CVE-2026-56682
9Router: Login Brute-Force Lockout Bypass via Spoofable X-9r-Real-Ip Header
9Router is an AI router & token saver. Prior to 0.5.6, 9Router deployments that allow requests to reach Next.js without the sanitizing custom-server.js wrapper use the client-supplied X-9r-Real-Ip value as the bucket key in getClientIp, checkLock, and recordFail in src/lib/auth/loginLimiter.js for POST /api/auth/login. A remote unauthenticated attacker can rotate the header on every password guess so each request uses a new failed-attempt bucket and the five-attempt progressive lockout never returns HTTP 429. This permits unthrottled password guessing against the dashboard login and can lead to an administrative session if the password is recovered. This issue is fixed in version 0.5.6.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
5.3
9Router: Login Brute-Force Lockout Bypass via Spoofable X-9r-Real-Ip Header
9Router is an AI router & token saver. Prior to 0.5.6, 9Router deployments that allow requests to reach Next.js without the sanitizing custom-server.js wrapper use the client-supplied X-9r-Real-Ip value as the bucket key in getClientIp, checkLock, and recordFail in src/lib/auth/loginLimiter.js for POST /api/auth/login. A remote unauthenticated attacker can rotate the header on every password guess so each request uses a new failed-attempt bucket and the five-attempt progressive lockout never returns HTTP 429. This permits unthrottled password guessing against the dashboard login and can lead to an administrative session if the password is recovered. This issue is fixed in version 0.5.6.
- Record
CVE-2026-56682- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-307, CWE-807
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-84542
5.3
9Router is an AI router & token saver. Prior to 0.5.6, 9Router deployments that allow requests to reach Next.js without the sanitizing custom-server.js wrapper use the client-supplied X-9r-Real-Ip value as the bucket key in getClientIp, checkLock, and recordFail in src/lib/auth/loginLimiter.js for POST /api/auth/login. A remote unauthenticated attacker can rotate the header on every password guess so each request uses a new failed-attempt bucket and the five-attempt progressive lockout never returns HTTP 429. This permits unthrottled password guessing against the dashboard login and can lead to an administrative session if the password is recovered. This issue is fixed in version 0.5.6.
- Record
EUVD-2026-84542- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-32gc-64m7-hj7v
5.3
9Router has a Login Brute-Force Lockout Bypass via Spoofable X-9r-Real-Ip Header
Summary
9router enforces a progressive login lockout (5 failed attempts → temporary 30s+ lock) keyed on the client IP. The client IP used for this limiter is taken from the X-9r-Real-Ip request header, which is intended to be set only by the bundled custom-server.js layer from the unspoofable TCP socket address. In deployment modes where requests reach Next.js directly, a remote attacker controls this header and can assign a unique value to every request. Because each distinct header value maps to a fresh limiter bucket, the lockout never triggers, enabling unlimited password guessing against the dashboard login endpoint. This was reproduced against a live instance: a fixed header value was locked out (429) after 5 attempts, while rotating the header produced unlimited 401 responses with no lockout.
Affected Component
src/lib/auth/loginLimiter.jsgetClientIp()— derives the rate-limit bucket key from the client-suppliedX-9r-Real-IpheadercheckLock()/recordFail()— per-IP progressive lockout (MAX_FAILS_BEFORE_LOCK = 5)
src/app/api/auth/login/route.js— login endpoint protected by the above limiter
Root Cause
The brute-force protection partitions failed-attempt counters by client IP, but obtains that IP from a client-controllable HTTP header rather than from the transport layer. getClientIp() returns the value of X-9r-Real-Ip directly. The design assumes this header is produced and sanitized only by the trusted custom-server.js wrapper. When the application is served without that wrapper, the header passes through unmodified, so the attacker chooses the bucket key. Since the lockout is per-bucket, assigning a new value per request keeps every counter below the threshold:
Untrusted Client Input
↓
X-9r-Real-Ip: <attacker-chosen, rotated each request>
↓
getClientIp() → distinct bucket per request
↓
recordFail()/checkLock() → threshold (5) never reached
↓
unlimited 401 attempts, no 429 lockout
Attack Scenario
-
The instance is deployed in a mode that does not use
custom-server.js, and the login endpoint is reachable by the attacker (the default bind is0.0.0.0). -
The attacker submits password guesses to
POST /api/auth/login, setting a differentX-9r-Real-Ipvalue on each request (e.g.,10.0.0.1,10.0.0.2, ...). -
Each request is counted against a new bucket, so the limiter always reports remaining attempts and never returns
429. -
The attacker continues guessing without throttling until the dashboard password is recovered, yielding an authenticated admin session.
