CVE-2026-56074

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

Summary

The approval system in PraisonAI Agents caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments. Once a user approves execute_command for any command (e.g., ls -la), all subsequent execute_command calls in that execution context bypass the approval prompt entirely. Combined with os.environ.copy() passing all process environment variables to subprocesses, this allows an LLM agent (potentially via prompt injection) to silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials without further user consent.

Details

The require_approval decorator in src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/approval/__init__.py:176-178 checks approval status by tool name only:

@wraps(func)
def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
    if is_already_approved(tool_name):   # line 177 — checks only tool_name
        return func(*args, **kwargs)     # line 178 — bypasses ALL approval

The mark_approved function in registry.py:144-147 stores only the tool name string:

def mark_approved(self, tool_name: str) -> None:
    approved = self._approved_context.get(set())
    approved.add(tool_name)              # stores "execute_command", not args
    self._approved_context.set(approved)

The approval context is never cleared during agent execution — clear_approved() exists (registry.py:152) but is never called in the agent's tool execution path (agent/tool_execution.py).

Meanwhile, the ConsoleBackend UI at backends.py:95-96 misleads the user:

return Confirm.ask(
    f"Do you want to execute this {request.risk_level} risk tool?",
    # "this" implies per-invocation approval
)

The UI displays the specific command arguments (lines 81-85), creating a reasonable expectation that the user is approving only that specific invocation.

Additionally, shell_tools.py:77 passes the full process environment to every subprocess:

process_env = os.environ.copy()  # includes OPENAI_API_KEY, etc.

There is no command filtering, blocklist, or environment variable sanitization in the shell tools module.

PoC

from praisonaiagents import Agent
from praisonaiagents.tools.shell_tools import execute_command

# Step 1: Create agent with shell tool
agent = Agent(
    name="worker",
    instructions="You are a helpful assistant.",
    tools=[execute_command]
)

# Step 2: Agent requests benign command — user sees Rich panel:
#   Function: execute_command
#   Risk Level: CRITICAL
#   Arguments:
#     command: ls -la
#   "Do you want to execute this critical risk tool?" [y/N]
# User approves → mark_approved("execute_command") is called

# Step 3: All subsequent execute_command calls bypass approval silently:
# execute_command(command="env")
#   → returns ALL environment variables (OPENAI_API_KEY, AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, etc.)
#   → NO approval prompt shown

# Step 4: Targeted extraction also bypasses approval:
# execute_command(command="printenv OPENAI_API_KEY")
#   → returns the specific API key
#   → NO approval prompt shown

# Verification: check the approval cache
from praisonaiagents.approval import is_already_approved
# After approving "ls -la":
# is_already_approved("execute_command") → True
# Any execute_command call now returns immediately at __init__.py:177-178

Impact

• Secret exfiltration: An LLM agent (or one subjected to prompt injection) can dump all process environment variables after a single benign command approval. Common secrets include OPENAI_API_KEY, AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, DATABASE_URL, and any other credentials passed via environment.
• Misleading consent UI: The console prompt displays specific arguments and uses language ("this tool") that implies per-invocation consent, but the system grants session-wide blanket approval.
• No expiration or scope: The approval cache uses a ContextVar that persists for the entire agent execution context with no timeout, no command-count limit, and no clearing between tool…

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-ffp3-3562-8cv3. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

Summary

The approval system in PraisonAI Agents caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments. Once a user approves execute_command for any command (e.g., ls -la), all subsequent execute_command calls in that execution context bypass the approval prompt entirely. Combined with os.environ.copy() passing all process environment variables to subprocesses, this allows an LLM agent (potentially via prompt injection) to silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials without further user consent.

Details

The require_approval decorator in src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/approval/__init__.py:176-178 checks approval status by tool name only:

@wraps(func)
def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
    if is_already_approved(tool_name):   # line 177 — checks only tool_name
        return func(*args, **kwargs)     # line 178 — bypasses ALL approval

The mark_approved function in registry.py:144-147 stores only the tool name string:

def mark_approved(self, tool_name: str) -> None:
    approved = self._approved_context.get(set())
    approved.add(tool_name)              # stores "execute_command", not args
    self._approved_context.set(approved)

The approval context is never cleared during agent execution — clear_approved() exists (registry.py:152) but is never called in the agent's tool execution path (agent/tool_execution.py).

Meanwhile, the ConsoleBackend UI at backends.py:95-96 misleads the user:

return Confirm.ask(
    f"Do you want to execute this {request.risk_level} risk tool?",
    # "this" implies per-invocation approval
)

The UI displays the specific command arguments (lines 81-85), creating a reasonable expectation that the user is approving only that specific invocation.

Additionally, shell_tools.py:77 passes the full process environment to every subprocess:

process_env = os.environ.copy()  # includes OPENAI_API_KEY, etc.

There is no command filtering, blocklist, or environment variable sanitization in the shell tools module.

