reachable services. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.115.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
8.3
Meta Ads MCP: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in `upload_ad_image` via Unrestricted `image_url` Fetch
Meta Ads MCP is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that lets AI assistants run Meta Ads. Prior to version 1.0.115, the upload_ad_image tool in meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py passes an attacker-controlled image_url to try_multiple_download_methods() in meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py, where httpx.AsyncClient uses follow_redirects=True and performs HTTP requests without validating the scheme, host, or resolved IP address. In a streamable-http deployment, a network caller can use any non-empty authorization value because Meta credential validation occurs after the image download, then direct the server to loopback services, private-network addresses, cloud metadata endpoints, or redirect-chained internal targets. The resulting server-side request forgery can expose internal data, invoke state-changing internal services, or disrupt reachable services. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.115.
- Record
CVE-2026-54549- CVSS 3.1
- 8.3 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-78887
8.3
Meta Ads MCP is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that lets AI assistants run Meta Ads. Prior to version 1.0.115, the upload_ad_image tool in meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py passes an attacker-controlled image_url to try_multiple_download_methods() in meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py, where httpx.AsyncClient uses follow_redirects=True and performs HTTP requests without validating the scheme, host, or resolved IP address. In a streamable-http deployment, a network caller can use any non-empty authorization value because Meta credential validation occurs after the image download, then direct the server to loopback services, private-network addresses, cloud metadata endpoints, or redirect-chained internal targets. The resulting server-side request forgery can expose internal data, invoke state-changing internal services, or disrupt reachable services. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.115.
- Record
EUVD-2026-78887- CVSS 3.1
- 8.3 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-45gf-fjxp-cjpq
8.3
meta-ads-mcp: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in `upload_ad_image` via Unrestricted `image_url` Fetch
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in upload_ad_image via Unrestricted image_url Fetch
Summary
The upload_ad_image MCP tool in meta-ads-mcp v1.0.113 passes an attacker-controlled image_url parameter directly to an HTTP fetch helper (httpx.AsyncClient(follow_redirects=True).get(url)) without any scheme, host, or IP address validation. When the server is deployed with the streamable-http transport (a documented, officially supported mode), an unauthenticated remote attacker can supply an arbitrary URL—including http://127.0.0.1/, RFC 1918 addresses, or cloud metadata endpoints such as http://169.254.169.254/—and cause the server to issue an outbound HTTP request to that target. The Authorization middleware only verifies that a non-empty Bearer token is present; actual Meta API credential validation occurs after the image download, so any dummy Bearer token bypasses the pre-fetch check. This constitutes a full, unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery with a confirmed CVSS 3.1 Base Score of 8.3 (High).
Details
Source
meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py, line 1316–1322: The MCP tool upload_ad_image is registered with @mcp_server.tool() and exposes image_url: Optional[str] as a direct tool argument that is fully attacker-controlled over the network.
# meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py
1316: @mcp_server.tool()
1318: async def upload_ad_image(
1322: image_url: Optional[str] = None,
Propagation
meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py, line 1389: The value is forwarded to try_multiple_download_methods(image_url) without any sanitization or validation.
# meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py
1389: image_bytes = await try_multiple_download_methods(image_url)
Sinks
meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py contains three independent HTTP fetch paths, all using httpx.AsyncClient with follow_redirects=True and no URL, host, or IP validation:
# meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py
166: async with httpx.AsyncClient(follow_redirects=True, timeout=30.0) as client:
168: response = await client.get(url, headers=headers)
214: async with httpx.AsyncClient(follow_redirects=True) as client:
215: response = await client.get(url, headers=headers, timeout=30.0)
224: async with httpx.AsyncClient(follow_redirects=True) as client:
228: response = await client.get(url, timeout=30.0)
Authorization bypass
meta_ads_mcp/core/http_auth_integration.py, lines 78–82: The middleware extracts any non-empty Bearer token value and places it into request context without validating it against Meta's API. The actual Meta OAuth token check (in meta_ads_mcp/core/api.py:415) occurs only after the image download completes, meaning the SSRF sink fires before any meaningful credential verification.