Proof of Concept
Baseline — fixed header value (lockout enforced)
Repeated POST /api/auth/login with a constant X-9r-Real-Ip: 9.9.9.9 and body {"password":"wrong"}:
POST /api/auth/login HTTP/1.1
Host: victim.example.com:20127
X-9r-Real-Ip: 9.9.9.9
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 20
Connection: close
{"password":"wrong"}
Observed responses (sequential):
#1 → 401 {"error":"Invalid password. 4 attempt(s) left before lockout.","remainingBeforeLock":4}
#2 → 401 {"error":"Invalid password. 3 attempt(s) left before lockout.","remainingBeforeLock":3}
#3 → 401 {"error":"Invalid password. 2 attempt(s) left before lockout.","remainingBeforeLock":2}
#4 → 401 {"error":"Invalid password. 1 attempt(s) left before lockout.","remainingBeforeLock":1}
#5 → 429 Retry-After: 30
{"error":"Too many failed attempts. Try again in 30s. ...","retryAfter":30}
Exploit — rotated header value (lockout bypassed)
Same request and body, but a different X-9r-Real-Ip per request, sent while 9.9.9.9 was already locked:
POST /api/auth/login HTTP/1.1
Host: victim.example.com:20127
X-9r-Real-Ip: 10.0.0.1
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 20
Connection: close
{"password":"wrong"}
Observed responses:
X-9r-Real-Ip: 10.0.0.1 → 401 …
- Record
GHSA-32gc-64m7-hj7v- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-307, CWE-807
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
5.3
9Router is an AI router & token saver. Prior to 0.5.6, 9Router deployments that allow requests to reach Next.js without the sanitizing custom-server.js wrapper use the client-supplied X-9r-Real-Ip value as the bucket key in getClientIp, checkLock, and recordFail in src/lib/auth/loginLimiter.js for POST /api/auth/login. A remote unauthenticated attacker can rotate the header on every password guess so each request uses a new failed-attempt bucket and the five-attempt progressive lockout never returns HTTP 429. This permits unthrottled password guessing against the dashboard login and can lead to an administrative session if the password is recovered. This issue is fixed in version 0.5.6.
- Record
CVE-2026-56682- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-307, CWE-807
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
5.3
9Router: Login Brute-Force Lockout Bypass via Spoofable X-9r-Real-Ip Header
9Router is an AI router & token saver. Prior to 0.5.6, 9Router deployments that allow requests to reach Next.js without the sanitizing custom-server.js wrapper use the client-supplied X-9r-Real-Ip value as the bucket key in getClientIp, checkLock, and recordFail in src/lib/auth/loginLimiter.js for POST /api/auth/login. A remote unauthenticated attacker can rotate the header on every password guess so each request uses a new failed-attempt bucket and the five-attempt progressive lockout never returns HTTP 429. This permits unthrottled password guessing against the dashboard login and can lead to an administrative session if the password is recovered. This issue is fixed in version 0.5.6.
- Record
CVE-2026-56682- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-307, CWE-807
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-32gc-64m7-hj7v
5.3
9Router has a Login Brute-Force Lockout Bypass via Spoofable X-9r-Real-Ip Header
Summary
9router enforces a progressive login lockout (5 failed attempts → temporary 30s+ lock) keyed on the client IP. The client IP used for this limiter is taken from the X-9r-Real-Ip request header, which is intended to be set only by the bundled custom-server.js layer from the unspoofable TCP socket address. In deployment modes where requests reach Next.js directly, a remote attacker controls this header and can assign a unique value to every request. Because each distinct header value maps to a fresh limiter bucket, the lockout never triggers, enabling unlimited password guessing against the dashboard login endpoint. This was reproduced against a live instance: a fixed header value was locked out (429) after 5 attempts, while rotating the header produced unlimited 401 responses with no lockout.
