Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-54755

Klever-Go: Integer overflow in split-royalty validation enables unbounded minting of KLV (native token)

9.6 CriticalFix available

Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.19, split-royalty fields decoded in core/kapp/builtInFunctions/utils.go can contain values greater than core.HundredPercent, and core/kapp/kda/create.go and core/kapp/kda/trigger.go sum those values in uint32 accumulators. Crafted values such as two 0x80000000 entries wrap the validation sum to zero and pass CheckValid100Params. Royalty payout paths in core/kapp/accounts/accounts.go, core/kapp/market/market.go, and core/kapp/ito/ito.go then credit each oversized split amount and silently discard a negative remainder, allowing ordinary asset transfers, marketplace purchases, or ITO purchases to create unbacked KLV or other assets. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.19.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

0.56%Up 0.2 points since Aug 29, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 9.6

Klever-Go: Integer overflow in split-royalty validation enables unbounded minting of KLV (native token)

Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.19, split-royalty fields decoded in core/kapp/builtInFunctions/utils.go can contain values greater than core.HundredPercent, and core/kapp/kda/create.go and core/kapp/kda/trigger.go sum those values in uint32 accumulators. Crafted values such as two 0x80000000 entries wrap the validation sum to zero and pass CheckValid100Params. Royalty payout paths in core/kapp/accounts/accounts.go, core/kapp/market/market.go, and core/kapp/ito/ito.go then credit each oversized split amount and silently discard a negative remainder, allowing ordinary asset transfers, marketplace purchases, or ITO purchases to create unbacked KLV or other assets. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.19.

Record
CVE-2026-54755
CVSS 3.1
9.6 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-190
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-67825 9.6

Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.19, split-royalty fields decoded in core/kapp/builtInFunctions/utils.go can contain values greater than core.HundredPercent, and core/kapp/kda/create.go and core/kapp/kda/trigger.go sum those values in uint32 accumulators. Crafted values such as two 0x80000000 entries wrap the validation sum to zero and pass CheckValid100Params. Royalty payout paths in core/kapp/accounts/accounts.go, core/kapp/market/market.go, and core/kapp/ito/ito.go then credit each oversized split amount and silently discard a negative remainder, allowing ordinary asset transfers, marketplace purchases, or ITO purchases to create unbacked KLV or other assets. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.19.

Record
EUVD-2026-67825
CVSS 3.1
9.6 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v 9.6

Klever: Integer overflow in split-royalty validation enables unbounded minting of KLV (native token)

Summary

The per-entry percentages of a KDA asset's split royalties are validated by summing them into a uint32 accumulator and checking the sum against HundredPercent (10000), with no upper bound on each individual entry. Two split entries whose percentages sum to just over 2^32 wrap around below 10000 and pass validation, while each stored value remains astronomically large (e.g. 0x80000000 = 2,147,483,648 ≈ 21,474,836%).

At royalty payout, each split recipient is credited pool × hugePct / 10000 — far more than the royalty pool — and the resulting negative remainder is silently discarded (if royaltiesToPay <= 0 { return Ok }). Because fixed royalties (and marketplace/ITO royalties) are denominated in KLV, an attacker mints KLV (the native token) out of thin air, on demand, by transferring or selling their own throwaway asset.

This is independent of, and not mitigated by, the existing FixMarketBuyOverflow guard.

Affected component

  • Repository: klever-io/klever-go (node).
  • Validation: core/process/kda/assetHelper.go, core/kapp/kda/create.go, core/kapp/kda/trigger.go, core/kapp/builtInFunctions/utils.go.
  • Payout (mint sites): core/kapp/accounts/accounts.go (transfer), core/kapp/market/market.go (marketplace buy), core/kapp/ito/ito.go (ITO buy).
  • Not gated by any fork flag — exploitable on current mainnet.