Absence of sanitization
A search for urlparse, urlsplit, ipaddress, localhost, 127.0.0.1, 169.254, private, allowlist, blocklist, or is_global in meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py and meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py returns no matches. No URL, scheme, hostname, or IP validation is present anywhere in the fetch path.
Transport exposure
meta_ads_mcp/core/server.py, line 219: The --transport streamable-http mode is a documented, officially supported deployment option (not a development-only stub), meaning the attack surface is reachable over the network in production deployments.
PoC
Environment setup
# Build and run the Docker image (includes vulnerable meta-ads-mcp v1.0.113 and poc.py)
docker build -f vuln-001/Dockerfile \
-t meta-ads-ssrf-poc \
reports/pypiAi_615_pipeboard-co__meta-ads-mcp/
docker run --rm meta-ads-ssrf-poc
# Exit code 0 = SSRF confirmed
Manual reproduction (two terminals)
# Terminal 1 — SSRF capture listener on port 9009
python3 - <<'PY'
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
class H(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
print("SSRF GET", self.path,…
- Record
GHSA-45gf-fjxp-cjpq- CVSS 3.1
- 8.3 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
8.3
Meta Ads MCP is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that lets AI assistants run Meta Ads. Prior to version 1.0.115, the upload_ad_image tool in meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py passes an attacker-controlled image_url to try_multiple_download_methods() in meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py, where httpx.AsyncClient uses follow_redirects=True and performs HTTP requests without validating the scheme, host, or resolved IP address. In a streamable-http deployment, a network caller can use any non-empty authorization value because Meta credential validation occurs after the image download, then direct the server to loopback services, private-network addresses, cloud metadata endpoints, or redirect-chained internal targets. The resulting server-side request forgery can expose internal data, invoke state-changing internal services, or disrupt reachable services. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.115.
- Record
CVE-2026-54549- CVSS 3.1
- 8.3 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
8.3
Meta Ads MCP: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in `upload_ad_image` via Unrestricted `image_url` Fetch
Meta Ads MCP is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that lets AI assistants run Meta Ads. Prior to version 1.0.115, the upload_ad_image tool in meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py passes an attacker-controlled image_url to try_multiple_download_methods() in meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py, where httpx.AsyncClient uses follow_redirects=True and performs HTTP requests without validating the scheme, host, or resolved IP address. In a streamable-http deployment, a network caller can use any non-empty authorization value because Meta credential validation occurs after the image download, then direct the server to loopback services, private-network addresses, cloud metadata endpoints, or redirect-chained internal targets. The resulting server-side request forgery can expose internal data, invoke state-changing internal services, or disrupt reachable services. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.115.
- Record
CVE-2026-54549- CVSS 3.1
- 8.3 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-45gf-fjxp-cjpq
8.3
meta-ads-mcp: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in `upload_ad_image` via Unrestricted `image_url` Fetch
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in upload_ad_image via Unrestricted image_url Fetch
Summary
The upload_ad_image MCP tool in meta-ads-mcp v1.0.113 passes an attacker-controlled image_url parameter directly to an HTTP fetch helper (httpx.AsyncClient(follow_redirects=True).get(url)) without any scheme, host, or IP address validation. When the server is deployed with the streamable-http transport (a documented, officially supported mode), an unauthenticated remote attacker can supply an arbitrary URL—including http://127.0.0.1/, RFC 1918 addresses, or cloud metadata endpoints such as http://169.254.169.254/—and cause the server to issue an outbound HTTP request to that target. The Authorization middleware only verifies that a non-empty Bearer token is present; actual Meta API credential validation occurs after the image download, so any dummy Bearer token bypasses the pre-fetch check. This constitutes a full, unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery with a confirmed CVSS 3.1 Base Score of 8.3 (High).
