Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-54690

datamodel-code-generator vulnerable to SSRF via JSON-Schema `$ref` to HTTP URL (silent by default)

8.2 HighFix available

datamodel-code-generator generates Pydantic v2 models, dataclasses, TypedDict, and msgspec.Struct from OpenAPI, JSON Schema, GraphQL, Avro, Protobuf, and raw JSON, YAML, or CSV. From 0.9.1 until 0.61.0, datamodel-code-generator silently dereferences attacker-controlled JSON Schema $ref HTTP or HTTPS URLs in src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py through _get_ref_body, and the --allow-remote-refs gate can warn instead of blocking, allowing server-side request forgery through src/datamodel_code_generator/http.py. This issue is fixed in version 0.61.0.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
Required

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.39%Up 0.2 points since Jul 29, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.2

datamodel-code-generator vulnerable to SSRF via JSON-Schema `$ref` to HTTP URL (silent by default)

datamodel-code-generator generates Pydantic v2 models, dataclasses, TypedDict, and msgspec.Struct from OpenAPI, JSON Schema, GraphQL, Avro, Protobuf, and raw JSON, YAML, or CSV. From 0.9.1 until 0.61.0, datamodel-code-generator silently dereferences attacker-controlled JSON Schema $ref HTTP or HTTPS URLs in src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py through _get_ref_body, and the --allow-remote-refs gate can warn instead of blocking, allowing server-side request forgery through src/datamodel_code_generator/http.py. This issue is fixed in version 0.61.0.

Record
CVE-2026-54690
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-50074 8.2

datamodel-code-generator generates Pydantic v2 models, dataclasses, TypedDict, and msgspec.Struct from OpenAPI, JSON Schema, GraphQL, Avro, Protobuf, and raw JSON, YAML, or CSV. From 0.9.1 until 0.61.0, datamodel-code-generator silently dereferences attacker-controlled JSON Schema $ref HTTP or HTTPS URLs in src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py through _get_ref_body, and the --allow-remote-refs gate can warn instead of blocking, allowing server-side request forgery through src/datamodel_code_generator/http.py. This issue is fixed in version 0.61.0.

Record
EUVD-2026-50074
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-954p-556p-r752 8.2

datamodel-code-generator vulnerable to SSRF via JSON-Schema `$ref` to HTTP URL (silent by default)

Summary

JSON-Schema $ref values pointing at HTTP or HTTPS URLs are silently dereferenced by datamodel-code-generator with no IP/host validation, no scheme allow-list, and redirects followed unconditionally. The --allow-remote-refs gate added in 0.56.0 defaults to None, which only emits a deprecation warning and then fetches the URL anyway; only explicit --allow-remote-refs=false blocks the request. The fetched body is parsed as a sub-schema and reflected verbatim into the generated .py source. As a result, any JSON-Schema document the developer feeds to datamodel-codegen — including documents authored by an attacker — can pivot to arbitrary internal addresses and leak the response into the generated code, with no developer cooperation beyond running the tool.

Details

Sink: src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py, _get_ref_body (lines 4776–4793, at tag 0.60.1 / commit a321547e):

def _get_ref_body(self, resolved_ref: str) -> dict[str, YamlValue]:
    if is_url(resolved_ref):
        if not resolved_ref.startswith("file://") and self.http_local_ref_path is None:
            if self.allow_remote_refs is False:
                raise Error(f"Fetching remote $ref is disabled: {resolved_ref}...")
            if self.allow_remote_refs is None:
                warn_deprecated(                            # (A) warn only
                    "behavior.remote-ref-default",
                    details=f"Reference: {resolved_ref}",
                    stacklevel=2,
                )
        return self._get_ref_body_from_url(resolved_ref)    # (B) fetch fires
    return self._get_ref_body_from_remote(resolved_ref)
  • (A) emits a deprecation warning when allow_remote_refs is its default (None); execution falls through to (B).
  • (B) routes the URL through _get_text_from_url → get_body, the same fetcher described in other report — no IP validation, redirects followed.