Root cause

1. Per-entry split percentages are decoded as raw uint32 with no bound

core/kapp/builtInFunctions/utils.go — decodeSplitInfo (≈L292):

func decodeSplitInfo(buf *bytes.Reader, splitInfo *transaction.RoyaltySplitInfo) error {
	fields := []*uint32{
		&splitInfo.PercentTransferPercentage,
		&splitInfo.PercentTransferFixed,
		&splitInfo.PercentMarketPercentage,
		&splitInfo.PercentMarketFixed,
		&splitInfo.PercentITOPercentage,
		&splitInfo.PercentITOFixed,
	}
	for _, field := range fields {
		if err := binary.Read(buf, binary.BigEndian, field); err != nil { // no <= HundredPercent check
			return err
		}
	}
	return nil
}

2. Validation sums into a uint32 and only checks the sum

core/kapp/kda/create.go (fungible path, ≈L351-382; NFT path ≈L228-264):

sumSplitTransferPercentage := uint32(0)   // L351  <-- uint32 accumulator
sumSplitTransferFixed       := uint32(0)
// ...
for key, value := range tc.GetRoyalties().GetSplitRoyalties() {
	// ... no per-entry bound ...
	sumSplitTransferPercentage += value.GetPercentTransferPercentage() // can overflow uint32
	sumSplitTransferFixed       += value.GetPercentTransferFixed()
	// ...
}
if !kda.CheckValid100Params(sumSplitTransferPercentage, sumSplitTransferFixed, /*...*/) { // sees the WRAPPED sum
	return transaction.Transaction_ParameterInvalid, common.ErrInvalidValue
}

core/process/kda/assetHelper.go (L101):

func CheckValid100Params(values ...uint32) bool {
	for _, value := range values {
		if value > core.HundredPercent { // HundredPercent = 10000
			return false
		}
	}
	return true
}

The per-entry > HundredPercent check that exists for TransferPercentage tiers (create.go:398, trigger.go:780) does not apply to these SplitRoyalties fields.

0x80000000 + 0x80000000 = 0x1_0000_0000 → wraps to 0 in uint32 → CheckValid100Params(0) is true.

3. Payout over-pays and silently drops the negative remainder (mint), in KLV

core/kapp/accounts/accounts.go — processFixedRoyaltiesTransfer (L316-382):

err := acntSrc.SubFromBalance(kda.Royalties.TransferFixed, kdautils.KLVIdentifier, ...) // L332: sender pays a tiny KLV fixed royalty
// ...
royaltiesFixedToPay := kda.Royalties.TransferFixed
for key, value := range kda.Royalties.SplitRoyalties {
	// L343: split paid in KLV using the overflowed PercentTransferFixed
	status, err := a.computeSplitRoyalties(key, kdautils.KLVIdentifier, kapps.KDAData_Fungible,
		acntSrc, kda.Royalties.TransferFixed, int64(value.PercentTransferFixed),…
Record
GHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v
CVSS 3.1
9.6 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-190
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 9.6

Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.19, split-royalty fields decoded in core/kapp/builtInFunctions/utils.go can contain values greater than core.HundredPercent, and core/kapp/kda/create.go and core/kapp/kda/trigger.go sum those values in uint32 accumulators. Crafted values such as two 0x80000000 entries wrap the validation sum to zero and pass CheckValid100Params. Royalty payout paths in core/kapp/accounts/accounts.go, core/kapp/market/market.go, and core/kapp/ito/ito.go then credit each oversized split amount and silently discard a negative remainder, allowing ordinary asset transfers, marketplace purchases, or ITO purchases to create unbacked KLV or other assets. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.19.

Record
CVE-2026-54755
CVSS 3.1
9.6 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-190
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 9.6

Klever-Go: Integer overflow in split-royalty validation enables unbounded minting of KLV (native token)

Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.19, split-royalty fields decoded in core/kapp/builtInFunctions/utils.go can contain values greater than core.HundredPercent, and core/kapp/kda/create.go and core/kapp/kda/trigger.go sum those values in uint32 accumulators. Crafted values such as two 0x80000000 entries wrap the validation sum to zero and pass CheckValid100Params. Royalty payout paths in core/kapp/accounts/accounts.go, core/kapp/market/market.go, and core/kapp/ito/ito.go then credit each oversized split amount and silently discard a negative remainder, allowing ordinary asset transfers, marketplace purchases, or ITO purchases to create unbacked KLV or other assets. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.19.