Details
Source
meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py, line 1316–1322: The MCP tool upload_ad_image is registered with @mcp_server.tool() and exposes image_url: Optional[str] as a direct tool argument that is fully attacker-controlled over the network.
# meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py
1316: @mcp_server.tool()
1318: async def upload_ad_image(
1322: image_url: Optional[str] = None,
Propagation
meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py, line 1389: The value is forwarded to try_multiple_download_methods(image_url) without any sanitization or validation.
# meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py
1389: image_bytes = await try_multiple_download_methods(image_url)
Sinks
meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py contains three independent HTTP fetch paths, all using httpx.AsyncClient with follow_redirects=True and no URL, host, or IP validation:
# meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py
166: async with httpx.AsyncClient(follow_redirects=True, timeout=30.0) as client:
168: response = await client.get(url, headers=headers)
214: async with httpx.AsyncClient(follow_redirects=True) as client:
215: response = await client.get(url, headers=headers, timeout=30.0)
224: async with httpx.AsyncClient(follow_redirects=True) as client:
228: response = await client.get(url, timeout=30.0)
Authorization bypass
meta_ads_mcp/core/http_auth_integration.py, lines 78–82: The middleware extracts any non-empty Bearer token value and places it into request context without validating it against Meta's API. The actual Meta OAuth token check (in meta_ads_mcp/core/api.py:415) occurs only after the image download completes, meaning the SSRF sink fires before any meaningful credential verification.
Absence of sanitization
A search for urlparse, urlsplit, ipaddress, localhost, 127.0.0.1, 169.254, private, allowlist, blocklist, or is_global in meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py and meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py returns no matches. No URL, scheme, hostname, or IP validation is present anywhere in the fetch path.
Transport exposure
meta_ads_mcp/core/server.py, line 219: The --transport streamable-http mode is a documented, officially supported deployment option (not a development-only stub), meaning the attack surface is reachable over the network in production deployments.
PoC
Environment setup
# Build and run the Docker image (includes vulnerable meta-ads-mcp v1.0.113 and poc.py)
docker build -f vuln-001/Dockerfile \
-t meta-ads-ssrf-poc \
reports/pypiAi_615_pipeboard-co__meta-ads-mcp/
docker run --rm meta-ads-ssrf-poc
# Exit code 0 = SSRF confirmed
Manual reproduction (two terminals)
# Terminal 1 — SSRF capture listener on port 9009
python3 - <<'PY'
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
class H(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
print("SSRF GET", self.path,…
- Record
GHSA-45gf-fjxp-cjpq- CVSS 3.1
- 8.3 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-3485
8.3
meta-ads-mcp: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in `upload_ad_image` via Unrestricted `image_url` Fetch
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in upload_ad_image via Unrestricted image_url Fetch
Summary
The upload_ad_image MCP tool in meta-ads-mcp v1.0.113 passes an attacker-controlled image_url parameter directly to an HTTP fetch helper (httpx.AsyncClient(follow_redirects=True).get(url)) without any scheme, host, or IP address validation. When the server is deployed with the streamable-http transport (a documented, officially supported mode), an unauthenticated remote attacker can supply an arbitrary URL—including http://127.0.0.1/, RFC 1918 addresses, or cloud metadata endpoints such as http://169.254.169.254/—and cause the server to issue an outbound HTTP request to that target. The Authorization middleware only verifies that a non-empty Bearer token is present; actual Meta API credential validation occurs after the image download, so any dummy Bearer token bypasses the pre-fetch check. This constitutes a full, unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery with a confirmed CVSS 3.1 Base Score of 8.3 (High).
Details
Source
meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py, line 1316–1322: The MCP tool upload_ad_image is registered with @mcp_server.tool() and exposes image_url: Optional[str] as a direct tool argument that is fully attacker-controlled over the network.
# meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py
1316: @mcp_server.tool()
1318: async def upload_ad_image(
1322: image_url: Optional[str] = None,
Propagation
meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py, line 1389: The value is forwarded to try_multiple_download_methods(image_url) without any sanitization or validation.
# meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py
1389: image_bytes = await try_multiple_download_methods(image_url)
Sinks
meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py contains three independent HTTP fetch paths, all using httpx.AsyncClient with follow_redirects=True and no URL, host, or IP validation:
# meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py
166: async with httpx.AsyncClient(follow_redirects=True, timeout=30.0) as client:
168: response = await client.get(url, headers=headers)
214: async with httpx.AsyncClient(follow_redirects=True) as client:
215: response = await client.get(url, headers=headers, timeout=30.0)
224: async with httpx.AsyncClient(follow_redirects=True) as client:
228: response = await client.get(url, timeout=30.0)
Authorization bypass
meta_ads_mcp/core/http_auth_integration.py, lines 78–82: The middleware extracts any non-empty Bearer token value and places it into request context without validating it against Meta's API. The actual Meta OAuth token check (in meta_ads_mcp/core/api.py:415) occurs only after the image download completes, meaning the SSRF sink fires before any meaningful credential verification.
Absence of sanitization
A search for urlparse, urlsplit, ipaddress, localhost, 127.0.0.1, 169.254, private, allowlist, blocklist, or is_global in meta_ads_mcp/core/ads.py and meta_ads_mcp/core/utils.py returns no matches. No URL, scheme, hostname, or IP validation is present anywhere in the fetch path.
Transport exposure
meta_ads_mcp/core/server.py, line 219: The --transport streamable-http mode is a documented, officially supported deployment option (not a development-only stub), meaning the attack surface is reachable over the network in production deployments.
PoC
Environment setup
# Build and run the Docker image (includes vulnerable meta-ads-mcp v1.0.113 and poc.py)
docker build -f vuln-001/Dockerfile \
-t meta-ads-ssrf-poc \
reports/pypiAi_615_pipeboard-co__meta-ads-mcp/
docker run --rm meta-ads-ssrf-poc
# Exit code 0 = SSRF confirmed
Manual reproduction (two terminals)
# Terminal 1 — SSRF capture listener on port 9009
python3 - <<'PY'
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
class H(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
print("SSRF GET", self.path,…
- Record
PYSEC-2026-3485- CVSS 3.1
- 8.3 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
meta-ads-mcpPyPI |
before 1.0.115 | 1.0.115 |
meta-ads-mcpPyPI |
before 1.0.115, plus listed versions 0.1.00.10.00.10.10.10.20.10.5 Show 45 moreShow less0.10.60.10.70.10.90.11.00.11.10.11.20.11.30.11.40.11.50.11.60.2.00.2.10.2.20.2.30.2.40.2.50.2.60.2.80.2.90.3.00.3.10.3.100.3.20.3.30.3.50.3.60.3.70.3.80.3.90.4.00.4.10.4.20.4.30.4.40.4.50.4.60.4.70.4.80.4.90.5.00.6.00.7.00.7.10.7.100.7.2 |
1.0.115 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-54549 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.3) in Pipeboard-co Meta-ads-mcp, published July 17, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.40%, the 34th percentile. Fixed in meta-ads-mcp 1.0.115.
References
github.com/pipeboard-co/meta-ads-mcp/security/advisories/GHSA-45gf-fjxp-cjpq
github.com/pipeboard-co/meta-ads-mcp/pull/138
github.com/pipeboard-co/meta-ads-mcp/commit/7d9926336bbdac6285a988d043c4ccfe126c94c5
github.com/pipeboard-co/meta-ads-mcp/releases/tag/1.0.115
github.com/advisories/GHSA-45gf-fjxp-cjpq
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/54xxx/CVE-2026-54549.json
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54549
github.com/pipeboard-co/meta-ads-mcp
pypi.org/project/meta-ads-mcp
Left out here: 122 versions and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.