The fetched body is then parsed as a sub-schema and merged into the model graph, so description, title, properties, etc. from the remote document end up in the generated .py source.

Only affects users who installed the [http] extra (pip install 'datamodel-code-generator[http]').

PoC

A self-contained one-file PoC is available here: https://gist.github.com/thegr1ffyn/562a6972d7dc3f2869458ae93fc608c0

Impact

Who is impacted. Anyone running datamodel-codegen on a JSON-Schema or OpenAPI document of uncertain provenance, with the [http] extra installed. Real-world scenarios:

  1. Trojaned OpenAPI document. A public REST API publishes openapi.yaml. One $ref points at http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/<role>; running datamodel-codegen against the spec from an EC2 instance leaks the IAM credentials into the generated client.
  2. Customer-supplied JSON Schema. A B2B SaaS auto-generates client code from customer-uploaded schemas. The customer adds an HTTP $ref to http://internal-admin:8080/users.json; the response (e.g. JSON user list) ends up in the generated Python the SaaS hands back to the customer.
  3. CI on a private network. A PR adds schemas/inbound.json with an HTTP $ref pointed at a service reachable only from the CI cluster's VPC; the CI runner fetches it and the generated .py leaks the response in PR artifacts.

Higher real-world risk than the sibling CLI-flag SSRF (other SSRF in this report bundle) because the schema author chooses the destination — the developer doesn't have to type any URL.

Suggested fix.

  1. Flip the default in parser/base.py: allow_remote_refs: bool = False, and remove the silent-fetch-with-warning fallback at parser/jsonschema.py:4786-4791.
  2. When fetching is allowed, apply the same IP/host validation proposed for other submitted SSRF report to both the initial $ref URL and every redirect target.
  3. Document HTTP $ref in a third-party schema as equivalent to running curl…
Record
GHSA-954p-556p-r752
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.2

datamodel-code-generator generates Pydantic v2 models, dataclasses, TypedDict, and msgspec.Struct from OpenAPI, JSON Schema, GraphQL, Avro, Protobuf, and raw JSON, YAML, or CSV. From 0.9.1 until 0.61.0, datamodel-code-generator silently dereferences attacker-controlled JSON Schema $ref HTTP or HTTPS URLs in src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py through _get_ref_body, and the --allow-remote-refs gate can warn instead of blocking, allowing server-side request forgery through src/datamodel_code_generator/http.py. This issue is fixed in version 0.61.0.

Record
CVE-2026-54690
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 8.2

datamodel-code-generator vulnerable to SSRF via JSON-Schema `$ref` to HTTP URL (silent by default)

datamodel-code-generator generates Pydantic v2 models, dataclasses, TypedDict, and msgspec.Struct from OpenAPI, JSON Schema, GraphQL, Avro, Protobuf, and raw JSON, YAML, or CSV. From 0.9.1 until 0.61.0, datamodel-code-generator silently dereferences attacker-controlled JSON Schema $ref HTTP or HTTPS URLs in src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py through _get_ref_body, and the --allow-remote-refs gate can warn instead of blocking, allowing server-side request forgery through src/datamodel_code_generator/http.py. This issue is fixed in version 0.61.0.

Record
CVE-2026-54690
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-954p-556p-r752 8.2

datamodel-code-generator vulnerable to SSRF via JSON-Schema `$ref` to HTTP URL (silent by default)

Summary

JSON-Schema $ref values pointing at HTTP or HTTPS URLs are silently dereferenced by datamodel-code-generator with no IP/host validation, no scheme allow-list, and redirects followed unconditionally. The --allow-remote-refs gate added in 0.56.0 defaults to None, which only emits a deprecation warning and then fetches the URL anyway; only explicit --allow-remote-refs=false blocks the request. The fetched body is parsed as a sub-schema and reflected verbatim into the generated .py source. As a result, any JSON-Schema document the developer feeds to datamodel-codegen — including documents authored by an attacker — can pivot to arbitrary internal addresses and leak the response into the generated code, with no developer cooperation beyond running the tool.