Record
CVE-2026-54755
CVSS 3.1
9.6 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-190
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v 9.6

Klever: Integer overflow in split-royalty validation enables unbounded minting of KLV (native token)

Summary

The per-entry percentages of a KDA asset's split royalties are validated by summing them into a uint32 accumulator and checking the sum against HundredPercent (10000), with no upper bound on each individual entry. Two split entries whose percentages sum to just over 2^32 wrap around below 10000 and pass validation, while each stored value remains astronomically large (e.g. 0x80000000 = 2,147,483,648 ≈ 21,474,836%).

At royalty payout, each split recipient is credited pool × hugePct / 10000 — far more than the royalty pool — and the resulting negative remainder is silently discarded (if royaltiesToPay <= 0 { return Ok }). Because fixed royalties (and marketplace/ITO royalties) are denominated in KLV, an attacker mints KLV (the native token) out of thin air, on demand, by transferring or selling their own throwaway asset.

This is independent of, and not mitigated by, the existing FixMarketBuyOverflow guard.

Affected component

  • Repository: klever-io/klever-go (node).
  • Validation: core/process/kda/assetHelper.go, core/kapp/kda/create.go, core/kapp/kda/trigger.go, core/kapp/builtInFunctions/utils.go.
  • Payout (mint sites): core/kapp/accounts/accounts.go (transfer), core/kapp/market/market.go (marketplace buy), core/kapp/ito/ito.go (ITO buy).
  • Not gated by any fork flag — exploitable on current mainnet.

Root cause

1. Per-entry split percentages are decoded as raw uint32 with no bound

core/kapp/builtInFunctions/utils.go — decodeSplitInfo (≈L292):

func decodeSplitInfo(buf *bytes.Reader, splitInfo *transaction.RoyaltySplitInfo) error {
	fields := []*uint32{
		&splitInfo.PercentTransferPercentage,
		&splitInfo.PercentTransferFixed,
		&splitInfo.PercentMarketPercentage,
		&splitInfo.PercentMarketFixed,
		&splitInfo.PercentITOPercentage,
		&splitInfo.PercentITOFixed,
	}
	for _, field := range fields {
		if err := binary.Read(buf, binary.BigEndian, field); err != nil { // no <= HundredPercent check
			return err
		}
	}
	return nil
}

2. Validation sums into a uint32 and only checks the sum

core/kapp/kda/create.go (fungible path, ≈L351-382; NFT path ≈L228-264):

sumSplitTransferPercentage := uint32(0)   // L351  <-- uint32 accumulator
sumSplitTransferFixed       := uint32(0)
// ...
for key, value := range tc.GetRoyalties().GetSplitRoyalties() {
	// ... no per-entry bound ...
	sumSplitTransferPercentage += value.GetPercentTransferPercentage() // can overflow uint32
	sumSplitTransferFixed       += value.GetPercentTransferFixed()
	// ...
}
if !kda.CheckValid100Params(sumSplitTransferPercentage, sumSplitTransferFixed, /*...*/) { // sees the WRAPPED sum
	return transaction.Transaction_ParameterInvalid, common.ErrInvalidValue
}

core/process/kda/assetHelper.go (L101):

func CheckValid100Params(values ...uint32) bool {
	for _, value := range values {
		if value > core.HundredPercent { // HundredPercent = 10000
			return false
		}
	}
	return true
}

The per-entry > HundredPercent check that exists for TransferPercentage tiers (create.go:398, trigger.go:780) does not apply to these SplitRoyalties fields.

0x80000000 + 0x80000000 = 0x1_0000_0000 → wraps to 0 in uint32 → CheckValid100Params(0) is true.