PoC

from praisonaiagents import Agent
from praisonaiagents.tools.shell_tools import execute_command

# Step 1: Create agent with shell tool
agent = Agent(
    name="worker",
    instructions="You are a helpful assistant.",
    tools=[execute_command]
)

# Step 2: Agent requests benign command — user sees Rich panel:
#   Function: execute_command
#   Risk Level: CRITICAL
#   Arguments:
#     command: ls -la
#   "Do you want to execute this critical risk tool?" [y/N]
# User approves → mark_approved("execute_command") is called

# Step 3: All subsequent execute_command calls bypass approval silently:
# execute_command(command="env")
#   → returns ALL environment variables (OPENAI_API_KEY, AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, etc.)
#   → NO approval prompt shown

# Step 4: Targeted extraction also bypasses approval:
# execute_command(command="printenv OPENAI_API_KEY")
#   → returns the specific API key
#   → NO approval prompt shown

# Verification: check the approval cache
from praisonaiagents.approval import is_already_approved
# After approving "ls -la":
# is_already_approved("execute_command") → True
# Any execute_command call now returns immediately at __init__.py:177-178

Impact

• Secret exfiltration: An LLM agent (or one subjected to prompt injection) can dump all process environment variables after a single benign command approval. Common secrets include OPENAI_API_KEY, AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, DATABASE_URL, and any other credentials passed via environment.
• Misleading consent UI: The console prompt displays specific arguments and uses language ("this tool") that implies per-invocation consent, but the system grants session-wide blanket approval.
• No expiration or scope: The approval cache uses a ContextVar that persists for the entire agent execution context with no timeout, no command-count limit, and no clearing between tool…

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-ffp3-3562-8cv3. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

Summary

The approval system in PraisonAI Agents caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments. Once a user approves execute_command for any command (e.g., ls -la), all subsequent execute_command calls in that execution context bypass the approval prompt entirely. Combined with os.environ.copy() passing all process environment variables to subprocesses, this allows an LLM agent (potentially via prompt injection) to silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials without further user consent.

Details

The require_approval decorator in src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/approval/__init__.py:176-178 checks approval status by tool name only:

@wraps(func)
def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
    if is_already_approved(tool_name):   # line 177 — checks only tool_name
        return func(*args, **kwargs)     # line 178 — bypasses ALL approval

The mark_approved function in registry.py:144-147 stores only the tool name string:

def mark_approved(self, tool_name: str) -> None:
    approved = self._approved_context.get(set())
    approved.add(tool_name)              # stores "execute_command", not args
    self._approved_context.set(approved)

The approval context is never cleared during agent execution — clear_approved() exists (registry.py:152) but is never called in the agent's tool execution path (agent/tool_execution.py).

Meanwhile, the ConsoleBackend UI at backends.py:95-96 misleads the user:

return Confirm.ask(
    f"Do you want to execute this {request.risk_level} risk tool?",
    # "this" implies per-invocation approval
)

The UI displays the specific command arguments (lines 81-85), creating a reasonable expectation that the user is approving only that specific invocation.

Additionally, shell_tools.py:77 passes the full process environment to every subprocess:

process_env = os.environ.copy()  # includes OPENAI_API_KEY, etc.

There is no command filtering, blocklist, or environment variable sanitization in the shell tools module.

PoC

from praisonaiagents import Agent
from praisonaiagents.tools.shell_tools import execute_command

# Step 1: Create agent with shell tool
agent = Agent(
    name="worker",
    instructions="You are a helpful assistant.",
    tools=[execute_command]
)

# Step 2: Agent requests benign command — user sees Rich panel:
#   Function: execute_command
#   Risk Level: CRITICAL
#   Arguments:
#     command: ls -la
#   "Do you want to execute this critical risk tool?" [y/N]
# User approves → mark_approved("execute_command") is called

# Step 3: All subsequent execute_command calls bypass approval silently:
# execute_command(command="env")
#   → returns ALL environment variables (OPENAI_API_KEY, AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, etc.)
#   → NO approval prompt shown

# Step 4: Targeted extraction also bypasses approval:
# execute_command(command="printenv OPENAI_API_KEY")
#   → returns the specific API key
#   → NO approval prompt shown

# Verification: check the approval cache
from praisonaiagents.approval import is_already_approved
# After approving "ls -la":
# is_already_approved("execute_command") → True
# Any execute_command call now returns immediately at __init__.py:177-178

Impact

• Secret exfiltration: An LLM agent (or one subjected to prompt injection) can dump all process environment variables after a single benign command approval. Common secrets include OPENAI_API_KEY, AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, DATABASE_URL, and any other credentials passed via environment.
• Misleading consent UI: The console prompt displays specific arguments and uses language ("this tool") that implies per-invocation consent, but the system grants session-wide blanket approval.
• No expiration or scope: The approval cache uses a ContextVar that persists for the entire agent execution context with no timeout, no command-count limit, and no clearing between tool…