Details

Sink: src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py, _get_ref_body (lines 4776–4793, at tag 0.60.1 / commit a321547e):

def _get_ref_body(self, resolved_ref: str) -> dict[str, YamlValue]:
    if is_url(resolved_ref):
        if not resolved_ref.startswith("file://") and self.http_local_ref_path is None:
            if self.allow_remote_refs is False:
                raise Error(f"Fetching remote $ref is disabled: {resolved_ref}...")
            if self.allow_remote_refs is None:
                warn_deprecated(                            # (A) warn only
                    "behavior.remote-ref-default",
                    details=f"Reference: {resolved_ref}",
                    stacklevel=2,
                )
        return self._get_ref_body_from_url(resolved_ref)    # (B) fetch fires
    return self._get_ref_body_from_remote(resolved_ref)
  • (A) emits a deprecation warning when allow_remote_refs is its default (None); execution falls through to (B).
  • (B) routes the URL through _get_text_from_url → get_body, the same fetcher described in other report — no IP validation, redirects followed.

The fetched body is then parsed as a sub-schema and merged into the model graph, so description, title, properties, etc. from the remote document end up in the generated .py source.

Only affects users who installed the [http] extra (pip install 'datamodel-code-generator[http]').

PoC

A self-contained one-file PoC is available here: https://gist.github.com/thegr1ffyn/562a6972d7dc3f2869458ae93fc608c0

Impact

Who is impacted. Anyone running datamodel-codegen on a JSON-Schema or OpenAPI document of uncertain provenance, with the [http] extra installed. Real-world scenarios:

  1. Trojaned OpenAPI document. A public REST API publishes openapi.yaml. One $ref points at http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/<role>; running datamodel-codegen against the spec from an EC2 instance leaks the IAM credentials into the generated client.
  2. Customer-supplied JSON Schema. A B2B SaaS auto-generates client code from customer-uploaded schemas. The customer adds an HTTP $ref to http://internal-admin:8080/users.json; the response (e.g. JSON user list) ends up in the generated Python the SaaS hands back to the customer.
  3. CI on a private network. A PR adds schemas/inbound.json with an HTTP $ref pointed at a service reachable only from the CI cluster's VPC; the CI runner fetches it and the generated .py leaks the response in PR artifacts.

Higher real-world risk than the sibling CLI-flag SSRF (other SSRF in this report bundle) because the schema author chooses the destination — the developer doesn't have to type any URL.

Suggested fix.

  1. Flip the default in parser/base.py: allow_remote_refs: bool = False, and remove the silent-fetch-with-warning fallback at parser/jsonschema.py:4786-4791.
  2. When fetching is allowed, apply the same IP/host validation proposed for other submitted SSRF report to both the initial $ref URL and every redirect target.
  3. Document HTTP $ref in a third-party schema as equivalent to running curl…
Record
GHSA-954p-556p-r752
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-3560 8.2

datamodel-code-generator vulnerable to SSRF via JSON-Schema `$ref` to HTTP URL (silent by default)

Summary

JSON-Schema $ref values pointing at HTTP or HTTPS URLs are silently dereferenced by datamodel-code-generator with no IP/host validation, no scheme allow-list, and redirects followed unconditionally. The --allow-remote-refs gate added in 0.56.0 defaults to None, which only emits a deprecation warning and then fetches the URL anyway; only explicit --allow-remote-refs=false blocks the request. The fetched body is parsed as a sub-schema and reflected verbatim into the generated .py source. As a result, any JSON-Schema document the developer feeds to datamodel-codegen — including documents authored by an attacker — can pivot to arbitrary internal addresses and leak the response into the generated code, with no developer cooperation beyond running the tool.