3. Payout over-pays and silently drops the negative remainder (mint), in KLV

core/kapp/accounts/accounts.go — processFixedRoyaltiesTransfer (L316-382):

err := acntSrc.SubFromBalance(kda.Royalties.TransferFixed, kdautils.KLVIdentifier, ...) // L332: sender pays a tiny KLV fixed royalty
// ...
royaltiesFixedToPay := kda.Royalties.TransferFixed
for key, value := range kda.Royalties.SplitRoyalties {
	// L343: split paid in KLV using the overflowed PercentTransferFixed
	status, err := a.computeSplitRoyalties(key, kdautils.KLVIdentifier, kapps.KDAData_Fungible,
		acntSrc, kda.Royalties.TransferFixed, int64(value.PercentTransferFixed),…
Record
GHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v
CVSS 3.1
9.6 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-190
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 4 moreShow less
OSVGO-2026-6310 No score

Klever: Integer overflow in split-royalty validation enables unbounded minting of KLV (native token) in github.com/klever-io/klever-go

Klever: Integer overflow in split-royalty validation enables unbounded minting of KLV (native token) in github.com/klever-io/klever-go

Record
GO-2026-6310
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21812-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260902T191204 2026-09-02T19:12:04Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-6305 CVE-2026-55834 GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv
  • GO-2026-6306 CVE-2026-55064 GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4
  • GO-2026-6307 CVE-2026-55067 GHSA-569v-q83c-3j3g
  • GO-2026-6308 CVE-2026-55066 GHSA-5pg6-m483-7vrg
  • GO-2026-6309 CVE-2026-54746 GHSA-8x7x-83cf-c3pg
  • GO-2026-6310 CVE-2026-54755 GHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v
  • GO-2026-6311 CVE-2026-54766 GHSA-f27p-pw2p-9pr4
  • GO-2026-6312 CVE-2026-55108 GHSA-fmgp-q6jx-gg3x
  • GO-2026-6313 CVE-2026-55065 GHSA-gg93-x632-9ccv
  • GO-2026-6314 CVE-2026-55569 GHSA-mf5c-hw34-4hpp
  • GO-2026-6315 CVE-2026-54754 GHSA-p7gw-2pcp-5pf8
  • GO-2026-6316 CVE-2026-55068 GHSA-x8mj-6p3q-g5pp
  • GO-2026-6317 CVE-2026-55588 GHSA-298f-872v-2rcx
  • GO-2026-6318 CVE-2026-55621 GHSA-64f3-v33m-w89f
  • GO-2026-6319 CVE-2026-55622 GHSA-c9f5-j9c3-mhrg
  • GO-2026-6320 CVE-2026-55245 GHSA-w98g-5w9p-p3rc
  • GO-2026-6321 CVE-2026-55484 GHSA-hr6j-w4mw-g9mj
  • GO-2026-6322 CVE-2026-55678 GHSA-p378-jp5r-gpgw
  • GO-2026-6323 CVE-2026-55763 GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv
  • GO-2026-6324 CVE-2026-55761 GHSA-x626-fcwx-f5pc
  • GO-2026-6325 CVE-2026-27878 GHSA-6xff-cpcq-vpw2
  • GO-2026-6326 CVE-2026-55784 GHSA-334q-h5g3-fpxv
  • GO-2026-6327 CVE-2026-55874 GHSA-56wq-x3wv-3ff4
  • GO-2026-6328 CVE-2026-55785 GHSA-fp46-6vfw-gc9c
  • GO-2026-6329 CVE-2026-55873 GHSA-hgpf-8634-g44c
  • GO-2026-6330 CVE-2026-55764 GHSA-mrpp-v6pg-p54x
  • GO-2026-6333 CVE-2026-25712 GHSA-37w2-86g3-h4qh
  • GO-2026-6334 CVE-2026-24690 GHSA-47rq-xp99-92mx
  • GO-2026-6335 CVE-2026-27657 GHSA-4c8f-3m6h-m56r
  • GO-2026-6336 CVE-2026-26232 GHSA-5v69-g2m3-3hq3
  • GO-2026-6337 CVE-2026-28705 GHSA-7jvx-g65v-r899