Affected Component
src/lib/auth/loginLimiter.jsgetClientIp()— derives the rate-limit bucket key from the client-suppliedX-9r-Real-IpheadercheckLock()/recordFail()— per-IP progressive lockout (MAX_FAILS_BEFORE_LOCK = 5)
src/app/api/auth/login/route.js— login endpoint protected by the above limiter
Root Cause
The brute-force protection partitions failed-attempt counters by client IP, but obtains that IP from a client-controllable HTTP header rather than from the transport layer. getClientIp() returns the value of X-9r-Real-Ip directly. The design assumes this header is produced and sanitized only by the trusted custom-server.js wrapper. When the application is served without that wrapper, the header passes through unmodified, so the attacker chooses the bucket key. Since the lockout is per-bucket, assigning a new value per request keeps every counter below the threshold:
Untrusted Client Input
↓
X-9r-Real-Ip: <attacker-chosen, rotated each request>
↓
getClientIp() → distinct bucket per request
↓
recordFail()/checkLock() → threshold (5) never reached
↓
unlimited 401 attempts, no 429 lockout
Attack Scenario
-
The instance is deployed in a mode that does not use
custom-server.js, and the login endpoint is reachable by the attacker (the default bind is0.0.0.0). -
The attacker submits password guesses to
POST /api/auth/login, setting a differentX-9r-Real-Ipvalue on each request (e.g.,10.0.0.1,10.0.0.2, ...). -
Each request is counted against a new bucket, so the limiter always reports remaining attempts and never returns
429. -
The attacker continues guessing without throttling until the dashboard password is recovered, yielding an authenticated admin session.
Proof of Concept
Baseline — fixed header value (lockout enforced)
Repeated POST /api/auth/login with a constant X-9r-Real-Ip: 9.9.9.9 and body {"password":"wrong"}:
POST /api/auth/login HTTP/1.1
Host: victim.example.com:20127
X-9r-Real-Ip: 9.9.9.9
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 20
Connection: close
{"password":"wrong"}
Observed responses (sequential):
#1 → 401 {"error":"Invalid password. 4 attempt(s) left before lockout.","remainingBeforeLock":4}
#2 → 401 {"error":"Invalid password. 3 attempt(s) left before lockout.","remainingBeforeLock":3}
#3 → 401 {"error":"Invalid password. 2 attempt(s) left before lockout.","remainingBeforeLock":2}
#4 → 401 {"error":"Invalid password. 1 attempt(s) left before lockout.","remainingBeforeLock":1}
#5 → 429 Retry-After: 30
{"error":"Too many failed attempts. Try again in 30s. ...","retryAfter":30}
Exploit — rotated header value (lockout bypassed)
Same request and body, but a different X-9r-Real-Ip per request, sent while 9.9.9.9 was already locked:
POST /api/auth/login HTTP/1.1
Host: victim.example.com:20127
X-9r-Real-Ip: 10.0.0.1
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 20
Connection: close
{"password":"wrong"}
Observed responses:
X-9r-Real-Ip: 10.0.0.1 → 401 …
- Record
GHSA-32gc-64m7-hj7v- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-307, CWE-807
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-56682 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 5.3) in Decolua 9router, published September 22, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.50%, the 43rd percentile. Fixed in 9router 0.5.8.
References
github.com/decolua/9router/security/advisories/GHSA-32gc-64m7-hj7v
github.com/decolua/9router/commit/efd20be8d81ef2e256a7037f3aa78e6b567b5fd3
github.com/decolua/9router/releases/tag/v0.5.6
github.com/advisories/GHSA-32gc-64m7-hj7v
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/56xxx/CVE-2026-56682.json
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56682
github.com/decolua/9router
Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.