Details

Sink: src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py, _get_ref_body (lines 4776–4793, at tag 0.60.1 / commit a321547e):

def _get_ref_body(self, resolved_ref: str) -> dict[str, YamlValue]:
    if is_url(resolved_ref):
        if not resolved_ref.startswith("file://") and self.http_local_ref_path is None:
            if self.allow_remote_refs is False:
                raise Error(f"Fetching remote $ref is disabled: {resolved_ref}...")
            if self.allow_remote_refs is None:
                warn_deprecated(                            # (A) warn only
                    "behavior.remote-ref-default",
                    details=f"Reference: {resolved_ref}",
                    stacklevel=2,
                )
        return self._get_ref_body_from_url(resolved_ref)    # (B) fetch fires
    return self._get_ref_body_from_remote(resolved_ref)
  • (A) emits a deprecation warning when allow_remote_refs is its default (None); execution falls through to (B).
  • (B) routes the URL through _get_text_from_url → get_body, the same fetcher described in other report — no IP validation, redirects followed.

The fetched body is then parsed as a sub-schema and merged into the model graph, so description, title, properties, etc. from the remote document end up in the generated .py source.

Only affects users who installed the [http] extra (pip install 'datamodel-code-generator[http]').

PoC

A self-contained one-file PoC is available here: https://gist.github.com/thegr1ffyn/562a6972d7dc3f2869458ae93fc608c0

Impact

Who is impacted. Anyone running datamodel-codegen on a JSON-Schema or OpenAPI document of uncertain provenance, with the [http] extra installed. Real-world scenarios:

  1. Trojaned OpenAPI document. A public REST API publishes openapi.yaml. One $ref points at http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/<role>; running datamodel-codegen against the spec from an EC2 instance leaks the IAM credentials into the generated client.
  2. Customer-supplied JSON Schema. A B2B SaaS auto-generates client code from customer-uploaded schemas. The customer adds an HTTP $ref to http://internal-admin:8080/users.json; the response (e.g. JSON user list) ends up in the generated Python the SaaS hands back to the customer.
  3. CI on a private network. A PR adds schemas/inbound.json with an HTTP $ref pointed at a service reachable only from the CI cluster's VPC; the CI runner fetches it and the generated .py leaks the response in PR artifacts.

Higher real-world risk than the sibling CLI-flag SSRF (other SSRF in this report bundle) because the schema author chooses the destination — the developer doesn't have to type any URL.

Suggested fix.

  1. Flip the default in parser/base.py: allow_remote_refs: bool = False, and remove the silent-fetch-with-warning fallback at parser/jsonschema.py:4786-4791.
  2. When fetching is allowed, apply the same IP/host validation proposed for other submitted SSRF report to both the initial $ref URL and every redirect target.
  3. Document HTTP $ref in a third-party schema as equivalent to running curl…
Record
PYSEC-2026-3560
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
datamodel-code-generator
PyPI
0.9.1 to 0.60.2
0.61.0
datamodel-code-generator
PyPI
0.9.1 up to 0.61.0, plus listed versions
0.10.00.10.10.10.20.10.30.11.0
Show 45 moreShow less
0.11.10.11.100.11.110.11.120.11.130.11.140.11.150.11.160.11.170.11.180.11.190.11.20.11.200.11.30.11.40.11.50.11.60.11.70.11.80.11.90.12.00.12.10.12.20.12.30.13.00.13.10.13.20.13.30.13.40.13.50.14.00.14.10.15.00.16.00.16.10.17.00.17.10.17.20.18.00.18.10.19.00.20.00.21.00.21.10.21.2
0.61.0

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-54690 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.2) in Koxudaxi Datamodel-code-generator, published July 28, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.39%, the 32nd percentile. Fixed in datamodel-code-generator 0.61.0.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 84 versions and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open