  • GO-2026-6338 CVE-2026-22547 GHSA-922f-hfwp-p56f
  • GO-2026-6339 CVE-2026-20909 GHSA-fhq3-p242-2qpf
  • GO-2026-6340 CVE-2026-25718 GHSA-h697-89cp-24q8
  • GO-2026-6341 CVE-2026-26307 GHSA-h9c5-x7g8-4q7f
  • GO-2026-6342 CVE-2026-26247 GHSA-m5ch-ppfx-xv3v
  • GO-2026-6354 CVE-2026-78662
  • GO-2026-6355 CVE-2026-56855
  • Update to version 0.0.20260828T144745 2026-08-28T14:47:45Z.
  • GO-2026-6303 CVE-2026-56854
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21812-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23692-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260902T191204 2026-09-02T19:12:04Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-6305 CVE-2026-55834 GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv
  • GO-2026-6306 CVE-2026-55064 GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4
  • GO-2026-6307 CVE-2026-55067 GHSA-569v-q83c-3j3g
  • GO-2026-6308 CVE-2026-55066 GHSA-5pg6-m483-7vrg
  • GO-2026-6309 CVE-2026-54746 GHSA-8x7x-83cf-c3pg
  • GO-2026-6310 CVE-2026-54755 GHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v
  • GO-2026-6311 CVE-2026-54766 GHSA-f27p-pw2p-9pr4
  • GO-2026-6312 CVE-2026-55108 GHSA-fmgp-q6jx-gg3x
  • GO-2026-6313 CVE-2026-55065 GHSA-gg93-x632-9ccv
  • GO-2026-6314 CVE-2026-55569 GHSA-mf5c-hw34-4hpp
  • GO-2026-6315 CVE-2026-54754 GHSA-p7gw-2pcp-5pf8
  • GO-2026-6316 CVE-2026-55068 GHSA-x8mj-6p3q-g5pp
  • GO-2026-6317 CVE-2026-55588 GHSA-298f-872v-2rcx
  • GO-2026-6318 CVE-2026-55621 GHSA-64f3-v33m-w89f
  • GO-2026-6319 CVE-2026-55622 GHSA-c9f5-j9c3-mhrg
  • GO-2026-6320 CVE-2026-55245 GHSA-w98g-5w9p-p3rc
  • GO-2026-6321 CVE-2026-55484 GHSA-hr6j-w4mw-g9mj
  • GO-2026-6322 CVE-2026-55678 GHSA-p378-jp5r-gpgw
  • GO-2026-6323 CVE-2026-55763 GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv
  • GO-2026-6324 CVE-2026-55761 GHSA-x626-fcwx-f5pc
  • GO-2026-6325 CVE-2026-27878 GHSA-6xff-cpcq-vpw2
  • GO-2026-6326 CVE-2026-55784 GHSA-334q-h5g3-fpxv
  • GO-2026-6327 CVE-2026-55874 GHSA-56wq-x3wv-3ff4
  • GO-2026-6328 CVE-2026-55785 GHSA-fp46-6vfw-gc9c
  • GO-2026-6329 CVE-2026-55873 GHSA-hgpf-8634-g44c
  • GO-2026-6330 CVE-2026-55764 GHSA-mrpp-v6pg-p54x
  • GO-2026-6333 CVE-2026-25712 GHSA-37w2-86g3-h4qh
  • GO-2026-6334 CVE-2026-24690 GHSA-47rq-xp99-92mx
  • GO-2026-6335 CVE-2026-27657 GHSA-4c8f-3m6h-m56r
  • GO-2026-6336 CVE-2026-26232 GHSA-5v69-g2m3-3hq3
  • GO-2026-6337 CVE-2026-28705 GHSA-7jvx-g65v-r899
  • GO-2026-6338 CVE-2026-22547 GHSA-922f-hfwp-p56f
  • GO-2026-6339 CVE-2026-20909 GHSA-fhq3-p242-2qpf
  • GO-2026-6340 CVE-2026-25718 GHSA-h697-89cp-24q8
  • GO-2026-6341 CVE-2026-26307 GHSA-h9c5-x7g8-4q7f
  • GO-2026-6342 CVE-2026-26247 GHSA-m5ch-ppfx-xv3v
  • GO-2026-6354 CVE-2026-78662
  • GO-2026-6355 CVE-2026-56855
  • Update to version 0.0.20260828T144745 2026-08-28T14:47:45Z.
  • GO-2026-6303 CVE-2026-56854
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23692-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23712-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260902T191204 2026-09-02T19:12:04Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-6305 CVE-2026-55834 GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv
  • GO-2026-6306 CVE-2026-55064 GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4
  • GO-2026-6307 CVE-2026-55067 GHSA-569v-q83c-3j3g
  • GO-2026-6308 CVE-2026-55066 GHSA-5pg6-m483-7vrg
  • GO-2026-6309 CVE-2026-54746 GHSA-8x7x-83cf-c3pg
  • GO-2026-6310 CVE-2026-54755 GHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v
  • GO-2026-6311 CVE-2026-54766 GHSA-f27p-pw2p-9pr4
  • GO-2026-6312 CVE-2026-55108 GHSA-fmgp-q6jx-gg3x
  • GO-2026-6313 CVE-2026-55065 GHSA-gg93-x632-9ccv
  • GO-2026-6314 CVE-2026-55569 GHSA-mf5c-hw34-4hpp
  • GO-2026-6315 CVE-2026-54754 GHSA-p7gw-2pcp-5pf8
  • GO-2026-6316 CVE-2026-55068 GHSA-x8mj-6p3q-g5pp
  • GO-2026-6317 CVE-2026-55588 GHSA-298f-872v-2rcx
  • GO-2026-6318 CVE-2026-55621 GHSA-64f3-v33m-w89f
  • GO-2026-6319 CVE-2026-55622 GHSA-c9f5-j9c3-mhrg
  • GO-2026-6320 CVE-2026-55245 GHSA-w98g-5w9p-p3rc
  • GO-2026-6321 CVE-2026-55484 GHSA-hr6j-w4mw-g9mj
  • GO-2026-6322 CVE-2026-55678 GHSA-p378-jp5r-gpgw
  • GO-2026-6323 CVE-2026-55763 GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv
  • GO-2026-6324 CVE-2026-55761 GHSA-x626-fcwx-f5pc
  • GO-2026-6325 CVE-2026-27878 GHSA-6xff-cpcq-vpw2
  • GO-2026-6326 CVE-2026-55784 GHSA-334q-h5g3-fpxv
  • GO-2026-6327 CVE-2026-55874 GHSA-56wq-x3wv-3ff4
  • GO-2026-6328 CVE-2026-55785 GHSA-fp46-6vfw-gc9c
  • GO-2026-6329 CVE-2026-55873 GHSA-hgpf-8634-g44c
  • GO-2026-6330 CVE-2026-55764 GHSA-mrpp-v6pg-p54x
  • GO-2026-6333 CVE-2026-25712 GHSA-37w2-86g3-h4qh
  • GO-2026-6334 CVE-2026-24690 GHSA-47rq-xp99-92mx
  • GO-2026-6335 CVE-2026-27657 GHSA-4c8f-3m6h-m56r
  • GO-2026-6336 CVE-2026-26232 GHSA-5v69-g2m3-3hq3
  • GO-2026-6337 CVE-2026-28705 GHSA-7jvx-g65v-r899
  • GO-2026-6338 CVE-2026-22547 GHSA-922f-hfwp-p56f
  • GO-2026-6339 CVE-2026-20909 GHSA-fhq3-p242-2qpf
  • GO-2026-6340 CVE-2026-25718 GHSA-h697-89cp-24q8
  • GO-2026-6341 CVE-2026-26307 GHSA-h9c5-x7g8-4q7f
  • GO-2026-6342 CVE-2026-26247 GHSA-m5ch-ppfx-xv3v
  • GO-2026-6354 CVE-2026-78662
  • GO-2026-6355 CVE-2026-56855
  • Update to version 0.0.20260828T144745 2026-08-28T14:47:45Z.
  • GO-2026-6303 CVE-2026-56854
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23712-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/klever-io/klever-go
Go
before 1.7.19
1.7.19
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0
From an advisory covering 39 CVEs
before 0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1
0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0
From an advisory covering 39 CVEs
before 0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1
0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 39 CVEs
before 0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1
0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-54755 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.6) in Klever-io Klever-go, published August 28, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.56%, the 46th percentile. Fixed in github.com/klever-io/klever-go 1.7.19.

References

Show 42 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open